MANGAM:

Architez here. I think "FTC" is a throwback to when Seun was the only one who posted topics. Back then it probably meant something (eg that u have the fastest phone, etc.) Now it means absolutely nothing. Infact it is a negative - it indicates an unemployed and probably brainless person who wastes a lot of time on NL. The only person who deserves any accolade, if any at all, is the poster of the thread.

Mskrisx:
Wowwwww for real....first to C?oooo geeez!

Architez here. I think FTC is a throwback to when Seun was the only one who posted topics. Back then it probably meant something (eg that u have the fastest phone, etc.) Now it means absolutely nothing. Infact it is a negative - it indicates an unemployed and probably brainless person who wastes a lot of time on NL. The only person who deserves any accolade, if any at all, is the poster of the thread.

oluface:
Threat

Architez here. I think FTC is a throwback to when Seun was the only one who posted topics. Back then it probably meant something (eg that u have the fastest phone, etc.) Now it means absolutely nothing. Infact it is a negative - it indicates an unemployed and probably brainless person who wastes a lot of time on NL. The only person who deserves any accolade, if any at all, is the poster of the thread.

Johnnoah1st:
ANOTHER TRASH 4RM NAIRALANDERS, do we still need to advice u here? d situation his clear, someone dat can put something in ur drink to have sex because dey advice him to do so can also kill u if dey advice him to kill u, stay clear of him. if she's comfortable to keep as secret she can if not she can do otherwise. BUT STAY CLEAR OF HIM!

Architez here. I think FTC is a throwback to when Seun was the only one who posted topics. Back then it probably meant something (eg that u have the fastest phone, etc.) Now it means absolutely nothing. Infact it is a negative - it indicates an unemployed and probably brainless person who wastes a lot of time on NL. The only person who deserves any accolade, if any at all, is the poster of the thread.

jstbeinhonest:
Any time i hear jega,orubebe always cums 2 my mind.

Architez here. I think FTC is a throwback to when Seun was the only one who posted topics. Back then it probably meant something (eg that u have the fastest phone, etc.) Now it means absolutely nothing. Infact it is a negative - it indicates an unemployed and probably brainless person who wastes a lot of time on NL. The only person who deserves any accolade, if any at all, is the poster of the thread.

Taylor86:
thread for the gods and ancestors

runs out of thread with my two bathroom slippers on my palms

screaming holy spirit on the streets

Architez here. I think FTC is a throwback to when Seun was the only one who posted topics. Back then it probably meant something (eg that u have the fastest phone, etc.) Now it means absolutely nothing. Infact it is a negative - it indicates an unemployed and probably brainless person who wastes a lot of time on NL. The only person who deserves any accolade, if any at all, is the poster of the thread.

OREMUSSANCTUS:
Click like if u want me to deactivate dis acct, click share if u still want me to stay put!

Architez here. I think FTC is a throwback to when Seun was the only one who posted topics. Back then it probably meant something (eg that u have the fastest phone, etc.) Now it means absolutely nothing. Infact it is a negative - it indicates an unemployed and probably brainless person who wastes a lot of time on NL. The only person who deserves any accolade, if any at all, is the poster of the thread.

lagmostkuit:
Op, na man and woman dey dere nah..

Which kyn thing be dis nah?
*Graphic picture*

Architez here. I think FTC is a throwback to when Seun was the only one who posted topics. Back then it probably meant something (eg that u have the fastest phone, etc.) Now it means absolutely nothing. Infact it is a negative - it indicates an unemployed and probably brainless person who wastes a lot of time on NL. The only person who deserves any accolade, if any at all, is the poster of the thread.

RichDad1:
Perhaps you've been staying the wrong men.
FTC? Btw, what's so special about being FTC?
Where is that Introvert sef?

