As we examine the philosophy behind national and international affairs, we discover it has a common purpose and source in every major nation, with the exception of perhaps China.

At first sight, militant national power appears to be the major force in history; but if there is a power which can bring nations into military conflict, it is a superior power. Is there such a power, and where, if anywhere, is it located?

There is a relationship between Finance, Centralization, and World Hegemony. Until the outbreak of the First World War, money appeared to be a mere mechanism. But the arrangements made to finance the war reveal that the money system was in fact the vehicle of a POLICY, and that that policy was the CENTRALIZATION of power leading progressively to World Government. Prior to the outbreak of war, Great Britain was the CENTRE (but not the BEING) of world financial control; with the war, financial control was transferred to New York and from there used to dismantle the British Empire which, by reason of British traditions and the Anglo-Saxon character, had been the great barrier to World Dominion by those operating through the world financial system. The fall of the British Empire was a FINANCIAL accomplishment, not a military one. But the terms of 'peace' imposed on 'victorious' Britain are those which might have been expected following military DEFEAT.

But the Power which emerged into the open in this century had its birth long before that. It was incubated (but not conceived) in the Secret Societies of Europe, appeared briefly in the French Revolution, and spread to Britain in the form of Fabianism, and to America in the form of various Socialist societies. Following the first phase of the war, it openly took over Russia, and since has visibly spread as International Communism until it has taken over the greater part of the globe.

Current history, which looks episodic, is in fact the culminating stages of a very long-term policy moving internationally, but visible only in the long perspective of time.

What we think we see is often an illusion intentionally presented, like the conjuror who would have you to believe he holds an orange in his right hand, when it is actually in his left hand. Citizens of the world, whether their sympathies are left-wing or right-wing, monarchist or republican, have been used as pawns in their game of Hegelian psychology by the hidden hand that rules.

In reality, the orange is in neither left nor right hand. The Hegelian dialectic process is the notion that conflict creates history. (See brain2.htm "Brainwash".

From this axiom it follows that controlled conflict can create a predetermined history. For example when the Trilateral Commission discusses 'managed conflict', as it does extensively in its literature, it implies the managed use of conflict for long run predetermined ends - not for the mere random exercise of manipulative control to solve a problem.

The dialectic takes this Trilateral 'managed conflict' process one step further. In Hegelian terms, an existing force (the thesis) generates a counterforce (the antithesis). Conflict between the two forces results in the forming of a synthesis. Then the process starts all over again: Thesis vs. antithesis results in synthesis.

It's like two companies with undisclosed common stockholding submitting competitive tenders for a project on a site for which their stockholder has different plans altogether. Whatever the outcome, the stockholder is in beneficial control.

In his novel "Conningsby", Disraeli wrote "the world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes".

Woodrow Wilson said, "Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it".

Now for our text. In Matthew 16:6, Jesus said, "Take heed and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees".

This is another illustration of Hegelian dialectics or logical argument. In other words, the mark of the beast: wisdom against faith.

Here were two denominations each inspired by Satan, whose purpose was to contest the Laws and Ordinances of the Old Testament. One was the THESIS, the other its ANTITHESIS. Neither could agree on the Word or recognize It manifested before them. The SYNTHESIS through the apostasy of both parties was their own damnation through rejection and crucifixion of Messiah. Even their high priest declared, "His blood be upon us and upon our people". And It has been ever since.

The synthesis sought by the Establishment is called the New World Order. Without CONTROLLED conflict, this New World Order will not come about. RANDOM individual actions of persons in society would not lead to this synthesis, it is ARTIFICIAL, therefore it has to be created. And this is being done with the calculated, MANAGED, use of conflict. And all the while this synthesis is being sought, there is no profit in playing the involved parties against one another. (Hence World War I was postponed three times until the pawns were in their predetermined places). This also explains why the International bankers backed the Nazis, the Soviet Union, North Korea, North Vietnam, etc., against the United States. The 'conflict' built profits while pushing the world ever closer to One World Government.

The Establishment is ruled by elite, secret societies. Their operations must be seen and explained in terms of the Hegelian dialectic process. Their operations cannot be explained in terms of any other philosophy; therefore they cannot be described as "right" or "left", Marxist or Capitalist. However, one group is secular, and another is religious. The religious force is the Roman Catholic church. We are familiar with their place in history and in prophecy. Our teaching will consider the secular group and its objectives which is ALL of these and NONE of these.

In Hegelian philosophy the conflict of political 'right' and political 'left', or thesis and antithesis in Hegelian terms, is essential to the forward movement of history and historical change itself. Conflict between thesis and antithesis brings about a synthesis or new historical situation.

Our descriptive world history in the West and Marxist countries consists only of description and analysis within a political framework of 'right' or 'left'. For example, historical work published in the West looks at communism and socialism either through the eyes of financial capitalism, or Marxism. While historical work published in Russia looks at the West only through Marxist eyes. However, there is another frame of historical analysis that has never been utilized. This would employ a framework of Hegelian logic, to determine if the elites who control the State use the dialectic process to create a predetermined historical synthesis.

The current world situation was deliberately created by elitist power more or less by manipulation of 'right' and 'left' elements. Over the past 100 years or so they've developed both right and left elements to bring about a NWO. Right-left situations have been deliberately created and then placed in conflict mode to bring about a synthesis.

Since the rise of Kant (who stressed reason and experience) in German philosophy, we can identify two conflicting systems of philosophy; and therefore two opposing ideas of the State, society and culture.

In the U.S., the British Commonwealth and France, philosophy is based on the individual and the rights of the individual. Whereas in Germany from the time of Kant, through Fichte and Hegel up to 1945, basic philosophy has been universal brotherhood, rejection of individualism, and general opposition to Western classical liberal thought in almost all of its aspects. German idealism was the philosophical basis for the work of Karl Marx and the LEFT Hegelians, as well as Bismarck, Hitler and the RIGHT Hegelians. The paradox is that Hegel gave a theoretical basis not only to the most conservative of German movements, but also to most of the revolutionary movements of the 19th century. Both Marx and Hitler have their philosophical roots in Hegel.

