chelsea will loose for so many reason, so i urge all chelsea fans to take things calm cos it is bayarn cup to loose.

adefash:
It is only the unwise that will place betting on this.the two teams,expecially chelsea,are highly unpredictable.though i'm chelsea fan but the club d3y dull me wella.i'll only go & njoy soccer.staying @ home will dull me more!

So in other words,you are calling me f00lish?

Did i bet with your money?you are not a Chelsea fan or anything near it so quit acting like you belong cos you don't.

I know a true fan when i see one .

Bawss1: I think the scales are tipped towards Munich favor as they will be playing in their own stadium, the Allianz Arena.

That shouldn't be a plus bro cos no team has won the UCL final at home.pls respect history

R.I.P bayern munich.

polorus: chelsea will loose for so many reason, so i urge all chelsea fans to take things calm cos it is bayarn cup to loose.

do u really knw wat u meant by ur statement?kindly proof read.

chelsea to loose by 3.0 up Bayern M

polorus: chelsea will loose for so many reason, so i urge all chelsea fans to take things calm cos it is bayarn cup to loose.

What is this one saying?

In your mind you made sense o,explain the above please.

Prophet TB joshua said a bald man is going to score for my team in the first half.

the only Bald man in my team is Arjen Robben

By God's grace it would be chelsea 3 bayern munich 1. In God i trust.

Abeyjide:


wat do u mean by anti football?nobody is begging anyone to watch it.

Abeyjide:

as an experience club,u dont play d same tactics wit all club .against napoli,benfica,was der anytin like dat?and moreover if actually dey defended againts barca,how come dey scored two goals?playin barca wit ten men means u ave to defend and convert any oppurtunty to goal.

If this is the evolution of football when one team attacks practically for the entire game(Barca) and the other just plays in their own half, continuosly defending, diving intermittently to disrupt the flow of the game, relying upon a couple of opportunistic attacks and luck(Chelsea), then it is terrible for the game, period!

Games of such nature are destructive for the sport. The anti-football of Chelsea is shameful and destructive for the game of football. It's even more disgraceful when you consider that Chelsea are supposed to be a big club. Abrahamovic has endlessly pumped money into this Chelsea project since taking over. This is a Chelsea side that was put together with hundreds of millions of £ and even has a £50 million signing on the bench and yet, the best they could come up with is this cynical, vulgar and vomit-inducing, anti-football, SMH. It's understandable when small clubs like QPR, Blackburn and Stoke play like this but Chelsea? Even those poor clubs in Spain that don't have up to 1/10 of Chelsea's budget don't indulge in such shameful act. I can't even imagine how any football fan would be proud of such display. If every team played like that, I'm pretty sure there won't be as many football fans in the world today.

Where exactly is the sympathy for us fans enduring those 180 minutes of repulsive, anti-football?

Am hoping Chelsea will loose, i don't want Arsenal to play UEFA play off...

medjai: If this is the evolution of football when one team attacks practically for the entire game(Barca) and the other just plays in their own half, continuosly defending, diving intermittently to disrupt the flow of the game, relying upon a couple of opportunistic attacks and luck(Chelsea), then it is terrible for the game, period!

Games of such nature are destructive for the sport. The anti-football of Chelsea is shameful and destructive for the game of football. It's even more disgraceful when you consider that Chelsea are supposed to be a big club. Abrahamovic has endlessly pumped money into this Chelsea project since taking over. This is a Chelsea side that was put together with hundreds of millions of £ and even has a £50 million signing on the bench and yet, the best they could come up with is this cynical, vulgar and vomit-inducing, anti-football, SMH. It's understandable when small clubs like QPR, Blackburn and Stoke play like this but Chelsea? Even those poor clubs in Spain that don't have up to 1/10 of Chelsea's budget don't indulge in such shameful act. I can't even imagine how any football fan would be proud of such display. If every team played like that, I'm pretty sure there won't be as many football fans in the world today.

Where exactly is the sympathy for us fans enduring those 180 minutes of repulsive, anti-football?

so true! I hate watching Chelsea match, it is so boring.. Since Di Matteo take over it is this new method of 9-1 formation.. 9 players will just line up on 18yard box while only one player(Drogba or £50m) wil be on d front.
But am sure Bayern Munich will beat Chelsea even if they play that thier cowardly pattern becoz Bayern don't play like Barca.

medjai: If this is the evolution of football when one team attacks practically for the entire game(Barca) and the other just plays in their own half, continuosly defending, diving intermittently to disrupt the flow of the game, relying upon a couple of opportunistic attacks and luck(Chelsea), then it is terrible for the game, period!