Architez here. I think FTC is a throwback to when Seun was the only one who posted topics. Back then it probably meant something (eg that u have the fastest phone, etc.) Now it means absolutely nothing. Infact it is a negative - it indicates an unemployed and probably brainless person who wastes a lot of time on NL. The only person who deserves any accolade at all is the poster of the thread.

lagmostkuit:
Nothing

Good answer!! Good answer!!!!

I think there should be grades of pedophiles, depending on the age of the child they molested, and there should be different names for them and different penalties. If the molester is within 2 years of the victim, the penalty should be left to the judge's discretion.

Here is my recommendation.

1 to 6  - class A pedo - life in prison without possibility of parole.

6 to 9 - class B pedo - 1st offense 20 years, 2nd offense, life.

9 to 12 - class C pedo - 20 years

12 to 13 - class D pedo - 1st offense 5 years, 2nd offense, 20 years

14 - class E pedo - 2 years

What you folks think? What do u recommend?

cococandy:
settle ke.
For better for worse only works when the couple are there for each other and willing to make it work.

They are both obviously not interested anymore.
The lady packed out and even went to carry belle elsewhere. They r already divorced. Just to make it official.

Very true and very well put.

Hey, cococandy, remember I was telling u (or freecocoa) about my would be fiancee who told me (without me asking) that she was a virgin. Well I created a thread about it. Here's the link:

https://www.nairaland.com/2447069/she-virgin

naptu2:
An example.

Canada




https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_North_America

I think there should be grades of pedophiles, depending on the age they r attracted to and there should be different names for them and different penalties. If the molester is within 2 years of the victim, the penalty should be left to the judge's discretion.

1 to 6  - class A pedo - life in prison without possibility of parole.

6 to 9 - class B pedo - 1st offences 20 years, 2nd offense, life.

9 to 12 - class C pedo - 20 years

12 to 13 - class D pedo - 1st offense 5 years, 2nd offense, 20 years

14 - class E pedo - 2 years

What do you folks think?

innocentii:
I think Age of consent should be 15. we are in the 21st century where the whole system is fast developing, even kids nowadays attain puberty at 10-13 due to the stuffs they feed on. You will agree with me that some well fed young teen of today who attain puberty early do have bigger bosom and booobs than some adult and looks very fertile. donno if you have read about the youngest mother who gave birth naturally at 10 in Spain some years back. Even The bible said be fruitful and multiply without age restriction. I will say as long as the opposite sex is financially capable and mentally fertile enough, it should be considered a bigdeal.

I think there should be grades of pedophiles, depending on the age they r attracted to and there should be different names for them and different penalties. If the molester is within 2 years of the victim, the penalty should be left to the judge's discretion.

1 to 6  - class A pedo - life in prison without possibility of parole.

6 to 9 - class B pedo - 1st offences 20 years, 2nd offense, life.

9 to 12 - class C pedo - 20 years

12 to 13 - class D pedo - 1st offense 5 years, 2nd offense, 20 years

14 - class E pedo - 2 years

What do you folks think?

barcanista:
All these punishment because of wetin na?

I think there should be grades of pedophiles, depending on the age they r attracted to and there should be different names for them and different penalties. If the molester is within 2 years of the victim, the penalty should be left to the judge's discretion.

1 to 6  - class A pedo - life in prison without possibility of parole.

6 to 9 - class B pedo - 1st offences 20 years, 2nd offense, life.

9 to 12 - class C pedo - 20 years

12 to 13 - class D pedo - 1st offense 5 years, 2nd offense, 20 years

14 - class E pedo - 2 years

What do you folks think?

UnknownT:
So what are you advocating? For the age to be increased or reduced? Btw, just like everything, does the age of consent work in the country? What is the current age of consent to sex in Nigeria?

I think there should be grades of pedophiles, depending on the age they r attracted to and there should be different names for them and different penalties. If the molester is within 2 years of the victim, the penalty should be left to the judge's discretion.

1 to 6  - class A pedo - life in prison without possibility of parole.

6 to 9 - class B pedo - 1st offences 20 years, 2nd offense, life.

