Rorachy:
Why won't I amuse you? you don't get to see my type everyday and its very much okay if you feel intimidated by me, you are not the first.

"Intimidated" by you. LOL. Obviously you're a professional comedienne.

Rorachy:
Iook if am cheating in you, never in this life will you know, unless I want you to know and mess with your head.

You amuse me!

Rorachy:
That girl you so much trust and you think will die for you cos of love might be cheating seriously on you but you wont know, when circumstances change, she can also change her tone.

I can make you feel loved and still cheat on you at the same time, that's how clever someone like me is but anyway I don't cheat, so that one is ruled out.

In terms of cheating, women are the best, if I decide to cheat on my guy tomorrow, never in this world will he find out, its will be untraceable .

70% of girls cheat, let me just be plain with you.

Your boldness in arrogating cleverness to yourself is rather irritatingly appalling. Believe you me, you can never be more than "too clever by half" like 99% of other ladies. Majority of ladies are far from being clever, they're only disingenuous.

Personally, it doesn't take me more than 2 time meeting with anyone before I dissect the person's present and future actions and inaction. You never jam!

Softhands:
Don't twist the Bible to suite you

I wonder who told you that the bible is my standard. . . I'm too liberally conscientious to have the bible as my standard. Live and let live.

Submission! Submission! ! Submission! !! My grouse with this word whenever I hear it is, how small-minded men do mistakes it for servility and as such, expects servitude rather than loyalty, from their wives.

To the question, even though I'll make my stance without recognition and reverence to the bible, ethically one is expected to submit to the other who hasn't given him reason to question his loyalty towards him or their common cause.

God bless you Tanko Yakasi.

flames007:
I don't even get your point.An 'Entrepreneur' as the name implies is someone who
has The capacity and willingness to develop, organize and manage a business venture along with any of its risks
in order to MAKE A PROFIT. That's the goal of every successful entreprenuer. You are only successful as an entrepreneur if you make money in the short or long run.

Foremost, I have to assume you know that opportunism is different from opportunity. Well, while a success-conscious entrepreneur's aim is to identify opportunities and develop and bring them to fruition for betterment of the masses (customers), and in the process genuinely and peacefully make money - in most cases a whole lot of it. But same cannot be said of get-rich conscious person. In this latter person you have an opportunist who's ready to exploit anyone/take advantage of any condition to amass money for himself.

While a success conscious person is an entrepreneur that carries out her business on principle a get-rich conscious person is a non entrepreneur (but may disguise as one) that carries out her business on expediency.

In summary, an entrepreneur, a successful one has riches, in fact wealth as her major hallmark, but she's never in business to get rich. To her riches isn't the end but rather only a means. Her end target is success. I hope you will understand me better now. Happy Sunday.

flames007:
I disagree with your first point. Why do people venture into bussiness,is it not to make it rich. Although it's not very easy at first and you might not even break even not to talk of making profits for the start.

She's right and you're wrong. There's a difference between success consciousness and money consciousness. The former is what every genuine and longstanding successful entrepreneur has innately.

@OP

It's only those who do mistakes suffering for industriousness that holds such whack opinion.

Office politics just like conventional politics is mandatory - everyone gets involved in it either knowingly or unknowingly. Meanwhile, only those who plays politics based on principle rather than expediency always laugh last. . . Even though, this route is always slow at the beginning and majority, including your uninformed superiors, will be against you at such early stage, but don't worry because you must surely laugh last. As the saying goes manipulators lose credibility diplomats gain it.

Those who play on principle has smartness as their chief weapon while those why play on expediency has perfidiousness (lie and treachery) as their chief weapon.

One major hallmark of all smart people is that they never tell lies but they can be dishonest sometimes. Every liar is a dishonest person but not all dishonest people are liars. . . Don't mistake diplomacy for lie.

Erred!

I wonder when my race people would start to assume responsibilities of their actions and inaction. As far as I'm concerned, our forefathers allowed themselves to be deceived and exploited by the west. No one can deceive and exploit a sane and sound person without the victim's consent directly or indirectly.

Were our forefathers really gullible? To me, no - evidences abounds that showed majority of them were intellectually sound in their own ways. That means, it wasn't their foolishness that made them victims to the west and its shenanigans.

Well, the cause of their exploitation by the west was as a result of their love for leeching opportunism and conceited attitudes.

Meanwhile, secret of the west remains their predaceous opportunistic attitude. A predator can never lose to a leech in the long run in any game. Both leeching and predatory are offspring of opportunism.

A typical example of a case of predators vs leeches is what you see happens between church owners/administrator and the members.

Come on! Fayose isn't to be blamed, citing connotation of the message available. The committee failed in their briefing and much more. Neither the governor as an individual nor his state a as government owed her any obligation in this regard.

The rule: be open-minded towards all and sundry, yet never break down the wall that demarcated both of you. . . The wall remains the secret that make the friendship a healthy one.

Foremost, let me digress a bit. Actually, it's always appalling to hear most people assumed that the biggest beneficiary of a will is automatically the most loved by the benefactor. . . In most cases, this erroneous assumption isn't always true. What's truth is that, most realists do will bigger shares of their estates, to those they observed are less economically equip and with less potentials amongst all their loved ones.

To the main question, it's only those who're naturally inclined to handouts, that will fight their siblings/any beneficiary over a will that wasn't so favorable to him. Personally, I can't.

He's an Oceanian not African.

Conceit remains God's gift to small-minded people. I don't envy 9ice and his ilks.

Esama remains one of the most sagacious business men I've ever seen. Long live Grandlord.

RIP grandlord E.A.

One major hallmark of all wretched people is that they know all the ways that leads to success, but appallingly and irritatingly, they're never successful in anything.

