Mother nature sometimes can be cruel. Take a look at these pictures and you will see how conjoined twins can go wrong in some weird way.

More pictures here: http://myoddnews..com/2012/05/conjoined-twins-gone-wrong-god-is-great.html

what is this!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

God is truly Great

Mr_Anony: God is truly Great

yea, god is great. I wonder what this guy would be doing if he were to be a Nigerian...

olempe:

yea, god is great. I wonder what this guy would be doing if he were to be a Nigerian...

About that, we can never know for sure now can we?

God malforms, man corrects.

??!!;-(

thehomer:
God malforms, man corrects.

@thehomer

Cut God some slack

Appropriately more the below than your submission

God reforms, man rejects.
- Nothing to do with God because at the beginning He relinquished the power of governance and control of earth to man.

And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness:
and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea,
and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle,
and over all the earth,
and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the earth
Genesis 1:26 KJV

And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food,
and that it was pleasant to the eyes,
and a tree to be desired to make one wise,
she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat,
and gave also unto her husband with her;
and he did eat
Genesis 3:6 KJV

... the rest is legacy and history

KamiLara:

@thehomer

Cut God some slack

Appropriately more the below than your submission

God reforms, man rejects.
- Nothing to do with God because at the beginning He relinquished the power of governance and control of earth to man.

And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness:
and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea,
and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle,
and over all the earth,
and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the earth
Genesis 1:26 KJV

And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food,
and that it was pleasant to the eyes,
and a tree to be desired to make one wise,
she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat,
and gave also unto her husband with her;
and he did eat
Genesis 3:6 KJV

... the rest is legacy and history

Why should I cut God some slack. Is it not incompetence to place this tree of life that looked attractive in the garden of Eden before two naive humans? If one placed an open flame before a child and said the child shouldn't touch it but the child touches, what do you do? Do you punish the child and his offspring for eternity because of it?

thehomer: God malforms, man corrects.

Dear friend, trust me, you've lost ur way. I sincerely pray that God show u the way. Amen!!!

thehomer:

Why should I cut God some slack.
Is it not incompetence to place this tree of life that looked attractive in the garden of Eden before two naive humans?
If one placed an open flame before a child and said the child shouldn't touch it but the child touches, what do you do?
Do you punish the child and his offspring for eternity because of it?

@thehomer

It is not incompetence, it rather is, confidence

- the belief in Oneself and One's ability

that One can put right an incompetence

and failure to simultaneously

do the right thing,

at the right time

and remain/be in right standing with the Lord GOD.

Eve, naive? Well, yes.

Adam? No, he was not naive

olempe:

Dear friend, trust me, you've lost ur way. I sincerely pray that God show u the way. Amen!!!

When are you going to offer your sincere prayers and when do you expect a response from God? I'd like to know so I can mark my calendar.

KamiLara:

@thehomer

It is not incompetence, it rather is, confidence

- the belief in Oneself and One's ability

that One can put right an incompetence

and failure to simultaneously

do the right thing,

at the right time

and remain/be in right standing with the Lord GOD.

Eve, naive? Well, yes.

Adam? No, he was not naive

No it is not confidence but incompetence. Recall my example with the child. Deliberately placing one's own child in that situation would lead me to conclude that such a person was an incompetent parent.

Why do you say that Adam was not naive but Eve was? If Eve was naive, why was she punished? And keep in mind that Adam was buck naked.

thehomer:

No it is not confidence but incompetence.

Recall my example with the child.

Deliberately placing one's own child in that situation would lead me to conclude

that such a person was an incompetent parent.

Why do you say that Adam was not naive but Eve was?

If Eve was naive, why was she punished?

And keep in mind that Adam was buck nâked

@thehomer

OK,

however mind you, Adam was a grown man, and not a child

Moreover how do evaluate character?

How do you examine or judge, carefully, someone's moral or ethical quality? Hmm?

Eve was reprimanded along with other involved and guilty parties

Just like Job, Adam had an edge around him,

He only realised he was buck nâked when the covering was lifted

KamiLara:

@thehomer

OK,

however mind you, Adam was a grown man, and not a child

Moreover how do evaluate character?