Games of such nature are destructive for the sport. The anti-football of Chelsea is shameful and destructive for the game of football. It's even more disgraceful when you consider that Chelsea are supposed to be a big club. Abrahamovic has endlessly pumped money into this Chelsea project since taking over. This is a Chelsea side that was put together with hundreds of millions of £ and even has a £50 million signing on the bench and yet, the best they could come up with is this cynical, vulgar and vomit-inducing, anti-football, SMH. It's understandable when small clubs like QPR, Blackburn and Stoke play like this but Chelsea? Even those poor clubs in Spain that don't have up to 1/10 of Chelsea's budget don't indulge in such shameful act. I can't even imagine how any football fan would be proud of such display. If every team played like that, I'm pretty sure there won't be as many football fans in the world today.

Where exactly is the sympathy for us fans enduring those 180 minutes of repulsive, anti-football?

Remember dats wat inter did against barca and no single person complained and also defended wel wen dey wer one man down. Immagine wen chelsea 2 central defence were out,what wil u do as a coach?is a matter of usin ur strenght to counter ur weakness and lik wise barca did der own.if barka were betaoff chelsea,dey wont allow a porous defendin as it was.d way dey did is stil part of football.in football we ave defenc,midfield and attack .

This will surely be fun to watch

Torch1: Am hoping Chelsea will loose, i don't want Arsenal to play UEFA play off... so true! I hate watching Chelsea match, it is so boring.. Since Di Matteo take over it is this new method of 9-1 formation.. 9 players will just line up on 18yard box while only one player(Drogba or £50m) wil be on d front.
But am sure Bayern Munich will beat Chelsea even if they play that thier cowardly pattern becoz Bayern don't play like Barca.

D coach first match was napoli and afta benfica ,was der any form of 9 -1 formation?stop usin sentiment in ur comment.chelsea fans dont force haters to lik dem.u dey vex say drogba and torres scored in some crucial matches ba? Go hug transformer

Torch1: Am hoping Chelsea will loose, i don't want Arsenal to play UEFA play off... so true! I hate watching Chelsea match, it is so boring.. Since Di Matteo take over it is this new method of 9-1 formation.. 9 players will just line up on 18yard box while only one player(Drogba or £50m) wil be on d front.
But am sure Bayern Munich will beat Chelsea even if they play that thier cowardly pattern becoz Bayern don't play like Barca.

Cry cry baby!!!

If this is the evolution of football when one team attacks practically for the entire game(Barca) and the other just plays in their own half, continuosly defending, diving intermittently to disrupt the flow of the game, relying upon a couple of opportunistic attacks and luck(Chelsea), then it is terrible for the game, period!

Games of such nature are destructive for the sport. The anti-football of Chelsea is shameful and destructive for the game of football. It's even more disgraceful when you consider that Chelsea are supposed to be a big club. Abrahamovic has endlessly pumped money into this Chelsea project since taking over. This is a Chelsea side that was put together with hundreds of millions of £ and even has a £50 million signing on the bench and yet, the best they could come up with is this cynical, vulgar and vomit-inducing, anti-football, SMH. It's understandable when small clubs like QPR, Blackburn and Stoke play like this but Chelsea? Even those poor clubs in Spain that don't have up to 1/10 of Chelsea's budget don't indulge in such shameful act. I can't even imagine how any football fan would be proud of such display. If every team played like that, I'm pretty sure there won't be as many football fans in the world today.

Why are barca fans crying ? Stop crying ?
Fans are not entertained? I thought Barca was tapping and passing that day. Is that not enough an entertainment for you.

Na by force to dance on the pitch ?

Chelsea wanted the ball in the net and they got it. Barca can go employ Chris brown to play for them on the pitch while they dance. Thats their choice.

All chelsea wanted is defend and score and they achieved it. Is their any crime in it?

Abeg stop ur rubish beatiful football and parking bus of thing. Who gives a blip?

If barca is so good, why cant they stop Ramires from scoring. Or Ramires was an outsider. Or Ramires was not part of Chelsea?

