Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,143,482 members, 7,781,440 topics. Date: Friday, 29 March 2024 at 02:25 PM

Fg’s 7% Growth Report Questioned - Politics - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Fg’s 7% Growth Report Questioned (5344 Views)

Are You Selling Cars Here: Buhari Questioned Tinubu / Nigeria Terror Suspects Were Questioned By Mossad Agents / Ngige Scores Peter Obi 7% In 7 Years (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) (4) (Reply) (Go Down)

Fg’s 7% Growth Report Questioned by AjanleKoko: 8:33am On Jul 16, 2010
FG’s 7% growth report questioned
FRIDAY, 16 JULY 2010 01:21 BLESSING ANARO   


Experts say magnitude of growth is unrealistic
The report by the National Bureau for Statistics (NBS) that the economy grew by 7.2 percent in the first quarter of 2010 is raising eyebrows among experts who say it is illogical for the economy to have grown by such magnitude when key components that drive the economy are looking downward. Specifically, they identify negative growth in the automobile industry where imports declined by 55 percent, house prices which have remained depressed, and little or no foreign investors trickling in, as factors that make the report unrealistic.

On the contrary, NBS' stance is that the increase in crude oil production as a result of the success of Federal Government's amnesty programme added fresh impetus, and thus, growth, to the real sector. But Bismarck Rewane, renowned economist and chief executive officer of Financial Derivatives Company (FDC), insists that housing, automobile and retail sales, manufacturing output, among others, are examples of proxies used all over the world to measure the level of economic activities.

"The question many have asked is how a country can record a real growth rate of 7.2 percent in the first quarter with house prices remaining depressed with analysts reckoning that it is yet to bottom out; new automobile imports declining by 55 percent in the same period, and a stuttering manufacturing output", he said in his FDC Economic Monthly for July.

In his view, the plethora of national maladies makes the idea of a 7.2 percent growth startling. Rewane said institutional and infrastructural deficiencies, a struggling financial sector that has drained credit from the private sector, little or no foreign capital investments as political and policy environments remain highly volatile, all constitute major growth barriers.

This volatile environment had resulted in delays to the final investment decisions on key projects by multi-nationals like Shell Nigeria, among others.

Okechukwu Unegbu, former president of the Chartered Institute of Bankers of Nigeria (CIBN), said he did not perceive any form of growth in the economy during the first quarter. According to him, the rate of unemployment went up, as many people were laid off in various sectors. Unegbu noted that most industries were either shut or declined in productivity, while the capital market is yet to recover from the slump.

Thomson Okoli, a manufacturer of polythene products, said he is almost closing shop because of the near collapse in public power supply. According to him, they (manufacturers) are billed specially by the Power Holding Company of Nigeria (PHCN) even after providing their own transformers and procuring special cables for connecting their factories to the national grid.

Okoli, who operates in Lagos, said the agonizing part is that a particular amount is paid to PHCN whether commensurate power is supplied or not. He said many manufacturers like him, who depend on the availability of power are beginning to look elsewhere for their livelihood. He wondered what could be growing the economy.

Rewane likened the kind of economic data reeled out to a situation where nothing can be more counterproductive than a doctor's medication that is premised on a distorted diagnosis.

"The authenticity and reliability of government released data has been the subject of debate for a long time. For instance, there is a lot of controversy about growth, inflation and other macroeconomic figures", he said