From the Hegelian system of political thought, alien to most of us in the West, stem such absurdities as the State seen as the "March of God through history", that the State is also God, and the only duty of a citizen is to serve God by serving the State, that the State is Absolute Reason and citizens can only find freedom by worship and utter obedience to the State. Other Hegelian absurdities have thoroughly penetrated our education system. But that is for another topic.

From this system of Hegelian philosophy comes the historical dialectic, "that all historical events emerge from a conflict between opposing forces." These emerging events are above and different from the conflicting events. Any idea or implementation of an idea may be seen as THESIS. This thesis will encourage emergence of opposing forces, known as ANTITHESIS. The final outcome will be NEITHER thesis nor antithesis, but a SYNTHESIS of the two forces in conflict.

In DAS KAPITAL, Marx posed capitalism as thesis and communism as antithesis. What has been completely ignored by historians, including Marxists, is that any clash between these forces cannot lead to a society which is either capitalist or communist but must lead to a society characterized by a SYNTHESIS of the two conflicting forces. The clash of opposites must in the Hegelian system, bring about a society neither capitalist nor communist. Moreover, in the Hegelian scheme of events, this new synthesis will reflect the concept of the State as God, and the individual as totally subordinate to an all powerful State. This was the thought we encountered in "Hubris".

The function of a Parliament or a Congress is for Hegelians, psychology. Merely to allow individuals to feel that their opinions have some value, and to allow a government to take advantage of whatever wisdom the 'peasant' may accidentally demonstrate. This is so obvious in Australian politics today. As Hegel puts it:

"By virtue of this participation, subjective liberty and conceit, with their general opinion, (individuals) can show themselves palpably efficacious and enjoy the satisfaction of feeling themselves to count for something."

War, the organized conflict of nations for Hegelians, is only the visible outcome of the clash between ideas. Following the outbreak of war in 1939, Social Creditor C.H. Douglas said, "The international money marketeers care no more for the immolation of the peoples of a continent that for the death of a sparrow"; and "unfortunately the world is in the grasp of theorists to whom misery and death of millions is a grain of sand beside the working out of their designs". As John Dewey, the Hegelian darling of the modern educational system, puts it:

"War is the most effective preacher of the vanity of all merely finite interests, it puts an end to that selfish egoism of the individual by which he would claim his life and his property as his own or as his family's."

Above all, the Hegelian doctrine is the divine right of States rather than the divine right of kings. The State for Hegel and Hegelians is God on earth:

"The march of God in history is the cause of the existence of states, their foundation is the power of Reason realizing itself as will. Every state, whatever it be, participates in the Divine essence. The State is not the work of human art, only Reason could produce it."

For Hegel the individual is nothing, the individual has no rights, morality consists solely in following a leader.

Compare this to the spirit and letter of the Australian Constitution: "WHEREAS the people" grant the State some powers and reserve all others to the people. Whilst it recognizes no State denomination, it places the Christian God as its Head, unlike Hegel's "the State is God on earth." To elitists like The Order in the USA, The Group in the UK, Illuminati in Germany, and the Politburo in Russia, the State is supreme, and a self-appointed elite running the State acts as God on earth.

Manipulation of 'left' and 'right' in domestic USA, where Wall Street supports both Republicans and Democrats, as their Australian associates support Liberal and Labor, is duplicated in the international field where 'left' and 'right' political structures are artificially constructed and collapsed in the drive for a one-world synthesis. In fact, 'left' and 'right' are two controlled factions of the Illuminati.

Textbooks present war and revolution as more or less accidental results of conflicting forces. The decay of political negotiations into physical conflict comes about, according to these books, after valiant efforts to avoid war. Unfortunately, this is nonsense. War is always a deliberate creative act by individuals.

The Tribunals that investigated Nazi war criminals were careful to censor any records of Western Assistance to Hitler. And Western textbooks on Soviet economic development omit any description of the economic and financial aid given to the 1917 Revolution and subsequent economic development by Western firms and banks.

Revolution is always recorded as a spontaneous event by the politically or economically deprived against an autocratic state. Western textbooks never reveal the evidence that revolutions need finance; and the source of the finance in many cases traces back to Wall Street.

Of course our Western history is every bit as distorted, censored, and largely useless as that of Hitler's Germany, the Soviet Union or Communist China. No Western foundation will award grants to investigate their own benefactors. Few Western scholars can survive by researching such theses, and publishing houses daring to accept such manuscripts suffer intimidation or even violence from the Establishment. The recent trials of David Irving with his erstwhile publisher bears this out.

Like the true revelation of God's Word, largely unrecorded history tells a story contrary to what we've been taught to regard as truth. A story of the deliberate creation of war, the knowing finance of revolution to change governments, and the use of conflict to create a New World Order.

We will explore thesis and antithesis in the development and construction of the Soviet Union (thesis) and Hitler's Germany (antithesis). We will also explore the continuation of this dialectic conflict into the last few decades, specifically in China today and show that the purpose is to create a new synthesis, a New World Order along Hegelian lines where the State is Absolute and the individual can find freedom only in blind obedience to the State.

Something we have to do is to break an almost universal mindset, that Communists and Capitalists are bitter enemies. This Marxist axiom is a false statement and for a century has fooled academics and investigators alike. The key to understanding modern history is that elitists had as close working relations with both Marxists and Nazis as they have with Marxists and Capitalists.

After World War II the world stage was changed. After 1945 it became the Soviet Union on one side versus the United States on the other. The first dialectical clash led to the formation of the United Nations, an elementary step on the road to world government. The second dialectical clash led to the Trilateral Commission and REGIONAL groups, like Oceania, Eurasia and Eastasia from "1984," and more subtly to efforts for a merger of the United States and the Soviet Union. Definitely Orwellian! Various stooges 'fronting' for the faceless elite agitate for a new Constitution that will enable them to usurp Australia's sovereignty and absorb us into an Asian Bloc, ruled from Beijing or Tokyo.

