Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,149,975 members, 7,806,841 topics. Date: Wednesday, 24 April 2024 at 03:50 AM

Why Is Eko Atlantic Legal, And Makoko Illegal (case Of Two Nigerias) - Politics - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Why Is Eko Atlantic Legal, And Makoko Illegal (case Of Two Nigerias) (6531 Views)

Profile of Aisha-jummai Alhassan Nigerias' First Elected Female Governor. / Yari Abubakar, Martins Elechi, Nigerias Youngest & Oldest Governors Respectively / Pictures From Eko Atlantic Opening Ceremony... (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) (Reply) (Go Down)

Why Is Eko Atlantic Legal, And Makoko Illegal (case Of Two Nigerias) by MajeOfficial: 4:39pm On May 05, 2013
As a Nigerian American, I have a hard time discussing Nigeria with Nigerians because I'm often met with two types of Nigerians with two types of stories. To the extent that you wouldn't believe they're from the same country I'm talking about.

Group one
One group of Nigerians are very well connected to the world. They watch the same shows I did growing up in America, listen to and are aware of the same music, have a current sense of fashion and aren't too focused on 'living' abroad as they are capitalizing on it's institutions (healthcare, school etc). This group of Nigerians, to my surprise being that I was raised in the village, don't seem to know anything about the Nigeria I remember. Traditions, culture, even the mannerisms and customs of the people in their own country. I recently had one girl tell me that if you're from America people won't call you an 'americana', that they stopped doing that in Nigeria because it's 'razz'. Yet I'm being called such on facebook by Nigerians themselves today.

This group of Nigerians describes a Nigeria that's developing, changing, with opportunities opening up for anyone with skills and focus and they are all looking forward to staking their claim.

Group two
the other group reminds me more of the Nigerians i grew up with and I'm used to, but seem to be 'detached' or completely unaware of this alleged 'development' and all of these 'opportunities' the first group of Nigerians speak of. It's even strange that my knowledge of modern nigerian music surpasses their own and they're often apathetic to Nigerian pop culture. They describe a Nigeria with 'no roads, no schools, no jobs, no power', and paint a less rosy picture of the reality on the ground. These are Lagosians, people from the village etc. Their primary focus a lot of the time is completely getting out of Nigeria more than it is capitalizing on the 'development' which they truly don't see or believe exists and often equate to government propaganda and 'internet' lies.


Unbalanced Development
I have been aware of the unbalanced development in Nigeria, but the recent case with Makoko is a glaring example of exactly of endemic and severe the issue is. Nigeria isn't developing. The Nigeria that is developing is the Nigeria that has always been developed. The rich are truly getting richer, the IT boom, banking boom, retail boom, and so forth are employing their already rich children. Banks are only loaning to already rich persons and their children, housing developments are only accommodating to the already rich and wealth isn't spreading what so ever but only expanding in the hands of those that have it. Nigerians in this Nigeria are among the most optimistic people I've ever had chance to encounter. Nigeria to them is a land of endless opportunity. They are the ones that are creating the 'face' of this new 'boom' despite the fact that there's nothing new in its fundamentally nepotistic and elitist nature.

It should also reign and little to no surprise that those that are putting on the face of the new Nigeria in, for example, music, are by majority the children of the already rich. Davido, Wizkid, Dbanj, Naeto C, Burna Boy, Tiwa Savage, Dammy Krane etc etc. It's sadly rare for a Nigerian musician to have a rags to riches story. At worst, the next sizeable portion of these guys are from the middle class. This is the case in banking, telecoms, media, retail, and everything else you're made to believe is 'changing' nigeria.




Makoko v. Eco Atlantic
Makoko is a floating residential structure built by private initiative, as is Eko Atlantic. The differences between the two are trivial. It is now funny to me that the ACN led 'Awoist' (Awolowo himself as advocate for ending poverty with socialism) government of Babatunda Fashola believes the Makoko developments are illegal, while Eco Atlantic has not only been considered legal, but allowed to, in it's development, violate several other Nigeria laws such as having an independent power grid before the grid was decentralized only a few months ago, as well as a Free Trade Zone, which Tinapa in Calabar has still not been granted upon completion due to the 'legal' (class) implications of both.


v.


So what's the difference? The difference is Fashola is from the first Nigeria I described, and members of that Nigeria are only aware of each other. They are in power and thus develop Nigeria for each other, by each other, because they 'are' Nigeria in their own determentally limited opportunistically elitist perspective. The other Nigeria is the one by which the new Makoko developments was trying to reach. It's the 'real' Nigeria. The people you see on the streets that have never seen or entered any of Nigeria's allegedly 'booming' malls and 'housing developments'. Because they are completely ignored by the government, the devise inventive means of solving their own problems.


The difference is today, the elite Nigeria is destroying the other Nigeria's solutions, and offering no alternatives. the poor Nigeria is the only Nigeria by which the 'law' if you're far enough detached from sensibility to call Nigeria's 'legal' frame work by such a name, matters. Makoko and Eko Atlantic are the exact same thing for exact opposite types of Nigerians,and Lagos State has proven to be the champion of this one side facade styled development that has turned Nigeria's 'boom' into a lie for the vast swath of the people that need it the most.

3 Likes

Re: Why Is Eko Atlantic Legal, And Makoko Illegal (case Of Two Nigerias) by braine(m): 5:07pm On May 05, 2013
Nice write up, but I don't agree with your views.