Source: Business Day http://www.businessdayonline.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=12785:fgs-7-growth-report-questioned&catid=1:latest-news&Itemid=18
Re: Fg’s 7% Growth Report Questioned by Parnassuss(m): 2:42pm On Jul 16, 2010
7% Growth, oh come thats too much a lie. Even three % i can't vouch for.
Re: Fg’s 7% Growth Report Questioned by donugapi(m): 3:00pm On Jul 16, 2010
Growth ko growth ni, na -7% them mean, Must have been a typo,
Re: Fg’s 7% Growth Report Questioned by Kobojunkie: 3:28pm On Jul 16, 2010
Magnitude Now questioned?? It should have been seriously looked at from the beginning. ROFLMAO!!!  I have always been suspicious of those numbers, especially given the report came from the same time the banks were imploding and people were running helter skelter trying to save their money and selves. Oil production was cut by at least a quarter and not much else going on elsewhere. And the rest of the world was in recession, and investors were reportedly pulling out from Nigeria.
Re: Fg’s 7% Growth Report Questioned by ollypass: 4:10pm On Jul 16, 2010
Very intresting opinions especially since some folks were defending this statistics in an earlier post.i believe kobojunkie is well acquainted with that post. so does any one have a contrary view to this? can amnesty with militants= increased oil production be the only basis for such a growth rate as the government wants us to believe? Because it is obvious economic indicators aint supporting anything near 7%.
Re: Fg’s 7% Growth Report Questioned by ollypass: 4:24pm On Jul 16, 2010
www.forbes.com
Still-high unemployment indicates the recession is hardly over.

This should shed a little light,
Re: Fg’s 7% Growth Report Questioned by 4Play(m): 5:40pm On Jul 16, 2010
I have always found a lot of our economic stats highly questionable. Even in the developed countries, measuring economic indicators is very difficult never mind Nigeria where there is an additional element of deception.
Re: Fg’s 7% Growth Report Questioned by debosky(m): 5:56pm On Jul 16, 2010
When oil production dominates national income to the extent that it does in Nigeria, increase in oil production will often dwarf decreases observed in other areas.

Those advocating manufacturing output, house prices and other such measures don't appear to be fully considering the overwhelming dependence of the economy on oil receipts.

The examples given in the businessday report simply point to negative growth in the individual sectors mentioned - banking, manufacturing, vehicle imports, etc and not necessarily the economy as a whole. While those decreases may be valid, their contribution to the overall economic output is what will determine whether they are sufficient to counteract the increase in oil exports.

Without seeing the details of the NBS' analysis, it's not clear how realistic or otherwise their assessment of growth is.
Re: Fg’s 7% Growth Report Questioned by chamber2(m): 5:59pm On Jul 16, 2010
I am yet to xperience d 7% growth in my pocket.pls nairalanders am I left out here?

A country dat v been in a recession since 1st october 1960 is claiming 2 b growing at 7%. Deceitful
Re: Fg’s 7% Growth Report Questioned by Beaf: 6:03pm On Jul 16, 2010
olly pass:

Very intresting opinions especially since some folks were defending this statistics in an earlier post.i believe kobojunkie is well acquainted with that post. so does any one have a contrary view to this? can amnesty with militants= increased oil production be the only basis for such a growth rate as the government wants us to believe? Because it is obvious economic indicators aint supporting anything near 7%.

I recall the article you mentioned and being roundly flogged and abused for suggesting that every known indicator points to oil as practically the only source of FG revenue (while Abuja is practically the source of all state revenues).
There were astonishingly ridiculous figures bandied about then, like agriculture accounting for 42% of our GDP. shocked

"Can amnesty with militants= increased oil production be the only basis for such a growth rate?" Thats all too visible, because every other area remains depressed. I am slowly leaning toward the belief that our economic figures are being massaged to cover up the staggering scale of fraud in the oil industry; NNPC was declared bankrupt (and by extension, Nigeria) by a talkative junior Minister. He's since been shut up, but is that what the strange economic figures are all about? Are we going to witness Earthquake level numbers mentioned in NNPC frauds in the near future? This one is worth watching!
Re: Fg’s 7% Growth Report Questioned by canuck(m): 6:26pm On Jul 16, 2010
Are we talking about statistics generated by the same Federal Government of Nigeria?

Those stats have always been hogwash.
Re: Fg’s 7% Growth Report Questioned by Ibime(m): 7:23pm On Jul 16, 2010
debosky:

When oil production dominates national income to the extent that it does in Nigeria, increase in oil production will often dwarf decreases observed in other areas.

Those advocating manufacturing output, house prices and other such measures don't appear to be fully considering the overwhelming dependence of the economy on oil receipts.

