Nairaland Forum

same stuff i been hearing for the last 26years. that means nothing learned.

how about, only political scientists should occupy elected offices?

what's the point of the bike stunts?

mods, here's to hoping you'll do us the honors and frontpage a thread of "nkem owoh taking a sh!!t". imbec!les

manny4life:

My own understanding of the Bible, GOD NEVER CREATED EVIL. Yall should get it straight.

true dat, bredrin...true dat. evil simply is the consequence of the good lord's incompetence and/or sociopathy. he's either clueless, or he's a sick fvck that derives pleasure in slaughtering innocent children the world over....with fire in sodom and gomorrah(or however the fark them stoopid biblical names are spelt), tsunamis in southeast asia, earthquakes haiti, hurricanes in north america, mudslides in south america, diseases in africa etc etc etc....oh, and obama drones of death in the middle-east!


@OP: like you, i dont see the big deal in this character's death. besides the fact that dude's death was quintessential self-righteous suicide, it accomplished no tangible positive results. some of the christians on here will die horrible deaths due to poverty, sickness, accidents, natural disasters and all kinds of strife...! yet jesus' self-righteous suicide was supposed to reverse the consequences of original sin - which were both physical and spiritual. but as you and many have witnessed, fark aint changed for the better since j-boy passed...and fark aint never go'n change.

someone claims dude was sin-free. i call bs on that, straight up and down. his rant and physical abuse at the temple was criminal and unnecessary. jesus clearly didn't have the nerve to assault the actual culprits...the custodians of the temple, the ogas at the top! instead he turned on the weak, the innocent folk adversely affected by the social circumstances of the times, who also happened to be trying hard to provide for their families! jesus turned on the victims! what fate would await me should i run amok with a baseball bat in a known den of thieves like any winners chapel church - thrashing the banks, church merchandise points, and the livelihoods of the poor kpofkpof, pure water, ice-cold 'mineral' and egg-roll sellers, trying to make ends meet?

Shollyps: Who is MEND?

they're a bunch of twats. ebele-sponsored loudmouthed nitwits sucking for attention all over the place. pays to ignore them.

lol. e be like say this op nor get wetin to use him data for.

these moderators really need to get it together. y'all are failing this platform. how about you find us a charlyboy "why i have facial piercings" thread and kindly post it up on the front page? i don't believe that's too much to ask.

you're not even qualified to be a part time eagle's player.

maasoap: I can see the way you see everybody as imbec!les that must include ur parents

i'll break it down for you, you illiterate piece of shoite... if ya papa and/or ya mama, and every other papa and/or mama for dis wa world dey worry diasef becos dem pikin dey use lef hand, then, ya papa and/or mama and all such papa and/or mama dem be imbeh! now, as ya papa and/or ya mama dey for dis katigori, e nor sorprize me say you sef ton out to be imbeh.

wetin dis mean on the flip side be say: ma papa and mama, and every other papa and/or mama wey get beta tings to konsain demselves with, other than the hand wey dia shidrens dey use chop, write, or clean nyansh, nor be imbeh. dem head korrekt well well...and wen dia shidrens sef com bon shidrens, dem nor go worry wish hand dem shidrens go dey use. for dis reason, my parents nor be imbeh, while you and yours dem be proper imbeh. e clear you now?

megastu: I am even trying to teach my kids to write with left hand. The left side of the brain is the most developed.

actually, the left hemisphere of the brain doesn't coordinate activities on the left side, it does the opposite. albeit, it's a good thing to train your kids to use their left hands as well. i hear i was born left-handed, but i'm ambidextrous today

maasoap: What has this got to do with being a woman? Must you comment? You think she is only parent in the world that is concerned about the child using left hand? Google is your friend, there you will a lot of concerned parents asking same question.

see this deadhead o... the op happens to be a woman. if that was a man, i'd rightly refer to him as a man. but you're too much of an !mbec!le to get that. you illiterate fucktard... try to read, understand, then respond APPROPRIATELY.

ps: the op and ALL other parents of the world concerned about their children's left-handedness are industrial strength !mbec!les, and do not deserve to be parents.

PrettyCindy: Hello everyone, people around me have been saying that my 1 year old son is a 'lefty'. Though i have keenly observed that he does practically everything from picking up objects to waving goodbye with his left hand.

