The bible like many people have said is not complete. Some people believe that the bible was intentionally made so.
My question is why was the bible made so?
Enlighten a brother if you can.
This is not a thread for atheist.

firstly foslink i'm an atheist....secondly....the bible i believe is indeed incomplete...the roman church clipped away many letters and poems meant to be included in the book,namely they were;
Removed from the old testament:
The book of the covenant ,referenced in ezekiel 24;4-7
The wars of the lord,referenced in numbers 21;14
The book of statutes,referenced in 1st samuel 10;25
The sayings of the seers,referenced in 2nd chronicles 33;19
The book of shemaiah,referenced in 2nd chronicles 12;15
The acts of uzziah,written by isiah,referenced in the bible in 2nd chronicles 26;22
Removed from new testament:
Epistle of jude,referenced in jude 3
prophesies of enoch,referenced im jude 14
An epistle of paul to the laodiceans,referenced in colossians 4;16
many more stupid boring books were taken out in favour of books that were populous(apparently "god's word" was changed by popular vote)

The Bible is not complete because it does not contain everything there is to reveal by God.

striktlymi: The Bible is not complete because it does not contain everything there is to reveal by God.

why did "mere mortals" choose which books were meant to be in the bible....if all of it is "god's word"?...