Nihilist:


What is not straight about that line?

It's not straight, I am sure they used manual technology. You need to see the one drew by The Sun, even a primary school pupil would have done better.

Elampiro

This is Howard Webb writing in the Times

Manchester United benefited from an error by assistant referee Mick McDonough in the build-up to their equaliser. Positioning is everything as an assistant referee and he is not where he needs to be, which is looking along the offside line. Because he is too far down the touchline, he cannot judge whether Antonio Valencia is just offside before he receives the ball, which he is. In those circumstances, he gives the benefit of the doubt to the attacker.

He will have known he lost his position at a crucial time.

Thats two ex Manyoo employees saying the same now.

Even with this dubious line, Valencia is still levelled with their number 6

Another ex-Referee Keith Hackett

That said, his performance at Old Trafford was not perfect. When Michael and his team look back on the game there will be three decisions they will be disappointed with.

The most serious of them was when assistant referee Mick McDonough failed to notice Antonio Valencia was offside in the build-up to Manchester United’s equaliser. He was completely out of position and it was a poor error considering the move was being conducted at walking pace.

elampiro:


It's not straight, I am sure they used manual technology. You need to see the one drew by The Sun, even a primary school pupil would have done better.

Lmao at manual technology

Nihilist:
Elampiro

This is Howard Webb writing in the Times



Thats two ex Manyoo employees saying the same now.

They are also looking at the wrong line drawn.

See The Sun newspaper bent line.

The second picture, I used my phone technology to help them. Na only them get technology?

This is not an offside, Skysports misled everyone. They need to apologize.

You know even opta do correct their technologically generated live data hours after the final whistle.

How is Valencia offside?

White people and astigmatism sef


Nice one baba elampiro!

elampiro, this your line straight so?

Evildoer:
How is Valencia offside?

White people and astigmatism sef


Nice one baba elampiro!

Dont mind them, Manchester United is becoming a feard team again, the only way is to report against them to turn the referees and fans against United.

Imagine the sun said United has benefited from 6 offside goals this season and United must be stopped. When we were here crying from poor officiaty against us m

elampiro:


They are also looking at the wrong line drawn.

See The Sun newspaper bent line.

The second picture, I used my phone technology to help them. Na only them get technology?

i dey gbadun you jare... technology aiye, technology oro!!!

na to prepare for stoke remain those guys have been on a tear lately.

SIRcumalot:
elampiro, this your line straight so?

Very well, I did not draw it. I placed it on the edge of the last centre defender, then it ran to Valencia.

Elamps wehdone jare

Oasis007:
"In the second half, Liverpool were winning and they know how to defend – they defend very well. I think they press really well and their lateral movement is good. When we played at Anfield, we had a phenomenal defensive performance with lots of critics; today I think Liverpool don’t deserve critics, I think they deserve people to say that defensively they are very good."


- Jose Mourinho

mourinho yarning opata since the death of christ.

I want make we meet Liverpool again for that carling cup final.

elampiro:


They are also looking at the wrong line drawn.

See The Sun newspaper bent line.

The second picture, I used my phone technology to help them. Na only them get technology?

Your line is across the picture not through it. That's the reason why you're arguing with sky sports, ex referees, and replay technology.

Your line has no perception of depth.

Nihilist:


Your line is across the picture not through it. That's the reason why you're arguing with sky sports, ex referees, and replay technology.

Your line has no perception of depth.

should we now call on the Prof then to help use some f/m equations to calculate if the line is correct

Nihilist:


Your line is across the picture not through it. That's the reason why you're arguing with sky sports, ex referees, and replay technology.

Your line has no perception of depth.

Simple question now. What did you see from the video you watched? The 45sec video I provided?

elampiro:


Simple question now. What did you see from the video you watched? The 45sec video I provided?

The simple question you should ask yourself is why the only person in this world arguing this point is Elampiro.

When Coogar used to say you watched matches in a calabash of water, I thought he was joking.

You're talking 45 second clip in real time, when there's a freaking 30 minutes post match analysis with replays in front of you.

I've literally just taken this picture of that piece of play to show you how crap your analysis is.

