Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,148,842 members, 7,802,693 topics. Date: Friday, 19 April 2024 at 07:05 PM

Front Wheel Drive Vs Rear Wheel Drive; Which Is Better? - Car Talk (2) - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Car Talk / Front Wheel Drive Vs Rear Wheel Drive; Which Is Better? (14898 Views)

Motorized Three-Wheel Tricycle Spotted In Onitsha (Photos) / Reasons Why Front-wheel Drive Sucks And Why Rear-wheel Drive Is best / The New 6-wheel-drive Mercedes G63 AMG (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) (Reply) (Go Down)

Re: Front Wheel Drive Vs Rear Wheel Drive; Which Is Better? by zylkenny(m): 8:11pm On Oct 22, 2012
,
Re: Front Wheel Drive Vs Rear Wheel Drive; Which Is Better? by zylkenny(m): 8:36pm On Oct 22, 2012
In addition to earlier comments, it depends on d type of road you're plying
With all electric gadgets turned off (traction, stability etc) fwd fares better on roads with a lot of sharp bends. RWD rides tend to spin out

But when under strictly monitored conditions (
2.8-liters maximum displacement, 225 to 275 hp power) comparing fwd mazda6s to rwd bmws and lexuses or even d awd audis.... D mazda6 outruns them all. That's on even roads tho[color=][/color]
Re: Front Wheel Drive Vs Rear Wheel Drive; Which Is Better? by Nobody: 9:41pm On Oct 22, 2012
Rear wheel driven cars are better in that they accelerate better without slippage.
Re: Front Wheel Drive Vs Rear Wheel Drive; Which Is Better? by Ikenna351(m): 10:14pm On Oct 22, 2012
zyl_kenny: In addition to earlier comments, it depends on d type of road you're plying
With all electric gadgets turned off (traction, stability etc) fwd fares better on roads with a lot of sharp bends. RWD rides tend to spin out

But when under strictly monitored conditions (
2.8-liters maximum displacement, 225 to 275 hp power) comparing fwd mazda6s to rwd bmws and lexuses or even d awd audis.... D mazda6 outruns them all. That's on even roads tho[color=][/color]

See how this poster twisted this post just to make It look as if FWD is an improvement on RWD. You said Mazda6 FWD outruns RWD BMWs and even AWD Audis. Can you be that biased? Are you comparing 2.8 litre (probably a v6) FWD Mazda with 1.8 litre I-4 RWD BMW? Why didnt you state the engine sizes, hp and maximum engine torques of both cars and lets understand you better.

The simply truth is that most car manufacturers changed to FWD vehicles because they are cheaper to produce, compared to RWD configuration. The less the cost of production, the more the profit. Benz and BMW maintained RWD configurations when other brands shifted to FWD, because they have fans that are still willing to spend more to buy those their products that cost more to produce, knowing what they gain driving them.

Ikenna.
Re: Front Wheel Drive Vs Rear Wheel Drive; Which Is Better? by BOUNTYDOG(m): 10:47pm On Oct 22, 2012
Which will serve better in sandy areas like beachside when the sand attempts to sink the wheels,fwd or RWD.
Re: Front Wheel Drive Vs Rear Wheel Drive; Which Is Better? by Nobody: 11:00pm On Oct 22, 2012
zyl_kenny: In addition to earlier comments, it depends on d type of road you're plying
With all electric gadgets turned off (traction, stability etc) fwd fares better on roads with a lot of sharp bends. RWD rides tend to spin out

But when under strictly monitored conditions (
2.8-liters maximum displacement, 225 to 275 hp power) comparing fwd mazda6s to rwd bmws and lexuses or even d awd audis.... D mazda6 outruns them all. That's on even roads tho[color=][/color]

