Java Or C++

   

@logica
thumbs up 

i was simply pointing out that the suffix "++" which happens to be the "increment" operator in the C language is there to show that C++ is an "increment" (advance 1 level) to C.

well, how different are they when c++ is a superset of c (meaning c became a subset of c++)? same cannot be said of c/c++ and java for instance as they are quite different.

Another thing going for C++ is multiple inheritance ,  while Java has singly rooted hierarchy

for differences between C and C++ http://david.tribble.com/text/cdiffs.htm

Apart from the pointer thingy and large library java is also very much like C 

Well Java is great. I am in favour of C++ however.
Java users point out the strenght in Java and the weaknesses in C++ but Java has its Achiles heels too. I'll point out some of the weaknesses of java i.e. areas where C++ is known to out perform Java:

1. Speed - Because java is an "Interpreted code" it requires Java Virtual machine to interprete the programmes compilled byte code. This makes Java slower than equivalent native code produced by an optimised C++ compiler.

2. Poor low level access - Java has no pointers (while this is touted as one of it's strenght since it makes it simpler and easier to use) it is virtualy incapable of accessing a computer system on low level. This makes Java unsuitable for system software that perform such operations as calling BIOS and DOS subroutines and responding to interrupts. Java is not a good choice for writing operating systems, device drivers, and other low level code.

3. No Multiple inheritance - Java classes supports only single inheritance. In C++ a class may be derived from several base classes, while in Java a class may only be derived from one superclass. [a limited form of multiple inheritance is possible using Java interface clases but it does not compare to the more sophisticated form of multiple in C++]

4. No bBackward compability with C - Any legacy code written in C will have to be totally re-written if it's desired in Java. C++ compilers are however able to tranlate C.

5. No support for in-line functions - Java does not support in-line function but C++ does. The use of inline functions provide programmers with optimisation techniques which have a great impact on program runtime speed. Java does not support source-level optimisations, and the code optimisations supported by Java compilers are not language specific.

This are just a few I picked out of a Book by one of my favourite Java Authors. (Tom Swan).
There are many advantage/ disadvantages to both languages and there are many shared points too. it wouldn't hurt to learn both languages. I've learned close to 8 programming languages (not counting scripting languages) but my favourite is C++. Learn as much as you can. Both languages are great.

C++ or Java, Its just a question of what is it you want to do.I am yet to see a very functional OS written from ground up with Java, there is one  OS on SourceForge some Jokers claim can compete with the likes of Unix and Linux, tried it and puff its blam.

So as I av said its a matter of what is it you want to do. If you want to write drivers, OSes and d likes i will definitely advise even the KIDS to stay with C++, but if you what you want is a compelling user interface across multiple screens of your live, write once run anywhere, intuitive technology backed by a Fortune 500 company and a community as large as you can have, with all the necessary hypes and buzz, then what you need is Java

Now I ask myself, will I rather write an OS or a Driver or a very good software that is actually usable? Its a matter of choice. I believe if C++ has the kind of backing Java has, it will also make sense for writing client side programs, even with IDE's it's still a little pain designing GUI's with C++.

What can't I give for Netbeans.

I beg leave story for market women java indeed rules.