^^ But Kay, you should remember my point on that issue on that other thread!

Anyway, refresh your memory here https://www.nairaland.com/966459/arming-faithful-against-logic/1#11156971

Kay 17: Enigma talks about evangelical atheism as a religion, so I was curious of its opposite pole evangelical theism.

Good for you. But you asked the wrong question.

Enigma: ^^ But Kay, you should remember my point on that issue on that other thread!

Anyway, refresh your memory here https://www.nairaland.com/966459/arming-faithful-against-logic/1#11156971

You ignored me there

^^ I don't think so, but sorry if I did.

Reyginus: Good for you. But you asked the wrong question.

It is more like a silly question.

Kay 17:

It is more like a silly question.

Lol.;-)

Logicboy03:
Anony sir,

I bow in awe of your sheer dubiousness! No one this forum can match your anonyism

Lol, once again the "dubious anonyism" cop-out.

Premise 1: Logicboy states an argument of sorts.
Premise 2: Anony points out problems with his argument and asks questions demanding that the argument be explained properly.
Conclusion: Anony is dubious for not using his psychic powers to see Logicboy's "logic"

Loool, What wonderful "logic" from our resident "knight of atheism"

Mr_Anony:
Lol, once again the "dubious anonyism" cop-out.

Premise 1: Logicboy states an argument of sorts.
Premise 2: Anony points out problems with his argument and asks questions demanding that the argument be explained properly.
Conclusion: Anony is dubious for not using his psychic powers to see Logicboy's "logic"

Loool, What wonderful "logic" from our resident "knight of atheism"

You can lie to yourself. You have been caught being dubious so many times.......

Logicboy03:
You can lie to yourself. You have been caught being dubious so many times.......

Yawn.....empty accusations does not equal "being caught" just like shouting debunked and epic fail do not make them true.

Mr_Anony:
Yawn.....empty accusations does not equal "being caught" just like shouting debunked and epic fail do not make them true.

Not even by me but by both christians and atheists.


Your soul thread,

the thread about tragedy and evil


etc

Remember your rapethiest comment that got universally panned by atheists?

MrAnony1:
Lol, I'll explain it to you in a nutshell:

The universe is believed to have started because of the big bang which is said to be the origin of space and time. Usually when a theist argues the that if space and time began to exist, then the cause of space and time must be one that transcends space and time.(Kalam cosmological argument)
The atheist usually disagrees saying that it is impossible to make sense of any being that is spaceless and timeless.

The next argument that a theist presents is that the fine-tuning of the universe in the sense that the universe follows a very specific order is an indication that the universe has a designer.
The atheist usually counters by citing the multiverse theory which is that the universe is not alone but is part of an infinitely large number of universes ordered in many different ways.

I believe that the big bang theory contradicts the multiverse theory because if space and time started locally in each universe, then whatever is inbetween any two universes cannot possibly be space so what is it?

It seems to me that on one hand the atheist denies that a spaceless and timeless realm exists but on the other hand indirectly admits spaceless and timeless realm when he/she cites the multiverse theory (which by the way has no scientific proof/evidence whatsoever). I am really interested in finding out how his/her explanation for reality works.

Do you follow?

Probably the boundary between two universes is infinite densities, Stephen Hawkings suggests an imaginary time prior to the Big Ban.g; there are rich speculations nonetheless. However what does not make sense is the timeless, spaceless talk. Because it is of negative connotation and points to no particular direction, it is a host of confusion.