Beowulf:
So according to your logic Henderson of Liverpool (€25M) (I stand to be corrected) Carroll of Liverpool (€30M), David Bently of Spurs (€16M) are all quality players because of their price tags? Everyone knows that the market in football is highly overpriced. Footballers like any merchandise is always subject to bargains. Sometimes you get a basement deal that turn out fantastic and sometimes you get the pricy merchandise that turn out a dud. I disagree that the price tag of a player is directly proportional to his ability, quality or intrinsic worth. Sometimes it is sometimes it is not.

Your argument that Podolski, a German international, one of the first names on the German team sheet, the youngest capped player in Europe is cack because he played in a relegated club doesn't hold water. It is like saying that Lukaku is a better player to Podolski because he played for a team that won the UCL and the FA cup.

arsenal fans will tell u that they are building a stadium and they bought podolski and giroud. if podolski is good with his 1000 caps, buyern and other german teams for don take am since. if he wants to play in epl, man u, man city and will show interest. before going for podolski, ur club did not see hulk? una no sabi cavani abi ur jersey no go fit ibrahimovic? coaches are judged by trophies not the number of stadium they built. why are we giving wenger the credit of stadium self? in arsenal, there boards of directors and positions like chairman and presidents so what happened to all these offices if wenger as a coach is responsible for stadium or are there things u guys are not telling us?

harryobas:

Bleep U

wat arrant person u are. u lot (arsenal) need to grow up

Adufaye: Buyin a goods wit low quality n quatity 4 a high abt of,50m,30m,25,...is rubblish,..shev 30m,did he perform?No!...torres 50m....did he score 15goals?NO!....david luiz 25m,is he beta da vermelean?NO! Meireles is he beta dan ateta?NO....dere is no player in ur club u wil use 2 compare any of my player dat wil b beta of....is our keeper...'vermelean,song,wilshere,ateta,v.persie,chamberlain,sagna,gevinho! D amount of dose guy dose nt reach d amount u sign shevenko,talklex of torres....if arsenal win trophy money go touch me...mteewch...nonesense

are u deluded or something,okay una win 5-3 uba dey shout,our worst season for epl still be una best season of which at the end of the day una no win nada
2 trophies despite not playing good
comon give it to chelsea when due

nolongtin:
some players died playing for chelsea without winning jack shit.wot will they be saying in their graves?blakburn won the league after spending like dis in d 90s but its been relegated,leeds spent like dis qualified 4 d champions league but its been relagated to oblivion.wot whr saying is same can happen to chelsea if they can t self sustain ,will u still follow chelsea if they play division 3?they real fans of chealsea will but u will move on cus ur not a real fan.can u answer dis qusetion+why didnt the fans of Chelsea Pitch Owners sell the freehold to abramovic?.they know chelsea its ders abra is just an investor he will go and chelsea will still be ders simple..real supporters stay will investors like abra will move on.

because that is how you do your own investments abi
no wonder naijans dey suffer to make am when u always abandon your investments

its only in Nigeria that utd fans will be suporting arsenal,chelsea fans supporting totenham
go look into the different history of these clubs and realise that what most Nigerian fans of these clubs are bandwagoners
am a Nigerian and chelsea to the core,cant stand arsenal,cant stand totenham,dislike qpr and sure as hell hate barca

harryobas: Im sick of the Arsenal haters.. We are the model club.. Chelsea City and United are just clubs on steroids!!!! Until any of your clubs build a stadium, then I will love to see how much money you are spending in transfers!!! We are ahead of the game. Imagine that money was spent on players instead of the stadium, do you not think we would have won the league? We have been around the top of the table in March in a few of the previous seasons, we have been to cup finals... Having spend no money. I think the most we have been in debt is 6 million.

NEXTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT

1025:

arsenal fans will tell u that they are building a stadium and they bought podolski and giroud. if podolski is good with his 1000 caps, buyern and other german teams for don take am since. if he wants to play in epl, man u, man city and will show interest. before going for podolski, ur club did not see hulk? una no sabi cavani abi ur jersey no go fit ibrahimovic? coaches are judged by trophies not the number of stadium they built. why are we giving wenger the credit of stadium self? in arsenal, there boards of directors and positions like chairman and presidents so what happened to all these offices if wenger as a coach is responsible for stadium or are there things u guys are not telling us?