9 to 12 - class C pedo - 20 years

12 to 13 - class D pedo - 1st offense 5 years, 2nd offense, 20 years

14 - class E pedo - 2 years

What do you folks think?

zanga420:
yeah, thats a good one also but not as important as the anderson case the op pointed out. For teenagers, adolescents n those in the early 20's, theirs no mark on their foreheads indicating their ages, so its a matter of verbal statement. Which d minor can inflate when s/he admirers the adult.

Very true. And they even forge birth certificates these days. So even if they show u a false birth certificate, you will still go to jail.

Gurgle:


Ok

I mean how do you feel now?

you don't sound particularly angry but you do sound as if you want revenge?

I feel just fine and I'm not angry at all. But I want to end this thread... I feel it could be bringing bad luck.

Bottom line, the girl and one of my boys have landed in the hospital...
It's a long story...
I feel a bit guilty.

As for the virgin thing, we were able to dig up an old boyfriend of hers who is still very angry that she aborted his baby years back.

END OF THREAD.

zanga420:
a situation in which, if u're aware that ur partner is underage n u stl go ahead to have carnal knowledge of them = maximum punishment. If u're been lied to/deceived that ur partner is underage = very lesser punishment. Then 4d underage that inflate their age to enjoy sexual pleasure maybe sending them to rehab or documenting their fingerprint for future reference, since they cant go jail or something like that for being minors. My 2cents

I think there should be grades of pedophiles, depending on the age they r attracted to and there should be different names for them. To some who r attracted to 14 year olds, attraction to a 9 or 6 year old may be quite repulsive.

1 to 6
6 to 9
9 to 12
12 to 14
They all should be different categories.

vapid:
Confident and independent female flatmate needed in a 2 bedroom apartment both en suite. rent is monthly(first and last month upfront), negotiable.
if interested text 08144233896.

There is this raging thread where they r saying that Muhammad (PBUH) slept with a child. Please help me tell them it's not true.
Here is the link:

https://www.nairaland.com/2439827/age-consent-sex-what-want

tsdarkside:
Written by Channels TV
Tweet
date published=unknown

Federal Government is expected to borrow $25 billion by 2015, Nigeria’s Debt Management Office (DMO) told the House of Representatives

He who goes aborrowing...

BTW,

There is this raging thread where they r saying that Muhammad (PBUH) slept with a six year old. Please help me tell them it's not true.
Here is the link:

https://www.nairaland.com/2439827/age-consent-sex-what-want

BodyKiss:
[img]http://2.bp..com/-Wa10t2dVEpk/VQFWctm3GFI/AAAAAAAEutk/GJuSnzuSO6Y/s1600/00.png[/img]



http://lindaikeji..com/2015/03/wait-whats-going-on-see-what.html

There is this raging thread where they r saying that Muhammad (PBUH) slept with a child. Please help me tell them it's not true.
Here is the link:

https://www.nairaland.com/2439827/age-consent-sex-what-want

finofaya:
Quite a number of Christians expect the world to end real soon. All Christians expect the world to end at some point. This point is sooner than that at which science expects all life on earth to cease.

The reason given by Christianity for why the world should end is somewhat obscure. The official reason is that God wants to judge everybody at once and after judgment everybody will be consigned to either heaven or hell. This is said to be for the greater good, since man may then be admitted into paradise.

This reason fails to take into account the fact that man may then also be admitted to hell. Majority of man in fact will likely be ushered into the blazing furnace of God. If you take this into account, you will see that judgment day is not actually for the greater good.

You may feel that the end of the world is justified because the world does not meet God's standards, so he has to discontinue it. The question is; why now? Why not earlier? Of what use was the bad world? And why discontinue it if that does not address the problem of evil?

Yes. Even when the world ends, evil will remain. It will only be transferred from earth to hell. Most of it anyway, since there is always the start up capital in heaven. And since there will be a far greater number of people in hell, people who will never be free from pain again, there will remain a surplus of suffering in God's utopia. What then was the point of ending the world?

