https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJ2sx0kc7ZU

Another example of Christians eating human flesh

What causes christians to eat the flesh of man

Christian Militias In The CAR Give Muslims A Choice: Convert Or Die
http://www.mintpressnews.com/christian-militias-in-the-car-give-muslims-a-choice-convert-or-die/208491/

The scripture does not support any of this act, the disciples do not force anyone to convert, the disciples die for their faith. Acting contrary to this is sin against God.

Surah 8:67:
“It is not for any prophet to have
captives until he hath made
slaughter in the land. Ye desire the
lure of this world and Allah desireth
(for you) the Hereafter, and Allah is
Mighty, Wise.” (Pickthall)

Surah 5:33: The only reward of those
who make war upon Allah and His
messenger and strive after corruption
in the land will be that they will be
killed or crucified, or have their
hands and feet on alternate sides
cut off, or will be expelled out of the
land. Such will be their degradation
in the world, and in the Hereafter
theirs is an awful doom. (Pickthall)
Sahih Muslim, Book 38, Number 4359:
Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: The
verse “The punishment of those
who wage war against Allah and
His Apostle, and strive with might
and main for mischief through the
land is execution, or crucifixion, or
the cutting off of hands and feet
from opposite side or exile from the
land…most merciful” was revealed
about polytheists. If any of them
repents before they are arrested, it
does not prevent from inflicting on
him the prescribed punishment
which he deserves.

malvisguy212:
The scripture does not support any of this act, the disciples do not force anyone to convert, the disciples die for their faith. Acting contrary to this is sin against God.

Surah 8:67:
“It is not for any prophet to have
captives until he hath made
slaughter in the land. Ye desire the
lure of this world and Allah desireth
(for you) the Hereafter, and Allah is
Mighty, Wise.” (Pickthall)

Surah 5:33: The only reward of those
who make war upon Allah and His
messenger and strive after corruption
in the land will be that they will be
killed or crucified, or have their
hands and feet on alternate sides
cut off, or will be expelled out of the
land. Such will be their degradation
in the world, and in the Hereafter
theirs is an awful doom. (Pickthall)
Sahih Muslim, Book 38, Number 4359:
Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: The
verse “The punishment of those
who wage war against Allah and
His Apostle, and strive with might
and main for mischief through the
land is execution, or crucifixion, or
the cutting off of hands and feet
from opposite side or exile from the
land…most merciful” was revealed
about polytheists. If any of them
repents before they are arrested, it
does not prevent from inflicting on
him the prescribed punishment
which he deserves.

nonsense! all forms of barbarism including cannibalism are rife in your bible

That is one very angry man.... pushed to the wall.

this is what religion and religious violence is turning the world to a place filled with angry people waiting to do damage and get revenge.

He missed the whole love your enemy thingy I keep hearing about

johnydon22:
This is disturbing... he is even been hailed as a hero by fellow christians for eating a raw human flesh... But the muslims did some real bad horrible thing to the guy too.. they murdered his wife and sister and cut his baby into two thats terrible

Not only in the CAR bro,it happened in adamawa in 2012....got some guys here who said the spirit of the one killed is weakened as they do this .i mean both muslims and the christians who are not real christian

The main issue is islam ;bringing men to an animalistic state

hockeyoilers:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJ2sx0kc7ZU

Another example of Christians eating human flesh

Who is a Christian ?

It is someone who believes in Christ and behaves like Him. Where did you see Jesus eating human flesh. Where did you see Jesus killed anybody?

The man you saw in the video is not a Christian by Bible standard.

malvisguy212:
The scripture does not support any of this act, the disciples do not force anyone to convert, the disciples die for their faith. Acting contrary to this is sin against God

I can relate to how this young man must have felt concerning the tragedy that beset him
however the scripture does not support his heinous act of retaliation.