I don't believe he is a 'lefty' because i feel its because he sees me and others use our right hand alot which to him may be left when he is facing opposite me or anyone.
Besides no one uses left hand in my family and am certain its same in his birth father too so i keep wondering where he got it from.

I do not like it and want to correct and stop it.

Someone said that it cannot be corrected because he was born that way. I totally disagree.

If anyone of you has experienced such in your kid and was able to correct it, how did you do it?

i'm reading this, and i still can't believe what the fark i'm seeing. how does god create a woman as mighty stoop!d as this one, and then take it a step further and bless her with a child? something's terribly wrong here, walai.

chreld_b:

Congratulations!!!!! . You are a witch/wizard you were sent to choke me with laughter.

correct persin....at least you have a sense of humor. all that is left for me na to show up for your dream! by the time i combine my winsh powers plus the brutal power of my overclocked galaxy note 2, me and my crew of winshes go forward your case to the underworld. better smear yourself in kernel oil or you nor go fit sleep well o.

chreld_b:

Thank you very much for that. The truth about the matter is that Iphone is not common in Nigeria so people are yet to understand the device. I used to be in the school of thought of most commentators on this thread until I gave it a trial for my self. I had to take back everything I said about the Iphone. That is why I am threading softly on the S3 because I have not used it so I have no right to say the Iphone is better. Before now I used to ask what can an Iphone do that a blackberry cant. Now I realise how silly I was. As for the issue about paying for APPS. I have two things to say first of all most of the APPS are free. Secondly if you have to pay for an APP how much is the APP really? 0.69 or 2.99 pounds/dollars that's no biggie. for you to spend money on an APP in the first place it means that it is totally worth it. The gains and benefits you get from that APP will outweigh the meager cash you spent on the APP. Anyway like you rightly said Iphone is more common in Europe and if I may add North America also. These countries are more advanced and developed so the Iphone technology is more appreciated. But Nigerians like "akpako" and the S3 just like the blackberry seems to appeal to that. So you are regarded a fool or "gay" by a certain buffon if you dont subscribe to that school of thought. As a Nigerian I can understand that school of thought. But both devices are really good what one can do the other can also do.

hahahaha...monkey. it's quite an honor to be a "buffon"!! isn't that one of the finest goalkeepers that ever stood between the sticks?

Armaniswiz:

iPhone remains a phone for girls n gays?Stop trolling bro..take a look @ both phones which of them looks more masculine both on the design n material? Here in europe u'l hardly see a guy with S3 but everyone has an iphone. The S3 is no doubt a top smartphone plus the second to none advert that pushed it's sales but Samsung r yet to make a device that beats d iPhone completely,they remain apple's closest competitor. And for anyone who thinks apple is too restricted n not user friendly..jailbreak an idevice n everything is free!

lol...what a dweeb. oga europe, say you and your fellow iSHEEP dey use iphone for the european lungu wia you dey, nor necessarily mean say everyone in europe has an iphone. now, let's just assume say your bullsheet assertion is correct, i'll have you know that europe has the largest population of gays...connect the dots, if your birdbrain go allow you.

it remains a phone for girls and the gays(not like there's anything wrong with any of those groups of people).

i made that statement. now with respect to the topic...and as far as my initial post goes, that statement remains the most irrelevant. why you berkshire khunts are getting hung up on that is gobsmacking, walai.

chreld_b:


Wow!! so I'm now gay because I own an Iphone. I think your view is the most convincing by a long way. .

you could also be a princess, no?

Belovedd:
haba now, this is nothing new, even my old x10 can do it. you can also do it via google talk

bros, nor mind that mumu wey waste money on iphone because e get speech recognition.

and for the lot blabbering on about gaming on the iphone5...i dont know any serious gamers(dead or alive) that'll prefer gaming on a device with a smaller screen, weaker processor, and an absolutely useless battery. spec for spec, the iphone5 is a joke in comparison to the s3. it remains a phone for girls and the gays(not like there's anything wrong with any of those groups of people).

@OP: you're most definitely better off with an android device(S3). android is the now and the motherfukin' future.


ps: the iphone crowd are called iSHEEP for a reason....for a very good reason.

please keep me informed...i cant wait to see it up in front page when his vulcanizer kicks the flipping bucket.