1 Like

Re: Why Is Eko Atlantic Legal, And Makoko Illegal (case Of Two Nigerias) by Ngwakwe: 8:11pm On May 05, 2013
No matter how great a developed city is, shit will still be housed either underground or on the surface.
Re: Why Is Eko Atlantic Legal, And Makoko Illegal (case Of Two Nigerias) by wesley80(m): 8:47pm On May 05, 2013
^ Such a great piece deserves better comments than you two have been able to muster.
@OP, I could'nt agree with you more. Just this morning while doing some urgent research on the correlation between Population and Economic Growth, I stumbled on an interesting article written by a Reuters reporter titled:
Will Nigerian boom babies feed prosperity or entrench poverty?
The piece kind of summarises the fear of every Development economist - Nigeria and Lagos state in particular may be recreating India!
Now India used to be the classic example of inequity, a reference point in how to achieve economic growth without concomitant Economic Development, a paradox that economists in the developed world had to embrace with the shocking reality India presented, a nation with the most stark levels of poverty amidst unquantifiable opulence and globally recognised economic growth. That was then, Inequality seems to be brewing a new poster face - Fashola's Lagos!
As part of research conducted by South Africa's Standard Bank, a research referred to in the piece I cited above, it was discovered that "93 percent of Lagos households were in the poorest category, with monthly income lower than $390, compared with only 38 percent in Johannesburg." This may not necessarily be BRF fault but his policies - I'd love to add here that they seem to be quite DELIBERATE - are aggravating the situation and widening that gap without as much as a care.
I could go on and on but I hope Nigerians wake up soon and realize what's happening in Lagos. Lagos has no business competing with New York, Dubai or Jo'burg, we've got real problems - human problems and the way Fashola is headed, we'll only end up competing with Calcutta!

1 Like

Re: Why Is Eko Atlantic Legal, And Makoko Illegal (case Of Two Nigerias) by bloggernaija: 9:23pm On May 05, 2013
Makoko should never have existed in the first place.it has morped from a clean and serene riverside settlement built with palm fronds to a refuse dump.no permanent structure should have existed in that place.As a socialist i understand where you are coming from. even in america where you have a recession or should i say depression ,the rich have never had it this good. The opportunites opened to the rich ,connected is large.Eko Atlantic may seem like an elitist project backed by the state but you cannot deny the opportunities it will generated once the project is complete.it does not take anything from the poor because it is a private sector backed project.what it does is to add value and protect what already exist.
The federal government is dumping her poverty on Lagos . And more keep coming everyday . Many of whom would not have bothered making the journey if the country's economy worked.a town like ajaokuka could have taken some of the pressures had the steel mill had not been looted .cities like jos,akure,ondo,onitsha ,oshogbo,aba,etc could have been major financial centres ,industrial centres in their own right . .The population of lagos is more or about the same as those of the following countries;Australia ,Romania,ivory coast,Angola etc. there is no way for a state without the privileges of immigrarion control to handle this crisis.go to makoko . most of the people there are migrant fom other states.lagos is overpopulated.the only thing that can be done is to rebuild the entire city. attempting to do this this will generate even more criticism because of the dislocation it will cause. i make bold to say that the lagos state government has even more responsibility than the useless federal government .. Many people leave their villages everyday to live the Lagos dream and make it. Just like a nigerian traveller to any country in Europe or America. You take the risk, you pay the price or reap the reward. However I do not think it is the duty of the government to babysit anybody. In fact, those ghettoes should not have been allowed to develop in the first place. In the same way I will not be allowed to put up a shack in st tropez,Monaco etc.

3 Likes

Re: Why Is Eko Atlantic Legal, And Makoko Illegal (case Of Two Nigerias) by wesley80(m): 9:59pm On May 05, 2013
^ I just dont get people like you, this line of thought about "Ghettos not supposed to exist" shocks me to the marrow. Do you know "jack" about Lagos state? Like really do you even have a clue? How do you define a Ghetto? Is the population of Lagos state an asset or a liability? If you were to fashion out an economic policy you mean you'll recommend de-populating Lagos to say the size of Abuja? To what end if I may ask?
This whole line of thot has been circling on and on and you all are beginning to make it sound like population is the problem of Lagos rather than the obvious case of "skewed and poorly co-ordinated development". I put it to you that the population of Lagos is her greatest asset and those shanties and ghettoes you say should not be allowed to develop are just a natural consequence of the govts poor development plan.
Re: Why Is Eko Atlantic Legal, And Makoko Illegal (case Of Two Nigerias) by emiye(m): 10:50pm On May 05, 2013
wesley80: ^ I just dont get people like you, this line of thought about "Ghettos not supposed to exist" shocks me to the marrow. Do you know "jack" about Lagos state? Like really do you even have a clue? How do you define a Ghetto? Is the population of Lagos state an asset or a liability? If you were to fashion out an economic policy you mean you'll recommend de-populating Lagos to say the size of Abuja? To what end if I may ask?
This whole line of thot has been circling on and on and you all are beginning to make it sound like population is the problem of Lagos rather than the obvious case of "skewed and poorly co-ordinated development". I put it to you that the population of Lagos is her greatest asset and those shanties and ghettoes you say should not be allowed to develop are just a natural consequence of the govts poor development plan.

Yes, ghettoes are not supposed to exist !!!!, it is an eye sore to the state, all over the world attempt should be made to depopulate slums,and not expand slums, even the MDGs recognises that in goal 7, target 7.10.

