sammycarz:
Can't even remember the last time Costa scored, been ages i need one today

aieromon:


Change wetin?Wait and see what happens when he gets the second goal.

illswift:
Good tins come to the patient ones

dotcomnamename:
[size=15pt]The ref is clearly biased and want Chelsea to keep their unbeaten record.

EPL refs are a joke! [/size]

KingTom:
Dem go srtip chelse naket today In other news
Rozzay
Jennimma
Vivly
Rokiatu
TemiGracie need your help please make una share una selves just make sure you vote each of them once and make it clear e.g I fredoooooo vote
Anyway Xynerise abeg give me champagne make I sip. Chelshite go see hell today. Ojoro team!

thegoodjoehunt3:
[b]I will continue crying out for video technology. That is the only way to stop bias officiating.


It Is Time For Video Technology In Football

however one thing is true about it. The pros of video technology is more than the coins of it Almost all sports have embraced technology. Those sports have not lost its passion. The game gets interesting and intriguing with video technology.

Some people say that bias officiating favors all teams as time progresses. I do not see it this way. What statistical analysis was used to come up with this fact?

Every time poor officiating takes place, my mind goes back to why people feel the video technology will work against the greatness of the game. Due to poor officiating, we see players lose their tempers and take matters into their hands to hurt other players. Zuniga and Neymar incident at the World Cup comes to mind.

Some argue the video technology will take the powers off the referees hands. I wonder why that is the case. In video technology, there is going to be a referee behind the cameras who takes the final decision. That referees decision is final. Video technology will improve the accuracy of the referee's decision and helps his final judgment. It would not undermine the referee but improve the referee's decision.

The argument that replays will slow down the game is another flawed argument. If we want the game moving along, why add fouls. Every foul in the frame slows down the game. Without video technology, we have cases where players have walked out of the pitch and refused to play. For instance, the game between France and Portugal at the European Cup of nation in 2000. A video technological decision would have saved this. Sometimes players decent the referees and lead to them sending off. Sometimes it gets to a point where coaches argue with referees. All these slow down the game. Video technology would make the game move faster than slow it down. It is a technological system and most problems have been addressed.
https://www.nairaland.com/1986327/it-time-video-technology-football[/b]

colossus2:


Bros shift abeg. So make referee dey watch replay all the time when something happen abi wetin
Match of 90mins go come be 4hours wen no be indian film.
Old mama go go market come back match go still dey on

Roland17:
Chelsea and their fake jersey...

Roland17:
Chelsea and their fake jersey...

franchizy:
I will commit suicide if chelsea draw or win this match. i hate chelsea with passion.
meanwhile undeserved goal

franchizy:
I will commit suicide if chelsea draw or win this match. i hate chelsea with passion.
meanwhile undeserved goal

franchizy:
I will commit suicide if chelsea draw or win this match. i hate chelsea with passion.
meanwhile undeserved goal

franchizy:
I will commit suicide if chelsea draw or win this match. i hate chelsea with passion.
meanwhile undeserved goal

thegoodjoehunt3:
Starting with shift abeg shows you put no thought behind your words. All major sports including basketball, lawn tennis, Ice Hockey etc use replay technology.

Do those games take four hours. There is a senior referee behind the cameras supported by quick technological replays and cameras to make more accurate decisions.

chimerase2:
Nna eh

thegoodjoehunt3:
[b]I will continue crying out for video technology. That is the only way to stop bias officiating.


It Is Time For Video Technology In Football

however one thing is true about it. The pros of video technology is more than the coins of it Almost all sports have embraced technology. Those sports have not lost its passion. The game gets interesting and intriguing with video technology.

Some people say that bias officiating favors all teams as time progresses. I do not see it this way. What statistical analysis was used to come up with this fact?

Every time poor officiating takes place, my mind goes back to why people feel the video technology will work against the greatness of the game. Due to poor officiating, we see players lose their tempers and take matters into their hands to hurt other players. Zuniga and Neymar incident at the World Cup comes to mind.

Some argue the video technology will take the powers off the referees hands. I wonder why that is the case. In video technology, there is going to be a referee behind the cameras who takes the final decision. That referees decision is final. Video technology will improve the accuracy of the referee's decision and helps his final judgment. It would not undermine the referee but improve the referee's decision.

The argument that replays will slow down the game is another flawed argument. If we want the game moving along, why add fouls. Every foul in the frame slows down the game. Without video technology, we have cases where players have walked out of the pitch and refused to play. For instance, the game between France and Portugal at the European Cup of nation in 2000. A video technological decision would have saved this. Sometimes players decent the referees and lead to them sending off. Sometimes it gets to a point where coaches argue with referees. All these slow down the game. Video technology would make the game move faster than slow it down. It is a technological system and most problems have been addressed.
https://www.nairaland.com/1986327/it-time-video-technology-football[/b]