Nairaland Forum

Sagamite:

Can you fcking answer my questions and stop the moronic "what am I going to say next so it does not look like if I have lost"? DON'T WASTE MY TIME!

BUT it was you who claimed there were no personal freedom but morals and I clearly pointed out to you that its not the case and such claim was ridiculous!!!

Sagamite, you have NO points!!

Kay 17:

BUT it was you who claimed there were no personal freedom but morals and I clearly pointed out to you that its not the case and such claim was ridiculous!!!

Sagamite, you have NO points!!

You are a fucktard!

Sagamite:

You are a fucktard!

Its not a war.

Kay 17:
Its not a war.

Of course it is not war.

I am well aware you are gay just based on your argument pattern.

This is not the first time I am debating with you. Other gay ones like you are all4naija and Eko Ile.

No matter the logic put forward to you, you will never accept any logic that proves homosexuality is not acceptable. You just love to waste peole's time by scraping at any distractive arguments when any of your moronic and numerously lame points is highlighted.

You are time waster since you are not here to hear an argument or be corrected. You are just here to justify your homosexuality.

I believe the idea is that between heterosexuality and homosexuality, there is no better or worse. They are both normal manifestations of human orientation. Consequently, if straight people can marry, gays should be allowed to. There is irrefutable evidence from human history and the mammalian world that gays are part of nature. Lets google animal sexuality, including the primates closest to humans. Nature couldn't have made gays in virtually all mammals and stopped at humans. Homophobes will shortly seem incredibly ignorant and silly. I'm surprised how everyone remembers God's law when it comes to gays. Most straight relationships are not even aimed at procreation, but based on contraception. Countless women have had their reproductive organs destroyed from inept or casual abortions. Those women might also have been ruined psychologically, and all from straight intimate relationships. Yet they'll preach how gays stop the growth of the population. In any case, the world's problem is not diminishing numbers but population growth. This argument has innumerable strands to it, but I'll say that Obama's approach is sensible, humane, progressive, and I as a black person am proud that he is called the first black President of America.

Sagamite:

Of course it is not war.

I am well aware you are gay just based on your argument pattern.

This is not the first time I am debating with you. Other gay ones like you are all4naija and Eko Ile.

No matter the logic put forward to you, you will never accept any logic that proves homosexuality is not acceptable. You just love to waste peole's time by scraping at any distractive arguments when any of your moronic and numerously lame points is highlighted.

You are time waster since you are not here to hear an argument or be corrected. You are just here to justify your homosexuality.

LOL!!

You don't have to be a partisan to issues, one doesn't need to gay to defend same sex relationships, one doesn't need to be a woman to defend abortion rights, one doesn't need to be religious to defend rights to religion, thought and conscience.

Obama isnt gay for having favourable gay rights opinion, neither was Author Fugard black for being against racism and Apartheid.

As long as you can accept that people's consciences are sovereign, you would understand the concept of personal freedom.

The French and American Declarations recognized the equality and freedom of man, yet most believed that blacks and slaves were not inclusive in the wordings of the declarations. Today, we find that outrageous. Qualifying human rights based on moral bias will nullify thw whole rights. Other classes of ppl can freely be included till no right is left.

Same with gay rights, homosexuality is considered an abomination in most parts of Nigeria, however if human rights is NOT at the instance of society's approval.

You have also abandoned your grounds that morals form human rights and that personal freedom is NOT in the constitution! Because they were too ridiculous!!

Kay 17:

LOL!!

You don't have to be a partisan to issues, one doesn't need to gay to defend same sex relationships, one doesn't need to be a woman to defend abortion rights, one doesn't need to be religious to defend rights to religion, thought and conscience.

Obama isnt gay for having favourable gay rights opinion, neither was Author Fugard black for being against racism and Apartheid.

As long as you can accept that people's consciences are sovereign, you would understand the concept of personal freedom.

The French and American Declarations recognized the equality and freedom of man, yet most believed that blacks and slaves were not inclusive in the wordings of the declarations. Today, we find that outrageous. Qualifying human rights based on moral bias will nullify thw whole rights. Other classes of ppl can freely be included till no right is left.

Same with gay rights, homosexuality is considered an abomination in most parts of Nigeria, however if human rights is NOT at the instance of society's approval.

You have also abandoned your grounds that morals form human rights and that personal freedom is NOT in the constitution! Because they were too ridiculous!!

YOU are gay, come off it!

You are a fucktard for saying I said morals form human rights. Homosexuality is not a human right.

Sagamite:

YOU are gay, come off it!

You are a fucktard for saying I said morals form human rights. Homosexuality is not a human right.

Not so great dogma. Whatever makes u sleep at night

Its nt even abt d sinfulnes of "gaysm" come to tink of it, its so absurd. Gosh! Irritative