eistien:
WRONG

sucess001:



Ok. But why do u think so?

eistien:

Why should the child be enjoying the flavour of the dad?

undercat:
Irrelevant.

When he suckles her nobody looks at it in a sexual light. This is no different.

undercat:
Irrelevant.

When he suckles her nobody looks at it in a sexual light. This is no different.

zeb04:
They are just having fun

brito:




Chaiii! you bad

EfemenaXY:
Gross.

sucess001:



He nids to suckle to feed...but dis? To what end?

undercat:


They are bonding. Look at the joy on the kids face. I think that is the purpose of the tongue kiss.

KELVINXY:
Anyone that thinks this is wrong is just dirty minded
#change your mind set

striktlymi:


I share your sentiments!

I don't see anything wrong with it, except maybe there is a medical reason not to do it.

KELVINXY:
Anyone that thinks this is wrong is just dirty minded
#change your mind set

EfemenaXY:


That's a horrible way to bond.

Would you still have this opinion if the pic was of father and daughter?

Anyway, humans are better than this. Only dogs, cats, and cows need their tongues to bond with their offspring.

bebe2:


i think its wrong, not becos of anything sexual,

but becos of bacteria that mum n son are busy distributing to each other.

undercat:


It's horrible for you.

I would still say the same thing, no matter which gender of parent or child is involved.

The child obviously cannot have sexual intentions. If the parents doesn't either, nothing is wrong with this.