Many of the slum dwellers have no business staying in urban lagos, they also do not make wise decisions, they breed like pigs with no concrete plan for the offsprings thereby enthrenching a vicious cycle of poverty, hopelessness and an expanding slum.

I put it to you that the population of Lagos is her greatest asset and those shanties and ghettoes you say should not be allowed to develop are just a natural consequence of the govts poor development plan.

Yes the population is one of the greatest asset, but it can also be a curse, most especially when majority do not pay tax and create a nuisance value. You talk about govts poor development plan a cause of the ghettoes, i agree with you, but the biggest blame goes to the FG at the centre, and many other state governors not stemming the tide of rural-urban migration, lack of employment opportunities across the nation e.t.c

1 Like

Re: Why Is Eko Atlantic Legal, And Makoko Illegal (case Of Two Nigerias) by bloggernaija: 4:22am On May 06, 2013
Go to London and put up a shack and tell me if you will not be charged to court. You cannot even put up a fence in front of your building without permission. If they operate their system like we do in nigeria,those places will look like lagos.A functioning state must have planning laws and those laws must be enforced. Poverty is no excuse. Many of the poor are better off in their villages and towns.but due to this oil induced laziness that is afflicting nigeria,everybody wants fast money.the federal government is the main culprit here.the intellectual laziness,gluttony ,corruption and buffoonery at the centre is the main cause as well as the outright stupidity of most nigerian.i will go further to advise fashola to put limits on the number of people that can reside in a house.1/3 of the recent email spying contract jonaduh and his meritorious goons from the creek has been embezzled already(over 20 million dollars).that money can build over a 100 village schools .the freaking idiots gallivant around the world thinking they are respected. But behind their back, they are nothing but a bunch of randy gorillas and baboons.

4 Likes

Re: Why Is Eko Atlantic Legal, And Makoko Illegal (case Of Two Nigerias) by naptu2: 4:42am On May 06, 2013
What processes did Eko Atlantic City go through before construction began? Did Makoko go through the same processes? Did they conduct environmental impact assessment? Do they have C of O? Do they have planning permission? Would any sensible and reasonable government allow people to set up illegal structures anyhow and anywhere they want?

By the way, about musicians rising from rags to riches, have you heard about Daddy Showkey, Baba Fryo, Dagrin, General Pype, Vector Tha Viper, etc?
Re: Why Is Eko Atlantic Legal, And Makoko Illegal (case Of Two Nigerias) by naptu2: 4:49am On May 06, 2013
One of the reasons I feel very strongly about this issue is because I remember how Lagos was before the military governments decided to ignore planning laws. There was a time when it was impossible to find traffic jams on Victoria Island, because it was a quiet residential area. This was a time when you wouldn't find rubbish being dumped on the roadside.

The military came and ruined everything. You had people building anywhere they wanted. Lagos was touted as the dirtiest city in the world. Pictures of filthy Lagos was broadcast around the world. A government that wants to restore sanity has come to power, but some people (mostly for political and ethnic reasons) do not want it to do its job.

4 Likes

Re: Why Is Eko Atlantic Legal, And Makoko Illegal (case Of Two Nigerias) by tpia5: 4:58am On May 06, 2013
this is a silly analogy.

eko atlantic is literally being built from scratch, not even from reclaimed land or urban gentrification, yet the op is still complaining?

look up urban gentrification:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gentrification
Re: Why Is Eko Atlantic Legal, And Makoko Illegal (case Of Two Nigerias) by naptu2: 5:04am On May 06, 2013
Once again, it's not about rich vs poor. My best friend owns a salon on Victoria Island. She is certainly not poor. One day government officials came and gave her a notice that she must knock down her wall and part of her building. Why? Because the law says that you cannot build within a certain distance from the canal. Government officials later came to knock down her wall and part of her building.

There's a saying "you can't use your reggae to disturb my blues". You can't say that, because you want to build a home for yourself, you should block the storm drains and expose me to flooding. The government will not allow you to do that.

So, what impact does Makoko have on flooding in Onike, Akoka, Iwaya, Somolu, etc?

Also note that it's not the entire Makoko that's being demolished (Makoko has existed for a long time). What's being demolished is the Makoko Extension, which is a more recent development.

1 Like

Re: Why Is Eko Atlantic Legal, And Makoko Illegal (case Of Two Nigerias) by naptu2: 5:22am On May 06, 2013
[size=14pt]Fashola explains current government intervention in Makoko[/size]

Tuesday, 24 July 2012 09:18 Agency Reports

Lagos State governor, Babatunde Fashola, on Monday explained why his administration has to intervene in the Makoko fishing community in Lagos Mainland, saying it had become necessary to halt the continuous expansion of the community into the lagoon with its negative impact on the environment.

Addressing scores of Makoko residents who came to the Lagos House, Ikeja to appeal for a reconsideration of the decision to demolish parts of the fishing community, Governor Fashola explained that while the state government was finding a solution for residents within the recognised boundaries, it would not allow further expansion of the community.

Fashola said sequel to several meetings with leaders of the community and an agreed boundary set, the state government had been working in the area to find solution to the difficulties which the indigenous residents encounter by way of providing basic infrastructure and amenities to uplift the standard of life of the people who, according to him, have been there for a long time.

