rev 1 vs 13- 15
daniel 7 vs 9
lamentations 4 vs 8
lamentations 5 vs 10
jeremiah 14 vs 2
job 30 vs 30

lies he was a shemite which is white i can prove it he had brown skin like a sun tan

crossman9:

lies he was a shemite which is white i can prove it he had brown skin like a sun tan

he was from  the tribe of judah. after the roman massacre of 70 AD, the tribe of judah, benjamin and levi ran into west africa and south africa where they still live today under different names as yorubas-igbos-lembas-ashantis- and whatnot

case-2. this is someones encounter with jesus. and jesus said, what you see here, write it in a book, because he knew he was close to the end. what did the person write ? that jesus had wooly hair that was prematurely whitish and his skin was like brass that has been burnt in fire.

and finally, these are israelites, just as jesus was-lamentations 4 vs 8 and lamentations 5 vs 10. case closed.

and who said shemite is white ? there are shemitic edomites (thats white people ), there is shemitic ishmaelites (arabs), then there is shemitic israelites (black people), then there is shemitic moabites and ammonites (chinese and japanese people). all those mentioned are from the seed of shem.

hamitic will be ethiopians, somalians, erritreans, hausas and fulanis

Hmm

Moses Ethiopian Wife
"And Miriam and Aaron spoke against Moses because of the Ethiopian woman whom he had married; for he had married an Ethiopian woman" (Num. 12.1).
Every now and again someone asks how it could be that Moses, the champion of the Lord for the chosen people, could have married an Ethiopian who was therefore of the descendants of Ham, youngest son of Noah. There was strong objection in Israel to such marriages although the assumption that Moses had married before he left Egypt only raises the second question how he later came to marry Zipporah the Midianite when he apparently had left one wife back in Egypt. The word "Ethiopian" is the Greek equivalent of the Hebrew word "Cush" who in Genesis 10.8 is recorded as one of the sons of Ham. The Cushites became the people known to history as the Sumerians. Eventually many of their tribes migrated, some down the eastern side of the Persian Gulf and into India, where they established the Indus civilization which endured from about 2000 BC to 1500 BC. Others moved down the western side and across Arabia and over the Red Sea into Africa where they became the people known to the Egyptians as Cush, living mainly in what is now the Sudan. Jewish legend has it that Moses when at the court of Pharaoh led an invading army into Cush and returned in triumph but there is probably no truth in that.
"Ethiopia" in the A.V. is taken from old Anglo-Saxon versions that were based largely on the Greek Septuagint. It used this word to translate the Hebrew "Cush", but to the Greeks the whole of the southern world from Africa to India was denoted by the word Ethiopia (English travellers as late as the 17th Century still used the name in that sense). The Egyptians despised the Cushites and called them "vile Cush" and lost no opportunity of waging war on them. It would have been social suicide for Moses to marry into that nation while still at the Egyptian court and most unlikely. Another factor is that by deduction from Scripture records, at that time in history a man was rarely below the age of fifty at marriage, and since Moses fled to Midian at age forty, his marriage whilst there and return forty years later with two sons is perfectly logical. There is no evidence aside from this questionable statement in Num. 12.1 that he had been married before.
Zipporah, his Midianite wife (Exodus 2.15-22) was a descendant of Abraham through his wife Keturah. She was therefore of Semitic race and there would be no valid objection on that score against the union. Midianites were scattered all over the lands south of Canaan and the tribal name of the Sinai Midianites was Cushan (referred to only once in the O.T. in Habakkuk 3.7 "I saw the tents of Cushan in affliction and the curtains of the land of Midian did tremble". The almost certain explanation of Num. 12.1 is that by an early copyist's mistake Cushan was turned into Cush by the omission of the final N. The archaic Hebrew N in the days before Ezra was a very insignificant little "squiggle" and could easily have been missed. On this basis the text tells us that Moses had married a Cushan Midianite, which is what Exodus 2 says anyway. The objection raised by Aaron and Miriam to the nationality of his wife was probably evoked by jealousy. They feared that one of Moses' own sons by Zipporah would be appointed by him to succeed him as Israel's leader when the time came. They, and probably most of their fellows, would much prefer a full blooded son of Israel. They need not have worried; when the time did come, the Lord brought forth His own choice for leader, the stalwart Joshua. This is one of the lessons we all find hard to learn, that the Lord is perfectly able to raise up His own instrument to carry on any section of His work when the torch begins to fall from failing hands. We need not plan and devise and agonize for the continuance of that which He has left in our charge for a space of time.