How do you examine or judge, carefully, someone's moral or ethical quality? Hmm?

Eve was reprimanded along with other involved and guilty parties

Just like Job, Adam had an edge around him,

He only realised he was buck nâked when the covering was lifted

What would you call a man who wandered around a jungle naked?
How I decide on morality and ethics depends on multiple variables which include the outcome, the intention, the degree of suffering among others.
According to you, Eve was naive so why punish her and her offspring?
What do you mean by "Adam had an edge around him"?
Since he noticed he later realized he was naked, doesn't that imply that before he came to this knowledge, he was ignorant?

thehomer:

What would you call a man who wandered around a jungle naked?

How I decide on morality and ethics depends on multiple variables which include the outcome, the intention, the degree of suffering among others.

According to you, Eve was naive so why punish her and her offspring?

What do you mean by "Adam had an edge around him"?

Since he noticed he later realized he was nâked, doesn't that imply that before he came to this knowledge, he was ignorant?

@thehomer

Typo, my bad

- its hedge; had a hedge rather :-(

Adam had fast tracked knowledge transfer

Dont make the mistake,

by a long shot Adam was not an ignoramus

he was not ignorant.

Did you not notice the discourse between Eve and the snake?

Who do you think gave Eve the lowdown on the tree?

If the child was in Nigeria, worse Calabar, he would have been stoned and ppl would have believed that they ve killed the devil.

Knowledge is powerful. Praying wouldn't have helped the boy in this case.

Kay 17: If the child was in Nigeria,

worse Calabar, he would have been stoned and ppl would have believed that they ve killed the devil.

Knowledge is powerful.

Praying wouldn't have helped the boy in this case.

^^^

There you are, the fear of the unknown or inexplicable

a good qualifier for ignorance

KamiLara:

@thehomer

Typo, my bad

- its hedge; had a hedge rather :-(

Okay.

KamiLara:
Adam had fast tracked knowledge transfer

Dont make the mistake,

by a long shot Adam was not an ignoramus

he was not ignorant.

Why do you say Adam wasn't ignorant? The man didn't know he was naked, he didn't know right from wrong etc. What do you call that?

KamiLara:
Did you not notice the discourse between Eve and the snake?

Who do you think gave Eve the lowdown on the tree?

Yes I've read the discussion between Eve and the snake. What is so important about that?

^^^

Are you familiar with Microsoft Office's normal.dot template?

Are you familiar with what happens to word documents created off a corrupted normal.dot template?

Do you see the parallel with Eve and her offsprings?

thehomer: God malforms, man corrects.

- Point blank simple!!

Okija_juju:


- Point blank simple!!

SMH!

KamiLara: ^^^

Are you familiar with Microsoft Office's normal.dot template?

Are you familiar with what happens to word documents created off a corrupted normal.dot template?

Do you see the parallel with Eve and her offsprings?

No I don't see a parallel with Eve and her offspring because humans aren't software programs.

thehomer:

No I don't see a parallel with Eve and her offspring because humans aren't software programs.

@thehomer

Coding.

Codes are all over the place

- Highway Code, Traffic code, Software code, Genetic code etc

Codes are systematically arranged and comprehensive collection of laws or set of instructions/rules

Violating the code will cause damage or harm whether, where applicable, its software or humans

Retribution?

Okija_juju:


- Point blank simple!!

Why thank you.

KamiLara:

@thehomer

Coding.

Codes are all over the place

- Highway Code, Traffic code, Software code, Genetic code etc

Codes are systematically arranged and comprehensive collection of laws or set of instructions/rules

Violating the code will cause damage or harm whether, where applicable, its software or humans

Retribution?

Are you suggesting that eating an apple disrupted Adam and Eve's genetic code and made them more knowledgeable? Or something along those lines?

thehomer:

Are you suggesting that eating an apple disrupted Adam and Eve's genetic code and made them more knowledgeable?

Or something along those lines?

@thehomer

Apple?

Were you trying to humor me with that "eating an apple" wisecrack?

Breaking the law is like opening Pandora's box

Adam, reiterating, had fast-tracked knowledge

and here is you saying, Adam wasnt knowledgeable enough. Huh?