Continuing, the governor explained that rather than maintain the established boundary, what had happened over the years was a rash of illegal shanties which expanded towards the Third Mainland Bridge and underneath the high tension electricity cables across the area.

Expressing the readiness of his administration to meet with genuine representatives of the community, Fashola advised them to be wary of people who are profiting from their difficult situation. He also advised the community to resist being used by people who want to take advantage of them, adding that some people were already collecting grants from the outside world under the guise of helping them.

The governor noted that piling saw dust on the lagoon, discharging wastes in it and blocking the discharge points for storm water had contributed to the flooding in places like Bariga, Shomolu, Ebute-Metta, Ogudu, Owode, Ajegunle and Ikorodu, among others.
“The truth must be told; some people are benefiting from your difficulty and that is the truth. They are taking advantage of you in the guise of being your friends.


They are taking all sorts of grants purporting to help you but it never gets to you. But as your government, we understand the challenges you face there and we are working to solve them”, the governor said.

According to the governor, who said the primary concern of his administration is to uplift the standard of living of the indigenous members of the community which has existed for over 60 years. “Now, as we are finding solution to the boundaries we recognise, we will not allow further expansion”.

“We owe you a duty, but we also owe the greater part of Lagos a duty. That lagoon is the only lagoon where we drain water during rainy season from Akoka, Bariga, Shomolu, Oworonsoki and from Macgregor Canal. The lagoon is shrinking because they are expanding and building into it; it has to stop”, the governor said.

Fashola said the way forward was for the leaders of the community to team up and meet the state government to find a lasting solution to the problem, adding that he is currently working with people within and outside the country to find a way to expose the community as part of the culture of Lagos where the indigenous people could live in a clean environment with clean drinking water and other basic amenities while they also engage in their fishing occupation.

He said the doors of the government were open at all times and that he would welcome such a team as appointed by the community to find lasting solution to the problem, adding that the community’s peaceful approach would lead to much more progress.

Governor Fashola explained that the state government has no problem with those living within the recognised boundaries, adding, “We are working to provide water, schools, libraries and so on for you. But those who have just come must leave. That is the reality”.

http://www.businessdayonline.com/NG/index.php/news/latest/41677-fashola-explains-current-government-intervention-in-makoko

3 Likes

Re: Why Is Eko Atlantic Legal, And Makoko Illegal (case Of Two Nigerias) by naptu2: 5:22am On May 06, 2013
Also note that, under federal regulations, it is illegal to build structures under high tension cables.
Re: Why Is Eko Atlantic Legal, And Makoko Illegal (case Of Two Nigerias) by wesley80(m): 7:33am On May 06, 2013
emiye:

Yes, ghettoes are not supposed to exist !!!!, it is an eye sore to the state, all over the world attempt should be made to depopulate slums,and not expand slums, even the MDGs recognises that in goal 7, target 7.10.

Many of the slum dwellers have no business staying in urban lagos, they also do not make wise decisions, they breed like pigs with no concrete plan for the offsprings thereby enthrenching a vicious cycle of poverty, hopelessness and an expanding slum.



Yes the population is one of the greatest asset, but it can also be a curse, most especially when majority do not pay tax and create a nuisance value. You talk about govts poor development plan a cause of the ghettoes, i agree with you, but the biggest blame goes to the FG at the centre, and many other state governors not stemming the tide of rural-urban migration, lack of employment opportunities across the nation e.t.c

If you re-read my post I'm sure you'd finally understand I never said ghettoes were desirable but only pointed out that they are a natural consequence of skewed development and govt inattention. As for who should actually shoulder shoulder the blame, I also mentioned it was'nt entirely BRF's fault didnt I?
A growing - booming population can only be a curse if its potentials are not harnessed, the ease with which you throw words like "depopopulate" and your likening slum dwellers to breeding pigs leaves a lot to be desired, such uncharitable words gives you up as being crassly ignorant and unfit to discuss the issues herein. Do you realize a huge area like Ajegunle would fall into the "ghetto" class if a threshold were set? Would you recommend de-populating Ajegunle? If you say Yes then I have to ask if you understand the concept of the "Food Chain"? Those Ghetto dwellers are now a part of the Lagos ecosystem, take them out and you disturb a level of that chain that balances the Lagos ecosystem and the resulting negative domino would leave you running away from Lagos! It's one thing to sit your butt down and proffer ignorant policies, it's another thing to know what you're talking about.
Re: Why Is Eko Atlantic Legal, And Makoko Illegal (case Of Two Nigerias) by wesley80(m): 7:54am On May 06, 2013
naptu2: One of the reasons I feel very strongly about this issue is because I remember how Lagos was before the military governments decided to ignore planning laws. There was a time when it was impossible to find traffic jams on Victoria Island, because it was a quiet residential area. This was a time when you wouldn't find rubbish being dumped on the roadside.

The military came and ruined everything. You had people building anywhere they wanted. Lagos was touted as the dirtiest city in the world. Pictures of filthy Lagos was broadcast around the world. A government that wants to restore sanity has come to power, but some people (mostly for political and ethnic reasons) do not want it to do its job.