The examples given in the businessday report simply point to negative growth in the individual sectors mentioned - banking, manufacturing, vehicle imports, etc and not necessarily the economy as a whole. While those decreases may be valid, their contribution to the overall economic output is what will determine whether they are sufficient to counteract the increase in oil exports.

Without seeing the details of the NBS' analysis, it's not clear how realistic or otherwise their assessment of growth is.

Oil exports alone cannot drive Nigerias GDP up 7% in one quarter. We cant discount increased Govt spending in the first quarter nor return of foreign capital to our capital markets. . . . that is of course if the statistics are correct.
Re: Fg’s 7% Growth Report Questioned by paddylo1(m): 7:40pm On Jul 16, 2010
Oil exports alone cannot drive Nigerias GDP up 7% in one quarter. We cant discount increased Govt spending in the first quarter nor return of foreign capital to our capital markets. . . . that is of course if the statistics are correct.

GDP is normally measured qtr on qtr. . that is Jan - march 2009 vs jan - march 2010. . . .

So if we are producing nearly 1million barrels of oil more(2million bpd plus 500,000 condensate) and oil prices are were on average $85 a barrel in 1q 2010
Versus $40 in 1st Qtr 2009 and 1.5millionbpd(oil and condensate). . .then that right there is a growth of close to 50% on oil GDP alone

Now oil accounts for 18% of our GDP so saying every other sector was flat,from credit crunch( which i doubt)that still pushes GDP up close to 10%. . . .

Finally Total GOVT spending is up at least 50% from this period last yr(Govt spending as % of GDP is 34% in Nigeria) . . . cool
Re: Fg’s 7% Growth Report Questioned by paddylo1(m): 7:55pm On Jul 16, 2010
Magnitude Now questioned?? It should have been seriously looked at from the beginning. ROFLMAO!!! I have always been suspicious of those numbers, especially given the report came from the same time the banks were imploding and people were running helter skelter trying to save their money and selves. Oil production was cut by at least a quarter and not much else going on elsewhere. And the rest of the world was in recession, and investors were reportedly pulling out from Nigeria.

U are mistaking 2009 for 2010. . . .Oil production rose rapidly to 2.1 million,plus another 500,000 barrels in condensates after amnesty(btw 0ct 2009 and march 2010)

Bank crises was mostly august - dec 2009. . .by march 2010 most had stabilized and some even reported profits for Q1 2010

Most of The world exited recession in July 2009. . .matter of fact IMF estimates world growth at 4.7% this yr

As for investors they came back fully at the beginning of this yr(capital market investors)

NSE is up 20% yr to date
Re: Fg’s 7% Growth Report Questioned by aktunde(m): 8:22pm On Jul 16, 2010
@ Chamber2

I am yet to xperience d 7% growth in my pocket.pls nairalanders am I left out here?

A country dat v been in a recession since 1st october 1960 is claiming 2 b growing at 7%. Deceitful

So Nigeria started her own recession since the day she gained independence? Meaning Nigeria was better off with the Colonial Masters? grin grin grin grin grin
Re: Fg’s 7% Growth Report Questioned by DisGuy: 8:40pm On Jul 16, 2010
Will the Chairman of NBS ever come out to defend their figures and what about NESG, or university economic group in nigeria will they ever justify the amount paid to them yearly by actually coming out with their research

What do (economic) professors in Nigeria do anyway, do they ever get the chance to actually comment national economic issues as a group or make public their research
Re: Fg’s 7% Growth Report Questioned by 4Play(m): 12:00am On Jul 17, 2010

Lagos — The National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) Wednesday revealed that Nigeria's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) for the first quarter of this year grew by 7.23 percent with the Nominal GDP with non-oil sector being the major driver of growth.

The NBS in its 2010 first quarter report on the Nation's GDP and endorsed by the Statistician-General of the Federation, Dr. Vincent Akinyosoye, revealed that the non-oil sector played a dominant role in the real GDP with growth rate of 8.15 as against the previous quarter.