If not, then why did Adam tell Eve that touching the fruit of the tree would make her die

Do not eat was part of the remit, not do not touch, lest you die.

So where did the information of not touching, magically spring from?

From Adam. He had always been knowledgeable prior before the ...

Shall we say,

the sudden and dramatic experience they shared culminated a confirmation with extra or more knowledge

- an aftermath resulting in exposure et al

KamiLara:

@thehomer

Apple?

Were you trying to humor me with that "eating an apple" wisecrack?

No it isn't a joke. That is what is written in the Bible.

KamiLara:
Breaking the law is like opening Pandora's box

Adam, reiterating, had fast-tracked knowledge

and here is you saying, Adam wasnt knowledgeable enough. Huh?

I said he was ignorant before eating the apple yet he and his offspring are going to be punished for it for eternity.

KamiLara:
If not, then why did Adam tell Eve that touching the fruit of the tree would make her die

Do not eat was part of the remit, not do not touch, lest you die.

So where did the information of not touching, magically spring from?

From Adam. He had always been knowledgeable prior before the ...

Shall we say,

the sudden and dramatic experience they shared culminated a confirmation with extra or more knowledge

- an aftermath resulting in exposure et al

What are you driving at? Are you saying that the problem was touching the fruit?

thehomer:

No it isn't a joke. That is what is written in the Bible.

I said he was ignorant before eating the apple yet he and his offspring are going to be punished for it for eternity.

What are you driving at?

Are you saying that the problem was touching the fruit?

@thehomer

Yes, it is a joke, because apple did not get mentioned in the Bible until four books later (i.e. in Deuteronomy)

Adam, again, reiterating, was not ignorant before eating the "apple"

Adam in trying to dissuade Eve from even considering at all by herself eating the fruit

upped the ante, by insinuating that mere touching rather than eating the fruit is a death sentence

He knew something hence the crisis preventative measures

I am not driving at anything but merely steering (not driving; but merely steering - excuse the pun)

to the fact that Adam was pre- and post- knowledgeable

The problem had nothing to do with touching the fruit

but a whole deal more from eating the fruit

KamiLara:

@thehomer

Yes, it is a joke, because apple did not get mentioned in the Bible until four books later (i.e. in Deuteronomy)

Adam, again, reiterating, was not ignorant before eating the "apple"

Adam in trying to dissuade Eve from even considering at all by herself eating the fruit

upped the ante, by insinuating that mere touching rather than eating the fruit is a death sentence

He knew something hence the crisis preventative measures

I am not driving at anything but merely steering (not driving; but merely steering - excuse the pun)

to the fact that Adam was pre- and post- knowledgeable

The problem had nothing to do with touching the fruit

but a whole deal more from eating the fruit

So, the problem was eating the fruit. Now, what was the knowledge that Adam had before eating the fruit other than a command that he shouldn't eat the fruit? And what were you getting at with your talk of a code?

thehomer:

So, the problem was eating the fruit.

Now, what was the knowledge that Adam had before eating the fruit other than a command that he shouldn't eat the fruit?

And what were you getting at with your talk of a code?

@thehomer

It is what it is.

Yes, the problem was eating the fruit and thereby breaking an underlying rule.

The knowledge Adam had before eating the fruit other than the command that he shouldn't eat the fruit

was Adam's understanding that lives are at stake if the fruit is eaten.

Eve said that ordinarily touching the fruit will make them die.

It is clearly obvious and easily seen that it was Adam that passed on this knowledge or information to Eve.

The rule or command; using your choice word; especially relating to man, is fundamental in the grand scheme of the universe.

What was I getting at with code?

Well, codes. They are everywhere.

Examples to list a few are Universal Code; Human Rights Code; Software code; Genetic Code etc

Codes can be guidelines, instructions, algorithms etc

Codes are there for sanity sake.

Everything, codes, whatnot hinged on that single rule or command

but the scale was tipped when the rule was broken.

The Pandora's box got opened.

Disarray set in. The whole shebang started going haywire thereafter,

taking an oblique course or direction, not in the beginning or originally intended.