I understand the seniments you've shared and cannot fault your desire to see a better planned, clean and organized city, I also have thos dreams but it's quite sad you'd reduce all this to the bolded above.
There are many issues I wld go down that "Political" or "ethnic" road for but sincerely, this isnt one. We must separate the issues for this to be worthwhile -the Lagos state govt has ignored it's poor populace and that's a fact. It's acting like the proverbial woman that intends to cover her pregnancy with her hands. While the grounds on which you fault the construction of a well intended slum school may hold true legally - granted, the issue is what has the state govt done to reduce the inequity and help balance out the shocking level of contrasting advancements between the rich and the poor? A govt that has been seen to help the poor and disadvantaged would have no difficulty making a case if it chose to demolish whatever it chose but not in this case. These people have been ignored and assumed not to exist and just as a ray of hope appears, the govt rushes out to extinguish it. While their action may be legally right, it is morally wrong. Development specialists have always judged societies and govt's not by the scale of opulence or economic aggregates but sometimes by the way they treat their most vulnerable citizens - those without a means to defend or assert themselves, how would you score Fashola?
Re: Why Is Eko Atlantic Legal, And Makoko Illegal (case Of Two Nigerias) by emiye(m): 10:11am On May 06, 2013
wesley80:

If you re-read my post I'm sure you'd finally understand I never said ghettoes were desirable but only pointed out that they are a natural consequence of skewed development and govt inattention. As for who should actually shoulder shoulder the blame, I also mentioned it was'nt entirely BRF's fault didnt I?
What do you then mean by "this line of thought about "Ghettos not supposed to exist" shocks me to the marrow"
wesley80: A growing - booming population can only be a curse if its potentials are not harnessed

How do you harness the potentials with very limited funds,if the bulk do not pay tax, they are a burden !,
wesley80: the ease with which you throw words like "depopopulate"
depopulate is simply to reduce the population of those living in the slum, the Millennium development goals has 8 goals, 21 targets nd 60 indicators. Goal 7 , target 7.10 focuses on depopulating slums.
wesley80: and your likening slum dwellers to breeding pigs leaves a lot to be desired, such uncharitable words gives you up as being crassly ignorant and unfit to discuss the issues herein
i said breed like pigs, a metaphor indicating having more children than they can cater for, a smart man can move away from a slum after a brief stay and proper planning, a slum is not where you plan to stay forever!

wesley80:
. Do you realize a huge area like Ajegunle would fall into the "ghetto" class if a threshold were set? Would you recommend de-populating Ajegunle? If you say Yes then I have to ask if you understand the concept of the "Food Chain"? Those Ghetto dwellers are now a part of the Lagos ecosystem, take them out and you disturb a level of that chain that balances the Lagos ecosystem and the resulting negative domino would leave you running away from Lagos! It's one thing to sit your butt down and proffer ignorant policies, it's another thing to know what you're talking about.

Stop talking nonsensical shiit, i am an environmentalist, I am as ignorant enough to educate you. What do you understand by the ecosystem, introducing filth in to water bodies is a way to balance the ecosystem in your ignorant mind, most of the fishes and aquatic organisms in those water bodies are filled with heavy metals like lead, and not particularly okay for human consumption.

1 Like

Re: Why Is Eko Atlantic Legal, And Makoko Illegal (case Of Two Nigerias) by MajeOfficial: 1:28pm On May 06, 2013
naptu2: What processes did Eko Atlantic City go through before construction began? Did Makoko go through the same processes? Did they conduct environmental impact assessment? Do they have C of O? Do they have planning permission? Would any sensible and reasonable government allow people to set up illegal structures anyhow and anywhere they want?

By the way, about musicians rising from rags to riches, have you heard about Daddy Showkey, Baba Fryo, Dagrin, General Pype, Vector Tha Viper, etc?
theyre still in rags lol
Re: Why Is Eko Atlantic Legal, And Makoko Illegal (case Of Two Nigerias) by wesley80(m): 5:04pm On May 06, 2013
emiye:
What do you then mean by "this line of thought about "Ghettos not supposed to exist" shocks me to the marrow"


I mean you have to understand you're talking about PEOPLE living in subhuman conditions because they have little or no choice.


How do you harness the potentials with very limited funds,if the bulk do not pay tax, they are a burden !,

Wrong, wrong, wrong. They contribute their quota to the State's economy through their productive activities and creating a huge market for consumer and other products. Without some of these Ghetto dwellers, Guinness, Star and others would struggle, no?

depopulate is simply to reduce the population of those living in the slum, the Millennium development goals has 8 goals, 21 targets nd 60 indicators. Goal 7 , target 7.10 focuses on depopulating slums.


Depopulate in the MDG sense does not mean knocking down peoples houses and forcing them back to their villages like you and Fashola seem to favour. It entails giving people better alternatives in terms of outlook and living conditions, it's imperative y'all understand this.
i said breed like pigs, a metaphor indicating having more children than they can cater for, a smart man can move away from a slum after a brief stay and proper planning, a slum is not where you plan to stay forever!

How would you feel if I said you were thinking thru your anus? Of course I'm being metaphorical arent I?


Stop talking nonsensical shiit, i am an environmentalist, I am as ignorant enough to educate you. What do you understand by the ecosystem, introducing filth in to water bodies is a way to balance the ecosystem in your ignorant mind, most of the fishes and aquatic organisms in those water bodies are filled with heavy metals like lead, and not particularly okay for human consumption.