Ahem...which Audi quattro does the Mazda 6 outrun? And what engines in the Audi are you comparing?
Re: Front Wheel Drive Vs Rear Wheel Drive; Which Is Better? by BOUNTYDOG(m): 11:04pm On Oct 22, 2012
Anyway nothing can make me prefer the FWD over RWD cos even when I have to think that its the driving wheels that still steers makes me feel insecure driving the FWD.then u have the problem of the shaft.and old mercedez will still turn 360 on a spot & hold the steering without any fear but for the FWD an old mazda dare not try it.when on highway the RWD will propel fast as much still with much stability.
Please can anyone list the RWD cars they know,cos I think its just the german thing.
Re: Front Wheel Drive Vs Rear Wheel Drive; Which Is Better? by Nobody: 11:57pm On Oct 22, 2012
BOUNTYDOG: Anyway nothing can make me prefer the FWD over RWD cos even when I have to think that its the driving wheels that still steers makes me feel insecure driving the FWD.then u have the problem of the shaft.and old mercedez will still turn 360 on a spot & hold the steering without any fear but for the FWD an old mazda dare not try it.when on highway the RWD will propel fast as much still with much stability.
Please can anyone list the RWD cars they know,cos I think its just the german thing.
The following RWDs are not german:
Lexus: IS,LS,SC and GS,
ford: mustang,falcon & GT
Chevy: camaro
Lotus:elise,Esprit,evora
Infiniti: M35/M45,G35 and Q45
Honda: S2000,NSX
Mazda: miata
Cadillac: ATS,CTS and STS
Jaguar: XJ,XK and XF,
Ferraris (except the FF).

These are a small percentage of non german RWDs.
* I omitted RWDs like the Chrysler 300,dodge challenger and dodge magnum because they use chrysler's 'LX' platform,which shares a lot of its underpinnings with the mercedes W210 E-class.

*the chrysler crossfire is missing here because its technically a 1st generation mercedes SLK underneath.

*the jaguar XK shares its ford derived 'VH' rwd platform with the Aston martin DB9,DBS and Rapide.
Re: Front Wheel Drive Vs Rear Wheel Drive; Which Is Better? by Nobody: 12:07am On Oct 23, 2012
RWD cars:

*BMW.
*Bentley.
*Mercury Mornach.
*Lincoln.
*Buick.
*Cutlass Supreme.
*Chevrolet Bel Air.
*Jaguar XJ Series / E-Type / S-Type.
*Mercedes-Benz.
*Lexus.
*Lotus.
*Volvo 200 / 700 / 900 series.
*Peugeot 403 / 404 / 504 / 505 / 604.
*Opel Carlton / Senator / Magnum / Manta / Monza / Royale Victor / Viceroy.
*Porsche.
*Pontiac Bonneville.
*Rolls-Royce.
*Rover P5 / P6 / SD1.
*Lamborghini.
*Toyota Corolla (pre-'87).
*Toyota Carina (pre-'88).
*Toyota Crown.
*Toyota Celica (pre-'86).
*Toyota Supra.
*Toyota Celica (pre-'86).
*Toyota MR2 (pre-'86).
*Datsun Bluebird (pre-Nissan).
*Datsun 120Y / 140J / 160B / 180K / Laurel.
*Nissan Skyline.
*Mazda 626 (pre-'86).
*Mazda MX5 / RX7 / RX8.
*MG MGF.
*Mitsubishi Galant (pre-'87).
*Mitsubishi Starion.
*Nissan 240Z / 300ZX / 350Z.
*Volga.
*Volkswagen Beetle Type 1 / Igala / Rio / Type 2 / Type 3 / Type 4.
*Ford Europe: Anglia / Capri / Cortina /Corsair / Consul / Escort / Granada / Scorpio / Sierra / Taunus / Zephr / Zodiac.
*Ford US: Crown Victoria/ Mustang / Thunderbird.

And loads more.
Re: Front Wheel Drive Vs Rear Wheel Drive; Which Is Better? by automine(m): 12:17am On Oct 23, 2012
Torque steer is a drawback that is peculiar with front wheel drives at top speed. when on top speed, the car becomes unstable because the same wheel (front wheels) that is driving the car is also steering at the same time. however, with RWD it's no problem.
Re: Front Wheel Drive Vs Rear Wheel Drive; Which Is Better? by Nobody: 1:07am On Oct 23, 2012
automine: Torque steer is a drawback that is peculiar with front wheel drives at top speed. when on top speed, the car becomes unstable because the same wheel (front wheels) that is driving the car is also steering at the same time. however, with RWD it's no problem.

Torque-steer isn't an issue with FWD once the car's on the move. It's only on initial take-off, if the car is launched hard. Once traction is restored, it doesn't matter if the car reaches 150 mph.

Torque-steer is as a result of unequal-length driveshafts, where in a FWD car, the engine's on one side, the transmission's on the other. So we're talking a transverse engine / transmission layout.

