|
JayFK (m)
|
the lines aren't blured, it's pretty clear when u look at the goals and actions of the group. the CIA is an intelligence area which has made mistakes but it isn't a terrorist group. are u claiming the FARC is not a terrorist group  Yeah because of course, an Intelligence organization is supposed to be involved in assassinations on their soil and foreign soil, the selling of Opium and of course dangerous experiments on the citizens of their country including the mentally challenged, they imported Nazi scientists who committed atrocities against the Jews and Roma, the arming and training of the Contras. and of course the US army's My Lai massacre and other massacres in Iraq and Vietnam by US marines, Let us note that this is not their country's freedom they are fighting for oh!! I'm sure that there are people who would define those actions as "Terrorist" c'mon dude stop hugging the US's nuts  , as for FARC I bet there are some Colombians who would disagree with you there. Like it was said earlier "One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter" until there is an internationally agreed upon definition of the word "Terrorist" I let this one rest. it still enriches uranium without UN inspection. that's the problem. it's strange u have no problem with countries like iran violating international protocol but raise a fit when the US does the same thing.
Iran has a right to the pursuit of Nuclear power for peaceful purposes. I'm sure that if the "oga US" can use Nuclear power to develop weapons they can surely make allowance for Iran to do the opposite. I reiterate, the IAEA finds no evidence that Iran has been developing weapons after 2003. Besides the US is the "Baba" of violating international protocol. Look up the clusterfuck that is Iraq and this is even prior to their beef with Iran. Anyways this has nothing to do with Colombia,Venezuela and Ecuador, how did we start arguing about this?
|
|
|
|
|
|
paddy_lo (m)
|
Timeline. . . .1975 Apartheid south africas bloody and racist Government invades Angola. . .without any condemnation from any major western power. . .Guess who comes to angolas aid. . .yes Fidel castro and cuba whom bush and the same people in washington(cheney)who gave tactic support to apartheid love to villify. . . whats my point. . ?
my point is that things are not black and white like u Bush supporters presume. . .chavez may be somewhat a dictator and rabble rouser,but hows he different from chinese . .saudi or,russian leaders. . .with whom bush is chummy and all smiles wit. . .it is all bullshit and the sooner you simpletons get it in your heads the better. . .
i want you to go ask the poor in venezuela whom chavez has uplifted,or look for statistics of how cuba was before castro came in terms of education and health and how they are now. . . .
we should be careful how we chant for war,because in the final analysis we are pretty much expendable in the eyes of the almighty US if they choose their so called interests over our survival. . . the wise ones root for chavez standing his ground,nationalizing precious assets and fighting poverty. . . the foolish ones as usual fail to see the big picture.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuba_in_Angola
|
|
|
|
|
|
RichyBlacK (m)
|
Timeline. . . .1975 Apartheid south africas bloody and racist Government invades Angola. . .without any condemnation from any major western power. . .Guess who comes to angolas aid. . .yes Fidel castro and cuba whom bush and the same people in washington(cheney)who gave tactic support to apartheid love to villify. . . whats my point. . ?
my point is that things are not black and white like u Bush supporters presume. . .chavez may be somewhat a dictator and rabble rouser,but hows he different from chinese . .saudi or,russian leaders. . .with whom bush is chummy and all smiles wit. . .it is all bullshit and the sooner you simpletons get it in your heads the better. . .
i want you to go ask the poor in venezuela whom chavez has uplifted,or look for statistics of how cuba was before castro came in terms of education and health and how they are now. . . .
we should be careful how we chant for war,because in the final analysis we are pretty much expendable in the eyes of the almighty US if they choose their so called interests over our survival. . . the wise ones root for chavez standing his ground,nationalizing precious assets and fighting poverty. . . the foolish ones as usual fail to see the big picture. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuba_in_Angola @paddy_lo, You're soooo right it hurts! A lot of these "America is always right" simpletons are ignorant of the numerous atrocities the US has committed/supported/encouraged and still commit/support/encourage. For example, the Americans supported the evil Apartheid government of South Africa responsible for the cold-blooded murder of thousands (including the anti-apartheid activist Steve Biko) and referred to the great Nelson Mandela as a "terrorist", and they are still supporting Apartheid Israel and its assassination, kidnapping and killing of Palestinian children using American-made armament. I thank Chineke, plus Olodumare, plus Ubangidi, plus Oghene, plus including Osanobua say pesin like you put correct comment for this place.