One has to realise that many of the women of the Old Testament history were not of Israel, although of Semitic race Isaac married Rebecca who was of Nahor, brother to Abraham. Jacob married Rachel and Leah of the same stock. Salmon prince of Judah at the entry to the Land married Rahab of Jericho whose name shows she was Semitic, either of Abraham through Esau, Ishmael or Keturah, or of Nahor. Tamar who carried on the Messianic line from Judah was not of Jacob but her name too reveals that she was Semitic. Ruth who married Boaz was a Moabite, from Lot the son of Haran another brother of Abraham. There was no inconsistency therefore in the case of Moses.
There are theories that assert that the name "Cush" means black and that he was a black man, the ancestor of the African races. While it is true that purely Hebrew names often have a meaning which can be traced by the construction of the word as for example Jesus in Greek is the Hebrew Joshua, or more properly Jehoshua, which means God is Saviour, the same practice cannot be applied to non-Hebrew names. There is no Hebrew word closely resembling Cush that means black. Cush was given his name long before there were any Hebrews or any Hebrew language. He was certainly the ancestor of the Sumerians and that language is the oldest one that is now known, but the Sumerian word for black is "gig" - not very similar. No one knows what the nature of the language spoken by Noah and his sons was and only that later languages were derived from it. It is probably true that many of the black peoples of Africa are descended from Cush but their black colour developed after they had settled in Africa and not before. The various, colours of men in different climes are the result of long habitation under specialised conditions of climate and food, and probably other factors not yet completely understood. There is no reason for thinking that Noah had grandsons in a variety of colours,. In fact there is evidence to the contrary. According to Genesis 10, Cush had a brother named Phut. The Phutites in later generations also crossed into Africa and colonised the north, right across the continent to the Atlantic in days when the present Sahara desert was a fertile well-watered country abounding in forests and animal life. Today there are cave-paintings still existing in that barren and uninhabited waste executed by, and depicting, those Phutites of four thousand years ago but they are not shown as black. They are painted with red and yellow skins; their descendants today are deep brown.
There is no means of determining the colour of the first men, nor yet that of Noah and his sons. The white races tend to think that they must have been white; but the Chinese insist, quite as logically, that they were yellow. We just do not know. What we do know is that God "hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on the face of the earth. (Acts 17.16) and that all men everywhere, of whatever colour, are able to propagate their own kind with each other, Perhaps the Lord, who is the supreme Artist in creation, sees some advantage in having men ultimately develop five outward colours, whilst still being men inside, just as He has ordained variety in the rest of His Creation.
Coming back to the main point, there is not much doubt that the only woman Moses married, the mother of his children was the daughter of the Midianite Chieftain. Jethro gave him hospitality during his term of exile and proved to be as much a reverential worshipper of the true God as was Moses himself.
AOH

I am a “White Man” a descendent of “Shem” of the line of “Abraham” and “Jacob” in the bible so I just can’t stop laughing at this senseless mind.
The last time I check the bible records in the “Table of Nation” in “Genius” chapter (9) and (10) “Ham” was the father of “Canaan” which is a “Black Man”
(NIV) Jeremiah 13:23 Can the Ethiopian change his skin or the leopard its spots? Neither can you do good who are accustomed to doing evil.
Did you notice the above passage and quote from the bible the words “change his skin” and the nation which is “Ethiopia” and the Ethnic grouping which is “Ethiopian” it is clear, “Ham” is a “Black Man” I am working on research at the moment on the “Nation’s History” I may release a little book when finished the research the little booklet maybe called “Origins of the Nations” get that when it comes out?