Rubish. If you fail, accept your failure and not excuses. Did chelsea parked bus for Valentia, Napoli, Benfica, Tottenham, LiverPool ?

We dont care who taps, all we want is victory. Shikenah,. If ya dont like it, bring a FIFA rule that says you must play a beautiful football.

Whats is the essence of a beautiful football when u cant break a defence?

Man City broke QPR defence, that is what we call beautiful futbol. If barca was good, it should have broken chelsea defence.

Barca was just passing the ball around without any motive. Chelsea utilized their own!

hotwax:

Why are barca fans crying ? Stop crying ?
Fans are not entertained? I thought Barca was tapping and passing that day. Is that not enough an entertainment for you.

Na by force to dance on the pitch ?

Chelsea wanted the ball in the net and they got it. Barca can go employ Chris brown to play for them on the pitch while they dance. Thats their choice.

All chelsea wanted is defend and score and they achieved it. Is their any crime in it?

Abeg stop ur rubish beatiful football and parking bus of thing. Who gives a blip?

If barca is so good, why cant they stop Ramires from scoring. Or Ramires was an outsider. Or Ramires was not part of Chelsea?

Rubish. If you fail, accept your failure and not excuses. Did chelsea parked bus for Valentia, Napoli, Benfica, Tottenham, LiverPool ?

We dont care who taps, all we want is victory. Shikenah,. If ya dont like it, bring a FIFA rule that says you must play a beautiful football.

Whats is the essence of a beautiful football when u cant break a defence?

Man City broke QPR defence, that is what we call beautiful futbol. If barca was good, it should have broken chelsea defence.

Barca was just passing the ball around without any motive. Chelsea utilized their own!

Pls tel dem!
Even wen footbal was created ther was no such tin as beautiful footbal.as time went on,that was added.pls d aim is to put the ball behind the net.whateva way u go abt it,we are less concern.
Or what does it profit a team to tap all through and loose d game.

medjai: If this is the evolution of football when one team attacks practically for the entire game(Barca) and the other just plays in their own half, continuosly defending, diving intermittently to disrupt the flow of the game, relying upon a couple of opportunistic attacks and luck(Chelsea), then it is terrible for the game, period!

Games of such nature are destructive for the sport. The anti-football of Chelsea is shameful and destructive for the game of football. It's even more disgraceful when you consider that Chelsea are supposed to be a big club. Abrahamovic has endlessly pumped money into this Chelsea project since taking over. This is a Chelsea side that was put together with hundreds of millions of £ and even has a £50 million signing on the bench and yet, the best they could come up with is this cynical, vulgar and vomit-inducing, anti-football, SMH. It's understandable when small clubs like QPR, Blackburn and Stoke play like this but Chelsea? Even those poor clubs in Spain that don't have up to 1/10 of Chelsea's budget don't indulge in such shameful act. I can't even imagine how any football fan would be proud of such display. If every team played like that, I'm pretty sure there won't be as many football fans in the world today.

Where exactly is the sympathy for us fans enduring those 180 minutes of repulsive, anti-football?

If Chelsea had played Barca style n lost, u for talk! Chelsea did it their way n won, u still talk!! Seriously man, purge urself of hate!!!!
For ur info, football is serious business, not just 4 ur bloody entertainment! Every team plays to win! These peeps don't just go into d field to knock d ball around! They map out a strategy b4 each game depending on d team they r facing!
Since u know Chelsea plays anti-football, instead of raising ur BP, take a chill pill!! pretend like chelsea doesn't exist and pass d mic joor!!

dr.laykay:

That shouldn't be a plus bro cos no team has won the UCL final at home.pls respect history

U should go and check ur history very wel cos Inter milan have done it before.

hotwax:

Why are barca fans crying ? Stop crying ?
Fans are not entertained? I thought Barca was tapping and passing that day. Is that not enough an entertainment for you.

Na by force to dance on the pitch ?

Chelsea wanted the ball in the net and they got it. Barca can go employ Chris brown to play for them on the pitch while they dance. Thats their choice.

All chelsea wanted is defend and score and they achieved it. Is their any crime in it?

Abeg stop ur rubish beatiful football and parking bus of thing. Who gives a blip?

If barca is so good, why cant they stop Ramires from scoring. Or Ramires was an outsider. Or Ramires was not part of Chelsea?