However, there are cars that are FWD, but have the traditional longitudonal engine and transmission layout, as in a RWD car. This puts the transmission directly bedind the engine, central in the chassis. It's a neater, more efficient solution compared to either a RWD or FWD transverse layout. Power lost through the transmission is less than both RWD and transverse FWD layouts. The transmission being central, aleviates the problems associated with powerful FWD cars of unequal length driveshafts, and torque-steer.

The power is put down cleanly, without drama, so such a vehicle with close to 300 hp will blast off the start line in a civilised manner. No sudden tugs towards the ditch! Examples of FWD cars with loungitudonal engines and transmissions, and thus equal-length driveshafts are as follows:

Audi 80/ 90 / 100 / 200 / A4 / A5 / A6 / A7 / A8.
Citroën DS.
Renault 5 / 12 / 14 / 16 / 20 / 21 / 25 / 30.
Subaru 1600 / 1800 / Imprezza / Forrester / Legacy.
Skoda Superb.
Volkswagen Passat B1, B2, B5, B5,5.

For reference, the Audi A8 3,7 V8 FWD makes 230 hp, no torque steer.

I've made reference to unequal-length driveshafts, and their relationship to torque-steer.

Driveshafts are usually hollow. Now, when the engine is mounted transversely, the gearbox sits at one side of the engine bay. So the driveshaft on this side is short, while the one on the engine side is quite long, often twice the length of the other. When power is applied 9in a high-output car) the longer shaft actually twists (like a torsional spring). So the shorter one will transmit the power to the road cleanly, while the longer one with excessive flex will lag behind.

This will cause the car to pull to the side that transmits the most power first (the short one). The longer one then catches up, and the car pulls back. Some manufacturers try to counteract this by making the longer shaft thicker, or even solid, but the effects still remain.

RWD feels more neutral, though with the engine in front, there is a tendency for a "spin-out" if full power is applied mid-bend. Stable once traction has been achieved at highway speeds, less stable in the wet, where FWD cars will have the edge, engine weight over the driven wheels. RWD is the least efficient in terms of power transfer - power losses are greater than with FWD. So a 230 hp engine in two similar weight cars, with RWD and FWD will have different power outputs at the driven wheels. You'll end up with approx. 180 at the rear wheels, and approx. 200 at the front wheels.

RWD will have the edge over FWD when launching off the start line, due to weight transfer. When a car is launched hard, the front lifts, and the rear drops. FWD will lose traction over the driven wheels as a result, while RWD will actually gain grip as the weight shifts momentarily to the rear.

So it's all about driving style, and personal preference. My choice?

AWD, the best of both worlds.

1 Like

Re: Front Wheel Drive Vs Rear Wheel Drive; Which Is Better? by modskiller(m): 1:37am On Oct 23, 2012
RWD anyday anytime. Right from ma day 1 ℓ̊ love dem RWDs,
And ℓ̊ hate that grinding noise from the shaft of the FWDs while
turning it drives M̶̲̅ε̲̣̣̣̥ nuts.
Re: Front Wheel Drive Vs Rear Wheel Drive; Which Is Better? by magiccheche: 8:22am On Oct 23, 2012
I have driven both and can categorically say RWD all the way. Long live Mercedes benz, long live Germany and long live the Federal Republic of Nigeria cool
Re: Front Wheel Drive Vs Rear Wheel Drive; Which Is Better? by Nobody: 9:04am On Oct 23, 2012
magic cheche: I have driven both and can categorically say RWD all the way. Long live Mercedes benz, long live Germany and long live the Federal Republic of Nigeria cool
Mercedes has FWD vehicles. the A,B and V Class range are all FWD. BMW doesn't hv any FWD on sale but that's likely to change very soon (the next generation 1series and the up-coming 1series GT will use their new FWD platform).
Re: Front Wheel Drive Vs Rear Wheel Drive; Which Is Better? by Nobody: 10:23am On Oct 23, 2012
platinumricky:
Mercedes has FWD vehicles. the A,B and V Class range are all FWD. BMW doesn't hv any FWD on sale but that's likely to change very soon (the next generation 1series and the up-coming 1series GT will use their new FWD platform).

If BMW goes FWD with their newer compact models, it would mean they're going to use the platform of the newly-revamped BMW Mini. I've seen the floorpan of both 2012 BMW 1 series, and 2012 BMW Mini. Floorpans are very similar, the Mini has most of the BMW 1 series rear suspension mounting points, but it remains FWD or AWD in the BMW Mini Countryman Crossover.