|
|
|
|
|
|
RichyBlacK (m)
|
Yeah because of course, an Intelligence organization is supposed to be involved in assassinations on their soil and foreign soil, the selling of Opium and of course dangerous experiments on the citizens of their country including the mentally challenged, they imported Nazi scientists who committed atrocities against the Jews and Roma, the arming and training of the Contras. and of course the US army's My Lai massacre and other massacres in Iraq and Vietnam by US marines, Let us note that this is not their country's freedom they are fighting for oh!! I'm sure that there are people who would define those actions as "Terrorist" c'mon dude stop hugging the US's nuts  , as for FARC I bet there are some Colombians who would disagree with you there. Like it was said earlier "One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter" until there is an internationally agreed upon definition of the word "Terrorist" I let this one rest. Iran has a right to the pursuit of Nuclear power for peaceful purposes. I'm sure that if the "oga US" can use Nuclear power to develop weapons they can surely make allowance for Iran to do the opposite. I reiterate, the IAEA finds no evidence that Iran has been developing weapons after 2003. Besides the US is the "Baba" of violating international protocol. Look up the clusterfuck that is Iraq and this is even prior to their beef with Iran. Anyways this has nothing to do with Colombia,Venezuela and Ecuador, how did we start arguing about this? @JayFK, Please enlighten that guy, he needs to hear you loud and clear. Great points!
|
|
|
|
|
|
bawomolo (m)
|
Yeah because of course, an Intelligence organization is supposed to be involved in assassinations on their soil and foreign soil, one of the mistakes of the CIA. i don't see how it's terrorism since they weren't targetting random civillians. the KGB and other organizations have engaged in this illicit activities. and of course the US army's My Lai massacre and other massacres in Iraq and Vietnam by US marines those activities weren't officially sanctioned by the US army. those were actions of individual soldiers that were immediately condemned. bad example. the CIA is an intelligence gathering agency, something the FARC or hezbollah aren't . hey imported Nazi scientists who committed atrocities against the Jews and Roma u must be confusing the US army with the CIA FARC I bet there are some Colombians who would disagree with you there. great, there are some people that support al qaeda, so that means al qaeda isn't a terrorist group. Like it was said earlier "One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter" until there is an internationally agreed upon definition of the word "Terrorist" I let this one rest. no it wont' rest, is a group that kills peasants at will, taxes colombians, traffics cocaine and kidnaps intellectuals and politicians a terrorist group?? yes or no. Anyways this has nothing to do with Colombia,Venezuela and Ecuador, how did we start arguing about this? the double standard that countries u like are allowed to violate international law. i like how u have ignored the fact that iranian generals are involved in the iranian nuclear program or that IAEA inspectors aren't allowed into iran's underground facilities. but hey, it's iran let them do that. i would prefer not to continue this convo if u are unwilling to answer my question about the FARC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
simmy (m)
|
sometimes i wonder how educated right thinking intelligent people can be so easily foled by western propaganda. even american liberals have been able to see through their governments hypocritical foreign policies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
texazzpete (m)
|
@RichyBlacK Please don't confuse people who say 'The US is NOT ALWAYS wrong' with 'The US is always right'. That has been a common Nairaland mistake. You constantly announce that you're not against America, that you only loathe people like Bush. Fine. Just when i start believing you, you go and support EVERYTHING people like JayFK say just because it casts your points in good light. For example. . .
@JayFK The CIA importing Nazi scientists to perform experiments on Jews and Gypsies? Provide proof or stand discredited.
Blaming the CIA for the My Lai massacres. . .you might as well blame the CIA for the recent rape case in Japan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
texazzpete (m)
|
@all Nigerien and Chadian rebels have long made incursions into some areas in the north, killing innocent cattlemen and rustling their cattle. If the Nigerian Government makes a limited incursion solely to apprehend and destroy the operational bases of these bandits, would that make us all terrorists?
|
|
|
|
|
|
JayFK (m)
|
@RichyBlacK Please don't confuse people who say 'The US is NOT ALWAYS wrong' with 'The US is always right'. That has been a common Nairaland mistake. You constantly announce that you're not against America, that you only loathe people like Bush. Fine. Just when i start believing you, you go and support EVERYTHING people like JayFK say just because it casts your points in good light. For example. . .
@JayFK The CIA importing Nazi scientists to perform experiments on Jews and Gypsies? Provide proof or stand discredited.
Blaming the CIA for the My Lai massacres. . .you might as well blame the CIA for the recent rape case in Japan.
