Toonice:

If she doesn't feel like doing it at the particular time and he uses force to get it. Anytime force is used to get sex, that is violation!

Inked_Nerd:


How can you say no he can't?

Inked_Nerd:


If a woman says no, then the answer is no. Her being your wife doesn't change the fact that as a human being she the right to not have sëx with her husband. Let me see this supposed constitution that you claim that a woman must abide by? Any man who forces himself on a woman, whether its his wife, girlfriend, or stranger isa pig and DESERVES to have his pënis cut off!!

~Bluetooth:

why would a legal wife deny his husband his constitutional and marital rights ?

Inked_Nerd:


A woman saying no is not a red light to look outside of the marriage. You thinking is the reason why such things continue to happen to women. I have said thsi before and I will say it again. Sëx and rapë are one in the same!!!

Ask am o!

dammizz:

Its not right 2 refuse d man his right, or how will d woman feel if d man refuse her when she needs it? She must have deprived him several times b4 any man cld think of using force. Its high time women stopped developin headache every evening

ronkebp:

i do not understand how men would think that sex is their right!!!!!!!! am trying to understand it, sex is the right of both the husdand and the wife. if one person is not up to the task, the otehr should understand and stop giving lame excuses for  bad attitudes.

sexkillz:

[size=14pt]SMH @ some pitiably lopsided discombobulated and incontrovertibly obfuscated responses! Ignorance must really really be eternal bliss, if at this day and time, some folks still compartmentalize r[b]a[/b]pe to the non married! SMH again at a failed education System, If someone is vociferous enough to type balderdash in form of comments, and say that a man has unequivocal rights to ra[b]p[/b]e a woman, because she is his wife!. . . Bull[b]s[/b]hit!. . .[/size]

Inked_Nerd:


Where is this law that you all keep talking about?!?! Show it since apparently you all want to use the law as a means of justifying such a heinous act!!!

wiki:
Marital rape, also known as spousal rape, is non- consensual sex in which the perpetrator is the victim's spouse. As such, it as a form of partner rape, of domestic violence , and of sexual abuse .
Once widely condoned or ignored by law, spousal rape is now repudiated by international conventions and increasingly criminalized. Still, in many countries, spousal rape either remains legal, or is illegal but widely tolerated and accepted as a husband's prerogative.

In 2006, it was estimated that marital rape could be prosecuted in at least 104 countries (in four of these countries, marital rape could be prosecuted only when the spouses were judicially separated) [1] and since 2006 several other countries have outlawed spousal rape. In many countries it is not clear if marital rape may or may not be prosecuted under ordinary rape laws. Several countries in Eastern Europe and Scandinavia made spousal rape illegal before 1970, but other countries in Western Europe and the English- speaking Western World outlawed it much later, mostly in the 1980s and 1990s.

Most developing countries outlawed it in the 1990s and 2000s.

toba:

op. nice question. I remember during one of my lectures in my MBA class in University of calabar couple of years ago, such a topic was brought up whilst the lecture was on. The lecturer is a British trained barrister at Law and an elderly man. he stated categorically that theres nothing like ra,apeee in marriage. There were decided court cases that were cited which shows similarities with whats being asked here. One of the marital responsibilities is $ex. However, the law doesn't permit violence on the wife but the husband must not also be denied enjoyment

sexkillz:

[size=14pt]Bulls[b]h[/b]it!. . . And for this to come from a so called British trained Barrister at law, is even more aggravated, B[b]u[/b]llshit!

Ra[b]p[/b]e is the act of forcing a girl or woman to have s[/b]ex against her will! Married or NOT! Then the same law that doesnt permit violence on the wife, says that there is nothing like violation in marriage? SMH!

The law is Discombobulated!. . .[/size]

ronkebp:

As long as the woman says NO!!!!!!!! foR whatever reason, and the man; carries her, removes her wrapper/ skirt/shorts by force and by fire, with the WOMAN still resisting, and the man forces her legs open and forces his thing into her,and restains her, pinning her to the ground or bed with all his might, then that is R.APE, whether MARRIED OR NOT.

toba:

well u could have saved your self a lot of stress by just reading what i posted from wiki to see if u have a say legally rather than feeling bad by what someone in the legal profession had said. I also hope u read the part where i said decided cases were cited in this regard. i think its the court that u need to vex with and not the lawyer citing a case decided by a judge

toba:

this still boils down to u using a word with several meaning and interpretations under the law. [b]Im not married to u and forcefully had a carnal knowledge of u is quite different from im married to u and forcefully had a carnal knowledge of u. [/b]do u agree with me?

sexkillz:

[size=14pt]Yeah! The law is an A[b]S[/b]S!. . . And because Wiki said so doesnt mean it's true! Or you actually believe everything you hear, or read? You allow your conscience to be guided by the consciences of lawyers, who apparently have NO REGARD for morality? How many times has a lawyer set a known criminal free? In law, it's all about winning an Argument! Winning an Argument doesnt make you RIGHT!. . . Cant believe i just explained that!. . .[/size]

sexkillz:

[size=14pt]Hmm! Law of Forcible "Carnalology!" Pls Explain, i dont agree!. . .[/size]