I doubt BMW will ever go FWD though...
Re: Front Wheel Drive Vs Rear Wheel Drive; Which Is Better? by Nobody: 10:48am On Oct 23, 2012
Siena:

If BMW goes FWD with their newer compact models, it would mean they're going to use the platform of the newly-revamped BMW Mini. I've seen the floorpan of both 2012 BMW 1 series, and 2012 BMW Mini. Floorpans are very similar, the Mini has most of the BMW 1 series rear suspension mounting points, but it remains FWD or AWD in the BMW Mini Countryman Crossover.

I doubt BMW will ever go FWD though...

U̶̲̥̅̊ r ryt. Their FWD architecture is shared with the mini,In september, BMW unveiled their 'concept active tourer' which is their 1st FWD model.
www.topgear.com/uk/photos/bmw-concept-active-tourer-2012-09-14

Re: Front Wheel Drive Vs Rear Wheel Drive; Which Is Better? by Nobody: 10:56am On Oct 23, 2012
Traditional BMW purists won't be happy about this. As long as the accountants and shareholders of BMW AG want returns on their investments, their FWDs will likely make it to production. The 1series is the only car in its segment with RWD and its interior dimensions are smaller than its rivals.
Re: Front Wheel Drive Vs Rear Wheel Drive; Which Is Better? by Nobody: 11:04am On Oct 23, 2012
platinumricky: Traditional BMW purists won't be happy about this. As long as the accountants and shareholders of BMW AG want returns on their investments, their FWDs will likely make it to production. The 1series is the only car in its segment with RWD and its interior dimensions are smaller than its rivals.

You're right.

I also run a 2008 BMW 120d M-Sport, and front legroom is poor. I tend to have my seat all the way back, but it's still cramped. To regain the space lost with the longitudonally-mounted engine and transmission, the wheelbase would need to be at least 3" longer.
Re: Front Wheel Drive Vs Rear Wheel Drive; Which Is Better? by ba7man(m): 12:16pm On Oct 23, 2012
Siena:

If BMW goes FWD with their newer compact models, it would mean they're going to use the platform of the newly-revamped BMW Mini. I've seen the floorpan of both 2012 BMW 1 series, and 2012 BMW Mini. Floorpans are very similar, the Mini has most of the BMW 1 series rear suspension mounting points, but it remains FWD or AWD in the BMW Mini Countryman Crossover.

I doubt BMW will ever go FWD though...
BMW is comming out with a small FWD vehichle positioned with the 1-series soon but cheaper.
Re: Front Wheel Drive Vs Rear Wheel Drive; Which Is Better? by Nobody: 12:56pm On Oct 23, 2012
ba7man: BMW is comming out with a small FWD vehichle positioned with the 1-series soon but cheaper.

It'll be interesting to see the reception it'll receive, when it makes it to the showrooms.
Re: Front Wheel Drive Vs Rear Wheel Drive; Which Is Better? by talktimi(m): 1:11pm On Oct 23, 2012
Mimiko won Ondo election...
Re: Front Wheel Drive Vs Rear Wheel Drive; Which Is Better? by Nobody: 1:16pm On Oct 23, 2012
Siena:

It'll be interesting to see the reception it'll receive, when it makes it to the showrooms.


Its amusing to know a good number of people will buy anything with a bmw badge on it.


Automotive News
80% of BMW 1-Series
owners think it's FWD!! -

Automotive News reports
that BMW CEO Norbert
Reithofer shared this
statistic during a call with
analysts last week. It is
unclear where this
information came from
within BMW, but it still
comes as a staggering
surprise that 80 (eighty!)
percent of 1 Series owners
believe that they are living
with front-wheel drive.
As we reported earlier,
BMW is planning to bring
front-wheel-drive vehicles
to market in the near
future, and the automaker
is worried that it might
confuse customers by
adding these new products
to the rear-drive-only
lineup.
Guess not.
We firmly believe that all
current 1 Series owners
who think their car is
front-wheel drive should
hand over their keys
immediately... to us.
source: autoblog

www.forums.beyond.ca/showthread/t-298125.html
Re: Front Wheel Drive Vs Rear Wheel Drive; Which Is Better? by Nobody: 1:22pm On Oct 23, 2012
Re: Front Wheel Drive Vs Rear Wheel Drive; Which Is Better? by Wallie(m): 1:46pm On Oct 23, 2012
There's no doubt that people will buy a fwd BMW especially since it will be an entry level model and will serve as an entry point to aspiring professionals to know the brand. BMW needs a car to compete with the Civic, RSX, Mazda 3 etc. With all the new models seriously creeping up in price, the introduction of a new model will fill in the void created at the entry level. There was a time when the 3 series was an entry level car but today, you can configure a brand new 3 series that will cost about the same as a top of the line 5 series of about 10 years ago.