Yeah, you saved the best worst for last didnt you? You really had to prove you're a nutter? SMH.
Yeah you're an environmentalist and I guess that explains your abysmal level of understanding of developmental issues - sorry pal. I wasnt really making reference to the "ecosystem" in an environmental sense when I mentioned it, I only tried to demonstrate the relationship in a society between the rich, middle class and the poor by likening it to the same kind of balance an ecosystem needs to thrive and flourish. The society needs a level of poverty to thrive - yeah quote me! The menial jobs and the low wages would only exist if there's a group willing to accept whatever is on offer, it's how the greatest nations on earth were built so when you speak of "depopulating" ghettos in the sense you and Fashola appear to favour, you'll be altering that naturally thriving balance the society needs to grow.

2 Likes

Re: Why Is Eko Atlantic Legal, And Makoko Illegal (case Of Two Nigerias) by Nobody: 5:56pm On May 06, 2013
wesley80:

I mean you have to understand you're talking about PEOPLE living in subhuman conditions because they have little or no choice.



Wrong, wrong, wrong. They contribute their quota to the State's economy through their productive activities and creating a huge market for consumer and other products. Without some of these Ghetto dwellers, Guinness, Star and others would struggle, no?



Depopulate in the MDG sense does not mean knocking down peoples houses and forcing them back to their villages like you and Fashola seem to favour. It entails giving people better alternatives in terms of outlook and living conditions, it's imperative y'all understand this.


How would you feel if I said you were thinking thru your anus? Of course I'm being metaphorical arent I?




Yeah, you saved the best worst for last didnt you? You really had to prove you're a nutter? SMH.
Yeah you're an environmentalist and I guess that explains your abysmal level of understanding of developmental issues - sorry pal. I wasnt really making reference to the "ecosystem" in an environmental sense when I mentioned it, I only tried to demonstrate the relationship in a society between the rich, middle class and the poor by likening it to the same kind of balance an ecosystem needs to thrive and flourish. The society needs a level of poverty to thrive - yeah quote me! The menial jobs and the low wages would only exist if there's a group willing to accept whatever is on offer, it's how the greatest nations on earth were built so when you speak of "depopulating" ghettos in the sense you and Fashola appear to favour, you'll be altering that naturally thriving balance the society needs to grow.

God I hate this type of thinking, there is nothing good about slums, getting rid of them should be the top priority of any city. If a city's ecosystem requires slums to be maintained than it should not exist at all. Slums are what give a country the statues of being a shithole.

5 Likes

Re: Why Is Eko Atlantic Legal, And Makoko Illegal (case Of Two Nigerias) by emiye(m): 6:01pm On May 06, 2013
wesley80:

I mean you have to understand you're talking about PEOPLE living in subhuman conditions because they have little or no choice.



Wrong, wrong, wrong. They contribute their quota to the State's economy through their productive activities and creating a huge market for consumer and other products. Without some of these Ghetto dwellers, Guinness, Star and others would struggle, no?



Depopulate in the MDG sense does not mean knocking down peoples houses and forcing them back to their villages like you and Fashola seem to favour. It entails giving people better alternatives in terms of outlook and living conditions, it's imperative y'all understand this.


How would you feel if I said you were thinking thru your anus? Of course I'm being metaphorical arent I?




Yeah, you saved the best worst for last didnt you? You really had to prove you're a nutter? SMH.
Yeah you're an environmentalist and I guess that explains your abysmal level of understanding of developmental issues - sorry pal. I wasnt really making reference to the "ecosystem" in an environmental sense when I mentioned it, I only tried to demonstrate the relationship in a society between the rich, middle class and the poor by likening it to the same kind of balance an ecosystem needs to thrive and flourish. The society needs a level of poverty to thrive - yeah quote me! The menial jobs and the low wages would only exist if there's a group willing to accept whatever is on offer, it's how the greatest nations on earth were built so when you speak of "depopulating" ghettos in the sense you and Fashola appear to favour, you'll be altering that naturally thriving balance the society needs to grow.

I have one statement for all the fallacy you have stated up there.

THE POOR DOES NOT HAVE TO LIVE IN SLUMS. !

4 Likes

Re: Why Is Eko Atlantic Legal, And Makoko Illegal (case Of Two Nigerias) by wesley80(m): 6:14pm On May 06, 2013
zetdee:

God I hate this type of thinking, there is nothing good about slums, getting rid of them should be the top priority of any city. If a city's ecosystem requires slums to be maintained than it should not exist at all. Slums are what give a country the statues of being a shithole.
emiye:

I have one statement for all the fallacy you have stated up there.

THE POOR DOES NOT HAVE TO LIVE IN SLUMS. !
zetdee:

God I hate this type of thinking, there is nothing good about slums, getting rid of them should be the top priority of any city. If a city's ecosystem requires slums to be maintained than it should not exist at all. Slums are what give a country the statues of being a shithole.
Sadly, neither of you got my point. I wasnt advocating for the continued existence of ghettos but only trying to point out the economic significance of having those considered to be less well off existing alongside the very rich. My reference was to highlight the danger of tearing down and depopulating ghettos (Fashola style) without recourse to their economic significance, dats all!
Re: Why Is Eko Atlantic Legal, And Makoko Illegal (case Of Two Nigerias) by Nobody: 6:23pm On May 06, 2013
wesley80:
Sadly, neither of you got my point. I wasnt advocating for the continued existence of ghettos but only trying to point out the economic significance of having those considered to be less well off existing alongside the very rich. My reference was to highlight the danger of tearing down and depopulating ghettos (Fashola style) without recourse to their economic significance, dats all!