Kaxmytex: Chai.....mikel carry im eye go market o....
O boi....see clean babe.

lol...na delta soap she dey use na...delta dey clean bodi well well.

anyway, di gyals don hama!...next ting na horma.

as much as i dislike abati, fani-kayode proves himself an !mbecile of biblical proportions. his rant makes absolutely no sense... albeit, i'm certain the sense-free will find it pretty deep.

yea. sometimes i really feel sorry for this almighty god...or what she/he/it has been reduced to. i'm saying, he could easily have interrupted the pope's acceptance speech right there in the vatican, with a thundering voice from heaven(or wherever the fark it/she/he chills at); declaring his/her/its acceptance of the pope's election to the hearing of the thousands present at that square, and the millions watching from home. but noooo, that's too much to ask of the almighty god. the bomboclatt opted to order the clouds to shape up like an "angel" in some irrelevant corner of the earth, instead. the joker didn't even deem it fit to show as an actual angel, na to insult us with angel-shaped cloud. smh... then you wonder why reasonable people don't take religion and its hebetudinous followers seriously.


i took a sh!!t precisely 4.2seconds before that angle-shaped cloud of yours showed up. translation: the good lord approved of my sh!!t. hallelujah praise the lordt!


farkin idiats.

~Bluetooth:


The pastor hustle the congregation for their money and now,a member is hustling the pastor for his own returns. . .its god's money and god alone can judge that man.

A case of scammer get scammed.Lmao

true that, masa! the lordt bredrins giveth, and the lordt bredrins taketh.

farkin yahoo boys. next time your imaginary brother carry false id go bank, na 50% him go lose...or e go face mopo. idiats.

davidylan:

huh? ok



Oh really? So lets take Bill Maher for example... his movie "religulous" just happened to avoid any mention of islam. Where are the books Dawkins and Hitchens have written to bash islam considering the alleged reason for their atheistic evangelism was 9/11? If a christian group was involved in 9/11 it probably would be extinct today as a religion. The same atheists who whine about how they bash islam spend their time cursing the God of the hebrews while slobbering over the muslims. I guess the urge of self-preservation is a lot stronger.

oi! quit being disingenuous, man. religulous not only mentioned islam, it made fun of it and even referred to muslims as a bunch of people in denial...especially when confronted with the myriad of crazy poo in their koran. yes had more fun with jews and christians, but isn't it easy to see that those groups are a majority in america and if he was seeking to stir some droppings, those groups are a perfect target? american muslims are not an influential bunch, period. you accuse him of giving islam a pass, others accused him of giving judaism a pass. also, why am i not surprised that all you know about bill maher's position on the many different religions of the world is based on religulous?...if your initial statement is anything to go by, then it's safe to assume you haven't even seen the movie. you just want tell us say you sabi the man work. why else would you claim he avoided the mention of islam?

again, you evidently know nothing about dawkins or hitchens or harris, bredrin. your religion is not that important to these people. these men write books that dismiss certain religious ideas. the god delusion is not a christian bashing book. it targets organized relgion...including christianity and islam. you should read it...and if dawkins' many anti-islamic views therein will help you sleep at night, do kindly knock yourself out. i think it's completely stoopid to think that dawkins, a man who categorically posits that "islam is one of the great evils in the world" is somehow scared of muslims. in the holy book of hitchens(god is not great. how RELIGION poisons everything) chapter 9, the great hitch does a job on islam. add that to the islamic scholars he's publicly debated and hitch slapped! if you had read sam harris' "the end of faith," you'd have seen that chapter 4 is titled "the problem with islam"(!) do you suppose he was bashing jesus and other jews on there? hezbollah put out a hit on salman rushdie for his book "the satanic verses." what do you think warranted that? l. ron hubbard and/or yahweh bashing? i honestly think you're a bright person with perhaps some legitimate beef against some(maybe all) atheists, but with this here topic, i dont know what you're fishing for.

davidylan:

lol i missed that part. Did he just say Dawkins, Maher and Hitchens are not evangelistic atheists? See, most of these guys are used to name dropping, they have no idea who these people are in real life outside what they have read once or twice online.

i think you're the one in the name dropping game, rasta. you mentioned religulous when the evidence shows you aint even seen it.