Instead of a fwd platform, I would have loved to see BMW's response to the Toyota/Subaru FT-86/BRZ/FRS but I guess having the Mini platform already makes it a no-brainer economically not to build a new platform. I like the new 2L twin turbo 4 cyl engine and will buy one, even if it is a hatchback, if they put it in a small light weight rwd platform.
Re: Front Wheel Drive Vs Rear Wheel Drive; Which Is Better? by Nobody: 1:56pm On Oct 23, 2012
Wallie: There's no doubt that people will buy a fwd BMW especially since it will be an entry level model and will serve as an entry point to aspiring professionals to know the brand. BMW needs a car to compete with the Civic, RSX, Mazda 3 etc. With all the new models seriously creeping up in price, the introduction of a new model will fill in the void created at the entry level. There was a time when the 3 series was an entry level car but today, you can configure a brand new 3 series that will cost about the same as a top of the line 5 series of about 10 years ago.

Instead of a fwd platform, I would have loved to see BMW's response to the Toyota/Subaru FT-86/BRZ/FRS but I guess having the Mini platform already makes it a no-brainer economically not to build a new platform. I like the new 2L twin turbo 4 cyl engine and will buy one, even if it is a hatchback, if they put it in a small light weight rwd platform.
Civic! mazda 3! Я U̶̲̥̅̊ kidding me?! That's way too down-market. U̶̲̥̅̊ seem to forget that BMW is meant to be a premium brand. Going too low will dilute the brand..the mini brand can cater for the 'boy racer' crowd.
Re: Front Wheel Drive Vs Rear Wheel Drive; Which Is Better? by zylkenny(m): 4:16pm On Oct 23, 2012
Ikenna351:

See how this poster twisted this post just to make It look as if FWD is an improvement on RWD. You said Mazda6 FWD outruns RWD BMW s and even AWD Audis. Can you be that biased? Are you comparing 2.8 liter (probably a v6) FWD Mazda with 1.8 liter I-4 RWD BMW? Why didn't you state the engine sizes, hp and maximum engine torques of both cars and lets understand you better.

The simply truth is that most car manufacturers changed to FWD vehicles because they are cheaper to produce, compared to RWD configuration. The less the cost of production, the more the profit. Benz and BMW maintained RWD configurations when other brands shifted to FWD, because they have fans that are still willing to spend more to buy those their products that cost more to produce, knowing what they gain driving them.

Ikenna.


You could be a little bit more polite with your post.
Quest is : rwd and fwd, which is better?
A lot of ppl have said d right things. Some are also wrong. When we make comparison, we need to state the terms. Are we referring to speed? Handling? Safety? Etc
Different cars and manufacturers excel in different aspects. A lot of ppl erroneously bliv that german cars are d best. Yes, maybe. IN THEORY! But have they actually MET each other on the track? Let them proof their worth. And when comparing, we compare cars with SIMILAR engines, SIMILAR displacement, SIMILAR power (like I stated earlier which IKENNA didn't have d time to notice). An LIVE example would be races. Where similar cars come together and ACTUALLY PROOF their worth. In races there are strict rules, strict conditions that must be adhered to. Eg wikipedia says. That mazda races in the GTA class of SCCA Pro Racing World Challenge. Which includes cars like audi, acura, lexus,BMW to mention but a few. Cars have similar engines and power. Mazda6 finished FIRST in that competition despite the fact that they use "stop start" as opposed to "rolling starts" used in other races which is to FWD's disadvantage. Mazda6 also came 1st and second in touring driver races. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mazda6#cite_note-2