Note the line you've been shouting that sky sports drew is actually a pattern on the pitch. Milner(No7) is on one side of the line and Valencia is on the other side

Elampiro look again. This is your pic.

Sky Sports did not draw that line...that is a pitch pattern that is clearly parallel to the line of the box

How can you look at that and say it's not off?

Nihilist:


The simple question you should ask yourself is why the only person in this world arguing this point is Elampiro.

When Coogar used to say you watched matches in a calabash of water, I thought he was joking.

You're talking 45 second clip in real time, when there's a freaking 30 minutes post match analysis with replays in front of you.

I've literally just taken this picture of that piece of play to show you how crap your analysis is.

Note the line you've been shouting that sky sports drew is actually a pattern on the pitch. Milner(No7) is on one side of the line and Valencia is on the other side

I am not the only one arguing. Many people are protesting the analysis provided by skysports. Even a certain youtube analysis suggesting Valencia was offside got more dislikes than likes.

Your picture here didn't show the center defenders

Nihilist:
Elampiro look again. This is your pic.

Sky Sports did not draw that line...that is a pitch pattern that is clearly parallel to the line of the box

How can you look at that and say it's not off?

The pass had already been made here, and Valencia already running forward.

It is also possible that one this occasion the pitch line was not properly drawn

Nihilist:
Elampiro look again. This is your pic.

Sky Sports did not draw that line...that is a pitch pattern that is clearly parallel to the line of the box

How can you look at that and say it's not off?

this is after the ball has been passed, look at the direction of the Liverpool players approaching Valencia, look at Valencia's position in the first and second picture and also look at the pitch pattern

Valencia was before the line when mata released the pass as it is evident in your first picture, the second picture is after the ball has been released

this is based on the picture you provided

elampiro:



The pass had already been made here, and Valencia already running forward.

That is the exact same frame you crudely drew your line over. The difference is that instead of looking at a thumbnail, I've now posted a full size pic.

I have already proven that the line you've say Sky Sports drew was actually a perfectly straight pitch pattern and it's pretty obvious there that Valencia us offside....I mean Gary Neville who was commentating on the game called it immediately sef.

dopeJemi:


this is after the ball has been passed, look at the direction of the Liverpool players approaching Valencia, look at Valencia's position in the first and second picture and also look at the pitch pattern

Valencia was before the line when mata released the pass as it is evident in your first picture, the second picture is after the ball has been released

this is based on the picture you provided

Whats the difference between these two pics?

Nihilist:


Whats the difference between these two pics?

The ruling on Old Trafford pitch is not horizontal but vertical.

That horizontal line you provided was added by the person (the Sun) who made that post match video.

Valencia was not offside. Don’t rely on dubious bent line.

Nihilist:


The simple question you should ask yourself is why the only person in this world arguing this point is Elampiro.

When Coogar used to say you watched WATCHED MATCHES IN A CALABASH OF WATER, I thought he was joking.

Nihilist you are just a hate filled blue _twunt! So the draw dey pain you like this? I wonder what you would have done if we had won!

Anyway I just had to register my pleasure at this shot that brought back memories! "Calabash and hen familia"...

elampiro:


The ruling on Old Trafford pitch is not horizontal but vertical.

That horizontal line you provided was added by the person (the Sun) who made that post match video.

Valencia was not offside. Don’t rely on dubious bent line.

Lmao

That's a picture of my telly baba elampiro

SIRcumalot:
I want make we meet Liverpool again for that carling cup final.

Better want better thing o. No say i no tell you

Nihilist:


Whats the difference between these two pics?

they are the same pictures, you uploaded two different pictures the first time

these two pictures you just uploaded is after the ball has been released

Funlordjnr:







Nihilist you are just a hate filled blue _twunt! So the draw dey pain you like this? I wonder what you would have done if we had won!

Anyway I just had to register my pleasure at this shot that brought back memories! "Calabash and hen familia"...

Of course I'm a proud ABU, but this has nothing to do with that.

Elampiro is contesting the judgement of pundits who were live at the game and had replay technology to hand. I'm also contesting his own interpretation dazall.