Western Christian civilization, whose domain was very nearly the world, had expanded without notable recession until in 1914. In 1917 it began a retreat that has since been uninterrupted (Matthew 24:7-. Huge amounts of Western property, much of it in land, factories and mines, has been stolen by revolutionaries, or abandoned by Western owners. Political and strategic losses are of more lasting and fundamental importance. But it is not politically correct to criticize its demise today.

World history since 1917 reflects an application of Hegelian dialectics. Russia was taken over by mainly Askenazi Jews from the East End of New York who established Socialism, later called Communism. This Revolution was planned by international financiers and financed by Wall Street. Indeed Woodrow Wilson sent US troops who took over and held the Siberian Railroad from 1918 to impede the transport of grain and raw materials to Germany, and so far as possible prevent commerce, until the Soviets were sufficiently established to take over. US troops remained until 1920.

Thus we see governments need censorship to classify certain files for thirty or fifty years after events, to protect the living from charges of treason, and to conceal the past intrigues and long term goals of the hidden elite who call the shots.

Soviet Russia's first Five Year Plan was devised by Detroit-based Albert Kahn, Inc., and Russia's industry financed by Wall Street. Thus was the THESIS: Communism, established.

But the MARXIST version of the Hegelian dialectic poses financial CAPITALISM as thesis, and Marxist revolution as antithesis. An obvious puzzle in this Marxian statement is the nature of the SYNTHESIS presumed to evolve out of the clash of these OPPOSITES. It cannot be Communism!

Lenin's statement that the State will wither away at the synthesis stage is nonsensical. In fact, as all contemporary Marxist states testify, in practice, the State becomes all powerful. The immediate task of "the revolution" is to convey all power to the State, and modern Marxist states operate under a constant paranoia that power may indeed pass away from the hands of the State into the hands of the people.

If MARXISM is posed as the thesis and NATIONAL SOCIALISM as antithesis, then the most likely SYNTHESIS becomes a Hegelian NEW WORLD ORDER, a synthesis evolving out of the clash of Marxism and national socialism. Moreover, in THIS statement those who FINANCE and MANAGE the clash of opposites can REMAIN in control of the synthesis.

The elite have artificially encouraged and developed BOTH revolutionary Marxism and national socialism while retaining some control over the nature and degree of the conflict, therefore it is able to determine the evolution and nature of the New World Order.

Out of war and revolution come opportunities for profit by corporations under the control and influence of these elites. In the two World Wars, the Korean and Vietnamese Wars, there are numerous examples of American banks and corporations trading with the enemy.

The antithesis, National Socialism, is no more. The Cold War is over, so we're taught the thesis of Russian Communism is also dead. This leaves the once Christian now Capitalist West. Since we are 'friends', the West now finances Russia at government level, increasing profits and reducing risks for the international bankers.

To prevent history coming to its end (he says tongue in cheek) the elite introduced a new dialectic process. World War II was the culmination of the dialectic process created in the 1920s and 1930s. The clash between 'left' and 'right', the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany, led to creation of a synthesis - the UN, and a start towards regional groupings in NATO, the Common Market, UNESCO, Warsaw Pact, SEATO, CIS, then the Trilateral Commission. A start towards New World Order.

World War II left the Elite with the necessity to create a new dialectical situation to promote MORE conflict to achieve a higher level synthesis.

The source of this process may be found in US National Security Memorandum No. 68 of 1950 which opened up the road for Western technology to build a more advanced Soviet Union - which it did in the 1960s and 1970s with computerized space-age technology. In true Hegelian tradition it simultaneously argued for massive expansion of US defenses - on grounds of a future Soviet threat. (Which would not have been possible without the transfer of Western technology). Thus the internationalists profited from Soviet and US purchases.

The principal devices used to control the dialectic process in the past two decades have been (a) information, (b) debt and (c) technology. These have become diluted over time. They don't work as well today as they did in the 1950s.

By and large, control of INFORMATION has been successful because the intellectual world is still locked into a phony verbal battle between 'left' and 'right', whereas the real struggle is the battle between individual freedom and the encroaching power of the absolute State. The Soviet Union, with its tight censorship, presents a strictly Marxist ('left') orientation to its citizens. The enemy is always the 'fascist' United States. The West is a little more complicated but not much more so. Whereas financial power is used to control politics, information is used to control human perceptions.

Brethren, to the elites, we're 'human cattle' participating in a double blind laboratory experiment. By God's Grace, the elect can't be deceived on the revealed Word of God, which, as a sharp two-edged sword, divides asunder these deceptions.

In the West the choice is basically between a controlled 'left-oriented' information, and a controlled 'right-oriented' information. The conflict between the two CONTROLLED groups keeps an apparent informational conflict alive. Unwelcome facts that fall into either camp are conveniently forgotten. Books that fall into either camp can be effectively neutralized because they will incur the wrath of both 'right' and 'left'. The faster the cattle run, the faster the treadmill takes them to nowhere.

Any publication which points up the fallacy of the Left-Right dichotomy is ignored . . . and citizens keep trooping down to the polling booths in the belief they have a 'choice'. Witness Australian elections. The Labor and Liberal Parties frankly admit their policies are common.

The second control mechanism is DEBT. We all understand that. If Marxist countries have to import technology, they need to earn or borrow Western currencies to pay for it. Loans have to be repaid. So to some extent, debtors are under control of creditors, unless they default. And therein lies the weakness.

The third control mechanism is TECHNOLOGY. If technology to advance to more efficient production levels has to be imported, then the recipient is always kept away from the 'state of the art'. The weakness for the elite is that military technology does not require a market system.

The dialectic plan therefore misfired for several reasons. Firstly, the informational blackouts were not as successful as they expected. Control of Time and Newsweek gave them dominance over weekly news summaries. The TV networks have been able to orchestrate viewers reactions - to some extent - by propaganda in movies. (For example, when I went to the giant IMAX movie theatre, I noticed propaganda for the 'Greenhouse' HOAX had been subtly included in the narrative). But the elite were unable to restrict individuals and relatively small non-academic groups, almost always outside Universities (whose curricula they control) from exploring obvious inconsistencies in Establishment propaganda. These groups, often mistakenly termed 'left' or 'right,' are outside the manipulated left-right spectrum.