You can't really be serious right? Haven't you read WWII and Cold War history? I said the CIA imported War criminals "who" performed experiments on Jews and Gypsies look up "Operation Paperclip" this is not fiction. I did not blame the CIA for My Lai, don't misunderstand me. Your boy above there he says basically that anyone who utilizes Terrorist tactics must be a terrorist, so I told him that "how bout the CIA and the US army who utilized such tactics, Can they be called terrorists too? My point is if he is so willing to extend the label to just about anyone surely he must be willing to extend it to the CIA no?
|
|
|
|
|
|
bawomolo (m)
|
My point is if he is so willing to extend the label to just about anyone surely he must be willing to extend it to the CIA no? what official millitary or CIA code of conduct are terror tactics approved. the US follows the geneva accord while the FARC doesn't. there is a big difference. why won't u answer the question. is the FARC a terror group
|
|
|
|
|
|
JayFK (m)
|
what official millitary or CIA code of conduct are terror tactics approved. the US follows the geneva accord while the FARC doesn't. there is a big difference. why won't u answer the question. is the FARC a terror group
dude I stated evidence above, they are off the books operations aka Black Operations sanctioned by the CIA I'm not willing to call FARC a terrorist organization, because if FARC is a terror group then every rebel group can be called Terrorist including Castro and the July movement who rebelled against Batista. However, I will be willing to concede that FARC is a terrorist organization, if you concede that the CIA is/was a terrorist organization. If we can't make concessions then hey, we leave it as it is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
JayFK (m)
|
@all Nigerien and Chadian rebels have long made incursions into some areas in the north, killing innocent cattlemen and rustling their cattle. If the Nigerian Government makes a limited incursion solely to apprehend and destroy the operational bases of these bandits, would that make us all terrorists?
I don't think you've been following the argument. No one is calling Colombia a "Terrorist"
|
|
|
|
|
|
bawomolo (m)
|
I will be willing to concede that FARC is a terrorist organization, if you concede that the CIA is/was a terrorist organization. please list what CIA policy officially sanctions the killing of civilians. u have issues if u think the transportation of nazi scientists is terrorism. the actions of rogue elements in the CIA doesn't dampen the aim of the organization. the CIA is an intelligence gathering group, is hezbollah one?? is FARC one or is shining path one. it's irritating to see how people would justify bad actions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 Play (m)
|
I saw this funny story in the Economist.Apparently,on March the 2nd,after the Colombian incursion,Chavez issued detailed orders for military mobilisation on live television! "Minister of defence!" bellowed Mr Chavez on "Alo Presidente"("Hello President"),his weekly radio and television programme."Send me ten battalions to the border,including tanks." He also ordered the deployment of his new Russia fighter-bombers while threatening to "send over the Sukhois" all on live television. The man is a clown
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uche2nna (m)
|
please list what CIA policy officially sanctions the killing of civilians. u have issues if u think the transportation of nazi scientists is terrorism. the actions of rogue elements in the CIA doesn't dampen the aim of the organization. the CIA is an intelligence gathering group, is hezbollah one?? is FARC one or is shining path one. it's irritating to see how people would justify bad actions.
None. But then that does not mean that they don't. Hacve You ever heard of the dark side of the CIA. It is neither a tale nor a myth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 Play (m)
|
None. But then that does not mean that they don't. Hacve You ever heard of the dark side of the CIA. It is neither a tale nor a myth.
Intelligence operations,almost by definition,involve killings, in many cases, of civilians.If you broadened the meaning of terrorist to include every conceivable organisation that kills or has killed civilians(whether its the Bakassi Boys or the Sicilian Mafia) that would strip the term of its unique meaning and render it useless.Is the Nigerian police a terrorist organisation because it regularly kills civilians and "terrorises" innocents to part with their cash? Terrorists groups are those whose raisond'etre is the indiscriminate killing of civilians.Alternatively,it can be used to describe groups whose main MO is the indiscriminate killing of civilians. Sure,many security services(especially intelligence services)may occasionally engage in activities that border on terrorism ,but to label them terrorist will be to stretch the meaning of terrorist beyond reason.
|
|
|
|
|
|
doyin13 (m)
|
@4play
I doubt it will ever be possible to come to a unanimous conclusion about what constitutes or what group can be correctly identified as a terrorist organisation.
Using your example of Law Enforcement Agencies, there are examples in times past of such, Fascist and Communists no less, that are now described in 'terrorist' terms.
|
|
|
|
|
|