|
Petname (m)
|
 |
Nature
« on: February 04, 2008, 12:08 PM » |
|
If you were an element of nature e.g. Tree, Shrub plant, Rain, Sea, Grass etc What would you like to say to humans concerning how they treat and relate with you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
ayobase (m)
|
i will tell them fine of course!!! what about u?
|
|
|
|
|
|
opuro (m)
|
take am eazy mankind o
|
|
|
|
|
|
top_kin (m)
|
If you were an element of nature e.g. Tree, Shrub plant, Rain, Sea, Grass etc What would you like to say to humans concerning how they treat and relate with you?
Bros I don't understand u o! R u for or against? You be plant? I beg, the topic sound dumb!! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
drrionelli (m)
|
This is a good question!
I feel that I would speak to humans in a manner that is consistent with what they understand, which is to say that I'd attempt to appeal to their sense of heritage.
Natural "elements" and even plants have spent a much longer time on this Earth than humans have. That, as I see it, is part of the problem. We humans tend to forget that we're still "new kids on the block," so to speak. We feel that because we have our large, well-developed brains, our ability to reason and our opposable thumbs that we don't necessarily have to play by the rules.
The fact is: We humans don't even know what the rules are. We can't because we haven't been here long enough. Consider that no other species except humans has figured out a way to eradicate every other life form on the planet--and we're doing so with surprising speed.
And for what? We cannot survive as a species, to say nothing of a planet, without our dependence on (and interdependence with regard to) all other living things. Earth has finite resources and a finite capacity to sustain. Yes, humans can create artificial environments, but if nothing is suited to them, so what?
This planet did very well without humans for billions of years. Even after life came about (however one wishes to consider it), it thrived for many millions more. Far be it for me to be a naysayer, but is it coincidence that the arrival of humans just happened to be the catalyst that began the downfall of our Earth?
Or, is it such that, in the great scheme of things, our planet was due for some major "renovations." Certainly, that has happened before (albeit ever-so-gradually). And, to paraphrase Max Ehrmann, whether or not it is clear to us, the world shall unfold just exactly as it should. Thus, we should be respectful, because Nature is allowing us to occupy this third rock from the sun. Right now, if all humans were to vanish, the Earth would continue to be, albeit a much different--and arguably, better for all, save humans--place.
My apologies for the length of this posting. However, not even all these words have begun to address this issue. Of all the postings thus far, I feel that opuro's has said so much with eloquent understatement: Take it easy, mankind.
|
|
|
|
|
|
darfur (m)
|
If you were an element of nature e.g. Tree, Shrub plant, Rain, Sea, Grass etc What would you like to say to humans concerning how they treat and relate with you?
these elements can't talk  how you for wan talk as a tree. dude which fairy tale you been de enjoy recently 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Petname (m)
|
No need to apologise drrionelli. Your post was encouraging . Love the paraphrase from Desiderata
|
|
|
|
|
|
drrionelli (m)
|
@Petname: Thank you, sir. You're very gracious to afford me such kind words.  I also wish to thank you for initiating this thread in such a cleverly posed manner! I'm looking forward to hearing more views from others!
|
|
|
|
|
|
TCUBE (m)
|
tree, don't cut me, global warmingggggggggggggg, u need me dam it , lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
Petname (m)
|
@ drrionelli,
I would love you to contact me. my e-mail is info@petfarm-ng.com I wish to share something with you. Will be looking forward to a mail from you.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
iice (f)
|
 |
Re: Nature
« #10 on: February 12, 2008, 11:49 AM » |
|
opuro pretty much summed ittake it easy mankind
|
|
|
|
|
|
Petname (m)
|
 |
Re: Nature
« #11 on: February 12, 2008, 03:41 PM » |
|
iice, thanks for the post. Nice colour code.  drrionelli, still expecting a mail from you. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Petname (m)
|
 |
Re: Nature
« #12 on: February 12, 2008, 04:19 PM » |
|
Heads UP!!!! Let's have more contributions please. Lets assume you are a bird, stripped of its nest / nesting tree (where you perch to sleep). What would you say to humans about what they have done to you & with the tree they hacked down?!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Petname (m)
|
 |
Re: Nature
« #13 on: February 13, 2008, 11:21 AM » |
|
In a bid for the topic to remain on top!
|
|
|
|
|
|
iice (f)
|
 |
Re: Nature
« #14 on: February 13, 2008, 03:11 PM » |
|
Thanks petname 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Petname (m)
|
 |
Re: Nature
« #15 on: February 13, 2008, 04:49 PM » |
|
@ iice, (Royality)
You are welcome.