Secondly, the debt weapon was over-used. Communist countries are now saturated with debt to Western bankers.

Thirdly, while technology is still a useful weapon, there are distinct stirrings among independent analysts of the danger posed for the Western world by building enemies.

We've spent 50 years arming our enemies, and developing their industries with our technology. And under the LIMA Agreement, have transferred our manufacturing infrastructure offshore. Last year China purchased the whole of New Zealand's forests "in perpetuity" for US$80 million donated by Australia. No wonder our Aborigines are caught up in Communist ideas when we give money to foreign nations who consider us "barbarians," and to others, who have the Northern half of our continent colored green and labeled "South Irian" in their school atlases and on military maps.

Brother Branham said the West was trying to buy her friends, and when we can no longer afford to bribe them we will discover they are our enemies (This Day This Scripture, 16:132; Influences, 7:40; Genesis 3:15).

Even without interference by the international bankers the consequences are alarming, both for America and for the Western world. The West has a brief opportunity between the decline of Russia and the rise of China. Europe has wasted most of the present decade by pursuing the dangerous IRRELEVANCE of the single currency. (No doubt a ploy of her fairweather banking friends). America has wasted it on a shallow prosperity; even the recovery hasn't greatly strengthened the US economy. Neither Europe nor America is prepared for the global competition of the next century. For America, the progressive shift of wealth and power to Asia will be humiliating, and perhaps destabilizing.

Consequently, in today's world we can identify two facts in construction of a new dialectic. First, cautious reinforcement of the Marxian arm - for example: Marxist Angola got a green light, Marxist Grenada got a red light.

Second, the construction of a completely new arm, that of Communist China, itself Marxist, but with conflict potential for the Soviet Union. Major efforts are in progress, only partly revealed in the press, to create a new superpower in conflict mode with the Soviet Union. This is the new antithesis, replacing Nazi Germany.

American involvement in China began with Wall Street's intervention into Dr. Sun Yat Sen's revolution of 1911. During World War II the US helped the Chinese Communists into power. The decision to build Communist China as a new arm of the dialectic was made under Richard Nixon and executed by Henry Kissinger and George Bush.

By the turn of the century, Communist China will be a "superpower" built by American technology and skill, presumably for conflict with Russia. What then is left for the USA but an 'accommodation' with the CIS to set up a world government.

"And the sixth angel poured out his vial upon the great river Euphrates; and the water thereof was dried up, that the way of the kings of the East might be prepared" (Revelation 16:12). The drawing-away of the Holy Spirit from apostatising Western (once Christian) civilization gradually diminished our invisible barrier and defence of faith in the Word. Thus the pagan ways of the kings of the East were entertained and adopted in place of faith. Foreign aid, intermarriage, immigration and preferential tariffs began. We have since transferred our manufacturing industries to these strange people. With no manufacturing we have unemployment and no self-reliance in the event of hostilities. Furthermore, we fall further under obligation to the foreign bankers.

The Hegelian dialectic is being employed to secure and sustain absolute world power and authority to an elite. We have fallen into a Hegelian trap and don't know it.

http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/bb970219.htm

Was just reading through to refresh on Hegelian dialectics and stumbled on this article...

The Hegelian dialectical formula: A (thesis) versus B (anti-thesis) equals C (synthesis).

For example: If (A) my idea of freedom conflicts with (B) your idea of freedom then (C) neither of us can be free until everyone agrees to be a slave.

The Soviet Union was based on the Hegelian dialectic, as is all Marxist writing. The Soviets didn't give up their Hegelian reasoning when they supposedly stopped being a communist country. They merely changed the dialectical language to fit into the modern version of Marxist thinking called communitarianism.

"Hegel's dialectic often appears broken up for convenience into three moments called "thesis" (in the French historical example, the revolution), "antithesis" (the terror which followed), and "synthesis" (the constitutional state of free citizens). ... Much Hegel scholarship does not recognize the usefulness of this triadic classification for shedding light on Hegel's thought. Although Hegel refers to "the two elemental considerations: first, the idea of freedom as the absolute and final aim; secondly, the means for realising it, i.e. the subjective side of knowledge and will, with its life, movement, and activity" (thesis and antithesis) he doesn't use "synthesis" but instead speaks of the "Whole": "We then recognised the State as the moral Whole and the Reality of Freedom, and consequently as the objective unity of these two elements." ...

"Hegel used this system of dialectics to explain the whole of the history of philosophy, science, art, politics and religion, but many modern critics point out that Hegel often seems to gloss over the realities of history in order to fit it into his dialectical mold

http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/05/dialectic.htm

Problem-Reaction-Solution... (Hegelian Dialectic)

How to Recognize the Three Steps

1) Problem

The PROBLEM can be any major catastrophe big enough to be on the news for many weeks. The PROBLEM could take one of three forms:

Created solely for the purpose of bringing on the SOLUTION. But most people won’t see it that way because they are lead to believe that there’s some “bad guy(s)” out there that caused this PROBLEM. Most applications are in this category.

There is no real PROBLEM, but the general population is lead to believe that there is. A real PROBLEM isn’t required, but only the perception of it. Examples are Global Warming later called Climate Change, and Saddam Hussein's alleged Weapons of Mass Destruction or Boko harem.

An event that was not created by the Elite, but is taken advantage of nonetheless to help support some SOLUTION already in the queue. This is less common. We really can’t know if something was truly non-purposeful, or if we just haven’t connected the dots. This category usually contains the smaller, local events.

Whatever the form, the PROBLEM will be dragged on, even artificially if necessary, in order to saturate the public mindset with it.


2) Reaction

The REACTION usually involves prolonged fear and panic in the general population. It will be on the news for many weeks. The public will be constantly reminded of the situation throughout the day through TV, radio, newspapers and the internet. TV programs may even be interrupted with “Breaking News”, the red color of the banner on the bottom of the screen helping to invoke panic and fear.