Here's the result as it were:
Top Ten Drivers
1. Randy Pobst - TriPoint Motorsports – Mazda6
2. Jeff Altenburg - TriPoint Motorsports – Mazda6
3. Pierre Kleinubing - RealTime Racing – Acura TSX
4. James Sofronas - GMG/Greek Bros. Racing BMW
325i
5. Peter Cunningham - RealTime Racing – Acura TSX
6. Kuno Wittmer RealTime Racing – Acura RSX
7. Chip Herr - STaSIS Engineering –Audi A4
8. Charles Espenlaub - Tindol Motorsports- Mazda6
9. Michael Galati - Tindol Motorsports- Mazda6
10. Brandon Davis - RealTime Racing – Acura TSX
* 25. Andrew Wojteczko(R)- Auto Analyzer Racing-
Lexus IS (only two races this season)
Manufacturer Points
Mazda 47 Points
Acura 32 Points
Audi 19 Points
BMW 17 Points
*Lexus 0 Points (only two races this season)
www.autospies.com/news/What-Offers-the-Best-Performance-FWD-RWD-or-AWD-17435/

That is not to say that other drive trains don't have their aspects of specialization, but personally, I'd go with FWD any day. They're generally safer too

Re: Front Wheel Drive Vs Rear Wheel Drive; Which Is Better? by Wallie(m): 4:35pm On Oct 23, 2012
platinumricky:
Civic! mazda 3! Я U̶̲̥̅̊ kidding me?! That's way too down-market. U̶̲̥̅̊ seem to forget that BMW is meant to be a premium brand. Going too low will dilute the brand..the mini brand can cater for the 'boy racer' crowd.

There's no question that doing that will dilute the brand; however, there's no way BMW can continue to remain independent and innovative without creating more vehicles!

Why do you think Porsche started selling SUVs and Panameras? Even Lamborghini is trying to come out with an SUV! Moreover, Porsche and Lamborghini rely on VW for subsidy and/or technology. With Lambo, the cost of the Gallardo is subsidized by sharing the platform and engine with the Audi R8. The Porsche Cayenne is practically the same as a Touareg and Q7.

BMW is the only German company that doesn't, at least not yet, share its platform with other Make. Of course, you can argue that the X5 is really RR Sport but I think that they are so far apart that they're mere distant cousins. :-)

Did you see the monster Toyobaru created for auto enthusiast, with Toyota making the chassis and injectors and Subaru building the flat 4? That car took me into a Toyota and Subaru showroom, which is a rare feat for brands that I’ve never considered owning. That is the type of car BMW should be building for the entry level market!
Re: Front Wheel Drive Vs Rear Wheel Drive; Which Is Better? by Wallie(m): 4:50pm On Oct 23, 2012
zyl_kenny:


You could be a little bit more polite with your post.
Quest is : rwd and fwd, which is better?
A lot of ppl have said d right things. Some are also wrong. When we make comparison, we need to state the terms. Are we referring to speed? Handling? Safety? Etc
Different cars and manufacturers excel in different aspects. A lot of ppl erroneously bliv that german cars are d best. Yes, maybe. IN THEORY! But have they actually MET each other on the track? Let them proof their worth. And when comparing, we compare cars with SIMILAR engines, SIMILAR displacement, SIMILAR power (like I stated earlier which IKENNA didn't have d time to notice). An LIVE example would be races. Where similar cars come together and ACTUALLY PROOF their worth. In races there are strict rules, strict conditions that must be adhered to. Eg wikipedia says. That mazda races in the GTA class of SCCA Pro Racing World Challenge. Which includes cars like audi, acura, lexus,BMW to mention but a few. C[b]ars have similar engines and power. Mazda6 finished FIRST in that competition despite the fact that they use "stop start" as opposed to "rolling starts" used in other races which is to FWD's disadvantage. Mazda6 also came 1st and second in touring driver races.[/b] en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mazda6#cite_note-2

....

That is not to say that other drive trains don't have their aspects of specialization, but personally, I'd go with FWD any day. They're generally safer too

Kenny, you're not seeing the entire picture. This is more of a race to determine better drivers than to determine better platforms. I say this because the series is set up to neutralize a winning platform. There's a reason why you will almost never see a FWD platform competing is races having cars with hp greater than 300.

Competition Adjustments: In order to keep the competition close within the Pirelli World Challenge series, competition adjustments will be made to a vehicle model when deemed necessary. Competition adjustments will primarily be done through adjustments to the base weight, the engine speed limit and/or the required restrictor size.

R.E.W.A.R.D.S. System: Rewarding of Equalizing Weight Assigned to Reduce Driver Sensitivity, referred to as “REWARDS Weight,” is a weight equalization system based on the addition and subtraction of ballast weight based on the finishing position of individual drivers in the previous race(s). The goal of the REWARDS System is to provide close ontrack competition between a diverse variety of cars in the top third of the field. REWARDS System weight adjustments are in effect for the next race in which a driver competes in the same class. The maximum additional weight is 7% in GT and GTS and 5% in Touring Car.

