Nairaland Forum

manny4life:


LOL, the bold is the key word, don't waste your time bruh. Don't argue with NL resident "Development Economist" with certifications, [b][/b]who claimed Risk Managers perform "Macroeconomic" Analysis... LOLLLLLLLLLL. You can see how he digs out facts from his Bottom..

Abduljohn: It beats my imagination dat dey wnt to flog Lawan than Otedola, yes he's a victim of bribe(because he's yet to b convictd) bt to b frank, How on earth will a man collect 300m to supply fuel and didn't supply? If not subsidy the man wont be reprimanded. Pls Nigeria hasnt get their atall :oIt beats my imagination dat dey wnt to flog Lawan than Otedola, yes he's a victim of bribe(because he's yet to b convictd) bt to b frank, How on earth will a man collect 300m to supply fuel and didn't supply? If not subsidy the man wont be reprimanded. Pls Nigeria hasnt get their atall

Kobojunkie:

um . . . why in the world would you even think the courts have such power?

mbhs139: Hunnnnn!

Well, if I were Otedola I'll simply approach the court to restrain the house from investigating my company for any wrong doing after being exonerated by a committee set up by the house itself. Two, I'll sue the house for even attempting to investigate my company after clearing it of any wrong doing it the report and insist that the earlier report be made to stand, and since the Ouse itself have said that they still stand by that report, then they lack the locus status to query my company again based on that report.

Now, come to think of it, how can you say that report still stand and yet you want to bring in a company whose name was initially cleared of any wrong doing only after the chairman of the committee was accused of collecting bribe?

It just appears as if the people will call our representatives can not think more or less than like a child. Well, which ever way they want to take this case, except and only if Otedola himself have something to hide, they will loose if this matter is taken to court.

I think u re confused about dis matter, why not seek a better explanation. So the fact dat an adhoc committee and even d house had erroneously expunged Otedola's coys, he can now claim in court to be innocent? So d house has become GOD or a supreme court. Was d reason to expunge his coys not based on d bribe? An act which is wrong to which is now to be righted.

By the way, like someone said on this matter in an earlier post, why must it always be the house of representative that should be investigating fraud cases, what is the work of the police, SSS, icpc and the efcc? Must they always wait until they are called in? What is the rule of law on criminal investigation?

To cut the whole story short, this one na just film we dey watch, it will soon end. Make one big thing just happen again now, then that's the end of this show. But serious, this people aren't ashamed of themselves. It's terribly terrible.

BAMM GROUP:



Farouk can't go to jail cos bribery is not a jailable offence n its bailable

mbhs139: Hunnnnn!

Well, if I were Otedola I'll simply approach the court to restrain the house from investigating my company for any wrong doing after being exonerated by a committee set up by the house itself. Two, I'll sue the house for even attempting to investigate my company after clearing it of any wrong doing it the report and insist that the earlier report be made to stand, and since the Ouse itself have said that they still stand by that report, then they lack the locus status to query my company again based on that report.

Now, come to think of it, how can you say that report still stand and yet you want to bring in a company whose name was initially cleared of any wrong doing only after the chairman of the committee was accused of collecting bribe?

It just appears as if the people will call our representatives can not think more or less than like a child. Well, which ever way they want to take this case, except and only if Otedola himself have something to hide, they will loose if this matter is taken to court.

By the way, like someone said on this matter in an earlier post, why must it always be the house of representative that should be investigating fraud cases, what is the work of the police, SSS, icpc and the efcc? Must they always wait until they are called in? What is the rule of law on criminal investigation?

To cut the whole story short, this one na just film we dey watch, it will soon end. Make one big thing just happen again now, then that's the end of this show. But serious, this people aren't ashamed of themselves. It's terribly terrible.

mbhs139: Hunnnnn!

Well, if I were Otedola I'll simply approach the court to restrain the house from investigating my company for any wrong doing after being exonerated by a committee set up by the house itself. Two, I'll sue the house for even attempting to investigate my company after clearing it of any wrong doing it the report and insist that the earlier report be made to stand, and since the Ouse itself have said that they still stand by that report, then they lack the locus status to query my company again based on that report.

Now, come to think of it, how can you say that report still stand and yet you want to bring in a company whose name was initially cleared of any wrong doing only after the chairman of the committee was accused of collecting bribe?

It just appears as if the people will call our representatives can not think more or less than like a child. Well, which ever way they want to take this case, except and only if Otedola himself have something to hide, they will loose if this matter is taken to court.

By the way, like someone said on this matter in an earlier post, why must it always be the house of representative that should be investigating fraud cases, what is the work of the police, SSS, icpc and the efcc? Must they always wait until they are called in? What is the rule of law on criminal investigation?

To cut the whole story short, this one na just film we dey watch, it will soon end. Make one big thing just happen again now, then that's the end of this show. But serious, this people aren't ashamed of themselves. It's terribly terrible.

Lanquart:



The House said the two companies collected about $300 million USD for the purpose of importing petroeleum products in 2010 but never did. The companies were earlier cleared of any wrong doing by the probe report after Lawan was allegedly induced with bribe.

Jonwesley:

If u do not understand dis issue, why not keep quiet. Imagine what u posted. Lame talk.

Jonwesley:

If u do not understand dis issue, why not keep quiet. Imagine what u posted. Lame talk.

gbadexy: These legislators can fit behave childishly. I pity for otedola because they will so show him.
I just hop he is totally clean himself.

zenoj: What a Nation where illegality is valued as sanity.A Nation where touts are being refered to as Godly men with public showering encomium singing their praises.Yes Lawan was suspended by the house A Round of applause for the initiative but has the AGF,IGP or GEJ issued a warrant of arrest to Otedola a major sponsor of GEJ's election?

bayooooooo: The subsidy probe report is dead and buried.

BAMM GROUP:



Farouk can't go to jail cos bribery is not a jailable offence n its bailable

thegoodjoehunt: What will the president arrest Otedola for? A bogus charge? Don't u get it? The bribe was to remove his companies name from a list the names shouldn't have been on in the first place. It also means a lot of names there are fake. So Otedola defended himself and the president should arrest him for that.

zenoj:

This y I keep saying that nigerians are easily predictable.Once any issue of corruption comes up,they bring up another thing they know nigerians will be more interested in.And in a ntion where change/loss of focus is d order of d day,such a thing easily works.We all know even d bribe giver himself isn't anywhere near clean but we know there are levels.
Against all odds,I just belive God will bring confusion into d enemy's camp n free Nigeria.Nigeria will flourish again.

koruji: There you go again. Justice has no meaning to you, I think.

If Otedola has done anything wrong he won't be the one to expose it publicly or call the SSS to come into his house to record the giving/taking of bribes.

Farouk seems to have only himself to blame here, and the real victim, at least in this instance, is Otedola. He was the one that was unduly being threatened with legislative power, and again at least in this case, did the right thing.

Whistle blowers are to be encouraged, not punished, unless & until it can be proved that they were perpetrators. There is no evidence of the latter in the case of Otedola here.