Rubish. If you fail, accept your failure and not excuses. Did chelsea parked bus for Valentia, Napoli, Benfica, Tottenham, LiverPool ?

We dont care who taps, all we want is victory. Shikenah,. If ya dont like it, bring a FIFA rule that says you must play a beautiful football.

Whats is the essence of a beautiful football when u cant break a defence?

Man City broke QPR defence, that is what we call beautiful futbol. If barca was good, it should have broken chelsea defence.

Barca was just passing the ball around without any motive. Chelsea utilized their own!

[B] Don't be sentimental while talking or maybe you were watching a different match. Barca broke chelseas defence but were unlucky to put the ball at the back of the net. Barca had 18 shots on target and 5 hit the crossbar as against 3 of chelsea, how come they didn't break chelsea's defence? [/B]

medjai: If this is the evolution of football when one team attacks practically for the entire game(Barca) and the other just plays in their own half, continuosly defending, diving intermittently to disrupt the flow of the game, relying upon a couple of opportunistic attacks and luck(Chelsea), then it is terrible for the game, period!

Games of such nature are destructive for the sport. The anti-football of Chelsea is shameful and destructive for the game of football. It's even more disgraceful when you consider that Chelsea are supposed to be a big club. Abrahamovic has endlessly pumped money into this Chelsea project since taking over. This is a Chelsea side that was put together with hundreds of millions of £ and even has a £50 million signing on the bench and yet, the best they could come up with is this cynical, vulgar and vomit-inducing, anti-football, SMH. It's understandable when small clubs like QPR, Blackburn and Stoke play like this but Chelsea? Even those poor clubs in Spain that don't have up to 1/10 of Chelsea's budget don't indulge in such shameful act. I can't even imagine how any football fan would be proud of such display. If every team played like that, I'm pretty sure there won't be as many football fans in the world today.

Where exactly is the sympathy for us fans enduring those 180 minutes of repulsive, anti-football?

shaarap! Another shameless barca fan. Not seeing barca in the final still dey pain u abi? Busybody.. SMH for u. Being bitter of the past wouldn't solve the past okay? Well, Whatever pattern your team is able to play at a particular period, play it. So far the ultimate objective is winning. That is what is called ''tactics'' oponu. If i attack and i lose, what has it brought me? NOTHING! If i defend and win, what has it brought me? TROPHIES.. That is what Nigeria national team coaches lack (tactics & technical no how) Benny sings and clap
#Barca shame unto you all power belong to chelsea! Shame unto you all power belong to CHELSEA!!!#

Effenberg urges Schweinsteiger to rise to the occasion in Champions League final
The former Germany international feels that the time has come for the midfielder to step up, and thinks that Bayern are too predictable

[B] Don't be sentimental while talking or maybe you were watching a different match. Barca broke chelseas defence but were unlucky to put the ball at the back of the net. Barca had 18 shots on target and 5 hit the crossbar as against 3 of chelsea, how come they didn't break chelsea's defence? [/B]

They hit the post because they did not get a clear chance to shoot at the goal keeper.

U dont have to be a genious to know that when you are playing against defence minded team, you will only be taking wasting shots.

Silva79: I have to admit dat chelOCEAN would be beaten lyk gangan drum by bayern.

I know you are one of those gibberish ManUre fans.
Ur prayerz no go work...
I pity the kind shame we go hold You after the match.

Funkymallam:

Which team is more depleted? Chelsea likely to miss 6 key players, 4 tru suspension and two tru injuries or Bayern missing 3 players out of suspension?

stand on top of that mortar from today

mukina2: ^
be nice

will relax and watch this

no heart attack at all.

you hold the pestle from today .... then cooldown tell me who we go support ? dont loud it

Funkymallam:

Which team is more depleted? Chelsea likely to miss 6 key players, 4 tru suspension and two tru injuries or Bayern missing 3 players out of suspension?

chelsea has a manageable bench unlike bayern. The stand in CB is not a good/natural CB. LFB is no no no. smh

GAB1: How far with TB Joshua? Abi the 2nd half never finish for heaven? I am waiting...........

The second half ended along with the first half.

Bayern won 1 nil. goal scored by arjen Rbben

toba: The second half ended along with the first half.

Bayern won 1 nil. goal scored by arjen Rbben

Toba how far, long time. So you guys are playing us in the finals.

What about Rafinha and who will be playing for Gustavo? Just wanna know