At times some of you forget these club sides are corporate entities and must therefore be financially responsible. The board of the club has a duty to ensure the club runs within its means. This includes analysing potential financial risks. Arsenal has assets and generates a lot of profits but the problem has to do with cash flow. If you stretch the club beyond what it is at the moment you create liquidity problems for the club giving the current liabilities it has to settle. One option is to take more loans, however, it would be irresponsible to take further loans to finance purchase of players or the payment of wages. The board has a responsibility to ensure an entity is run in a financially responsible manner. Arsenal is a club that would last the test of time given its focus on the long term rather than the short term. Arsenal's has a robust governance structure than most clubs in England. For example, the Chairman can be said not to have unfettered powers. This cannot be said of Chelsea with Abramovich dominating the board or Man United with the Glazer family dominant on the board.

Football club sides are corporate entities and as such must be run as one. UEFA recognises this as can be seen from the introduction of the Financial Fair Play rule.

To achieve what Wenger achieves with Arsenal is a miracle. There are very few managers who can achieve similar feats with a limited amount of resources. He has won trophies and continually put Arsenal in the top flight with the little he has and had. It takes a genius to do that.

I repeat again Arsenal would stand the test of time. It is a responsibly run corporate entity. It does not employ very risky strategies and assets to meet short term objectives but rather focuses on the long term.

Please no beer parlour analysis.

shey torres 50m no fit play 4 his country,na bench e de sitdown tru out! e value pass all does guys wel dey start

Azubreezy: wat arrant person u are. u lot (arsenal) need to grow up

Bleep OFF

1025:

arsenal fans will tell u that they are building a stadium and they bought podolski and giroud. if podolski is good with his 1000 caps, buyern and other german teams for don take am since. if he wants to play in epl, man u, man city and will show interest. before going for podolski, ur club did not see hulk? una no sabi cavani abi ur jersey no go fit ibrahimovic? coaches are judged by trophies not the number of stadium they built. why are we giving wenger the credit of stadium self? in arsenal, there boards of directors and positions like chairman and presidents so what happened to all these offices if wenger as a coach is responsible for stadium or are there things u guys are not telling us?

Mind you chelsea bidded for oliver giroud ,but he choose arsenal instead.wenger encouraged the board about moving to a new stadium the y where sceptical @ first because of money and wit agreement agreed to cost cost and tighten der belts to acheive dis.which is a great compliment to wenger cus oder team b4 arsenal in d league dat tried such went straight into relegation.

1025:

arsenal fans will tell u that they are building a stadium and they bought podolski and giroud. if podolski is good with his 1000 caps, buyern and other german teams for don take am since. if he wants to play in epl, man u, man city and will show interest. before going for podolski, ur club did not see hulk? una no sabi cavani abi ur jersey no go fit ibrahimovic? coaches are judged by trophies not the number of stadium they built. why are we giving wenger the credit of stadium self? in arsenal, there boards of directors and positions like chairman and presidents so what happened to all these offices if wenger as a coach is responsible for stadium or are there things u guys are not telling us?

Abeg forget hulk, if hulk is such a world class player like u claim why is it only chelsea showing interest in signing him, why are baca, madrid, man u not all struggling with chelsea to sign him. Please stop making noise with your beer palour analysis.

harryobas:

Abeg forget hulk, if hulk is such a world class player like u claim why is it only chelsea showing interest in signing him, why are baca, madrid, man u not all struggling with chelsea to sign him. Please stop making noise with your beer palour analysis.

no mind am hulk ko spider man ni,,jokes...lol

All clubs that tried to build a new stadium got relegated from the premiership cus of cost/performance .only arsenal managed to survive wot affected them was turning from cup winners to a drop of just top4 always 15 yrs or more running .u think na beans?they have been well managed ,history is der 2 check .bolton tried they gat relagated when they built reebork.sunderland treid same shit happenned.go figure.

nolongtin:
some players died playing for chelsea without winning jack shit.wot will they be saying in their graves?blakburn won the league after spending like dis in d 90s but its been relegated,leeds spent like dis qualified 4 d champions league but its been relagated to oblivion.wot whr saying is same can happen to chelsea if they can t self sustain ,will u still follow chelsea if they play division 3?they real fans of chealsea will but u will move on cus ur not a real fan.can u answer dis qusetion+why didnt the fans of Chelsea Pitch Owners sell the freehold to abramovic?.they know chelsea its ders abra is just an investor he will go and chelsea will still be ders simple..real supporters stay will investors like abra will move on.