"On an aggregate basis, the economy when measured by the Real Gross Domestic Product (GDP), grew by 7.23 percent in the first quarter of 2010 as against 4.50 percent in the corresponding quarter of the previous year.

"The 2.73 percentage point increase in Real GDP growth observed in the first quarter of 2010 was accounted for by the increase in production in the oil sector of the economy. The nominal GDP for the first quarter of 2010 was estimated at 6,399,716.09 million naira as against the 5,404,850.00 million naira during the corresponding quarter of 2009, thus, indicating an increase of 994,866.09 million naira," the NSS report read in part.

Stating that the oil sector plays a pivotal role in the Nigerian economy as a dominant source of revenue period NBS disclosed that the sector witnessed increased production within the period under review than in the corresponding quarter of 2009.

It cited that about 202,358,601 barrels of crude oil and condensates were estimated for the first quarter of 2010 with an average daily production of 2.25 million barrels per day compared with the 184,661,774 barrels produced within the first quarter of 2009 with a corresponding average daily production of 2.05 million barrels per day.

The NBS explained that the observed increase contribution of oil to the GDP was attributable to the improvement in output, which could be traced to the various interventions by government in the peace process in the oil producing regions.

"The Oil sector contributed about 18.70 percent to real GDP in the first quarter 2009, while the contribution in first quarter of 2010 was however 18.00 percent. The Non-oil sector continued to be a major driver of the economy in the first quarter of 2010 when compared with the corresponding quarter of 2009.

"The sector recorded 8.15 percent growth in real terms in the first quarter of 2010 compared with 7.90 percent achieved a year ago. The Nonoil sector experienced a declining growth in the first quarter of 2010 when compared with the preceding quarter of 2009" the read further observed.


On the subsectors of the non-oil sector of the economy, the NBS noted that during the first quarter of 2010, the manufacturing activities decreased relative to the same period in 2009 as it recorded a decline in growth rate from 7.03 percent in 2009 to 6.43 percent in 2010.

It attributed the development to the low manufacturing activities usually recorded in the first quarter after the festivities in the last quarter of the previous year, poor electric power supply, and inability to access credit from banks arising from the credit crisis in the banking sector.

The Telecommunications sector continued to perform impressively and has remained one of the major drivers of growth in the Nigerian economy.

The report pointed that following intensive marketing strategies and value added services by telecommunication companies in Nigeria, the sector recorded a real GDP growth of 32.54 percent in the first quarter of 2010 compared with 31.75 percent recorded in the corresponding period of 2009.

It seems Debo and Paddy Lo make up their own stats where oil, 18% of GDP, is the main driver of Q1 growth. Even our Govt ''statisticians'' won't stoop so low.

http://allafrica.com/stories/201006250645.html

The key question is, do you believe that Nigeria's non-oil sector grew that strongly? I would like to see how this is reflected in consumption figures. 55% drop in automobile imports is pretty indicative of a marked slowdown.

http://www.nigerianstat.gov.ng/ext/latest_release/GDP_Q12010.pdf
Re: Fg’s 7% Growth Report Questioned by paddylo1(m): 12:55am On Jul 17, 2010
It seems Debo and Paddy Lo make up their own stats where oil, 18% of GDP, is the main driver of Q1 growth. Even our Govt ''statisticians'' won't stoop so low.

http://allafrica.com/stories/201006250645.html

The key question is, do you believe that Nigeria's non-oil sector grew that strongly? I would like to see how this is reflected in consumption figures. 55% drop in automobile imports is pretty indicative of a marked slowdown.

http://www.nigerianstat.gov.ng/ext/latest_release/GDP_Q12010.pdf

What are you yapping. . from the link u provide oil GDP grew at a total rate of 11.29%
i.e from negative -8.08 to positive +3.21 thats a swing around of approx 11.29%

so even my rough estimates are correct

And Automobile imports are a tiny portion of the Nigerian economy it is just a part of the huge service sector
Since they are imports and not manufactured locally,u really cant read too much into that data

cause demand may have dropped for new cars(which is what the data tracks),and risen for fairly used cars. . . .
Re: Fg’s 7% Growth Report Questioned by paddylo1(m): 1:03am On Jul 17, 2010
@4play

one more thing u have to understand is it is fairly easy to estimate GDP from money supply growth. . .and growth of Credit to the private sector

with exchange rates being fairly stable,steady money supply growth will indicate to u that there is steady GDP growth