Mr_Anony:
Lol, really??

yea, really. those guys aren't out there trying to stop you from believing whatever imaginary shoite was shoved down your throat by your parents or whatever, they challenge the veracity of the claims your religions make, while asking you to think. they challenge the idea perpetuated by the followers of all religions that godlessness is equivalent to amorality and that ethics require the underpinning presence of some sort of ultimate arbiter, some sort of supernatural absolute, without which secularism, humanism, relativism, hedonism, liberalism and all manner of permissive improprieties will inevitably seduce the unbeliever down immoral ways.

so, to those of us who are perfectly prepared to indulge in the above vices but still believe ourselves to be ethical beings, we seek to put to bed this most glaring and idiotic canard - that godlessness equals immorality.



*my test just got cancelled! alhamdulillah!! boys and girls, time for some BF3. lessgo! *

davidylan: The impetus for this post was a surprising comment that i read from a popular militant atheist around here...



This was particularly shocking to me. How is it that "atheists" who claim to have such an overwhelming evidence of the mythology of religion be completely unable to discuss these points with their families and friends with the same zeal with which they attack christians here? Are atheists guilty of living a double life? One of affected supreme knowledge of the science that disproves God online (where they have the safety of anonymity) and are complete cowards to their real friends and family outside of here?

While reading through some writings by other prominent atheists, i realized the idea of atheist cowardice isnt quite new... take this for example - In 2010, Christian apologist Mariano Grinbank wrote:
“ The New Atheists have expressed that the proverbial straw-that-broke-the-Atheist-camel's-back was the group of attacks on the United States of America on September 11, 2001 AD. That is not to say that some of them were not Atheist activists before then, but 9/11 fanned the flames of their activism.
The attacks on 9/11 where primarily caused by Islamic extremism (with a long list of other causes such as maintenance or gaining of power, wealth, popularity, etc.). The question is: what have the New Atheists done in response to this particular event, this particular threat? Surely, they would focus their efforts primarily, if not exclusively, upon confronting this threat, this cause, head on.
Yet, what have the New Atheists done? What they have and have not done makes one wonder if their appeal to 9/11 is a reason or an excuse. After all, why 9/11? Are they not aware of similar atrocities throughout history? Are they not aware of the recent chronicles of the most secular century in human history also being the bloodiest-with millions upon millions being murdered not only during war, but also by their own regimes? (see here).
Have any of the New Atheists toured Islamic countries giving lectures in which they condemn Allah, Muhammad, Islam, or Muslims? Have any of them debated Muslims in Islamic countries? Have any of them been interviewed on Al Jazeera? Have any of them written entire books in which they condemn Allah, Muhammad, Islam, or Muslims? Have they done anything of the sort at all? The answers to all of the above are: "No." Rather, what they have done is sit within the comfort and safety of countries based on Christian principles and conveniently launched condemnations which are roughly quantifiable as being 90% anti-Christian and 10% anti-other religions (and this may be being too generous an estimation).[33]

think about this... how many "atheists" do you see loudly proclaiming that islam is a myth? why do they prefer to sit within the comfort and safety of the christian section of Nairaland conveniently launching vitriolic tirades at God (i.e. Jesus Christ) while paying complete lip service to Allah? when questioned on this... why is the puerile excuse usually that "most atheists" were formerly christians anyway?

exactly what are you on about here, mate? is your problem that my mother has no inkling i'm an atheist, or that i don't go out dismissing islam? i think atheists are well known for making good use of their measure of common sense. my mother is hypertensive, and she believes that only god has kept her politician husband safe from two "alleged" political assassination attempts. she believes only god has kept her only son(yours truly) safe from chronic asthma and the same evil forces that seek to destroy his father. she prays before she eats the food she cooked with her own hands...she prays before she takes a pain killer or her high blood pressure medications. every single time she speaks with me on the phone, she spends at least 4minutes praying for me. what do you think will happen to this woman when she discovers her only child is a godless, hell bound heathen? i certainly don't wanna find that out. so yea, for that woman, i'll be a coward.