Genesis 10:6The sons of Ham: Cush, Mizraim, Put
and Canaan.
7The sons of Cush: Seba, Havilah,
Sabtah, Raamah and Sabteca. The
sons of Raamah: Sheba and Dedan.
8Cush was the father of Nimrod, who
grew to be a mighty warrior on the earth.
9He was a mighty hunter before the
Lord ; that is why it is said, "Like Nimrod,
a mighty hunter before the Lord ."

dayummmmmm why write so much ? ok i havent read it yet and i will in a minute but from the first 2 lines. moses is an israelite (a black shemetic nation) and ethiopians are hamites (a black hamitic nation) or what is also known as cushites. nations mixing wasnt allowed then and still is not allowed but the white man since he recieved authority of the world(   job 9 vs 24, rev 6 vs 4, 1 maccabees chapter 1 vs 9, ) has forcibly moved people around and mixed people up so i can imagine how today you will think it is strange what aaron and miriam said against moses. see back then all nations stuck together. people were identified by their nations. people didnt cross nations to breed. you stuck and stayed and played and ate within your nation . you didnt have to write all that epistle. a few biblical passages would have done the job.
lamentations 4 vs 8
lamentations 5 vs 10
jeremiah 14 vs 2
job 30 vs 30

those are the colors of the jews of which 'jesus' was a part of. (same nation, same color of people)

and here is jesus color
1 revelation 13-15 (skin the color of brass as if burnt in a furnace) burn brass in a furnace you get wesley snipes black
daniel 7 vs 9 (nappy hair)

and moses was hidden in the house of pharoah. the ancient egyptians were black so how can you hide a white baby till the age of 40 in a black mans house and pretending he is your baby ? see ancient egyptians and israelites are black and were often confused for each other as in when the israelites were going to bury isaac and the people who saw them mistook them for egyptians.

and please stay away from newly revised bibles. this is why you are getting confused. they have been edited to promote white superiority (job 9 vs 24). when the earth is handed to the wicked, he cover the faces of the real judges (this includes removing a huge chunk of the bible so as to hide who he really is (apocrypha), this includes painting the image of jesus and the jews white, and this includes changing the text in the bible so that anything which says black is changed to white) if you think i am lying, get a KJV bible and then start comparing it to newer revised and edited versions.
i will give you some verses to cross reference between the KJV and the NIV and other tampered with bibles
lamentations 4 vs 8
lamentations 5 vs 10
revelation 13 vs 10
jeremiah 14 vs 2
revelation 1 vs 13-15
daniel 7 vs 9

cross check these verses between the 2 bibles and then you will start to see white superiority at work. see they couldnt get to the KJV because they were not that sophisticated at first. wasnt no computers then. you would have had to manually tamper with 1000 pages of text. nowadays, they do it easy. which is why, if you are a real biblical scholar and not just some church going indoctrinated person who is blindly following christianity, then you need to have the real stuff. KJV1611

white people are what is called edomites (which also means red, because their skin is red ) from the caves of mount seir and then from there they moved to idumea or edom, which is south of where the israelites lived. edomites (red skin, hairy, great outdoors man, blessed with great hunting skills, will conquer the world and the fatness of the world with his sword (weapons). tell me that is not the white man ? edomites. in the bible it even tells you why dogs are the white mans best friend. in malachi 1 vs 3, the curse on the edomites (esau) (aka the white man) is that he will inherit the unproductive waste lands of the world (which he did and which is why he needed to conquer africa for the fertile land ) and that his inheritance will be run awash with the desert jackals (modern day dogs). so basically the white man and dogs co-existed for thousands of years in the caves of europe. then a mutual bond developed between him and the jackals that has lasted to this very day. thats why the edomites (white man) love their dogs

A Biblical Anthropologist has shown that the lines of Shem and Ham intermarried
(edit the link by replacing the (dot) with '.')
http://jandyongenesis.(dot)com/2012/01/abraham-descendant-of-both-shem-and-ham.html

As for the Edomites as described in 2 Esdras 6, perhaps that is referring to sinners? considering what the Saviour told Abraham about the Amorites as recorded in Genesis 15:16

http://yemitom./2011/12/31/in-the-4th-generation/

Edo - Edom?

amor4ce:

A Biblical Anthropologist has shown that the lines of Shem and Ham intermarried
(edit the link by replacing the (dot) with '.')
http://jandyongenesis.(dot)com/2012/01/abraham-descendant-of-both-shem-and-ham.html

link not working brah. and do not subscribe to biblical anthropologists. let me guess ? he is a white man right ?

amor4ce:

As for the Edomites as described in 2 Esdras 6, perhaps that is referring to sinners? considering what the Saviour told Abraham about the Amorites as recorded in Genesis 15:16

http://yemitom./2011/12/31/in-the-4th-generation/

Edo - Edom?

nah edomites is a nationality of people. does not mean sinners. edomites are descendants of esau.