Under achievement isn't and can never be a sign of holiness and goodness. Truly, conceit is God's gift to small-minded people. Anything beyond the parochial and low intellect of a small-minded person is evil.

I'll continue to say it loud and clear that the cause of our political backwardness, is a fundamental one. But the good thing is that its malleable. A simple change in ethical philosophy of choosing principle over expediency in deeds and in actions, will correct the problem. When this is done, it'll give birth to a definite political ideology. From there an institution - yes, Tinubu, for instance, is a political institution - will automatically established itself. And then power will be grabbed.

Believe you me, I've a blueprint on how to make things happen. . . I only need to create time for it.

"If you don't believe in something you'll fall for anything." The need for a definite political ideology can never be overemphasized. The act in practice "Any Government In Power (AGIP)" is a major sign of skewed ethical philosophy and lack of political ideology, which it breed, and the bane of our political backwardness as a tribe.

Erums:



Im now confused.... How do u mean

It's obvious that you didn't understand all the points in my foremost submissions.

Erums:

:.... I try nt to be an opportunist.... My last haf visited and slept over for 3nights. Bt i didnt F. her for alot of reasons... Not just ne yielding to her flimsy excuses bt i was just learning 2be a man and in the same way letting her see it.... I get boners she sees it outta ny boxer.... Plays wit it bt i wudnt just fall in.. .... It wasnt realli abt sex man.... I wanted to truly know her. I just realized that move was foolish of me... I guess i didnt take the lead.... The rest are just story.... People can be heartless..... I realli wanna stop giving an F

You not hitting on your girlfriend when she slept over neither made you an opportunist nor a non opportunist.

@OP

Foremost, there's no evil in falling in love (fancy an opposite se.x) and meting out goodness towards such a person.

However, there's everything wrong with you, when you fails to decipher the intentions and character of such a person, around you, at least few hours to days after coming into contact with her.

This beg to question your level of self-awareness. Try to achieve self-realization. Once you get this done, automatically you'll be able to know or structure your ethical leanings, and by extension you'll be able to start to know what mandatory character you need or don't need from any woman. When the right characters are there couple with fancy, there you have found a true love. . . And you will never experience heartbreak again.

So, you need self-realization, altruism and willpower to be free from heartbreak.

Having explained the importance of self-realization above, let me explain the other values. Altruism and willpower; they helps you to know when to say no to exploitative requests and when to put an end to an unhealthy relationship - whenever you come into contact with a gold digger (opportunist).

When you live on the principle of altruism, sure you'll most often experience betrayals and disappointments from opportunists that crosses your path, but you can never experienced heartbreak. The reason is simple - when you give or honor request, you do so because of your selflessness and most importantly on your own volition, and not because of your greed/opportunistic dependencies to exploit the lady. And when a demand of intent to exploit you is made by your lady, you will have the willpower to turn down such request and call off her bluff because you've no opportunistic tendency against her.

Greed/exploitation tendency is the number one reason many people do suffer heartbreak, because you're likely to become a pawn in the hands of an equally opportunistic and perfidious party you planned to exploit. A typical example of this is what usually happens between a ponzi scheme promoter and the participant(s).

hedonistic:


Very true. In fact, I hate bringing people too close, especially these hypocritical eye service 'poor' wretches. Very sad, evil-minded, treacherous souls, most of the time.

Give them their crumbs and keep them very far.

That's wisdom bro. Keep it up.

Conventional wisdom demands that: You help the poor, but always do so by keeping them at parallel and arm's length. Also, never employ a greedy person as your personal assistant in any capacity, else you would indirectly brought death nearer to yourself.

Nothing can be more appalling than seeing dimwits like all of you above that picked on my submission. Anyway, I don't join issue with a no bodies.

Truly, conceit is God's gift to small-minded people.

It's obvious he's suffering from Guillian-Barre Syndrome.

Disparity remains different from problem. Politicians of different ideological leanings/opposing political parties only have differences in political ideologies not personal problems.

Only sycophantic followers always assumes that politicians of different political leanings are automatically enemies as individuals.

In you I see a brilliant but a non intelligent guy - but I pray that you'll become intelligent very soon. Let me help diagnose your problems:

(1) You're both superficial and covetous. . . Not until you redefined your ethical philosophies would you find peace - I bet you, if peradventure you get a car today, you wouldn't have a feeling of inner peace (the most important treasure one can have), so long as you retain this same ethical philosophy you're currently inclined to.

(2) You hear, know but don't understand life fundamentals. Successful armed robbers and their ilks in other ignoble professions are successful because they don't just hear and know about their professions but most importantly they understand their professions.

Now citing the above simple analogy, you would see that the first of the three basic tools you need to conquer the world is having understanding of something, not just something but something of great value. People are neither paid because they are breathing nor because they know something no, they're paid for what they do with that they understand.

What's that valuable thing you understand?

Send me a proposal on it at talentsponsor@yahoo.com .A convincing proposal may help set you on the path of an eldorado life you long for.

Good attributes, valuable aptitude(s) and of course money remains the secret of any real, peaceful and meaningful wealth you see out there.

Meanwhile, believe you me, I know that your thread is a mere reverse psychology. So don't ascribe smartness to yourself yet. Lol.

I was told to kindly be wary of sycophants. And true to that, experience has shown me that sycophants are the number one pitfall and retrogression force against any progressive person. . . Enemies within ish.

VP calm down. There's a clear difference between an acting president and a VP coordinating activities of the government on behalf of a vacation president. While the former is saddled with power to control things at his will the latter has no such power rather, he can only carry out orders already marshalled out by the vacation president through his proxies.

A computer software will always remains inferior to a computer hardware; an acting president is likened to a computer hardware in this regard while a coordinator of government is likened to the computer software.