Weight adjustments (in pounds) are as follows:

GT and GTS
1st +2.25%

2nd +1.5%

3rd +0.75%

4th–5th 0

6th 0.75%

7th -1.5%

TC (TOURING CAR)
1st +1.5%

2nd +1%

3rd +0.5%

4th–5th 0

6th -0.5%

7th -1%

TCB (TOURING CAR B-SPEC)
1st +1.5%

2nd +1%

3rd +1%

4th +.5%

5th 0%

6th -0.5%

7th -1%

8th -1.5%
http://www.world-challenge.com/series.php?page=seriesfacts
Re: Front Wheel Drive Vs Rear Wheel Drive; Which Is Better? by zylkenny(m): 5:04pm On Oct 23, 2012
...
Re: Front Wheel Drive Vs Rear Wheel Drive; Which Is Better? by zylkenny(m): 5:06pm On Oct 23, 2012
Wallie:

Kenny, you're not seeing the entire picture. This is more of a race to determine better drivers than to determine better platforms. I say this because the series is set up to neutralize a winning platform. There's a reason why you will almost never see a FWD platform competing is races having cars with hp greater than 300.


http://www.world-challenge.com/series.php?page=seriesfacts


I completely agree with you. That's why I said. "It depends in the conditions".
How many AVERAGE nigerian drives a TRUELY sports car? In real racing, you won't see a fwd car. But the AVERAGE nigerian would drive an AVERAGE car. Fuel economy, speed, safety and comfort are very important. FWD excels here. You want more power? Then go for RWD or AWD. That why mazda or acura didn't put up their FWD cars for such races. Instead they switch to other trims that have RWD or AWD.

1 Like

Re: Front Wheel Drive Vs Rear Wheel Drive; Which Is Better? by optimusprime2(m): 5:23pm On Oct 23, 2012
Wallie: The old argument of push (rear wheel drive) vs. pull (front wheel drive)! Which one is better? It depends on your use.

1. Need more wet traction in a low powered car (less than 300 hp)? Front wheel drive because of the weight of the engine weighing on the tires. If the car is high powered, tires and quality of electronic aids will determine traction.

2. Care only about fuel economy? Front wheel drive because it is usually lighter due to all the drivetrain components being in the front.

3. Your car has more than 300 hp? Rear wheel drive because you won’t get the torque steer and understeer of front wheel drives. Front wheel drives are trying to steer the car while also pulling the car. In a rear wheel drive, the front wheel steers the car and the rear wheel pushes (drives) the car.

4. You are passionate about driving feel? Rear wheel drive because the steering feel is unadulterated.

5. You want the fastest low powered car you can buy? Neither because the actual car, its engine and electronic aids (traction control, dynamic stability control) determines how fast the car will be.

6. You want the fastest high powered car you can buy? Rear wheel drive.


All wheel drive complicates things a little because it gives you more traction but at the expense of more weight and drivetrain losses, which means that all else being equal, it will be slower than a rear wheel drive except when wet.
Wallie pheeew...
you took the words outta my Brainbox
Re: Front Wheel Drive Vs Rear Wheel Drive; Which Is Better? by Wallie(m): 5:26pm On Oct 23, 2012
zyl_kenny:
I completely agree with you. That's why I said. "It depends in the conditions".
How many AVERAGE nigerian drives a TRUELY sports car? In real racing, you won't see a fwd car. But the AVERAGE nigerian would drive an AVERAGE car. Fuel economy, speed, safety and comfort are very important. FWD excels here. You want more power? Then go for RWD or AWD. That why mazda or acura didn't put up their FWD cars for such races. Instead they switch to other trims that have RWD or AWD.

Very true, although, we all like to believe that we're Michael Schumacher behind the wheel. grin On a side note, Peter Cuningham seems to be doing really well racing in GTS in a fwd Acura TSX with a 3.5 engine transplant. I think the bottom line with any car, with enough money and know-how you can negate any inherent deficiencies a platform presents. Understeer or oversteer can always be dialed out or mitigated against.

(1) (2) (3) (Reply)

FRSC Writes Toyota Over High Rate Of Crashes / Free Premium Vin Checks. Drop your vin / Any Power-bike Clubs In Nigeria?

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 84
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.