Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,150,118 members, 7,807,375 topics. Date: Wednesday, 24 April 2024 at 12:52 PM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Religion / Can A Christian Divorce And Remarry? (1333 Views)
Prophet Samuel Kayode Abiara To Remarry At 75 / According To The Bible Is There Any Difference Between Divorce And Separation? / Pastor Chris Oyakhilome Plans To Remarry As Anita Reverts To Maiden Name-ThisDay (2) (3) (4)
Can A Christian Divorce And Remarry? by Nogodye(m): 10:23am On May 22, 2016 |
The subject of divorce and remarriage is one of
the most tendentious issues in Christianity.
Nothing inflames passions more. In his discourse
on divorce and remarriage in Matthew 5 &
Matthew 19, Jesus made specific references to the
law of Moses. The Pharisees did too. Therefore a
disquisition on divorce and remarriage without a
historical perspective will be most remiss.
In Matthew 5 we see Jesus focus attention on the
abuse of the proviso on divorce in the law of
Moses. By this time the people had perfected the
abuse of the divorce clause. God had designed this
wonderful program called “marriage.” A critical
component of that program is airtight
commitment. Knowing the Israelites however–
these were a very hardened lot, God allowed
Moses to provide for an escape clause. And so
Moses inserted a divorce clause into the law. This
wasn’t part of the original plan. (Matthew 19:8
MSG) You will find that escape clause in
Deuteronomy 24:1-4. The society being a
patriarchy, the clause naturally leaned towards the
man. The man could give his wife a bill of
divorcement but no such provision was made for
the woman: “If a man marries a woman and she
does not please him because he has found
something offensive in her, then he may draw up a
divorce document and give it to her, and evict her
from his house.” The word “offensive” in that
passage is the Hebrew phrase ‘ervat davar. It
refers in context to gross sexual impropriety,
though it ordinarily refers to indecent exposure of
genitals, like sending a nude pix to someone. Can
also refer to adultery.
Now, under the divorce clause remarriage was
feasible. Another man could marry the woman.
The law states that if the second husband has an
issue with her he can also divorce her, only that
the first husband cannot remarry her. There is no
Elizabeth Taylor/Richard Burton reprise under the
law of Moses. No marital musical chairs.
But it soon became clear the Jews had other
ideas. They turned the law on its head and began
to abuse the divorce clause. They whimsically got
rid of their faithful wives, just to make room for a
new wife. There was also serial cheating. And on
top of that, wife abuse. It’s what prompted
Prophet Malachi to write: “Be attentive, then, to
your own spirit, for one should not be disloyal to
the wife he took in his youth. “I hate divorce,”
says the Lord God of Israel, “and the one who is
guilty of violence,” says the Lord who rules over
all. “Pay attention to your conscience, and do not
be unfaithful.” (Malachi 2:15-16 NET) So we see
God appealing to the sense of nobility of the men.
There are varied interpretations of this passage
because of its figurative expression. The literal
translation reads: “For I hate sending away, saith
Jehovah, God of Israel, And he hath covered
violence with his clothing, said Jehovah of
Hosts.” (Malachi 2:16 YLT98) The Hebrew word
rendered clothing is Kasah. It means to conceal,
to keep secret. The word used for violence is
Chamas. It means violence, oppression,
wickedness, wrong. The New Century Version (NCV)
actually reads: “The Lord God of Israel says, “I
hate divorce. And I hate people who do cruel
things as easily as they put on clothes,” says the
Lord All-Powerful. So be careful, do not break
your trust.” The true interpretation is perhaps in
the words of Jesus: “Too many of you are using it
(the law) as a cover for selfishness and whim,
pretending to be righteous just because you’re
‘legal.’ Please, no more pretending.”
1. The only ground for divorce under Mosaic law is
unfaithfulness. (Deuteronomy 24:1-4) What the
Jews did was to ignore the body of the law and
concentrate on the process of divorce – the
service of papers. It’s why Jesus said, “It was said,
‘Whoever divorces his wife must give her a legal
document.’ But I say to you that everyone who
divorces his wife, except for immorality, makes her
commit adultery and whoever marries a divorced
woman commits adultery.” (Matthew 5:31-32 NET)
Jesus essentially returned the people to the
original provision of the law, laying out
implications of non-compliance. Where there’s
infringement, all the men involved in the value
chain become liable for adultery. (Matthew
5:31-32 NET) They automatically become guilty of
that which was circumvented – adultery. The old
husband is facilitator, the new husband accessory
after the fact but treated as joint principal. You
can see the problem Jesus has is the cultural
conspiracy of the men in society in their creative
avoidance of compliance with the law, the
chauvinistic hypocrisy of society. He was going
after the men, as well as the Pharisees who
devised the legal editing. Don’t forget before all
this he had expanded the definition of adultery to
include lust. (Matthew 5:28) It was aimed at men.