Most people will be so distraught that their mind will be made over. They will now eagerly accept what they would have vigorously fought against a few weeks ago.


3) Solution

The SOLUTION always gets us one step closer to the global police state of the New World Order. Usually it takes the form of new rules and regulations, which give the ruling class more power and control, at the expense of freedom, prosperity and privacy of the people. The size of the step toward the NWO will be in relation to the size of the REACTION, just enough for most people to willingly accept it.

Remember how much that was budgeted for defense cos of boko harem?


With the larger applications of the Hegelian Dialectic, the SOLUTION is many faceted, so here are some gross generalities: World War 1 allowed the creation of the League of Nations, increased defense spending, as well as increased debt and poverty (more control for the bankers). Similarly, World War 2 allowed for the United Nations, the European Union and more defense spending, debt and poverty. The Great Depression of 1929 allowed huge changes to the banking system through FDR’s New Deal.

Similarly qualifying are the Cold War, the Vietnam War, the Afghanistan War and the Iraq War, the War on Terror, War on Drugs, War on Guns, etc.

Then there are the crises. The Climate Crisis, the Energy Crisis and virtually all of the Economic Crises have been created with an agenda.

In general, most riots, bombings, shootings – anything that is covered on the news for weeks and invokes fear and panic, is an application of the Hegelian Dialectic.

How to Watch the News

According to Mark Twain:

“If you don’t read the newspaper, you are uninformed. If you do read the newspaper, you are misinformed.”

So when you watch the news, watch it, not to find out what’s going on, but to see which way “they” are currently leading society. Remember that what goes on the news is carefully constructed to get most people to react – just the way most people react to it. If we see something shocking on the news, we need to realize that our initial reaction is probably exactly the reaction that the story was designed to bring. We need to ask ourselves: “Why are they putting this on the news, now, in this way? What REACTION is it designed to bring? What agenda or SOLUTION do they want to bring on, based on this reaction?” Could the PROBLEM have been artificially created solely for this purpose?

We need to realize that items make the news not because they are newsworthy or important, but because they are useful in directing society.

Understand the Hegelian Dialectic and emerge from the media trap.

So how do we stop it? Well, all three steps are absolutely necessary or the Hegelian Dialectic falls apart. We can’t do much about the PROBLEM or the SOLUTION after the fact. However, the REACTION is us. All we have to do is stop reacting the way “they” want us to. Stop playing along with their script.

Once we realize that it was all planned out ahead of time, including our reaction in our programmed ignorance, it’s easy to stop participating. When enough people become aware, and stop participating in this sinister agenda, the house of cards will come crashing down.

You can see how they want my muslim brothers to react to the film bout the prophet? Truth is that you can see Hegelian dialectics in virtually all human endeavors be it between lovers,family,church,society,government,business etc.

Hegelian Dialectic

Named after Georg Hegel, the late German philosopher, the Hegelian Dialectic is also known as “Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis” or “Ordo Ab Chao” (Latin for “Order from Chaos” the motto of 33rd degree Freemasons) or most descriptively as “Problem-Reaction-Solution”.

Hegel was an imbecile - ask Schopenhauer.

PhysicsQED: Hegel was an imbeci le - ask Schopenhauer.

Agreed that both philosophers had issues, But for the sake of scholarship, both thoughts makes an interesting read for an independent mind....But hegels thoughts are the most diffcult in understanding.

@op,

Nice coverage, these are the kind of discussions we need to be having here. This theory has implications in our daily life and view of the world around us.

All early age philosophers belonged in an order, particularly the freemasons which was one of the first in Greece and had been modeled after an Egyptian occult.

This version you gave here is a classroom narration of the principle of 3 which in trigonometry is represented by the triangle.

The order recognized it as an orbital force....recurrent and infinite and thereby elevated it as a divine principle. This is how they got the double 3 they call 33rd degree. In practice and in observance it is actually a 3rd degree.

There are elements of the teachings which you did not cover in your narration and Id like to know if that was deliberately omitted or you just dont have the whole materials on the subject of Thesis-antiThesis-Synthesis to share full coverage.

I am particularly looking for you to share the teaching on the formulation of Thesis itself. Like I said, it is orbital and synthesis does not rest....it recycles back into thesis always forming a dynamic loop and in continuance.

@Negro_Ntns, Hegels dialectics is like a roadmap for guiding thoughts and actions into conflicts and then solutions....importing conspiracy into the discussion is to show that hegels dialectics can be used as a tool for manipulating thoughts and actions...for when you get into the mix of hegelian dialectics, you cannot see outside of the box.

Today the dialectic is active ine very political issue thatencourages taking sides. We can see it in Acn Vs Pdp, in democrats against republicans,Igbo's against yorubas in Christians against Muslims,
No matter what the issue, the invisible dialectic aims to control both the conflict and their solution of differences, and leads everyone involved into a new cycle of conflicts.......Your inputs on hegels dialectics and how it affects us will be highly appreciated.

Ummmmhhh....
Interesting perspectives, especially on the 'assumed' manipulation of world events towards a convergence by 'powers' bent on establishing a pre-defined goal.
I am a christian, so it's easy for me to belive this. ...but wait a minute, let's do a little thinking using some analogies


There are many ways to create a movie or write a book
-You can first start with the end in mind, then gradually work the characters and events towards this end
-You can start by creating characters, with no destination in mind, get lost in the minds and events of your created world, and maybe finally somehow manage to get to the end as events unfold logically.

Conclusion: Are we in a script?, if we are, who is the author? Is it God or some cult groups; or is it a combination of us, God and cult groups?

Now, to the next thinking
Apart from the ability to break down issues into small intelligent bits, there is something that you would notice about 'top' analysts
-They observe the dots
-They then create a compelling story linking the dots
-Based on their observation of the dots and the story line that they have taken, they make predictions/postulate models
-People are captivated by the narrative

Conclusion: All these story/analysis about the New World Order is a great and compelling story to christian nations. We are likely to swallow it hook, line and sinker. But what if it is just that, a compelling story that manipulators use to call us to action. So for example, some of us feel justified that all should have rights to own guns in order to protect our individualism, damn dem socialists. Weapons companies offf course would support this and cash in.

