KaptainAfrika:
No problem, just don't use the same fingers to type that corruption is Nigeria's problem. Unless you are benefiting from a senator, no Nigerian senator represents any interests apart from his own. Solve the problem diplomatically LOL! Then you will be complaining in silence. Okay, what will it take the comedy show called the senate, to confirm MAGU. Are they saying Buhari doesn't know who he is appointing?! Are they not in the same APC?.

tee4lowyeh:
It is so sad...Nigerians cant just see these legislators are the bane of our progress and democracy.

They are chief of thieves, sponsors of bokoharam and financiers of militancy. They are selfish and shallow; only thinking about themselves and family.

They are not only holding the executive to ransom but the entire country!

Imagine saying "Lets hear from Muhammadu Buhari on Magu's case, Magu is terrorising us, because we disqualified him", Sen. Francis Alimikhena who also supported the motion cited.

BUT WE KNOW REVERSE IS THE CASE! You disqualified Magu because your hands are DIRTY!!!

You have disqualified Magu, what else do you want? How does magu's case affect confirming the REC's

NB: The law allows Magu to keep serving in "acting" capacity.....

They had better move On...CORRUPTION MUST BE KILLED!

doctokwus:
Since 1999,no Nigerian president has been so toyed and disgraced,like a mentally challenged child,like Buhari.
Even as clueless and useless as d fisherman was as president,he showed a bit of bite,even when done shambolically,when d NASS tried teleguiding him.
I dont understand this Buhari again.Like someone once said,the problem he has that's incapacitating and seemingly paralysing his thought processes maynot be ordinary.It maybe spiritual,because even a dull president knows when to say enough is enough of d ridiculing by any NASS.

AngelicBeing:
+ they all deserve to be flogged , all APC national , state, local executive members + all federal ministers & commissioners + members of the economic team + everyone of them that crippled Nigeria as a nation + useless PDP that raped Nigeria for 16 years and handed over a raped child to APC , where is my cane

yarimo:
the senators are claiming that they have disqualified MAGU, constitutional the senate can only reject but not disqualify . Is like this sets of senators don't know much about the constitution

seguno2:


Is a confirmed thief not the president?

dlondonbadboy:
BUHARI can not disrespect our distinguished senators..This is not a military regime.

yarimo:
the senators are claiming that they have disqualified MAGU, constitutional the senate can only reject but not disqualify . Is like this sets of senators don't know much about the constitution

TheAdvocate:


Which Constitution?
Some who was rejected twice is tantamount to not just a disqualification but can be called by any name.

comos:


biased man,

can't you condemned your clueless APC without involving PDP

PDP raped Nigeria for 16 years without a condom + and gave birth to APC, and APC is currently raping the same Nigeria with a torn condom and what we have now is a country mixed with 2 blood and the result is confusion, one step forward 20 steps backward, deal with it , that is the truth

eph12:

Which means constitutionally there is no need for senate confirmation for any appointment by the executive right?

AngelicBeing:
PDP raped Nigeria for 16 months without a condom + and gave birth to APC, and APC is currently raping the same Nigeria with a torn condom and what we have now is a country mixed with 2 blood and the result is confusion, one step forward 20 steps backward, deal with it , that is the truth [/b]

yarimo:
there is different between REJECT and DISQUALIFY in the nigeria constitution

comos:


It is APC that destroyed Nigeria within 2yrs,

At least people were not committing suicide by jumping into the lagoon during PDP era

PDP 16 years without a condom + APC 2years with a torn condom = confused baby that needs special care from specialist, both parties are useless and deserves more flogging, where is my caneeeee

eph12:

What then is the implication if a nominated is rejected by the NA? Can the nominated still go ahead with the job? If yes then there was no need for the Senate confirmation in the first place.

yarimo:
the senators are claiming that they have disqualified MAGU, constitutional the senate can only reject but not disqualify . Is like this sets of senators don't know much about the constitution

toolovely:


and that poo you wrote there means you know the constitution more than them.

a president's role is to appoint which he has done, the senate is to confirm the appointment. if the senate rejects, then, the appointment stands null. its a two way thing the sole responsibility is not on the president alone.

AngelicBeing:
PDP 16 years without a condom + APC 2years with a torn condom = confused baby that needs special care from specialist, both parties are useless and deserves more flogging, where is my caneeeee

comos:


it seems i am talking to a teenager

You are a hungry kid, now crawl back to the hole you came from and buzz off, my last reply to you jobless kid that lacks comprehension, nonsense

freeze001:
At this rate, governance will simply grind to a halt because some conceited, self-important mofos have no respect for institutions. Mr President should quickly disengage Magu and appoint a new person please! Must it all go to he'll in a hand basket because of one person? Why is d presidency so hung up on Magu? Is there any special favour he's expected to execute?

The president erred in delaying sending Magu to the Senate for confirmation and now there are incriminating reports arising out of his engagement as Acting head of EFCC. There are more competent hands please!

dlondonbadboy:
BUHARI can not disrespect our distinguished senators..This is not a military regime.

rottennaija:


So that you will have some relief from the corruption campaign? More competent hands that senators and Governors can control?

yarimo:
number one problem of Nigeria is the constitution, the constitution need serious amendments

holysina:
I ain't supporting my president on this one. How can u keep some one in acting capacity for so long and allow him to show his power to the same ppl he is surposed to investigate before sending his name for confirmation, if na u , u go gree confirm am??. The mistake has been done abeg forward another person name sharperly make we move to another serious business

KaptainAfrika:
No problem, just don't use the same fingers to type that corruption is Nigeria's problem. Unless you are benefiting from a senator, no Nigerian senator represents any interests apart from his own. Solve the problem diplomatically LOL! Then you will be complaining in silence. Okay, what will it take the comedy show called the senate, to confirm MAGU. Are they saying Buhari doesn't know who he is appointing?! Are they not in the same APC?.

tete7000:


There is no bigger corruption that when you rubbish a democratic institution because of grudge you have against those in the office. What is at stake here is not integrity of Saraki as a person but integrity of the senate as an institution. When the executive encourages his appointee not to appear before the house, it is the image of that institution that is being dented. If a conflict arise between an individual and an institution, you don't expect the institution to bow to the whim of an individual. That denigrate the institution and set a bad precedence. They say you don't cut your nose to spite your face. Rather than Nigerians seeing individuals in the house, we better start seeing an institution that must not be allowed to be brought into disrepute. Buhari is gradually dragging Nigeria into chaos and anarchy. There are many people more qualify to head EFCC than Magu. Why turn Magu to a god? Let present another person for the office and move on. Enough of this charade called corruption war. It is turning to a circus show - dancing round a circle.

freeze001:


I cannot fathom how you think for some reason that Magu is indispensable or the only competent person in a country full of many professionals..who even told you Magu ever acted independently and without any influence? He is under the full control of the President more so in the time he hadn't been sent to the Senate for screening and confirmation. You can be sure he did everything to please his principal including turn blind eyes to petitions requiring the EFCC to investigate and prosecute some Ministers and the SGF so as to get sent for confirmation and enjoy the statutory tenure of a substantive chairman so why the fuss really? If (God forbid), Magu becomes incapacitated or even dies, will the EFCC not have a Chairman anymore? Will EFCC close up shop after Magu?

I don't want the corruption campaign to end but I want it to spread around properly an more impartially, none should be seen as sacred cows! It should not also be the only focus of the Presidency to the detriment of the Nigerian economy and well-being of he citizens.

rottennaija:


It's Magu we want. Senate can go to hell