|
|
|
|
|
|
drrionelli (m)
|
 |
Re: Nature
« #16 on: February 13, 2008, 06:05 PM » |
|
@Petname: Iice really is royal, isn't she? And, delightfully chilly, too!  She has been nothing less than charming during the time I've spent here on nairaland.com. She's given me great insight into the people and culture of Nigeria (and she's provided more translations from Pidgin to Proper English than I care to count!). She's witty, intelligent and always pleasant to encounter! I don't mean to go off topic (as I have done), but while the opportunity presented itself, I did wish to take advantage of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Petname (m)
|
 |
Re: Nature
« #17 on: February 14, 2008, 03:15 PM » |
|
@ drrionelli:
Thanks, for the insight into iice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Petname (m)
|
 |
Re: Nature
« #18 on: February 14, 2008, 03:17 PM » |
|
@ drrionelli: I hope you don't mind if I use this post? This is a good question!
I feel that I would speak to humans in a manner that is consistent with what they understand, which is to say that I'd attempt to appeal to their sense of heritage.
Natural "elements" and even plants have spent a much longer time on this Earth than humans have. That, as I see it, is part of the problem. We humans tend to forget that we're still "new kids on the block," so to speak. We feel that because we have our large, well-developed brains, our ability to reason and our opposable thumbs that we don't necessarily have to play by the rules.
The fact is: We humans don't even know what the rules are. We can't because we haven't been here long enough. Consider that no other species except humans has figured out a way to eradicate every other life form on the planet--and we're doing so with surprising speed.
And for what? We cannot survive as a species, to say nothing of a planet, without our dependence on (and interdependence with regard to) all other living things. Earth has finite resources and a finite capacity to sustain. Yes, humans can create artificial environments, but if nothing is suited to them, so what?
This planet did very well without humans for billions of years. Even after life came about (however one wishes to consider it), it thrived for many millions more. Far be it for me to be a naysayer, but is it coincidence that the arrival of humans just happened to be the catalyst that began the downfall of our Earth?
Or, is it such that, in the great scheme of things, our planet was due for some major "renovations." Certainly, that has happened before (albeit ever-so-gradually). And, to paraphrase Max Ehrmann, whether or not it is clear to us, the world shall unfold just exactly as it should. Thus, we should be respectful, because Nature is allowing us to occupy this third rock from the sun. Right now, if all humans were to vanish, the Earth would continue to be, albeit a much different--and arguably, better for all, save humans--place.
My apologies for the length of this posting. However, not even all these words have begun to address this issue. Of all the postings thus far, I feel that opuro's has said so much with eloquent understatement: Take it easy, mankind.
|
|
|
|
|
|
drrionelli (m)
|
 |
Re: Nature
« #19 on: February 14, 2008, 06:38 PM » |
|
By all means use it! I made it in a public forum, after all. But thank you for the extending me the courtesy of asking.
Do you mind if I ask what you wish to use it for?
|
|
|
|
|
|
iice (f)
|
 |
Re: Nature
« #20 on: February 16, 2008, 05:57 PM » |
|
@Petname: Iice really is royal, isn't she? And, delightfully chilly, too!  She has been nothing less than charming during the time I've spent here on nairaland.com. She's given me great insight into the people and culture of Nigeria (and she's provided more translations from Pidgin to Proper English than I care to count!). She's witty, intelligent and always pleasant to encounter! I don't mean to go off topic (as I have done), but while the opportunity presented itself, I did wish to take advantage of it. Dri Muchas gracias
@Petnameerhhh i might not come across as such to you which is still cool 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Petname (m)
|
 |
Re: Nature
« #21 on: February 18, 2008, 01:04 PM » |
|
@ Iice, You are & thats why I mentioned it in the first place! @ iice, (Royality)
You are welcome.
@ Drrionelli , You gave a version of the campaign exercise I'm presently running! And thats what i plan on using excepts from your response for. Can't say more than this in public! But would love to share more with you on this campaign. Kindly mail me. Love always, OJO
|
|
|
|
|
|
Petname (m)
|
 |
Re: Nature
« #22 on: February 19, 2008, 09:40 AM » |
|
@ Drrionelli , You gave another version of the campaign exercise I'm presently running (on the low key at the present moment)! And thats what i plan on using excepts from your quote for. Can't say more than this! But would love to share more with you on this campaign. Kindly mail me -- Please?!.
Love always, OJO
|
|
|
|
|
|
Petname (m)
|
In a bid to put You on TOP!
|
|
|
|
|
|