Why have I brought these up? Simple.
So that we be on our guards, and understand how some of these analysis are arrived at,or how they can be twisted, but which at the end appeal to our senses

-There is no doubt that the thesis, anti-thesis, synthesis model is well grounded. However, it is not a new discovery, it has always been. Simply because of the timeless nature of humans resistance to change. So let's take away the eureka that comes with suddenly stumbling on something that lends credence to our world view. We need to be careful in our information 'synthesis'.

Conclusion: Deeper than the thesis/anti-thesis theory is the human nature, and its resistance to change. Perhaps, just perhaps this tool, can be swung dangerously in both ways. In order words, while some 'powers' can create conditions that compel change towards a pre-determined goal, some other 'powers' can also create spell binding narratives that compels us to resist change so that we can keep on patronizing them

@esere826, Nice and interesting contribution..... This theory is very much alive in and around us all.

Chubhie: @Negro_Ntns, Hegels dialectics is like a roadmap for guiding thoughts and actions into conflicts and then solutions....importing conspiracy into the discussion is to show that hegels dialectics can be used as a tool for manipulating thoughts and actions...for when you get into the mix of hegelian dialectics, you cannot see outside of the box.

Today the dialectic is active ine very political issue thatencourages taking sides. We can see it in Acn Vs Pdp, in democrats against republicans,Igbo's against yorubas in Christians against Muslims,
No matter what the issue, the invisible dialectic aims to control both the conflict and their solution of differences, and leads everyone involved into a new cycle of conflicts.......Your inputs on hegels dialectics and how it affects us will be highly appreciated.

I can see what dialectics is about from your opening post, I am intimate with the theory and had a lengthy debate on its social impact with morpheus here last year . I will be willing to participate in this discussion and share what i can but i am concerned about this being nothing more than a theoretical textbook debate, void of direct applications in society. I apologise if i sound sharp and preemptive, but you will soon agree with me the moment people start coming in to discuss Kant, Marx andtheir hosts but never offering or connecting where Kant's teachings intersect with daily life in the Nigerian society or what solutiona are proper to remedy our suffer head.

What I am asking is whether you know if a dynamics exist between the end (synthesis) of one episode leading in and feeding life into a new embryonic idea or intuition (thesis). If the aim of compromise is self-preservation, then why isnt every society preserving itself.....why are there deliberate confrontations and wars aimed at annhiliation?

If the citizen is being swept in and sold into conspiracy why do they keep buying?

If the media is conditioning the end utility of the consumer why isnt there a revolt against the media?

@Dudu_Negro, yes dynamics exists between the synthesis and the thesis........the thesis inevitably brings forth its opposite (the antithesis). From that interaction, a third state emerges in which the opposites are integrated in a richer and higher synthesis.
This synthesis then becomes the basis for another dialectical process of opposition and synthesis.......... I will like to examplify using the fuel subsidy issue. It all started when news suddenly came from our govt that the economy will crash if nothing urgent is done(Thesis) and then increased the pump price to 120 naira or there about. The masses reacted by downing tools and taking to the streets to protest(Anti Thesis) the organised labour was then called to a round table, which created the illusion that a common ground has been reached(synthesis) against the wishes of the masses to 97. This 97 will now be the new basis for any further increase and as usual, the masses reacts,reaches a common ground and then the cycle continues. opposition
becomes irrational and unjustified when a common ground has
been reached.

On the role of compromise and why society is not preserving itself.......This is a process by which the ruling elite create a problem, anticipating in advance the rection that the population will have to the given crisis, and thus on reconditioning the people that a change is needed. When the population is properly web into the mix, the desired agenda of the ruling elite is presented as the solution.The solution isn't intended to solve the problem, but rather to serve as thebasis for a new problem.

When the newly inflamed difficulty reaches the boiling crisis, it becomes the foundation upon which arguments may again be made for change. Hence, the process is repeated, over and over, moving society toward whatever end the planners have in mind. The ones doing the manipulating are the ones to determine the course to which society takes.

If the citizen is being swept in and sold into conspiracy why do they
keep buying?........... Since Hegelian dialectics tends to replace old with something new, it employs a wide range of tactics, dialogue, compromise, consensus forming, conflict resolution, divide and conquer, deceit, redefinition of
words, giving new names to objectionable things,crisis creation,tolerance,acceptance,relativism,groupmentality. And the issue of common goal helps in getting the masses into the mix.
In nigerian today if anyone wants to tap in the psychic of the masses, one only needs to study how they tend to respond to issues... A quick glance at some threads now will give you a pre view of how to condition them beit tribal based, religion or money politics then tis bingo!

Very insightful, thanks for your response.

Here is the summary of what you said.

1. The counteract between Thesis and antiThesis produces a Synthesis of noble ideals that soon dies off and give way to new chaotic challenges from which new Thesis must sprout and re-engage society.

The oil subsidy compromise did not produce a "higher and richer synthesis". This is one example where synthesis can go the negative way. It is not an abberation, rather.......it is an integral part of the formula. In that outcome, the opportunity to self-preserve and produce a "higher and richer" society was missed. The government more than likely have officials who have studied dialectical theories but they lacked the skills to apply the theories. They failed to produce "higher and richer" ideals through negotiations, instead they forced compliance for self-preservation by deploying boots and guns on the streets. They failed the people on negotiation table and they failed them on the streets.

This is typical of how our government operate on social challenges. If Nairaland was available 30yrs ago most of the people ruling us today would have participated on this forum. Those of us participating here now will in turn be sitting in power at some time in future, if not as Nigerians......as leaders in whatever sovereinty we end up in. So this thread you opened is a good one to discuss "applications". Thanks for the initiative.