Ok, blackburn & leeds may av bin relegated, bt dia history certainly isnt, dats wat archives are 4. Dey relegated because dey were mismanaged, and mismanagement can hapn 2 any club, includn ur belovd arsenal. Wat i'm sayin is dat 2 win big trophies in modern futbol, u nid 2 spend, u tel me a club dats wining big trophies dat dint invest in players by spending. See barca 4 example, dey've bin dominating 4 quite a while now, bt it dint cum easy, dey spent big moni on players, r.madrid spent lyk £200m in buyin CR7, kaka & benzema, and dey're now reaping dia benefits. Take mancity as anoda example, 4rm a midtable club, dey started spendin big, buyin d lyks of tevez, silva, aguero, y.toure...and c dem now, dey won d FA Cup and league in 2yrs. C d lyks of nasri, clichy, flamini, fabregas and adebayor who left arsenal after growin tired of being trophyless, goin 2 clubs dat spend big, dey are nw wining trophies 4 fun. D examples can go on and on, im sure u get my point. Arsenal are a great club, dy play gud futbol, bt dy jst av 2 spend 2 start wining trophies again. I stand 2 b corrected.

1025:

arsenal fans will tell u that they are building a stadium and they bought podolski and giroud. if podolski is good with his 1000 caps, buyern and other german teams for don take am since. if he wants to play in epl, man u, man city and will show interest. before going for podolski, ur club did not see hulk? una no sabi cavani abi ur jersey no go fit ibrahimovic? coaches are judged by trophies not the number of stadium they built. why are we giving wenger the credit of stadium self? in arsenal, there boards of directors and positions like chairman and presidents so what happened to all these offices if wenger as a coach is responsible for stadium or are there things u guys are not telling us?

So you are knocking Arsenal for buying a striker (Podolski) which they felt they needed at the time instead of Hulk (a midfielder)? This just about sums up your knowledge of footie. Your argument that if Podolski was a class player all Europe top clubs would be queuing for him is fallacious. Pirlo is class but was a free agent last season! Clubs go for players they need not players they want to just stick on their benches. Do you know how many strikers competing at City? So much so that Ade had to go on loan for some game time last season. If City bought Podolski where will he fit in? Let's not even talk about the wage bill. Real Madrid is already maxed out in terms of strikers so where will he fit in? Chelsea is keeping faith with Torres and prolly feels they don't need an additional striker. When Henry went to Arsenal how many clubs were after him? When Fabregas went to Arsenal how many clubs were gunning for him. RVP is arguably the hottest attacker in Europe right now but how many clubs are really interested in him despite his having had a blinding se
ason? Answer: Most top clubs feel they don't need striking additions (so far). The economic situation in Europe is also affecting footie too. Very few clubs in Europe like Man City, United, Chelsea, Real and Barca shop at the high end. The rest shop at the lower reaches of transfer prices. The economic downturn is already affecting Real (sponsored by the Spanish govt) and Barca (who owe banks millions) Negredo and Llorente in Spain had fantastic seasons but how many "top" clubs are lining up for their signatures?

Beowulf:

So you are knocking Arsenal for buying a striker (Podolski) which they felt they needed at the time instead of Hulk (a midfielder)? This just about sums up your knowledge of footie. Your argument that if Podolski was a class player all Europe top clubs would be queuing for him is fallacious. Pirlo is class but was a free agent last season! Clubs go for players they need not players they want to just stick on their benches. Do you know how many strikers competing at City? So much so that Ade had to go on loan for some game time last season. If City bought Podolski where will he fit in? Let's not even talk about the wage bill. Real Madrid is already maxed out in terms of strikers so where will he fit in? Chelsea is keeping faith with Torres and prolly feels they don't need an additional striker. When Henry went to Arsenal how many clubs were after him? When Fabregas went to Arsenal how many clubs were gunning for him. RVP is arguably the hottest attacker in Europe right now but how many clubs are really interested in him despite his having had a blinding se
ason? Answer: Most top clubs feel they don't need striking additions (so far). The economic situation in Europe is also affecting footie too. Very few clubs in Europe like Man City, United, Chelsea, Real and Barca shop at the high end. The rest shop at the lower reaches of transfer prices. The economic downturn is already affecting Real (sponsored by the Spanish govt) and Barca (who owe banks millions) Negredo and Llorente in Spain had fantastic seasons but how many "top" clubs are lining up for their signatures?

ur spot on bruv.u understand the politics of football,not arm chair beer parlour football fans we have these days.

samuelee1:

Ok, blackburn & leeds may av bin relegated, bt dia history certainly isnt, dats wat archives are 4. Dey relegated because dey were mismanaged, and mismanagement can hapn 2 any club, includn ur belovd arsenal. Wat i'm sayin is dat 2 win big trophies in modern futbol, u nid 2 spend, u tel me a club dats wining big trophies dat dint invest in players by spending. See barca 4 example, dey've bin dominating 4 quite a while now, bt it dint cum easy, dey spent big moni on players, r.madrid spent lyk £200m in buyin CR7, kaka & benzema, and dey're now reaping dia benefits. Take mancity as anoda example, 4rm a midtable club, dey started spendin big, buyin d lyks of tevez, silva, aguero, y.toure...and c dem now, dey won d FA Cup and league in 2yrs. C d lyks of nasri, clichy, flamini, fabregas and adebayor who left arsenal after growin tired of being trophyless, goin 2 clubs dat spend big, dey are nw wining trophies 4 fun. D examples can go on and on, im sure u get my point. Arsenal are a great club, dy play gud futbol, bt dy jst av 2 spend 2 start wining trophies again. I stand 2 b corrected.

Man try to understand why,how a big football club should run .leeds ,black burn spent wot they dont have,no big enuffan base to baill them out when they got into trouble ,same with portsmoth,they spent wot they dont have they are in shit. Big clubs like barca,madrid,man u do same but they have the followership ,worldwide appeal to get in funds when needed.do u know how barca n madrid get their funds?is it legal?is it sustainable?spain is a poor country compared to oder countries no resources,no big coydo u know some yrs back spain was a 3rd world country?,all they have in spain is real madrid,barca and holiday spots.so the country allows them to do wot wont be allowed in normal countries, barca n madrid are so much in debt but the country/council bail them out when in trouble,will that be allowed in england?if man u is not as massive as it is do u know they will be a forgoting team with the debt they owe?but big teams with massive fan base n support will always pull tru,small team will crash.man city,chelsea,are small teams living in a transient and Ephemeral glory.The finicial law comes into play soon lets see the clubs that will survive,lets c dos dat will fall by d way side dats when u know whos big or not.in ur economics u no the laws of demand n supply yeah?why is arsenal more expensive to watch in england dan all oder clubs?more expensive dan manu,chelsea,etc.[b]the most expensive in the world[/b]quote me.The reason more peeps want to watch arsenal dan the capacity can take.its 60k stamford bridge is 41k yet not always full why?its in london which is expensive,man u is in manchester and d locals cannot afford to pay top dollar.

samuelee1:

Ok, blackburn & leeds may av bin relegated, bt dia history certainly isnt, dats wat archives are 4. Dey relegated because dey were mismanaged, and mismanagement can hapn 2 any club, includn ur belovd arsenal. Wat i'm sayin is dat 2 win big trophies in modern futbol, u nid 2 spend, u tel me a club dats wining big trophies dat dint invest in players by spending. See barca 4 example, dey've bin dominating 4 quite a while now, bt it dint cum easy, dey spent big moni on players, r.madrid spent lyk £200m in buyin CR7, kaka & benzema, and dey're now reaping dia benefits. Take mancity as anoda example, 4rm a midtable club, dey started spendin big, buyin d lyks of tevez, silva, aguero, y.toure...and c dem now, dey won d FA Cup and league in 2yrs. C d lyks of nasri, clichy, flamini, fabregas and adebayor who left arsenal after growin tired of being trophyless, goin 2 clubs dat spend big, dey are nw wining trophies 4 fun. D examples can go on and on, im sure u get my point. Arsenal are a great club, dy play gud futbol, bt dy jst av 2 spend 2 start wining trophies again. I stand 2 b corrected.

PSG spent a lot of money and did not win ligue 1 title but montpelier won it instead now how did that happen.

[/color]

---

[b][/b][color=#990000][quote author=emmke]Simples
'Cos Arsenal is the best run club in England and along with bayern Munich the best run in the world. Fans of other clubs can't just seem to understand how Arsenal manges to finish amongst the top 4 year in year out on a shoe string budget. Man shity and chelski don't matter cos soon their sugar daddies will get bored and leave. They'll both be back to their befitting mid table status. Man utd with all their debts, thanks to the Glazers, will soon go the leeds way. Arsenal, however, with its rock solid foundation, thanks to le Prof. Wenger, has a bright and assured future.


