VickyyB:

None is going to be raped.
I can attest that if they both dress like that in an outing, nothing will happen.
A perverted man would rape any of them if 'either' get into his bait.

chibwike:
Lol...you said men re the once corrupting as day goes on...ok what would you say bout prosituttes.

5minsmadness:

Pls lets be honest abeg.
Which of them dressing like this ALL THE TIME is most likely going to get raped?

VickyyB:

Prostitute objectify themselves as a commercial sex workers.
Their work is to be sexed and paid for/on.
So, don't compare them with other girls.

MizMyColi:

---

Lol, and to think I'd wanted speaking with you, one on one on the Dos and Donts in that world.....*facepalm*

I read thru' your blog and for a moment.....I questioned if blogging's my calling.
LoL


I'll share the addy as soon as I add more posts.
My exams are crippling me in a way.

I'll mail you tho'

UjSizzle:

If men can train themselves to notice a zillion and one things in a woman before her sexuality, I'm sure this rape menace will be reduced. Even if it takes seeing them as siblings to make it work at all.

Meanwhile, why is everything in this world highly sexualized? It's like humans have suddenly become walking intimacy gadgets

Seun:
I object to the terms "provocative" or "indecent" dressing, by the way. They are loaded with biased meaning. The term "skimpy" is better.

Seun:
The term "skimpy" is better.

Deehvahrzz:

Lemme ask Men that rape 3years old girls, was it
because of indecent dressing? If ur senses tell
you to force the lady dressed indecently, den u
nid to be delivered or taken to yaba left. If your
sister dresses in wat you see as indecent, wont u
tell konji to chill?
Let's all imagine our sisters, daughters victim of
rape Nd d guys says its cuz she was flashing her
bosoms. Am sure u will be d first to go for his
neck. Nothing justifies rape I tell you. Nd in every
10 girls, at least six have been raped. Let us all
not try to justify what has destroyed a lot of
people.
Working with rape victims open my eyes to a lot.
Pls let's say no To Molest. They turn our angels
to scared, timid ladies with no self esteem.

Seun:
I object to the terms "provocative" or "indecent" dressing, by the way. They are loaded with biased meaning. The term "skimpy" is better.

BuddhaPalm:


Our closest relatives, on the evolutionary tree, Chimps and Bonobos are hypersexed 5-star sluts.

So are we.

The only problem with cheating this, and cheating that is that we haven't fully come to terms with the true nature of human sexuality.

Not so long ago 'experts' still held that women had absolutely no sex drives. As in ZERO.


Up till the 19th century, do you know what happened to women suffering from sexual frustration? They were diagnosed with a disease! A disease, yes. They called it hysteria.

What was the treatment? Massaging the genitals to órgasm.

The vibrator was eventually invented by a doctor for the treatment of hysterics...because the number of women who suffer from hysteria - and required repeated 'treatment' were just overwhelming for doctors .

Socially, we only adopted a concept like monogamy to maintain order. But monogamy itself is an aberration in nature.

You can read more about hysteria here.

MizMyColi:
The Long and Short is No!

Nothing justifies rape, nothing.

@Seun, I quite disagree with you.

Her question doesn't seem silly, not from where I'm sitting tho'........

Agree or not, there are people out there who believe that a lady who wore hot mini and half top, walking past Ojuelegba bridge at about 7:30pm yesterday and was gang raped got exactly what she deserved......more like she got served!

Yes, there are people with such low thinking out there.

Depending on the outcome of this thread, I think it's a way of educating people, especially the uninformed among us (on this subject).

Irrespective of people's actions and inactions.....the change we direly need ought to start from us.

It begins with our thought process(es).

Good one, Kachisbarbie

GSKing:



Its so unfortunate that this is your view.

How do you mean? What's unfortunate about my view?

I don't quite follow
Is that what you feel/think I'm saying or did I expressly say that anywhere on this thead?

It doesn't matter what any females puts on on the streets... be it a monokini or bikini... rape isn't justified.


If ever there is an excuse to justify rape, no judge should accept "indecent dressing" as a reason.

Objectifying the body should stop, everyone should wear what she's comfortable in without worrying about some rapist stalking their lives.

How does this differ from what I've been saying?

GSKing:



Its so unfortunate that this is your view. What you're saying is that boys will always be boys and girls should cover up their bodies so as not to provoke the animalistic tendencies in boys. In other words, the male libido should be tamed?

It doesn't matter what any females puts on on the streets... be it a monokini or bikini... rape isn't justified.

If ever there is an excuse to justify rape, no judge should accept "indecent dressing" as a reason.

Objectifying the body should stop, everyone should wear what she's comfortable in without worrying about some rapist stalking their lives.

BuddhaPalm:
^^^ Ahhh...wrong thread.

UjSizzle:

No we're not. I know about bonobonos and their hypersexuality, but most often than not, they serve bigger functions than reproduction for their community eg settling disputes, of which the human population have courts.
So why again should we climb down the evolutionary ladder just because we think there's more fun down there?


Nice story
There's something wrong with the link though.

MizMyColi:


How do you mean? What's unfortunate about my view?


What you're saying is that boys will always be boys and girls should cover up their bodies so as not to provoke the animalistic tendencies in boys. In other words, the male libido should be tamed?

I don't quite follow
Is that what you feel/think I'm saying or did I expressly say that anywhere on this thead?




How does this differ from what I've been saying?

Kachisbarbie:


I think both of you're said the same thing. #confused

yinkuscious:
indecent is "indecent", since everyone knows what the generally accepted standard is. Skimpy is also indecency.

5minsmadness:

Abeg direct me to the thread where u guys r discussing this plssssss

BuddhaPalm:


My brother, there's really no genarally accepted standard.

A little over 100 years ago, women in the east walked about bare breasted - and it wasn't considered indecency. Why would it be indecent now?

My very own grandmother said they ran into the bush whenever the whites wanted to give them clothes.

yinkuscious:
this is the 21st century, where semi-unclothedness or total unclothedness is tagged as "madness"

BuddhaPalm:


By who?

Its all shifting sands bro...