Ending the world seems not to serve a greater good and also seems pointless.

One then has to wonder what the appeal of ending the world is, especially when you remember that every person will die at some point and this, for all intents and purposes, is the end of that person's world. Every man is therefore guaranteed the end of his world. Why bother yourself about ending the world for everybody?

So, exactly what is ending the world supposed to achieve?

I don't think human reasoning can decipher these things.

BTW,
There is this raging thread where they r saying that Muhammad (PBUH) slept with a child. How true? Add your two cents.

Here is the link:

https://www.nairaland.com/2439827/age-consent-sex-what-want

Anas09:
Everyday I hear people criticising children of God who are wealthy. This made me to go back to the Bible again to check if it is indeed a sin for believers to have material wealth. Well, I have my conclusions, but what are yours? Do you think God created silver and Gold and the world's wealth for the Devil and his crowd, but banned his own children from Touching them? Let's talk.
NOTE: this discussion is for the Christian community, if you are not a Christain you will hardly have scriptures to back your claims. Don't bring in your own or worldly opinions of what you think. NO. Pls bring up scriptures that says believers shd or shd not be wealthy.

I, like every Christian I know, wouldn't mind being wealthy, but, to be honest, Christ variously condemed wealth.

BTW,
There is this raging thread where they r saying that Muhammad (PBUH) slept with a six year old. How true is that? Add your two cents.

Here is the link:

https://www.nairaland.com/2439827/age-consent-sex-what-want

WASMOG:
A student of Geography & Planning from Kogi state university named ‘Lakeside’ graduated yesterday and see what they did to him.

SCARY.

BTW,

There is this raging thread where they r saying that Muhammad (PBUH) slept with a six year old. Please help me tell them it's not true.
Here is the link:

https://www.nairaland.com/2439827/age-consent-sex-what-want

burgerking:


http://finance.yahoo.com/news/21-way...ly.html?page=1


1. Average people think MONEY is the root of all evil. Rich people believe POVERTY is the root of all evil.

2. Average people think selfishness is a vice. Rich people think selfishness is a virtue.

3. Average people have a lottery mentality. Rich people have an action mentality.

4. Average people think the road to riches is paved with formal education. Rich people believe in acquiring specific knowledge.

5. Average people long for the good old days. Rich people dream of the future.

6. Average people see money through the eyes of emotion. Rich people think about money logically.

7. Average people earn money doing things they don't love. Rich people follow their passion.

8. Average people set low expectations so they're never disappointed. Rich people are up for the challenge.

9. Average people believe you have to DO something to get rich. Rich people believe you have to BE something to get rich.

10. Average people believe you need money to make money. Rich people use other people's money.

11. Average people believe the markets are driven by logic and strategy. Rich people know they're driven by emotion and greed.

12. Average people live beyond their means. Rich people live below theirs.

13. Average people teach their children how to survive. Rich people teach their kids to get rich.

14. Average people let money stress them out. Rich people find peace of mind in wealth.

15. Average people would rather be entertained than educated. Rich people would rather be educated than entertained.

16. Average people think rich people are snobs. Rich people just want to surround themselves with like-minded people.

17. Average people focus on saving. Rich people focus on earning.

18. Average people play it safe with money. Rich people know when to take risks.

19. Average people love to be comfortable. Rich people find comfort in uncertainty.

20. Average people never make the connection between money and health. Rich people know money can save your life.

21. Average people believe they must choose between a great family and being rich. Rich people know you can have it all.

Quite interesting.

Forgive me.
There is this raging thread where they r saying that Muhammad (PBUH) slept with a six year old. Please help me tell them it's not true.
Here is the link:

https://www.nairaland.com/2439827/age-consent-sex-what-want,

mustyhboy:

Fasting may be Muslim a tradition that’s 1,400 years old, but this Ramadan, many Muslims are employing 21st-century technology to help them gain spiritual enlightenment.