Using methods similar to those police have developed to solve crimes, British scientists, assisted by Israeli archeologists, have re-created what they believe is the most accurate image (above) of what the historical Jesus looked like.

http://www.giveshare.org/BibleStudy/217.realfaceofjesus.html

F00028:

Using methods similar to those police have developed to solve crimes, British scientists, assisted by Israeli archeologists, have re-created what they believe is the most accurate image (above) of what the historical Jesus looked like.

http://www.giveshare.org/BibleStudy/217.realfaceofjesus.html

lol yeah right. bible says he has black skin and prematurely whitish wooly hair. tell those your british scientists that their brain cells is clogged with shepherds pie

buzugee:

nah edomites is a nationality of people. does not mean sinners. edomites are descendants of esau.

In my opinion the oyinbo are not Edomites, going by what was recorded in times past by historians.

amor4ce:

In my opinion the oyinbo are not Edomites, going by what was recorded in times past by historians.

thats the problem. YOUR OPINION. you cant use your opinion to gauge biblical teachings. says in the bible. edomites
1 have red skin
2 love to hunt
3 are very hairy
4 very good with weaponry
5 will conquer the world because they are sophisticated at using and making weaponry
6 have immense pride
7 hate black people (israelites)


who else is that in this world ?

Heretical nonsense.

Brethren , please do not be deceived, Black Hebrews are a black supremacist group just like the British Israelites.

buzugee:

thats the problem. YOUR OPINION. you cant use your opinion to gauge biblical teachings. says in the bible. edomites
1 have red skin
2 love to hunt
3 are very hairy
4 very good with weaponry
5 will conquer the world because they are sophisticated at using and making weaponry
6 have immense pride
7 hate black people (israelites)


who else is that in this world ?

Likewise go check your Bible, specifically at Genesis 15 wherein the Messiah told Abraham that the Amorites would carry away his seed to serve as slaves for 400 years - this was fulfilled with the Amorites (oyinbo including the fake jews) engaging in the trans-Atlantic slave trade. In Genesis 15:16 the Saviour referred to the iniquity of the Amorites and not the Edomites.

frosbel:

Heretical nonsense.

Brethren  , please do not be deceived, Black Hebrews are a black supremacist group just like the British Israelites.

yeah yeah yeah. nice retort meaning 'ermmm ok i am stumped so let me just deflect the convo with mumbo jumbo' 

amor4ce:

Likewise go check your Bible, specifically at Genesis 15 wherein the Messiah told Abraham that the Amorites would carry away his seed to serve as slaves for 400 years - this was fulfilled with the Amorites (oyinbo including the fake jews) engaging in the trans-Atlantic slave trade. In Genesis 15:16 the Saviour referred to the iniquity of the Amorites and not the Edomites.

nigga please. may i recommend spectacles to you ? this is what genesis 15 says about the amorites > '17 When the sun had set and darkness had fallen, a smoking firepot with a blazing torch appeared and passed between the pieces. 18 On that day the LORD made a covenant with Abram and said, “To your descendants I give this land, from the Wadi[e] of Egypt to the great river, the Euphrates— 19 the land of the Kenites, Kenizzites, Kadmonites, 20 Hittites, Perizzites, Rephaites, 21 Amorites, Canaanites, Girgashites and Jebusites.”'  m


meaning their land will be taken from them and given to the israelites

In the past I had met some people who called themselves Christians and had this ITK attitude of "I know the Scriptures better than you"/I know what I'm doing and you do not". If you like, continue with your attitude. Know that I have so far not interacted with you in any condescending or superiority manner; how about you. Remember that you have two eyes and they are not the only ones on earth. Neither are you the only one with faculties.

amor4ce:

In the past I had met some people who called themselves Christians and had this ITK attitude of "I know the Scriptures better than you"/I know what I'm doing and you do not". If you like, continue with your attitude. Know that I have so far not interacted with you in any condescending or superiority manner; how about you. Remember that you have two eyes and they are not the only ones on earth. Neither are you the only one with faculties.

relax chief. its all in good fun. its called good natured ribbing. no malice meant by it. dig ? and accept my apologies if i have offended you

Jesus was a Jew of palestine origin.