Well, everything has economic significance, even crime, there are many people who financialy benefit from criminal activity, like security firms and companies manufacturing security gear. Getting rid of slums will benefit a city in a big way, benefits outway the costs.
Re: Why Is Eko Atlantic Legal, And Makoko Illegal (case Of Two Nigerias) by wesley80(m): 7:01pm On May 06, 2013
^ Do you have any sense at all? How do you "get rid" of slums without creating an avenue for improving the lives of its occupants? You think demolishing ghettos and rendering people homeless would solve any problem? You guys are just darn impossible SMH.
Re: Why Is Eko Atlantic Legal, And Makoko Illegal (case Of Two Nigerias) by bloggernaija: 8:51pm On May 06, 2013
wesley80: ^ Do you have any sense at all? How do you "get rid" of slums without creating an avenue for improving the lives of its occupants? You think demolishing ghettos and rendering people homeless would solve any problem? You guys are just darn impossible SMH.

Many of em come from states where they have farms and family homes. They will improve their lifestyle by simply relocating back to the states.go to a typical TIv village in benue state. They are poor but the huts are nice ,the environment clean and they are well fed.if any uneducated or unskilled fella leaves that kind of environment for makoko(most fall in this category),then no sympathy.it is just plain laziness and most nigerians fall into this category.
Re: Why Is Eko Atlantic Legal, And Makoko Illegal (case Of Two Nigerias) by Kairoseki77: 8:55pm On May 06, 2013
**I recently left this comment on a different thread. But it is about the Makoko demolition, so I will post it again.**

I see it as a health and safety matter.

Polluting the lagoon isn't good for anybody, least of all the people that live there. They will get diseases, spread diseases, invite vermin and pests, and I cannot imagine the level of fungus and mold they have to deal with living right on top of the water. That mold and fungus has to be bad for your lungs.

For adults, maybe that would be ok. They decided to move there illegally, so they should be prepared for the consequences to their health. Children are a different story though. It would be inhumane to turn a blind eye to children living in those conditions. Children that have no choice but to live there, because their parents are desperate, or selfish.

Let's not forget, everyone in Lagos that uses that water is affected (both the poor and the rich). When the fish in the lagoon live on a diet of human waste, what happens to the poor and rich that eat those fish? When the water is polluted beyond belief, what happens when we drink it? What happens when the dirty water breeds contagious diseases and the poor, and the rich, get sick? What about those who get sick and die?

Then, there is the safety aspect. Inevitably, the area is going to flood. That's what happens in Lagos. Are these people going to be safe, or are we going to be fishing their bodies out of the water for a month after the flood? Are the surviving family members not going to blame the LASG for 'not protecting them'? What about the children who drown there regularly? Should they be left to die?

____________________This last paragraph was in response to someone who was comparing Lagos with Manhattan__________________
Manhattan doesn't have any of those problems. The poor live in apartments in NYC, not in huts over the Hudson river. Health treatment is widely available. The only problem in those communities is that the police attack the poor instead of attacking the criminals. If drugs went away, and jobs were found for the people there, everything would be fine. Bloomberg is a billionaire, and is selfish. Totally different thing.
Re: Why Is Eko Atlantic Legal, And Makoko Illegal (case Of Two Nigerias) by naptu2: 9:01pm On May 06, 2013
wesley80:

I understand the seniments you've shared and cannot fault your desire to see a better planned, clean and organized city, I also have thos dreams but it's quite sad you'd reduce all this to the bolded above.
There are many issues I wld go down that "Political" or "ethnic" road for but sincerely, this isnt one. We must separate the issues for this to be worthwhile -the Lagos state govt has ignored it's poor populace and that's a fact. It's acting like the proverbial woman that intends to cover her pregnancy with her hands. While the grounds on which you fault the construction of a well intended slum school may hold true legally - granted, the issue is what has the state govt done to reduce the inequity and help balance out the shocking level of contrasting advancements between the rich and the poor? A govt that has been seen to help the poor and disadvantaged would have no difficulty making a case if it chose to demolish whatever it chose but not in this case. These people have been ignored and assumed not to exist and just as a ray of hope appears, the govt rushes out to extinguish it. While their action may be legally right, it is morally wrong. Development specialists have always judged societies and govt's not by the scale of opulence or economic aggregates but sometimes by the way they treat their most vulnerable citizens - those without a means to defend or assert themselves, how would you score Fashola?

1) So, do you now accept that the settlement is illegal and an environmental hazard?

2) The fact still remains that many people (though not all) take up these causes for ethnic or political reasons.

3) I will score the government highly when it comes to poverty alleviation. Out of all the governments we've had in Lagos, this government and Jakande's government have been the best with regards to poverty alleviation and taking care of the poor (the worst and worst government inn the history of Lagos was Oyinlola's government a.k.a. "No bitumen" ).

The problem is that the media prefer to report grand and spectacular projects, rather than projects that will improve the lives of the poor. They would rather report about Eko Atlantic City, than report about Lagos HOMS, they would rather report about the cable stayed bridge than report about Tekunle. These things exist. The fact that you don't hear noise about them does not mean that they do not exist.

In fact, the government is doing exactly what I thought would be necessary to turn Lagos around after the madness that was military rule. That is, the carrot and stick approach. Give them the carrot, but those who refuse to take the carrot will be beaten by the stick. The act of beating with the stick is more controversial, so it will take up more column inches in newspapers, but there's an alternative. . .there's the carrot.
Re: Why Is Eko Atlantic Legal, And Makoko Illegal (case Of Two Nigerias) by Kairoseki77: 9:09pm On May 06, 2013
I want to point out that this is part of development. It always has been, and always will be.