That’s thanks to a bevy of new apps and other digital tools designed to help the modern Muslim fulfill his or her daily fasting and prayer obligations.

Download the app here

http://ajidaraviews..com/2015/06/tech-do-you-know-there-is-app-for.html

Scoll to the bottom of the page to download

Good to know.


Forgive me.
There is this raging thread where they r saying that Muhammad (PBUH) slept with a six year old. Please help me tell them it's not true.
Here is the link:

https://www.nairaland.com/2439827/age-consent-sex-what-want

lovelyS:
I saw this Theory online and i think i should share it with my brothers and sisters of Africa...OPEN YOUR MIND WHEN READING.

W. H. O. MURDERED AFRICA

There is no question mark after the title of this article because the title is not a question. It's a declarative statement.

WHO, the World Health Organisation, murdered Africa with the AIDS virus. That's a provocative statement isn't it?

The answer to this little mystery, Murder on the WHO express, will be quite clear to you by the end of my report. You will also understand why the other suspects, the homosexuals, the green monkey and the Haitians, were only pawns in this virocidal attack on the non-Communist world.

If you believe the government propaganda that AIDS is hard to catch then you are going to die even sooner than the rest of us. The common cold is a virus. Have you ever had a cold? How did you catch it? You don't really know, do you? If the cold virus were fatal how many people would there be left in the world?

Yellow fever is a virus. You catch it from mosquito bites. Malaria is a parasite also carried by mosquitoes. It is many times larger than the AIDS virus (like comparing a pinhead to a moose head), yet the mosquito easily carries this large organism to man.

The tuberculosis germ, also much larger than the AIDS virus, can be transmitted by fomites (inanimate objects such as towels). The AIDS virus can live as long as ten days on a dry plate. So, are you worried about your salad in a restaurant that employs homosexuals? You'd better be.

You can't understand this murder mystery and you wouldn't believe my conclusions unless you learn a little virology. I'll make it as painless as possible.

Many viruses grow in animals and many grow in humans but most of the viruses that affect animals don't affect humans. There are exceptions, of course, such as yellow fever and small pox.

There are some viruses in animals that cause very lethal cancer in those animals, but do not affect man or other animals. The bovine leukaemia virus (BLV), for example, is lethal to cows but not humans. There is another virus that occurs in sheep called sheep visna virus which is also non-reactive in man. These deadly viruses are "retro viruses" meaning that they can change the genetic composition of cells that they enter.

The World Health Organisation in published articles, called for scientists to work with these deadly agents and attempt to make a hybrid virus that would be deadly to humans. In the bulletin of the World Health Organisation WHO), Volume 47, p. 259, 1972, they said, "An attempt should be made to see if viruses can in fact exert selective effects on immune function. The possibility should be looked into that the immune response to the vims itself may be impaired if the infecting virus damages, more or less selectively, the cell responding to the virus."

That's AIDS. What the WHO is saying in plain English is "Let's cook up a virus that selectively destroys the T-cell system of man, an acquired immune deficiency."

Why would anyone want to do this? If you destroy the T-cell system of man you destroy man. Is it even remotely possible that the World Health Organisation would want to develop a virus that would wipe out the human race?

If their new viruses creation worked, the WHO stated, then many terrible and fatal infectious viruses could be made even more terrible and more malignant. Does this strike you as being a peculiar goal for a health organisation? The thought occurred to me.

Sometimes I believe in conspiracies and sometimes I don't. It depends on the subject. (Was there a conspiracy to kill President Kennedy? If you don't think so, then you must be a dumb liberal). My attitude toward some alleged conspiracies, the Federal Reserve for instance, depends on what I had for breakfast.

But it doesn't take a bad breakfast to see an amazing concatenation of events involving Russian and Chinese communist nationals, the World Health Organisation, the National Cancer Institute and the AIDS pandemic.

But what about the green monkey? Some of the best virologists in the world and many of those directly involved in AIDS research, such as Robert Gallo and Luc Montagnier, have said that the green monkey may be the culprit. You know the story: A green monkey bit a native on the ass and, bam—AIDS all over central Africa.