perhaps you should know that atheist are fundamentally different from religious people. while some of them, like christians are evangelistic, most just couldn't give a fark! if a person tries to shove islam or any other religion for that matter, down our throats, we'll promptly and rightly do battle on that religion. you did rightly point out that there's bold atheists out there proclaiming their beliefs and droppings, but try to understand that not every atheist has/feels the need to evangelize. you mentioned richard dawkins in one of your posts....while dude has been out there a number of times sh!tting on christianity, you seem to forget that he pretty much sh!ts on islam and other religions when necessary! same can be said of christopher hitchens, sam harris, bill maher, etc etc...and neither of these guys are evangelistic atheists. i personally respect every man's right to believe in whatever made-up horseshit they desire...it's a crazy world as it is already...a few more nutcases can't make it any worse. just try not to base the laws that i live by on any of those imaginary sky-beings.

bendazum: This one caught my attention.We are still planning doing what,'getting intimate'?Am lost for speech. You married someone since 2005 and this is 2013.Still planning to have kids!Na waoh! !Whatever happened to consummating the marriage? 8 years still planning?!

I DON PROVOKE!!!

of course you would think that. if to say your parents been properly plan for you, you for turn out a more sensible human being than your post portrays. some people actually do put some serious thought to the idea of raising a family. oh and for the record, consummating a marriage simply means f*ck!ng. i don't believe any part of that interview gives away the fact they weren't thoroughly f*ck!ng.


@post: mr harvey comes across as a very self-assured fella...laconic, succinct...no time for long ting

cassava bread is not much of a bright idea, after all.

priorities very well misplaced.

Maxymilliano: EL-RUFAI DEFILES JESUS CHRIST ON TWITTER…

Earlier today, in his futile attempt to defend Mrs Oby Ezekesili , former FCT minister , Mallam Nasir El-Rufai derided Christians by the use of intimate epithets when referring to our Lord Jesus Christ. He simply defiled Christ on twitter

He went overboard when, on his Twitter page, today January 27, 2013, said our Lord Jesus Christ Were Intimate with Mary Magdalene.

We see this as a very insensitive, irresponsible, and a offensive thing to say about Christ, and an attack on the sensibilities of Christians globally.

El-Rufai betrayed his lack of respect for our Lord Jesus Christ and obvious hatred for Christians. How else can one explain his effrontery and buffoonery when he seemingly jokingly twitted that Christ Were Intimate with Mary Magdalene.

El-Rufai who aspires rule a multi religious nation, should have been circumspect in his use of words when referring to the sacred.
It is on record that less offensive things have been said about the Prophet Mohammed which led to loss of Christian lives.

The former minister has just told Nigerians that he lacks the decency to rule a multi religious nation, if he should display such disrespect for the sacred and thinks it is funny.His Tweet shows he is not a decent man.

He has disregarded the collective sensibilities of Christians all over the world by this very offensive reference to our Lord Jesus Christ.

Signed

Dr Thomas Agande

Below is the link to El Rufai Tweets

https://mobile.twitter.com/elrufai/status/295556718170083328

Nasir El-Rufai
@ elrufai
“ @zebbook : If Jesus criticizes Jonathan's govt, Maku/Abati/Okupe will say he slept with Mary Madgalene.”....LWKMD.....
3:39 p.m. Sun, Jan 27



83 Retweets 9 Favorites

wow! abi this dr. thomas agande na native doctor?? come on man... only a buffoon will read the post retweeted by el-rufai and understand it to mean, "jesus christ farked mary magdalene." when people say nigerians are a retar*ded bunch, na because of people like dis o.....and there's "dr" right in-front of his name! chai, my country is a motherfucka! smh....

it's fair enough to wonder if el-rufai would've retweeted this if mohammed was in it. to my mind though, this aint even about jesus. the twatter comment simply makes the point that jonathan's band of nitwits will seek to smear jonathan's mother or better yet, the most sacred person were that person to criticize jonathan. by retweeting this, el-rufai acknowledges jesus' sacredness....and of course the fact that there's nothing sacred to jona-cassava's band of nitwits.

not unlike the original tweet, the cacophonous backlash has nothing to do with jesus. all na because el-rufai is involved. 99% of the folks making all the noise are a farkin disgrace to jesus, anyway!...and should jesus return right now, he'll farkin send them all to burn in hell! playing the religion card has completely distorted the point of the tweet and retweet....and that works very well for the deadhead that is jona-cassava.