From the CBN website M2(Broad money) was Approximately N11 trillion Naira as at march 2010
While at March 2009 it was at N9Trillion

While Credit to the Private Sector grew from 8trillion to 10 trillion in the period(March 2009 - March 2010)

Pls see CBN website below


http://www.cenbank.org/rates/mnycredit.asp
Re: Fg’s 7% Growth Report Questioned by 4Play(m): 1:17am On Jul 17, 2010
paddy_lo:

So if we are producing nearly 1million barrels of oil more(2million bpd plus 500,000 condensate) and oil prices are were on average $85 a barrel in 1q 2010
Versus $40 in 1st Qtr 2009 and 1.5millionbpd(oil and condensate). . .then that right there is a growth of close to 50% on oil GDP alone

Now oil accounts for 18% of our GDP so saying every other sector was flat,from credit crunch( which i doubt)that still pushes GDP up close to 10%. . . .
paddy_lo:

[color=#000099]What are you yapping. . from the link u provide oil GDP grew at a total rate of 11.29%
i.e from negative -8.08 to positive +3.21 thats a swing around of approx 11.29%

[b]so even my rough estimates are correct


This man is a numpty. One minute, oil GDP growth(from the Paddy Lo Stats Bureau) grew a whopping 50% from Q1, the next, it's actually 3.21% growth from Q1 '09 to Q1 '10. Wasn't too difficult to actually check the stats instead of manufacturing figures from thin air.

Now let's deal with the facts. From Q1 '09 to Q1 '10, non-oil GDP(81.3% of GDP) grew 8.15% whilst the 'oil GDP'(18.7% of GDP) grew 3.21%. That oil production is now growing compared to the contraction from Q1 '08 to Q1 '09 doesn't hide the fact that we are meant to believe that the non-oil sector has been experiencing robust growth.

A 55% drop in imports is telling in so far as such a steep drop is usually indicative, unless due to some exceptional event(s), of a marked slowdown in economic activity.
Re: Fg’s 7% Growth Report Questioned by paddylo1(m): 1:19am On Jul 17, 2010
@all

Nigeria should really be growing at 12 - 13%. . The structural bottlenecks inherent in our Power problems has made that impossible for now

So oil and services continue to drive growth

If the Power sector is reformed u will see the Manufacturing sector tick up quickly
and together with backward integration help push growth rates towards 13% oer annum
cool
Re: Fg’s 7% Growth Report Questioned by 4Play(m): 1:27am On Jul 17, 2010
paddy_lo:

@4play

[b]one more thing u have to understand is it is fairly easy to estimate GDP from money supply growth
. . .and growth of Credit to the private sector

with exchange rates being fairly stable,steady money supply growth will indicate to u that there is steady GDP growth

From the CBN website M2(Broad money) was Approximately N11 trillion Naira as at march 2010
While at March 2009 it was at N9Trillion

While Credit to the Private Sector grew from 8trillion to 10 trillion in the period(March 2009 - March 2010)

Pls see CBN website below[/b]


http://www.cenbank.org/rates/mnycredit.asp

Can you stop making a fool of yourself? If it was 'easy' to extrapolate from the growth in money supply, then Zimbabwe will be one of the fastest growing economies, if not the fastest, on the planet. Presumably, the US which has seen the steepest contraction in money supply since the 1930 over the past year has been experiencing a contraction in GDP over the same period.
Re: Fg’s 7% Growth Report Questioned by paddylo1(m): 1:28am On Jul 17, 2010
This man is a numpty. One minute, oil GDP growth(from the Paddy Lo Stats Bureau) grew a whopping 50% from Q1, the next, it's actually 3.21% growth from Q1 '09 to Q1 '10. Wasn't too difficult to actually check the stats instead of manufacturing figures from thin air.