China recently instituted a blanket ban on villagers moving to the cities. They have to get a government permit to move, and it's extremely hard to get.

There was a famous book written during the 'development' stages of America's growth called 'A Tale of Two Cities'. It is about the same thing.

The point I am trying to make, is that it SEEMS like it is only the rich that benefit, but this is just an illusion. How many graduates cannot find jobs in Nigeria? Hundreds of thousands. Still, people with college degrees are in the extreme minority in this country. As the private sector grows, and the demand for college educated people increases, it will seem like everyone with a college degree is getting a job, while the "poor" without college degrees are left to rot.

Five years later, it will look like everyone without a college degree, or a 'technical degree', is being left out.
Five years later, it will look like...etc, etc.

Lets use China as a case study.

Look at this picture of Shanghai, in communist China. They did this in 20 YEARS! To this day they have an extremely unequal society, but they are still growing, so the wealth is still spreading. The middle class in China today is larger than the population of the entire United States. 50 years ago the per capita income in China was LESS than the per capita income average in Africa.

This is what they were able to accomplish:

Shanghai in 1990

Shanghai in 2010

**Now look at that picture and tell me that the Shanghai government should have focused on building floating slums on the river, instead of building those skyscrapers behind it.**

1 Like

Re: Why Is Eko Atlantic Legal, And Makoko Illegal (case Of Two Nigerias) by naptu2: 9:18pm On May 06, 2013
Now I'm going to give you links, stories, pictures, etc (if the anti-spam bot doesn't ban me), but before that I'm going to give you some background.

I believe that Fashola came to complete what Jakande started. Many of Fashola's policies are not really new, but he is returning Lagos to what it was in the 1950s and also completing or improving what Jakande started in the 1980s (I also have to admit that some of the projects were started during Tinubu's administration). (I'm smiling right now because I remember that my family were staunchly opposed to Jakande's education policies).

Lagos HOMS: Jakande (well, Lagos State Development and Property Corporation [LSDPC) built the famous Jakande low cost houses and offered them for sale to Lagosians. The key to the success of this scheme was mortgages. You pay a small initial deposit and pay the rest over the next twenty or thirty years. This made it affordable to the average Lagosian. However, there was a flaw in that model and Fashola has thought of a way to address that flaw. Multi-millionaires bought a lot of the flats and resold them at higher rates. I know one such man who still has several flats in several low cost estates in Lagos.

With Lagos HOMS you must swear an affidavit that you do not own any other house in Lagos and you are not allowed to let out the flat (that is, you must be the one occupying the flat) for the 20 or so years it will take you to pay off the mortgage.

There are also several other programmes and policies that I will post here tonight (if sleep doesn't take me away), including the skills acquisition centres, the Lagos Micro-Finance Institution, Kaiyero and other markets, Isale-Gangan urban renewal (I'll even show you pics of Isale-Gangan in the 1950s and 90s), the Destitute's Home, etc.

1 Like

Re: Why Is Eko Atlantic Legal, And Makoko Illegal (case Of Two Nigerias) by Kairoseki77: 9:20pm On May 06, 2013
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I would like to see it.
Re: Why Is Eko Atlantic Legal, And Makoko Illegal (case Of Two Nigerias) by wesley80(m): 9:33pm On May 06, 2013
^ Me too, uhm well! *shrugs*
Re: Why Is Eko Atlantic Legal, And Makoko Illegal (case Of Two Nigerias) by wesley80(m): 9:39pm On May 06, 2013
naptu2:

1) So, do you now accept that the settlement is illegal and an environmental hazard?

2) The fact still remains that many people (though not all) take up these causes for ethnic or political reasons.

3) I will score the government highly when it comes to poverty alleviation. Out of all the governments we've had in Lagos, this government and Jakande's government have been the best with regards to poverty alleviation and taking care of the poor (the worst and worst government inn the history of Lagos was Oyinlola's government a.k.a. "No bitumen" ).

The problem is that the media prefer to report grand and spectacular projects, rather than projects that will improve the lives of the poor. They would rather report about Eko Atlantic City, than report about Lagos HOMS, they would rather report about the cable stayed bridge than report about Tekunle. These things exist. The fact that you don't hear noise about them does not mean that they do not exist.

In fact, the government is doing exactly what I thought would be necessary to turn Lagos around after the madness that was military rule. That is, the carrot and stick approach. Give them the carrot, but those who refuse to take the carrot will be beaten by the stick. The act of beating with the stick is more controversial, so it will take up more column inches in newspapers, but there's an alternative. . .there's the carrot.

In the face of such compelling arguments, it really is difficult to keep arguing with you. I honestly would've thrown in the towel if I had'nt taken out time to do some study on the issue I'm arguing here. Truth is I know what I'm saying just as you I believe you do. Fashola might hae done some things but he has'nt done nearly anything for the poor compared to what he's done for the rich. I'll leave it at that for now and enjoy your pictures.

(1) (2) (3) (Reply)

JTF Sets Adulterated Diesel Tanker Ablaze In Imo / How GMB Killed Nollywood Actor, Nkem ‘osofia’ Owoh’s Brother In His Prime / Buhari Won But Not Presidential Seat, Read This

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 159
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.