Did you read the recent interview given by Governor Fashola? The Governor has been very successful because he applies theories. I encourage you read it if you have not already done so. We need to produce leaders of tomorrow that think and do their job like Fashola. Topics like this one here, and I hope you get good participation on it, can become instructive to those who need a new awareness of their contract with society and how to negotiate through the challenges.


........let me move on to your other points.

2. The ruling elite hoards power.

In past ages philosophers were either exiled from the land or murdered by their kings. The king has a duty to preserve the throne in his bloodline and so all the dramas (and there were plenty.....) played to this objective. The people must remain un-enlightened about the higher ideals of mankind.....only the king is divine and entitled to such. A philosopher who makes his duty to enlighten the people earns the anger of the court.


3. We believe we are exercising choice when we purchase commodity a instead of b. The selections are limited and directed. The choice of what to buy is not made by the consumer.....it is made for the consumer! The most powerful consumer is the one that refuses to buy and holds on to his/her money. The consumer with housefull of gadgets and commodities has a weak knowledge of how market and society inter-relates. The person spending cash for a purchase should be the one rewarded with perks and gifts. Why are credit card spenders rewarded for going into debts?

Anyway, nice topic for discussion......love it

Fashola seems decent than most nigerian politicians....i may not know the school of thought he subcribes to. And there are not much infos around to really study him... Maybe they should start putting their tots down in writting for people to have a new level of understanding their ideas and philosophies.. No matter what miracle he does before leaving, there is a tendency for a new govt to rubbish his legacies so as not to be overshadowed.... How do you think the issue of boko harem fits into all this? I enjoy your inputs bro.

@dudu

Thanks for simplifying it, chubbie wan kill pesin with complex thoughts.

hercules07: @dudu

Thanks for simplifying it, chubbie wan kill pesin with complex thoughts.

Dudu did a great job...@hercules, you are even lucky reading the simplified version cos the first time my Lecturer intoduced it to me back then, i lost interest sharp sharp...untill i was able to find time to really study it then applying same to events around me. We need more practical application of this theory.... Contributions are most welcomed.

Intellectual and rational postulations and expositions like this should be the magnetic core that draws most of intellectual minds on this forum. I am enjoying every bit of this while continuing in my research.

Chubhie: Fashola seems decent than most nigerian politicians....i may not know the school of thought he subcribes to. And there are not much infos around to really study him... Maybe they should start putting their tots down in writting for people to have a new level of understanding their ideas and philosophies.. No matter what miracle he does before leaving, there is a tendency for a new govt to rubbish his legacies so as not to be overshadowed.... How do you think the issue of boko harem fits into all this? I enjoy your inputs bro.

What do you mean belonging to "school of thought"? What is a school of thought?


Boko haram has undergone three or four transformations and leadership beginning with its parent cult - maitatsine. Maitatsine was disbanded in late 70s .....i think 79 or 80 thereabout. Anyway, its footprint in Kano dated far back into the 60s. After their leader, Mohammed Marwa was killed in a brutal confrontation that shut down Kano for two months in '79 the adherents disbanded into neighboring states. Some of the units did not survive. They have three ways of generating funds.

1. Operate arabic school and charge enrollment and classroom fees to children whose parents can afford to make payment. Children who cannot affird it are recruited into a work/study program. They work as almajiri begging for alms and charity.

2. Townsquare sermons. They spread the message of Islam and the traditions of the Hadith in public congregations and solicit donations.

3. They serve as purifiers. Islam enjoins a 5% alms or charity on one's income. This charity cleanses away sins and purifies the soul from harboring greed and selfishness. Arabic schools are favorite recipients for obvious reasons.

These methods of raising money helped a few of the diabanded units to survive where others perished. Their style of deliverey in the townsquare is very fiery, warming people towards them and therefore creating growth and popularity........and notoriety as well.

This was their position when Yussuf emerged as their leader in the 90s and cross over into the new millenia and by which time they had also swallowed a number of local arabic schools and almajiri institutions into their fold . They had grown into a syndicate with cross border networks. They came under surveillance because orthodox muslim prrachers began to notice patterns similar to maitatsine cult and alerted authorities. Their power and reach had grown wide and wild that local preachers feared a confrontation with the cult over who has the correct interpretation of Islam.

Authorities repeated their error with maitatsine. They decapitated the head and left the body to regrow a new and ferrociously vengeful head.

Before that and after 9/11 Osama became a model of righteousness for jihadists. Boko haram, under Yussuf, became the voice that coalesce the Noethern conscience on its duty against infidels. Therefore it slowly became the jihadi warriors. When Yussuf was killed in custody by police/army an already trained and agitated band of new age boko haram emerged. Boko haram transformed again and under their present leadership.........he took what was an arabic school/cult and turnwd it into a social movement opposed to government and establishments.

The Northern elite had already recognized and accepted Yussuf and his boko haram as a proxy fighter. In public they speak the language of the Southerner's......using flawless English to express unity and peace. In private they speak Hausa to one another agitating for exclusions of kafirs in the North. Boko haram has truly gone wild. They do not bend away from their doggone determination to drive infidels out. Infidels to them is not just a Christain or atheist, they consider some of their own Northern Muslims as infidels.

In summary, boko haram has gone from a alms and charity dependent institution to a sponsored movement for political opposition. It has gone from days when its harmless acolytes stand on streets begging for alms to now where they are being persuaded to lay down their bombs in exchange for millions of naira in rewarding amnesties.

Terrorism has found a willing buyer!

I did not finish answering the queation yesterday because i had to go get some sleep.. I have given a brief coverage of what i understand about boko haram. Now lets see how it ties in to the daily events.

Back in US, 2002....shortly after the invasion of Afhganistan, a handful of defense contractors approached Donald Rumsfeld with the offer to open public trading on terrorism.. After some debates it became apparent that a market venture will run counter to the Department of Defense war on terror and weaken American message to the world. That they even debated such an unthinkable idea alone speaks volume for how callous and calculating capitalists can sometimes become. The proposal was offered as a public trading and turned down but who knows if it exists as a private prospect or perhaps even public but masked as a future commodity? Carbon emissions is traded in the futures market afterall and who would have thought that a day would come when humans invest and trade against the odds that we will breathe clean and unpolluted air. That proposal and its contemplation and acceptance by Rumsfeld showed that, technically, terrorism can be bought and sold. What stopped it from public offer was the anticipated political backlash, not the market! For obvious reasons, one can understand why such an idea would come from people who stand to gain immensely from selling weapons and machines of war.