By his extensions, men can be properly guilty of
adultery in Jewish society, not just women. The
definition of adultery under the Ten
Commandments had strangely been restricted to
women. (Cf. Exodus 20:14) Remember the story of
the woman caught in adultery? The man who slept
with her was never accused, just the woman. The
woman somehow committed adultery with herself.
And now you understand why Jesus said, Let him
that is without sin among you cast the first stone.
All of you are guilty of adultery he was saying. In
the story of the woman caught in adultery we see
Jesus separate guilt from punishment. Where are
your accusers, Jesus asked. (John 8:10) If there’s
no charge there can be no condemnation. No
wonder the Bible says who can bring a charge or
accusation against God’s elect. (Romans 8:33) No
wonder the Bible says there’s no condemnation
against us. (Romans 8:1) There is NO CHARGE! The
woman caught in adultery was a pointer to grace.
The law accuses but grace nullifies the charge.
But the spirit of that perverse misogyny is still
present with us today. It’s in the church. Have
you noticed women are guilty of wearing trousers
to entice the men but the men are not guilty of
looking at a woman’s backside during church
service?
The preceding is the historical context that gives
us an understanding of the hard stance of Jesus
on the issue of divorce. He was addressing abuse
of Mosaic Law. He was returning the people to the
original law, correcting the bastardisation. He was
restoring the law. But the essence of his teaching
was, marriage is about commitment. Airtight
commitment.
But then Jesus made an interesting statement.
When he laid down the gauntlet on divorce, even
his disciples despaired. They feared being locked
down in marriage. Jesus said: “Not everyone is
mature enough to live a married life. It requires a
certain aptitude and grace.” (Matthew 19:11 MSG)
It is this aptitude and grace Paul was referring to
when he wrote the Corinthians, “Celibacy is not
for everyone any more than marriage is God gives
the gift of the single life to some, the gift of the
married life to the others.” (1 Corinthians 7:7
MSG) Paul was a eunuch. Jesus identified three
types of eunuchism – congenital eunuchism, non-
elective eunuchism, discretionary eunuchism:
“There are eunuchs who have been born incapable
of marriage (congenital); and there are eunuchs
who have been made so by men (non-elective);
and there are eunuchs who have made themselves
incapable of marriage for the sake of the kingdom
of heaven (discretionary).” (Matthew 19:12 AMP)
Paul arguably fell into the last category. He was
celibate for the kingdom.
Unfortunately the Corinthian Christians admired
Paul so much they began to desire celibacy too.
They saw marriage as a “step down.” (1
Corinthians 7:36-38 MSG) The married ones
wanted divorce, some going into technical celibacy
by abstaining from sex in marriage. Which is why
Paul wrote that abstinence from sex in a marriage
can only be by mutual agreement, and only for
the purposes of prayer and fasting. (1 Corinthians
7:2-6 MSG) He then instructed that a wife must
not leave her husband and if she does, then she
must remain single, or else be reconciled back to
her husband. And the man cannot put away his
wife. (1 Corinthians 7:10-11) Paul would go on to
proffer answers to different scenarios presented,
including marriage after widowhood and celibate
virginity. The desire for celibacy is why the
Corinthians asked Paul, “Is it a good thing to have
sexual relations?” So we see the contexts in which
Jesus and Paul spoke about divorce.
BUT, suppose a Christian is in an abusive marriage,
be it emotional or physical abuse, or his or her life
is threatened – can he or she divorce? Truth is,
neither our Lord nor Paul addressed these
challenges since their discourse was limited to
specific issues. Jesus addressed abuse of divorce
clause under Mosaic law, Paul addressed celibacy
and divorce. What provision of scriptures then
governs these scenarios? The legalist will of
course insist the teaching of Jesus makes no room
for divorce whatsoever, except for adultery. But
we’re “not ministers of the letter (of legally
written code) but of the Spirit; for the code of the
Law kills, but the Holy Spirit makes alive.” (2
Corinthians 3:6 AMP) When pressed however, some
legalists concede a Christian can leave a life-
threatening marriage. Yet going by strict legalism
Jesus never made such exception. How
inconsistent then for the legalist to “approve”
divorce on non-legal grounds in one instance, yet
deny divorce on non-legal grounds in other
instants. It’s even presumptuous.