His colour will be closer to a light skinned arab than black african

think more like Ghadaffi than wesley snipes

bermuda1:

Jesus was a Jew of palestine origin.

His colour will be closer to a light skinned arab than black african

think more like Ghadaffi than wesley snipes

and my name is obama

bermuda1:

Jesus was a Jew of palestine origin.

His colour will be closer to a light skinned arab than black african

think more like Ghadaffi than wesley snipes

Yep , that's right !!

frosbel:

Yep , that's right !!

might as well come out and admit that you have a soft spot for light skinned arab men. which of you is the pitcher and which is the reciever ?

buzugee:

might as well come out and admit that you have a soft spot for light skinned arab men. which of you is the pitcher and which is the reciever ?

if you like model yourself on basketMouth or I go dye

Just as Jesus couldn't have been a blue eyed blond no way could he had been as black as a sub saharan African

bermuda1:

if you like model yourself on basketMouth or I go dye

Just as Jesus couldn't have been a blue eyed blond no way could he had been as black as a sub saharan African

I am not in the business of convincing lost negros about whom jesus really is, but i will give you a few pointers
1 the middle east was occupied by black people and was part of africa (northeast africa to be exact) in biblical days up until 70 AD
2 The color of jesus is in the bible in revelation 1 vs 13-14 and daniel 7 vs 9
3 the lineage of jesus ran into west africa after 70 AD when the romans kicked them out of northeast africa (land of canaan). they are today now refered to as the ashanti, fanti, ga, ewe, igbo, yoruba, lemba etc in west and south africa
4 the color of the jews (jesus lineage) is described in the bible as black as soot. or black as an oven. lamentations 4 vs 8, lamentations 5 vs 10, jeremiah 14 vs 2 and job 30 vs 30

if all that does not convince you ? well have a nice day. i am done trying to convince self hating negros who dont think anything great came out of their lineage

buzugee:

I am not in the business of convincing lost negros about whom jesus really is, but i will give you a few pointers
1 the middle east was occupied by black people and was part of africa (northeast africa to be exact) in biblical days up until 70 AD
2 The color of jesus is in the bible in revelation 1 vs 13-14 and daniel 7 vs 9
3 the lineage of jesus ran into west africa after 70 AD when the romans kicked them out of northeast africa (land of canaan). they are today now refered to as the ashanti, fanti, ga, ewe, igbo, yoruba, lemba etc in west and south africa
4 the color of the jews (jesus lineage) is described in the bible as black as soot. or black as an oven. lamentations 4 vs 8, lamentations 5 vs 10, jeremiah 14 vs 2 and job 30 vs 30

if all that does not convince you ? well have a nice day. i am done trying to convince self hating negros who dont think anything great came out of their lineage

I doubt it if you are as pro-black or even as Neo-Black as I am but twisting history to suit your own aims is not the way to go about it

To say Jesus was black when all the historical, cultural and empirical facts point against it does not make you any more afrocentric than anybody else

Jesus lived barely 2000 years ago. in the grand scheme of the world, it is not enough time for people of a certain geographical area to completely evolve and change their looks

Believe it or not any black person from an Arab country go there because his ancestors were bought as slaves and not because they evolved from there

bermuda1:

I doubt it if you are as pro-black or even as Neo-Black as I am but twisting history to suit your own aims is not the way to go about it

To say Jesus was black when all the historical, cultural and empirical facts point against it does not make you any more afrocentric than anybody else

Jesus lived barely 2000 years ago. in the grand scheme of the world, it is not enough time for people of a certain geographical area to completely evolve and change their looks

Believe it or not any black person from an Arab country go there because his ancestors were bought as slaves and not because they evolved from there

you wish you were pro-black. who said anything about people evolving their looks in 2000 years ? they got slaughtered and massacred and kicked out of israel by the romans in 70 AD. do you even bother reading ? when they got kicked out, they ran into west and south africa in their millions. then the romans and greeks took over the land. most of the people in the land today are a hybrid of romans and greeks.