Now let's deal with the facts. From Q1 '09 to Q1 '10, non-oil GDP(81.3% of GDP) grew 8.15% whilst the 'oil GDP'(18.7% of GDP) grew 3.21%. That oil production is now growing compared to the contraction from Q1 '08 to Q1 '09 doesn't hide the fact that we are meant to believe that the non-oil sector has been experiencing robust growth.

A 55% drop in imports is telling in so far as such a steep drop is usually indicative, unless due to some exceptional event(s), of a marked slowdown in economic activity.

When u compute those oil stats u also have to take note of the dollar price
i just did a rough estimate in my head

anyway from 1.8million to 2.25million is a growth rate of about 25%
Oil prices rising will also grow GOVT revenue by close to 50%

bottom line like i told u,u cant use the stats on new car imports,since it is just a little part of our huge service economy
u might as well use demand for beer,demand for hotel rooms and so on. . .

I dont see anything special with new car imports,esp in Nigeria that has a thriving tokunbo informal car market
After all in the USA imports have been dropping but GDP rising for the past 3 quarters
Re: Fg’s 7% Growth Report Questioned by paddylo1(m): 1:34am On Jul 17, 2010
Can you stop making a fool of yourself? If it was 'easy' to extrapolate from the growth in money supply, then Zimbabwe will be one of the fastest growing economies, if not the fastest, on the planet. Presumably, the US which has seen the steepest contraction in money supply since the 1930 over the past year has been experiencing a contraction in GDP over the same period.

How do u think GDP is calculated/estimated with macro economic models?

Listen Zimbabwe has inflation running at 5000% per annum
Its exchange rate is almost 1million to 1 dollar

Nigerias exchange rate has been stable for 10yrs
while inflation is close to single digits

and yea the contraction in USA money supply and credit growth denotes the steep contraction in GDP we saw for 4 straight quarters up till 3q 2009
Even now M2 is not growing much in the USA,while credit to the priivate sector is falling

Growth is at a paltry 2.5% as only GOVT spending seems to be supporting growth. . . while the private sector retrenches

Go learn econometrics before u come open your mouth. . . .
Re: Fg’s 7% Growth Report Questioned by Ibime(m): 1:56am On Jul 17, 2010
Its getting hot in here. . . . grin grin grin

All I would add is that if you get into a debate with 4Play, make sure you are coming with an arsenal of weapons! grin grin grin
Re: Fg’s 7% Growth Report Questioned by 4Play(m): 1:58am On Jul 17, 2010
paddy_lo:

[color=#000099]How do u think GDP is calculated/estimated with macro economic models?

Listen Zimbabwe has inflation running at 5000% per annum
Its exchange rate is almost 1million to 1 dollar

Nigerias exchange rate has been stable for 10yrs
while inflation is close to single digits

Olodo, money supply tells us more about inflation/deflation pressures and is not a proxy for GDP growth as you idiotically suggested. Nigeria having a growth in money supply is not necessarily evidence that the economy is growing.

and yea the contraction in USA money supply and credit growth denotes the steep contraction in GDP we saw for 4 straight quarters up till 3q 2009
slowpoke, M3(broader than M2) contracted at the fastest rate since the Great Depression from January '10 to April '10, a period which has seen GDP growth. If money supply is a proxy for economic growth, the period from January to April 2010 must have seen the steepest contraction since the Great Depression.

The stock of money fell from $14.2 trillion to $13.9 trillion in the three months to April, amounting to an annual rate of contraction of 9.6pc. The assets of insitutional money market funds fell at a 37pc rate, the sharpest drop ever.