The scripture in Deuteronomy 32:35 and Romans 12:19, states God, saying vengence and recompense is His
and frowns on the way he went about getting assistance in his time of worst nightmare
and manner of getting relieved of the trauma and emotional distress caused by the sad event

Vengeance is mine, and recompense, for the time when their foot shall slip;
for the day of their calamity is at hand, and their doom comes swiftly.’
- Deuteronomy 32:35

Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath:
for it is written, Vengeance is mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
- Romans 12:19

The biblical people of Antioch will have a hard time recognising this chap and the amulet-arm-strapped fellows as ''christians''

He made matters worse by even picking on a defenceless, innocent, minding his own business Muslim

malvisguy212:
Surah 8:67:
“It is not for any prophet to have captives until he hath made slaughter in the land. Ye desire the lure of this world and Allah desireth(for you) the Hereafter, and Allah is Mighty, Wise.” (Pickthall)

Surah 5:33: The only reward of those who make war upon Allah and His messenger and strive after corruption in the land will be that they will be
killed or crucified, or have their hands and feet on alternate sides cut off, or will be expelled out of the land. Such will be their degradation in the world, and in the Hereafter theirs is an awful doom. (Pickthall)

Sahih Muslim, Book 38, Number 4359:Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: The verse “The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Apostle, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite side or exile from the land…most merciful” was revealed about polytheists. If any of them repents before they are arrested, it does not prevent from inflicting on him the prescribed punishment which he deserves

I wouldnt bother retaliating with tit for tat responses like this one brother

http://newsrescue.com/birom-christians-eat-roasted-flesh-of-muslims-they-killed-in-jos-nigeria/

Nigerian christians dining on the flesh of Muslims.

truthman2012:
Who is a Christian?

Beyonce clsaims to be a christian, Obama claims to be a christian, the Pope is a christian, Dbanj is a christian, the list-goes-on-and-you-get-the-drift is a christian

truthman2012:
It is someone who believes in Christ and behaves like Him.

The bible doesnt anywhere say a Christian is someone who believes in Christ and behaves like Him
The bible never called disciples, nver called any of the Apostles, never called saints etcetera christians

truthman2012:
Where did you see Jesus eating human flesh. Where did you see Jesus killed anybody?

He must have misunderstood what the Eucharist or Holy communion is about

truthman2012:
The man you saw in the video is not a Christian by Bible standard.

The man seen in the video lost the plot

The man and any other person(s) eating fellow human being(s) have barely sufficient theology
and truly dont have enough knowledge of what Jesus Christ would have done in such a situation as the one they must have experienced

Not only are they christians they are in a Christian militia

MuttleyLaff:


The bible doesnt anywhere say a Christian is someone who believes in Christ and behaves like Him
The bible never called disciples, nver called any of the Apostles, never called saints etcetera christians

Act 11:26 And when he had found him, he brought him unto Antioch. And it came to pass, that a whole year they assembled themselves with the church, and taught much people. And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch.

Act_26:28 Then Agrippa said unto Paul, Almost thou persuadest me to be a Christian.

1Pe_4:16 Yet if any man suffer as a Christian, let him not be ashamed; but let him glorify God on this behalf.



G5546

Χριστιανός
Christianos
khris-tee-an-os'
From G5547; a Christian, that is, follower of Christ: - Christian.
Total KJV occurrences: 3

It is unfair to judge all by the action of a few. I would assume 99.99% of all Christians would abhor this behaviour. We must not tar everyone with the same brush for the actions of a few, this goes for all religions and race/culture

MuttleyLaff:
Beyonce clsaims to be a christian, Obama claims to be a christian, the Pope is a christian, Dbanj is a christian, the list-goes-on-and-you-get-the-drift is a christian

The bible doesnt anywhere say a Christian is someone who believes in Christ and behaves like Him
The bible never called disciples, never called any of the Apostles, never called saints etcetera christians

johnw74:
Act 11:26 And when he had found him, he brought him unto Antioch. And it came to pass, that a whole year they assembled themselves with the church, and taught much people. And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch.

Act_26:28 Then Agrippa said unto Paul, Almost thou persuadest me to be a Christian.

1Pe_4:16 Yet if any man suffer as a Christian, let him not be ashamed; but let him glorify God on this behalf.

G5546

Χριστιανός
Christianos
khris-tee-an-os'
From G5547; a Christian, that is, follower of Christ: - Christian.
Total KJV occurrences: 3

SMH

The bible clearly endorses Jesus as the Christ and tells what Christ means.
Christ means the Promised One, the Messiah or literally translated the ''Anointed One''

The word Christian, is legacy nickname for the disciples invented by the residents of Antioch

Tacitus was a senator and a historian of the Roman Empire, who once wrote: ''Those who were vulgarly known by the name of Christians''

Peter saying suffer as a Christian is not implying, or saying the early christians and apostles called themselves christians

On another when I posted that the early christians and apostles never called themselves christians,
someone counter-posted with:
Just a point of correction, Well i actually think that the reverse might be the case. As we can see from the following verse of scripture (sic)
putting forward 1 Peter 4:16 as evidence that early christians and apostles called themselves christians

Well, context is king, which is referring to 1 Peter 4:15-16 and keeping to Peter's train of thought in the verses
Now, johnw74, please honestly answer these questions:
If I say:
johnw74, of course, you shouldnt suffer for being a murderer, thief, criminal, or troublemaker
but if you suffer as a nigger, dont be ashamed; but glorify God that you bear this name.