There is a fatal flaw here. It is very strange. Because Gallo, Montagnier and those other virologists know that the AIDS virus doesn't occur naturally in monkeys. In fact it doesn't occur naturally in any animal.

AIDS started practically simultaneously in the United States, Haiti, Brazil and Central Africa. (Was the green monkey a jet pilot)? Examination of the gene structure of the green monkey cells proves that it is not genetically possible to transfer the AIDS virus from monkeys to man by natural means.

Because of the artificial nature of the AIDS virus it will not easily transfer from man to man until it has become very concentrated in the body fluids through repeated injections from person to person, such as drug addicts, and through high multiple partner sexuality such as takes place in Africa, among homosexuals and among native American Indians. After repeated transfer it can become a "natural" infection for man, which it has.

Dr. Theodore Strecker's research of the literature indicates that the National Cancer Institute (NCI) in collaboration with the World Health Organisation made the AIDS virus in their laboratories at Fort Detrick (now NCI). They combined the deadly retroviruses, bovine leukaemia virus and sheep visna virus, and injected them into human tissue cultures. The result was the AIDS virus, the first human retrovirus known to man and now believed to be 100 percent fatal to those infected.

The momentous plague that we now face was anticipated by the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), in 1974 when they recommended that "Scientists throughout the world join the members of this committee in voluntarily deferring experiments (linking) animal viruses."

What the NAS is saying in carefully guarded English is: "For God's sake stop this madness!" Man went over the edge when he started playing God and started growing human tissue in the laboratory.

We've let the green monkey off the hook. How about the communists! In my original monograph on AIDS, before Dr. Strecker alerted me to the scientific absurdities being put on the American people, I said: "After the holocaust has run its course, and we've buried 10 or 20 million young people, who will protect us? If we are faced with an invasion from a Communist Mexico, aided by Communist Nicaragua and Cuba, who will defend the Rio Grande? Wouldn't it be ironic if the godless Russians and other communist countries, because of their Victorian attitude toward sex and their severe repression of homosexuality, escaped most of the ravages of the AIDS epidemic and took us over by simply walking across the Mexican border?"

I wouldn't change a word of that. But it was based on my natural paranoia toward the Communists, having observed the way they operate for 40 years. Besides, they are saying that AIDS is a "capitalist plot." That really got me suspicious because, as any student of the communist conspiracy knows they always blame others for what they are in the process of doing.

And what they are in the process of doing is conducting germ warfare from Fort Detrick, Maryland against the free world, especially in the United States, even using foreign communist agents with the United States Army's germ warfare unit euphemistically called the Army Infectious Disease Unit.

You don't believe it? Carlton Gajdusek an NIH big-shot at Detrick admits it: "IN THE FACILITY I HAVE A BUILDING WHERE MORE GOOD AND LOYAL COMMUNIST SCIENTISTS FROM THE USSR AND MAINLAND CHINA WORK, WITH FULL PASSKEYS TO ALL THE LABORATORIES, THAN THERE ARE AMERICAN. EVEN THE ARMY'S INFECTIOUS DISEASE UNIT IS LOADED WITH FOREIGN WORKERS NOT ALWAYS FRIENDLY NATIONALS."

Can you imagine that? A UN-WHO communist Trojan horse in our biological warfare centre with the full blessings of the Jimmy Carters of this world?

I can assure you that the creation of the AIDS virus by the WHO was not just a diabolical scientific exercise that got out of hand. It was a cold-blooded successful attempt to create a killer virus which was then used in a successful experiment in Africa. So successful in fact that most of central Africa may be wiped out, 75,000,000 dead within 3-5 years.

Quite interesting.

BTW ,
Forgive me.
There is this raging thread where they r saying that Muhammad (PBUH) slept with a six year old. Please help me tell them it's not true.
Here is the link:

https://www.nairaland.com/2439827/age-consent-sex-what-want