JOINT POSITION PAPER BY THE AREWA CITIZENS ACTION FOR CHANGE, AREWA YOUTH CONSULTATIVE FORUM, AREWA YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION, ALL AREWA YOUTH FORUM, THE NORTHERN PROFESSIONALS BUSINESS GROUP, AREWA STUDENTS FORUM AND NORTHERN EMANCIPATION NETWORK ON THE IGBO PERSISTENCE FOR SECESSION
MAY 30, 2017

PREAMBLE
The persistence for the actualization of Biafra by the Igbo of South-Eastern Nigeria has lately assumed an alarming twist. The new dimension which involved the call for the forceful lockdown of activities and denying of the right to free movement recently in South-East by the rebellious Indeginous People of Biafra group is so disturbingly embarrassing that in our view, calls for a rethink. The latest action amounted to a brutal encroachment on the rights of those termed as non-indeginous people residing and doing lawful businesses in those areas illegally demarcated and defined as Biafra by the Igbo. Concerned by this ever-escalating threat, the above-named northern groups met at the end of which we came up with the following resolutions to be adopted as the position of the Northern Region :

OUR OBSERVATIONS
1. The Igbo people of the South-East, not repentant of the carnage it wrought on the nation in 1966, is today boldly reliving those sinister intentions connoted by the Biafran agitation that led to the very first bloody insurrection in Nigeria's history.

2. Emboldened by the apparent indifference of the Nigerian authorities, the Igbo secessionists tendency is widening in scope and action at every stage.

3. As the threat widens and affects other law-abiding people of other tribes and regions residing in or passing through the East, the Igbo leaders and elders by their utterances and direct action or inaction appear to support and encourage it.

3. While this intimidation and aggression persist and grow in dimension with each new move, leaders of the North whose people are at the receiving end of the threats appear helplessly unperturbed.

4. Rather than endorsing a concise framework for preemptive action to protect and safeguard the interest of the North and its people, leaders of the region at every stage tend to recline on a flimsy and long-discarded excuse of having fought a civil war in the 60s to keep Nigeria united.

6. Rather than pursuing a resolute action, the northern leaders have adopted and are dragging its people into a pitifully percifist and defeatist position in order to sustain an illusive national cohesion that has long been ridiculed by the Igbo and other sections of the country.


OUR STAND
1. At this point we call the attention of the Nigerian authorities to the fact that the North, a critical player in the federal arrangement is no longer disposed to tolerating further Igbo blackmail and intimidation.

2. In this respect, it is our considered view that rather than the Igbo continuing to hold the whole country to ransom, they should be allowed to go their own way.

3. It is on record that the Igbo has done more damage to our collective nationhood than any other ethnic group in Nigeria:
a. The Igbo was responsible for the very first violent interference with democracy in Nigeria resulting in a prolonged counter productive chain of military dictatorship.
b. The Igbo was responsible for the first and so far, only civil war in Nigeria that coated millions of lives and sowed the seed of the current mutual suspicion and distrust.
c. Indisputably the Igbo is responsible for Nigeria's cultural and moral degeneracy with the notoreity for all kinds of crimes including International networking for drug and human trafficking, violent robberies and kidnapping, high-profile prostitution and advanced financial fraud.

3. It is also on record that since the inception of the current democratic dispensation, the Igbo has shown and maintained open contempt and dissension to the collective decision expressed by a majority of Nigerians at various stages through generally acceptable democratic processes.

4. Having come this far, we wish to categorically state that the North is no longer keen in being in the same country with this unruly pack of unrepentant hooligans.

5. That the North supports and encourages the authorities and other national and international stakeholders to allow the rebellious Igbo to go their way.

6. That in the event the Igbo is not allowed to pull out, the North shall divorce this marriage that has never been convenient to any of the parties.

7. That as a prelude we call on all Igbos currently residing in any part of Northern Nigeria to relocate within two weeks and northerners in the East should do likewise.

8. That northern leaders are hereby warned against further insisting on this union with the Igbo or any other part of Nigeria that is disposed to self determination.

CONCLUSION.
In conclusion, we wish to draw the attention of the authorities and all other interest groups that there is nothing difficult or impossible for all the units that make up Nigeria to pull out if they so wish.
We cite the example of the split of several independent nations from the old Soviet Union, the separation of Pakistan from India, the recent divorce of South Sudan with the former Sudan and most recently, the exit of Britain from the European Union.