Am I then calling you johnw74 a nigger?
Did I call you johnw74 a nigger?
Would a sane fellow black man call you a nigger?
Would you johnw74 call yourself a nigger?
Would you johnw74 answer back to being called a nigger?
What kind of person would want to call you a nigger?
Why would anyone/someone want to make you suffer as a nigger?

As earlier and all along insinuated, just like the term nigger, an anti-Black word, was created by the world (e.g. white supremacists, racists, slave owners etcetra)
from bastardizing the word niger (i.e. niger being used before the Slavery era to describe a black man or as used in Acts 13:1 for one of the disciple of Jesus)
and then used as nickname in a derogatory manner in reference to the black man
so the term Christian, an anti/gainst-Christ word, was created by the world (e.g. Jewish community Antioch residents, King Agrippa, heathens, non-believers etcetera)
and used as nicknames in a derogatory, contemptuous ridicule or mockery manner in reference to believer-disciples of Jesus

Now there were in the congregation {Gr. ekklesia – called out ones} that was at Antioch prophets and teachers:
Barnabas and Simeon that was called Niger
and Lucius of Cyrene and Manaen, who had been brought up with Herod the tetrarch, and Saul
- Acts 13:1

From the earliest usage of the word Christian, it was a term used by the Jewish community Antioch residents, King Agrippa etcetera for the early disciples
The name originated with unbelievers who despised the early disciples or true believers
and it carried with it a strong public condemnation, dislike, contempt and rejection for all that disciples are, what the disciples represent and what the aim of the disciples as in Matthew 28:19a is about

Therefore having gone, disciple all the nations, baptizing them
- Matthew 28:19a

Paul was willing to put into practice Matthew 28:19a
and especially pleased to have an opportunity of preaching the gospel to kings and rulers.
Discipling King Agrippa was exactly what Paul was doing when he tried to teach, instruct
and help King Agrippa to progressively to know about and learn the Word of God to become a matured, growing disciple

Paul tried to intimate King Agrippa in the truths of Scripture and the lifestyle required
but King Agrippa in Acts 26:28, wouldn't have any of that, so the king threw the gospel et al, back in Paul's face
and made the infamous sarcastic and disdained comment that Paul wants to turn him into a christian

That King Agrippa's comment in Acts 26:28, to Paul, was spoken and meant to be unflattering, unkind, insulting, disrespectful and demeaning, the same way the word nigger is meant to be when used

Agrippa answered, ''In brief, you are doing your best to persuade me to become a Christian''
- Acts 26:28

A christian is a follower of the religion of Christ,
- this is a world’s point of view,
and it's a misperception or misinterpretation of who a believer, disciple, saint, son of God, or who a called-out-one is

Believers themselves, just as with no denomination (e.g. Catholic, Methodist, Baptist, Celestial, RCCG, Christ Embassy, JW etcetera), know they have no religion
and that what they, believers, have, is a relationship with the Godhead,
- a relationship centrally and/or particurlarly with God, the Father,
and the relationship is grounded with/in Love, bonded with Faith and Grace

Believers, if pressed for a religion, might succumb to the label ''christian'',
if not chanced or ready to properly educate others about the ''christian'' tag

Bottom line, if care is not taken to properly understand and be right about little easy, peasy truths such as about the ''christian'' label,
then how are we going to fare when confronted with heavier, larger or difficult truths?
- like the label wasnt even ''christian'' to start with

I'll leave you with 1 Peter 4:15-16 verses to stew and ponder on towards accepting and admitting that Peter NEVER called anyone christian in 1 Peter 4:16

Instead of all these your 3 non applicable verses slash wuru-wuru to the answer tactics, I sincerely hope you look at the original text and see how it originally reads, as it will help you re-structure your thinking on this issue.