Lord have mercy! http://www.bummyla.com

mutter:
The man had a right to divorce her. The purpose of marriage is procreation.
It was really evil to tie a man up so long and waste his money. .

the purpose of marriage is procreation??

charlsecy:

As much as pictures may be welcome, I don't think pictures are of real significance as to whether or not the story is true.
The scenario is not out of this world.

Check the constitution of your church well. The relationship between the man and the woman doesn't fit a real marriage; what the church did was to cancel the union between the man and the woman. There was no marriage for divorce to take place because what happened between the couple in the first instance was only a ceremony, not a marriage. It is up to the husband to determine what to do.

I have a question for you; assuming you're a man and you met another man who had transformed himself into a woman through surgery. You took "her" to the altar and you two made a marital vow for "better for worse." When you found out the truth, would you continue the "marriage" since it is "for better for worse?"


The husband may have forgiven her, but that shouldn't stop the union from being annulled. Please be informed that what happened between the man and woman on the "wedding" day was merely a ceremony, not a marriage. It is up to the husband to determine what to do.

That clause may be applicable if the marriage was entered into by the 2 parties in good faith. Do you think the relationship between the couple was a true marriage? It is up to the husband to determine what to do.

[color=#006600][/color]

Thumbs up to you your analysis was incisive and thought provoking.Not like some analysts who are abusive on NL simply because they don't agree with your opinion.