One of the major gains or innovations supposedly introduced by the card readers is the purported electronic recording of accreditations which is so envisaged to stop the inflation of votes after voting has ended. During the test run of the card readers and its abysmal failure across the states.INEC has proposed the use of the incidents forms, in cases where the person's PVC is read to be authentic but the finger print is not captured by the card readers.

My questions now is" are the figures for those who will use the incident forms be also be captured by the card readers"? if No has then does the card readers stop the inflation of votes ?

Since obviously we shall have two modes of accreditations i.e the card readers and the incident forms.Will the figures for the incident form voters be manually inputted into the card readers? any INEC official or corper to shed more light on this

No one gives a fvcvk about your questions, old man.

Old man go and sit down jor

Segeggs:
No one gives a fvcvk about your questions, old man.

interesting

you know i didnt even see your comment before writing mine

There will be the need for the incident form when the PVC is adjudged authentic, belongs to the polling unit but the card reader couldn't capture the owner's thumb print accurately. Every PVCs must pass through the card reader before voting can be initiated. Those PVCs that are successfully captured will be recorded as dully accredited in the card reader as "success". However PVCs whose thumb couldn't be captured but has passed through card reader screening and adjudged to belong to the polling unit with correct passport of the bearer will as well be recorded as accredited, but will be termed "failure".

Thus, the incident form will be filled for every failure accreditation on the card reader explaining the reasons why the card reader couldn't capture the finger print of the voter (e.g. a disable without fingers). As a check and balance, the total number of incident forms filled must correlate to the total number of failure accreditation on card reader.

I hope that answer your question.

Most universities and other higher institutions of learning in the SE are in session and writing their exams through this week and next week.

Atleast 70% of them will not have time to participate in the presidential election voting process,as they will be busy too busy with their studies.

Why did GEJ allow this to be, he is going to need all the votes he can get from SE. The universities and other citadels of learning in the East should have be forced to go on one week compulsory break,to allow the students vote.

How can GEJ and his hordes of advisers be this careless.

Leyelyzo:
There will be the need for the incident form when the PVC is adjudged authentic, belongs to the polling unit but the card reader couldn't capture the owner's thumb print accurately. Every PVCs must pass through the card reader before voting can be initiated. Those PVCs that are successfully captured will be recorded as dully accredited in the card reader as "success". However PVCs whose thumb couldn't be captured but has passed through card reader screening and adjudged to belong to the polling unit with correct passport of the bearer will as well be recorded as accredited, but will be termed "failure".

Thus, the incident form will be filled for every failure accreditation on the card reader explaining the reasons why the card reader couldn't capture the finger print of the voter (e.g. a disable without fingers). As a check and balance, the total number of incident forms filled must correlate to the total number of failure accreditation on card reader.

I hope that answer your question.

you try my brother

agabusta:
Old man go and sit down jor

olodo is that how you talk to your grandfather? you kids of nowadays

Segeggs:
No one gives a fvcvk about your questions, old man.

mumu after you will come out and shout rigging after the illiterate General has already been defeated