@emmke
You wouldn't want to involve Man united, arse nal might be a well run club but it will always come after UNITED. In case you don't know, the only
reason why you are talking about debt in united is because the Glazers decided to buy UNITED with a loan which they are comfortably servicing annually from the club's purse. Perhaps you don't know UNITED is the most valuable sport club in the world, valued to be worth 2 billion dollars. Now tell me, how will they go the Leeds utd way when they can easily sell a fraction of their share to pay off any debt?

Arsenal de bid 4 harzard 15m,chelshit went 2 pay 30m,lets c weitin d guy go do n hw e go perform

Every Arsenal fan is a manager in Nigeria they know how to assemble a team. They make mouth pass anything. They said chelsea plays rugby tatics, spend unwisely, overpay average players. But in the space of the 7-8 yrs arsenal has gone trophyless we have won 9 trophies including the champions league last season; a trophy Arsenal won't win for the next 50yrs. If Arsenal was a succesfull club (trophy) for the past 8 yrs, opposite fans won't be allowed to voice their opinions or walk freely

I dnt kia au much hate ppl av for ars. For me, i remain a gooner!

Question-: Why Do Fans Of Other Clubs Hate Arsenal So Much?

Answer-: Because there are more responsible fans in Arsenal than in any other club in the world!

So you are knocking Arsenal for buying a striker (Podolski) which they felt they needed at the time instead of Hulk (a midfielder)? This just about sums up your knowledge of footie. Your argument that if Podolski was a class player all Europe top clubs would be queuing for him is fallacious. Pirlo is class but was a free agent last season! Clubs go for players they need not players they want to just stick on their benches. Do you know how many strikers competing at City? So much so that Ade had to go on loan for some game time last season. If City bought Podolski where will he fit in? Let's not even talk about the wage bill. Real Madrid is already maxed out in terms of strikers so where will he fit in? Chelsea is keeping faith with Torres and prolly feels they don't need an additional striker. When Henry went to Arsenal how many clubs were after him? When Fabregas went to Arsenal how many clubs were gunning for him. RVP is arguably the hottest attacker in Europe right now but how many clubs are really interested in him despite his having had a blinding se
ason? Answer: Most top clubs feel they don't need striking additions (so far). The economic situation in Europe is also affecting footie too. Very few clubs in Europe like Man City, United, Chelsea, Real and Barca shop at the high end. The rest shop at the lower reaches of transfer prices. The economic downturn is already affecting Real (sponsored by the Spanish govt) and Barca (who owe banks millions) Negredo and Llorente in Spain had fantastic seasons but how many "top" clubs are lining up for their signatures?

@beowulf,
you pointed out many issues here and i will try my best for the sake of clarity to touch as many as possible.
RVP the hottest attacker in europe means the hottest worldwide. now my question is; what has the hottest attacker in the world has to show for this? song is arguebly the best holding midfielder likewise other arsenal players in their various positions so how come these hottest players in one team cannot win even if it is feeding bottle?
aresnal fans will tell u they have the best goalkeeper not minding how many goals he conceded in a season.podolski is a striker no doubt so also is giroud but are players now valued with the number of international caps? you mentioned how madrid and other clubs are been sponsored but i ask you, is arsneal not the third richest club in the world?
you said chelsea wants to depend on torres, who told u? are u not reading news? at the end of the day, no one cares what happens behind the scene.ppl want to know what and why you have refused to win trophies. birmingham and portsmouth even won trophies so why not arsenal?

Arsenal de bid 4 harzard 15m,chelshit went 2 pay 30m,lets c weitin d guy go do n hw e go perform

shey torres 50m no fit play 4 his country,na bench e de sitdown tru out! e value pass all does guys wel dey start

@adufale,
he is coming to continue from where others stopped and those ur club are buying also will start from where others stopped. na by force to play for ur country?
we are talking about club and u are talking about country. van persie wey score 100 goals for arsenal, how many did he score for holland and how far did they go?

harryobas:

PSG spent a lot of money and did not win ligue 1 title but montpelier won it instead now how did that happen.

