Nigeria spends 86% of revenue on debt servicing, South Africa pays 20%

…analysts say Nigeria’s debt too expensive

Nigeria spent 86 per cent of its revenue on servicing debt in 2021, but South Africa spent only 20 per cent of its receipts on the same purpose, according to findings by The PUNCH.

According to the International Monetary Fund’s 2021 Article IV estimates, Africa’s most populous nation spent 85.5 per cent of its revenue on servicing the debt in 2021.

On the other hand, South Africa’s budget office, situated in the National Treasury, estimated its debt service-to-revenue in 2021 at 20 per cent, explaining that for every five rand raised by the government, only one rand was spent on servicing debt.

Nigeria’s total debt by end of December 2021 was only 30 per cent of South Africa’s debt, yet the former’s debt service appears too expensive, according to analysts.

Nigeria’s total debt as at December 2021 was $94.166bn, according to the Debt Management Office, but South Africa’s total debt at the same period was $261bn, according to the country’s National Treasury and Bloomberg.

Nigeria is the continent’s largest economy. Latest estimates by the National Bureau of Statistics put the nation’s economic size at $420bn. On the other hand, South Africa is second largest economy on the continent with an estimated size of $320bn.

Analysts say Nigeria’s debt service is very expensive because of the perception of investors of the country as high risk.

The Chief Executive Officer of Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprise, CPPE, Dr Muda Yusuf, said that debt service ratio was a function of the magnitude of the debt and its cost.

“If the amount you are borrowing is high, you also have to pay more. Also, Nigeria borrows at expensive rates, especially the Eurobonds. Sometimes, we celebrate that our Eurobondsare oversubscribed, but the yields are very high when you compare them with other countries,” Yusuf said.

He explained that investors perceived Nigeria as high-risk, explaining that risk premium must be paid when bonds were perceived as high-risk.

A market analyst, Ike Ibeabuchi, suggested that Nigeria must pay more attention to cost-cutting measures such as reducing the earnings of the legislature, adding that the country should look at ways of tapping equity rather than debt.

Findings have shown that Egypt’s debt service-to-revenue was 20.5 per cent in 2021, according to its central bank, while Kenya’s and Uganda’s were estimated at 60 per cent and 27-30 per cent respectively.

Another major reason for Nigeria’s high debt service-to-revenue is its low revenue generation. Analysts are worried that Nigeria is not raising enough revenue from an economic size of over $400 billion, wondering why policy makers are not thinking out of the box.

Nigeria’s revenue to GDP is nine per cent, while Ghana’s is 13 per cent. Nigeria is seven times Ghana’s population of 31 million.

According to the DMO, Kenya and Angola have a revenue-to-GDP ratios of 16.6 per cent, and 20.9 per cent respectively.

“We are likely to have a higher debt service-to-revenue ratio if revenue levels do not increase significantly,” said President of Lagos Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Michael Olawale-Cole, at a press conference in April.

Cole suggested that the Federal Government must improve its tax collection by expanding the tax net to reduce dependence on oil revenues and exposure to global shocks like the war in Ukraine.

A PricewaterhouseCoopers’ research has suggested that Nigeria must convert its dead assets into liquid ones.

Partner & Chief Economist, PwC Nigeria, Andrew S. Nevin, recently explained that Nigeria had $900 billion worth of dead assets in residential, real estate and agricultural land that must be revivified and converted into liquid assets.

The Director-General of Lagos Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Chinyere Almona, in a recent statement, said Nigeria must identify corporate, physical, intangible, human assets, determine their worth, and make plans to repurpose or redevelop idle ones.

Almona stressed the need to break government monopoly in the infrastructure sector (railway, pipelines, power transmission) in order to attract investors to commit equity funds into them.

TundeDes:
How did we get there

Mynd44:

It is simply because the South African Government earns more in terms of taxes and royalties than the Nigerian government

Mynd44:

It is simply because the South African Government earns more in terms of taxes and royalties than the Nigerian government

Mynd44:

It is simply because the South African Government earns more in terms of taxes and royalties than the Nigerian government

Mynd44:

It is simply because the South African Government earns more in terms of taxes and royalties than the Nigerian government

Mynd44:

It is simply because the South African Government earns more in terms of taxes and royalties than the Nigerian government

Mynd44:

It is simply because the South African Government earns more in terms of taxes and royalties than the Nigerian government

ObosiLandlord:
Even though SA earn more than Nigeria, GMB didn't borrow with sense.

I would have been more happy if he borrowed to fix power supply

Power supply is still very terrible even though e don almost spend 7 years in power.

When you tell some people Nigeria is not a wealthy Nation, dem go dey follow you argue. Buhari North bring so little to the table, yet he don finish us with the way he has been borrowing.

Ademola47:


https://punchng.com/nigeria-spends-86-of-revenue-on-debt-servicing-south-africa-pays-20/