"It’s frightening," said Professor Tim Congdon from International Monetary Research. "The plunge in M3 has no precedent since the Great Depression. The dominant reason for this is that regulators across the world are pressing banks to raise capital asset ratios and to shrink their risk assets. This is why the US is not recovering properly," he said.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/7769126/US-money-supply-plunges-at-1930s-pace-as-Obama-eyes-fresh-stimulus.html
Re: Fg’s 7% Growth Report Questioned by Beaf: 2:08am On Jul 17, 2010
===Takes a vantage sit, claps for 4 Play cool===
Re: Fg’s 7% Growth Report Questioned by 4Play(m): 2:10am On Jul 17, 2010
The US is experiencing contraction in its M3 because it is facing deflationary pressures as evidenced by today's inflation report. At same time, however, GDP has been growing.

Zimbabwe, and Nigeria to a far lesser extent, have growth in money supply because they're facing inflationary pressures. To claim that money supply is a proxy for GDP growth is the work of a quintessential charlatan. By Paddy Lo's figures, a 22% growth in M2 in just one year is not necessarily something to be proud of.
Re: Fg’s 7% Growth Report Questioned by paddylo1(m): 2:10am On Jul 17, 2010
Olodo, money supply tells us more about inflation/deflation pressures and is not a proxy for GDP growth as you idiotically suggested. Nigeria having a growth in money supply is not necessarily evidence that the economy is growing.

U use M2 to estimate the size of an economy. . . .and mugu how do u have GDP growth with deflation?

deflation is what the FED is fighting,so if money supply is falling sharply u inherently have deflation and zero growth

so in essence u are making my point,but are too dumb to realize it

slowpoke, M3(broader than M2) contracted at the fastest rate since the Great Depression from January '10 to April '10, a period which has seen GDP growth. If money supply is a proxy for economic growth, the period from January to April 2010 must have seen the steepest contraction since the Great Depression.

From your own quote it tells u that the fall in M3 has meant that the USA has not been recovering properly
again u make my point but cant use your head. . .the guy in your quote (Professor Tim Congdon) calls it frightening
If M3 falling is of no consequence to growth,why are the authorities so concerned about it?

again shrinking of money supply,whether by banks pulling credit or liquidation of assets via stock market corrections
is an indication of poor,low or anemic GDP growth. . . .
Re: Fg’s 7% Growth Report Questioned by paddylo1(m): 2:18am On Jul 17, 2010
The US is experiencing contraction in its M3 because it is facing deflationary pressures as evidenced by today's inflation report. At same time, however, GDP has been growing.

can u please explain to us how u can have GDP growth and deflation at the same time?. . . .

Deflationary pressures is a central bankers worst nightmare

All asset prices go down. . .money supply shrinks,GDP shrinks

It is what happened in the great depression

In essence ben bernanke is printing money as fast as he can and throwing it into the economy to reflate it and grow GDP
but that money is being liquidated almost as fast as he can create it. . . .

Japan has just had a lost decade due to deflation. . 10yrs of no growth. . . .

U must be an economic novice not to know that. . . .
Re: Fg’s 7% Growth Report Questioned by Beaf: 2:19am On Jul 17, 2010
paddy_lo:

U use M2 to estimate the size of an economy. . . .and mugu how do u have GDP growth with deflation?
From your own quote it tells u that the fall in M3 has meant that the USA has not been recovering properly
again u make my point but cant use your head. . .the guy in your quote (Professor Tim Congdon) calls it frightening
If M3 falling is of no consequence to growth,why are the authorities so concerned about it?

again shrinking of money supply,whether by banks pulling credit or liquidation of assets via stock market corrections
is an indication of poor,low or anemic GDP growth. . .

To we laymen, money supply isn't about GDP, its more to do with credit availability. To economics grads like paddylo, no?
Re: Fg’s 7% Growth Report Questioned by OAM4J: 2:25am On Jul 17, 2010
Beaf:

To we laymen, money supply isn't about GDP, its more to do with credit availability. To economics grads like paddylo, no?

well with my little economics, I also know that increase credit availability also grows the economy and the GDP.

But I will listen to the experts, am loving the debate.

(1) (2) (3) (4) (Reply)

R-E-V-E-A-L-E-D!!! Illiterate Buhari Will Destroy Nigeria - Oby Ezekwesili. / Ghana vs Nigeria again / Sad But True About We Northerners [PICTURE]

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 90
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.