PSG finished 2nd in d french league. A few years ago, dey wouldnt hav dreamt of even finishing 4th, and mind u d league was won on d last matchday, so dey could hav won it.

nolongtin:
Man try to understand why,how a big football club should run .leeds ,black burn spent wot they dont have,no big enuffan base to baill them out when they got into trouble ,same with portsmoth,they spent wot they dont have they are in shit. Big clubs like barca,madrid,man u do same but they have the followership ,worldwide appeal to get in funds when needed.do u know how barca n madrid get their funds?is it legal?is it sustainable?spain is a poor country compared to oder countries no resources,no big coydo u know some yrs back spain was a 3rd world country?,all they have in spain is real madrid,barca and holiday spots.so the country allows them to do wot wont be allowed in normal countries, barca n madrid are so much in debt but the country/council bail them out when in trouble,will that be allowed in england?if man u is not as massive as it is do u know they will be a forgoting team with the debt they owe?but big teams with massive fan base n support will always pull tru,small team will crash.man city,chelsea,are small teams living in a transient and Ephemeral glory.The finicial law comes into play soon lets see the clubs that will survive,lets c dos dat will fall by d way side dats when u know whos big or not.in ur economics u no the laws of demand n supply yeah?why is arsenal more expensive to watch in england dan all oder clubs?more expensive dan manu,chelsea,etc.[b]the most expensive in the world[/b]quote me.The reason more peeps want to watch arsenal dan the capacity can take.its 60k stamford bridge is 41k yet not always full why?its in london which is expensive,man u is in manchester and d locals cannot afford to pay top dollar.

Ok, mayb ure ryt abt govt supportn r.madrid and barca, bt dey sure hav mad profit 4rm dia investments. I repeat, u nid moni 2 b able 2 compete @ d top. Portsmouth, leeds & co. were bad business dat refused 2 b bailed out. Futbol's more dan a sport, dere's big business aspect 2 it, nd 2 mak it in business, u nid 2 spend gud moni. C malaga in spain, dey were taken ova last year, dey spent big moni, and nw dey'l b playn in d champions league nxt season. C d kind of players QPR were able 2 acquire wit d funds dey hav. D best managers in futbol 2day knw hw mch gud spending big wil do 2 dia clubs. D mourinhos and fergusons of dis world wnt settle 4 less, no mata wat. Wenger should learn 4rm dem if he wishes 2 end dat trophy drought. Peace

samuelee1:

Ok, mayb ure ryt abt govt supportn r.madrid and barca, bt dey sure hav mad profit 4rm dia investments. I repeat, u nid moni 2 b able 2 compete @ d top. Portsmouth, leeds & co. were bad business dat refused 2 b bailed out. Futbol's more dan a sport, dere's big business aspect 2 it, nd 2 mak it in business, u nid 2 spend gud moni. C malaga in spain, dey were taken ova last year, dey spent big moni, and nw dey'l b playn in d champions league nxt season. C d kind of players QPR were able 2 acquire wit d funds dey hav. D best managers in futbol 2day knw hw mch gud spending big wil do 2 dia clubs. D mourinhos and fergusons of dis world wnt settle 4 less, no mata wat. Wenger should learn 4rm dem if he wishes 2 end dat trophy drought. Peace

Football is a business any business dat needs bailing out is bad business and unsustainable.

samuelee1:

PSG finished 2nd in d french league. A few years ago, dey wouldnt hav dreamt of even finishing 4th, and mind u d league was won on d last matchday, so dey could hav won it.

I don't care if the league was won on the first, third or last day the fact remains PSG did not win it with all their money period. Since PSG spent so much money should't they have had the french title wrapped up with like 10 games to spare because in your opinion they spent a lot more on players than Montpelier.

nolongtin:
Football is a business any business dat needs bailing out is bad business and unsustainable.

There's more 2 futbol dan ure seeing. There's no big club dat doesn't owe. Mark my words

harryobas:

I don't care if the league was won on the first, third or last day the fact remains PSG did not win it with all their money period. Since PSG spent so much money should't they have had the french title wrapped up with like 10 games to spare because in your opinion they spent a lot more on players than Montpelier.

If u dnt care, den ure being biased. If a child takes 10th position in a class, den suddenly improves to 2nd, is dat nt improvement?

Adetayo100: Every Arsenal fan is a manager in Nigeria they know how to assemble a team. They make mouth pass anything. They said chelsea plays rugby tatics, spend unwisely, overpay average players. But in the space of the 7-8 yrs arsenal has gone trophyless we have won 9 trophies including the champions league last season; a trophy Arsenal won't win for the next 50yrs. If Arsenal was a succesfull club (trophy) for the past 8 yrs, opposite fans won't be allowed to voice their opinions or walk freely

Dude,
slow down
count the 9 trophies you have won since Arsenal last won a trophy!!!!
You wan steal am?
abi u sef dey count community shield like mourinho?
After you have done the little math. . . google how many trophies chelsea have won since inception and compare with Arsenal!