Jesus enunciated the principle of compassionate
pragmatism in one of his encounters with the
Pharisees. The phrase he used was, the “greater
matter of the law” – “Woe unto you, scribes and
Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and
anise and cummin, and have omitted the
weightier, more important matters of the law,
judgment, mercy and faith: these ought ye to
have done, and not leave the other
undone.” (Matthew 23:23 KJV) A forensic devotion
to the letter of the law that ignores the principles
of justice, fairness, mercy, compassion and loyalty
is the theological equivalence of filtering a gnat
but swallowing a camel. (Matthew 23:24) These
principles are greater than legalistic adherence,
Jesus was saying. If we legalistically insist a man
or woman must stay in an emotionally ruinous or
abusive marriage where then is mercy? And where
is justice? Where is compassion? Where is fairness?
It’s the demonstration of these higher principles
that made Jesus break the law of the Sabbath on
several occasions. (Cf. Luke 14: 1-6) He is after all
the Lord of the Sabbath. (Matthew 12: He is
greater than the law, above the law, he being the
author. He can exercise sovereign power over the
law. He has discretionary latitude, which he often
exercised for compassion. Which was why he
healed a certain man on the Sabbath with this
justification: “Which of you, having a son or a
donkey or an ox that has fallen into a well, will not
at once pull him out on the Sabbath day?” (Luke
14: 5) Surely a child of God is greater than a
donkey or a horse. (Matthew 12:12) Shouldn’t a
Christian then be rescued from the pit of a terrible
marriage and the black hole of depression?
Shouldn’t a Christian be saved from certain
death? The compassionate pragmatism of Jesus
overwrites the legalism of the law. Jesus the
prophecy says, “will not crush the weakest reed
or put out a flickering candle. He will bring justice
to all who have been wronged.” (Isaiah 42:3 NLT)
The idea God will insist a Christian remain in an
emotionally ruinous or unjust marriage CANNOT
be a revelation of the spirit of Christ. Depression
CANNOT be God’s will for his child. Jesus died to
save us from depression. (Isaiah 53:4) How does
mental illness or premature death glorify God?
Our jaundiced legalism and lack of compassion has
sent many to mental asylums, ruined wonderful
lives and frustrated the purposes of God. Some
have died. Jesus came to proclaim liberty to the
captives, and good tidings to the afflicted. (Isaiah
61:1) Marriage as bondage is antithetical to the
will of God.
There are those of course who say that a spouse
must endure abuse and ask for grace to bear it.
But that’s perversity. In the Old Testament cruelty
to animals was forbidden. (Deuteronomy 22:6,
25:4) How is it then that the abuse of a human
qualifies as trial of faith? The Bible says, “A good
man regards the life of his beast: but the tender
mercies of the wicked are cruel.” (Proverbs 12:10)
Surely those who advocate this strange grace are
wicked people.
But, does this then mean people can go in and out
of marriage willy-nilly? Of course not! That’s
abuse of grace. Can a Christian remarry after
divorce? Even under the law of Moses a divorcee
could remarry. Why force a man or a woman into
non-elective eunuchism?
It is important though to keep in mind the
essence of the teaching of Jesus – loving airtight
commitment. Those who are married should pay
heed. They ought to be fanatically devoted to this
principle. 1 Like |
Re: Can A Christian Divorce And Remarry? by misreal(m): 10:36am On May 22, 2016 |
just passing |
Re: Can A Christian Divorce And Remarry? by achinaboy(m): 11:47am On May 22, 2016 |
we have bible already, so we don't need this long epistle |
Re: Can A Christian Divorce And Remarry? by Kobojunkie: 5:47am On Jun 02, 2021 |
Nogodye:Interesting excuse given there for rejecting the very commandment of God. So, we know from Jesus Christ Himself that the Word of God is the Spirit of Truth, of God. By rejecting the Word of God, you also reject the Truth of God. So what Spirit is it that you suppose enables you to doing just that? Certainly not one that is of God. |
Re: Can A Christian Divorce And Remarry? by Kobojunkie: 8:52pm On Jun 02, 2021 |
Nogodye:The idea that God will insist a Christian remain in an emotionally ruinous or unjust marriage? Are you speaking here of the same God of Hosea? You are trying to make an emotional argument where it isn't necessary. It is a choice to be a follower of Jesus Christ, one who submits to and obeys the teachings and commandments of God. Those who make the choice to follow Him, know that obedience is the key to this relationship and to obtaining anything from Him. In the case of marriage and divorce, well, Jesus Christ made it clear that divorce on any other grounds other than fornication is a Sin. So, He leaves it up to the decision to the individual as to whether to sin against His God or not. It is after all the individual who bares the consequences of said sin, not your groups or churches. |
Re: Can A Christian Divorce And Remarry? by 1Sharon(f): 9:03pm On Jun 02, 2021 |
Christians can do whatever they want and ask God for forgiveness |
(1) (Reply)
Is It Advisable For A Christian Lady To Propose To A Man? / Imam Who Hated Christians Until Jesus Raised Him Up From The Dead / RCCG Declares 70 Days Fasting In 2018
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 43 |