Judging from their background, there is no way boko haram could operate at this scale of offense and tactical sophistication unless there is a link to a steady supply of weaponry. Nigeria does not manufacture these high level killer machines and boko does not have political connection of its own to negotiate and seal such a contract.......so there is no missing link. All the links are where they belong we just lack the guts to connect the dots that reveal them.

Around the world currently there thousands of soldiers of fortune (mercenaries) scouting for the next hot place to go earn blood money. A conflict free society or zone is bad for their business.

Interesting. I'd never heard of this Hegel guy before today.

ekt_bear: Interesting. I'd never heard of this Hegel guy before today.

You weren't missing out on anything. I once tried to read through a compilation of his work to see what all the hype was about and to see where Marx got his inspiration, and I was left surprised that such an unclear thinker whose writings were filled with so much nonsense had had such a major following and such a huge impact. I doubt that any rational person can read through the entirety of Hegel's Phenomenology of Mind (don't even try it, it's a complete waste of time) without wondering whether this guy wasn't at least partially aware that he was spewing out bullsh1t by the bucket load while writing it. It's amazing that people were/are able to develop reasonable and coherent ideas by building off of his ramblings.

@Dudu_Negro, by school of thought i mean his ideals and political orientation. Cos looking at most of our politicians,i doubt if anyone of em is well grounded in any sound political thought.... Meh you don school me on the history of boko harem! You are right bout all the missing links of boko harem starring us all in the face. My interest on boko harem grew when they suddenly became stronger and most powerful than our military i knew that interests have hijacked them to further political goals.......................You see most people who voted for Gej now turning against him to the point of wishing him dead......Same man that rode on the same goodwill of the masses as that of hitler. Gej on assuming office elected to ball with same set of people that are runing our dear nation underground while hitler was able to awaken a new conciousness in the german people who were battered after ww1! A new spirit of nationalism was set into motion by him to the point that he wanted to restore the germans to the apex in Europe.........The nigerian psychic as we speak now is at it's lowest now and most people felt that 'iam one of you mantra' has dashed the only remaining hope they have. While the masses are divided by tribe,religion and all the petty petty party politics our leaders play on us to distract us all from asking questions and seeing who the enemy really is.....i so much have great faith in this country and it really pains my heart seen how our leaders are running a country that has the potiential to compete with the world best....All we can do for now is to conribute in our own lil ways in waking up our people........plz forgive any typos and lack of spacing cos i typed this on a phone.

ekt_bear: Interesting. I'd never heard of this Hegel guy before today.

welcome bro.

PhysicsQED:

You weren't missing out on anything. I once tried to read through a compilation of his work to see what all the hype was about and to see where Marx got his inspiration, and I was left surprised that such an unclear thinker whose writings were filled with so much nonsense had had such a major following and such a huge impact. I doubt that any rational person can read through the entirety of Hegel's Phenomenology of Mind (don't even try it, it's a complete waste of time) without wondering whether this guy wasn't at least partially aware that he was spewing out bullsh1t by the bucket load while writing it. It's amazing that people were/are able to develop reasonable and coherent ideas by building off of his ramblings.

you are right broda....Even the Guy that first introduced it to me did not even understand it. It can be a very powerful tool in the hands of one who elect to use em.

Chubhie: @Dudu_Negro, by school of thought i mean his ideals and political orientation. Cos looking at most of our politicians,i doubt if anyone of em is well grounded in any sound political thought.... Meh you don school me on the history of boko harem! You are right bout all the missing links of boko harem starring us all in the face. My interest on boko harem grew when they suddenly became stronger and most powerful than our military i knew that interests have hijacked them to further political goals.......................You see most people who voted for Gej now turning against him to the point of wishing him dead......Same man that rode on the same goodwill of the masses as that of hitler. Gej on assuming office elected to ball with same set of people that are runing our dear nation underground while hitler was able to awaken a new conciousness in the german people who were battered after ww1! A new spirit of nationalism was set into motion by him to the point that he wanted to restore the germans to the apex in Europe.........The nigerian psychic as we speak now is at it's lowest now and most people felt that 'iam one of you mantra' has dashed the only remaining hope they have. While the masses are divided by tribe,religion and all the petty petty party politics our leaders play on us to distract us all from asking questions and seeing who the enemy really is.....i so much have great faith in this country and it really pains my heart seen how our leaders are running a country that has the potiential to compete with the world best....All we can do for now is to conribute in our own lil ways in waking up our people........plz forgive any typos and lack of spacing cos i typed this on a phone.

What is ideals and what is political orientatiom?

Dudu_Negro:


What is ideals and what is political orientatiom?

From wiki: In social studies, a political ideology is a certain ethical set of ideals, principles, doctrines, myths or symbols of a social movement, institution, class, and or large group that explains how society should work, and offers some political and cultural blueprint for a certain social order. A political ideology largely concerns itself with how to allocate power and to what ends it should be used. Some parties follow acertain ideology very closely, while others may take broad inspiration from a group of related ideology without specifically embracing any one of them

Thank you.

Given what you have shared about political orientation, idealism, school of thought and the wiki definition, it would seem this is a path for a society or an individual to organize order and harmony in a way that synthesis produces value-added outcomes and generates higher and enriching thesis.

In Nigeria do we have a society or culture or leaders that fit that description?
If we do they need to be identified. Such leaders are the ones that must be returned to political seats of power at every election.

If we dont have such societies or leaders, given our academic excellence and accomplishments, the laxity supports the argument that our scholarship is a training in the wromg direction and for wrong objective. We shiuld review our academic curriculum to refocus on indigenous philosophical principles and the development of humanity.