The Legacy Of A Prophet

Welcome. Please Login, Register, Or Activate! 
type your username and password to login
Date: November 25, 2009, 01:43 AM
432153 members and 299122 Topics
Latest Member: GODDYPOWER
Nairaland [Nigerian Forum] Home Help Search Who is currently online? Login Register
Nairaland Forum  |  General | Welcome  |  Religion  |  Islam for Muslims (Moderator: Jarus)  |  The Legacy Of A Prophet
Pages: (1) (2) Go Down Send this topic Notify of replies
Author Topic: The Legacy Of A Prophet  (Read 957 views)
nossycheek (f)
Re: The Legacy Of A Prophet
« #32 on: April 16, 2008, 02:46 PM »

Quote from: Frizy on April 15, 2008, 02:50 PM
@nossycheek
The moon split was witnessed by the disbelievers of the time and also the Musl'ims. The good thing about The Great Religion is that everything was written and dated. The pagans asked the prophet to show them signs and God inspired him(Muhamm'ed) to show the moon split. It was not Moh'ammed that splitted the moon because he had no such power, rather it was God.
Now, when the disbelievers saw it, they turned in aversion saying that it was magic because they don't believe Moha'mmed's messengership. Anyone who denys Muhamm'ed as being a prophet or calling him names as Nwando did are disbelievers. What is the point of proving to you it was true when you're not ready to believe.
When we showed witness,4Him and all christians in the house the sign(picture)- no even one believed. Rather they ran on by posting controversial comments probably from sites that deny the evidence.
And God said: As for the disbelivers, whether thou warn them or thou warn them not, it is all one for them- they believe not! (baqarah)

There is no verse in the Qu'ran that is not right. And instead of you people to pray and know the gospel truth, you pursuit that which your own heart tells you. If you've studied the Kor'an, my constant question is - Can anybody even the knowledgeable Aristotles (philosphers) produce a similar copy?Claim it's from God- I have read the Grail Message by Abushin and it's all trash, incomprehensible jargons with many contradictions.

It is up for you to believe but it is only All'ah Himself that helps man know the truth. That you ascribe to your Lord, He opposes and reject with anger and He says it's belittleness of whom He is.

Now read this

Narrated Abdullah bin Masud: "During the lifetime of the Prophet the moon was split into two parts and on that the Prophet said, 'Bear witness (to thus).' (Translation of Sahih Bukhari, Virtues and Merits of the Prophet (pbuh) and his Companions, Volume 4, Book 56, Number 830)"

Narrated Anas: "That the Meccan people requested Allah's Apostle to show them a miracle, and so he showed them the splitting of the moon. (Translation of Sahih Bukhari, Virtues and Merits of the Prophet (pbuh) and his Companions, Volume 4, Book 56, Number 831)"

Narrated Ibn 'Abbas: "The moon was split into two parts during the lifetime of the Prophet. (Translation of Sahih Bukhari, Virtues and Merits of the Prophet (pbuh) and his Companions, Volume 4, Book 56, Number 832)"

Narrated Anas bin Malik: "The people of Mecca asked Allah's Apostle to show them a miracle. So he showed them the moon split in two halves between which they saw the Hiram' mountain. (Translation of Sahih Bukhari, Merits of the Helpers in Madinah (Ansaar), Volume 5, Book 58, Number 208)"

Narrated 'Abdullah: "The moon was split ( into two pieces ) while we were with the Prophet in Mina. He said, "Be witnesses." Then a Piece of the moon went towards the mountain. (Translation of Sahih Bukhari, Merits of the Helpers in Madinah (Ansaar), Volume 5, Book 58, Number 209)"

Narrated 'Abdullah bin 'Abbas: "During the lifetime of Allah's Apostle the moon was split (into two places). (Translation of Sahih Bukhari, Merits of the Helpers in Madinah (Ansaar), Volume 5, Book 58, Number 210)"

Narrated 'Abdullah: "The moon was split (into two pieces). (Translation of Sahih Bukhari, Merits of the Helpers in Madinah (Ansaar), Volume 5, Book 58, Number 211)"

This hilarious Islamist site recounts the many ludicrous hadiths of ‘moon splitting’.
http://www.answering-christianity.com/moon_split.htm

Osama Abdallah’s answering-christianity article attempts to deflect criticism of Muhammad’s splitting of the moon. Apparently the moon never really split. The ‘moon splitting’ incident was merely a misunderstanding – the hadiths were only referring to the new moon. This is patently false as the hadiths clearly refer to this incident as somehow miraculous. The new moon occurs every month and thus is not miraculous; certainly not miraculous enough to fool even the gullible into believing that Muhammad is a prophet of God.

According to Muslim legend, Cheraman Perumal (aka Chakrawati Farmas) was supposed to have witnessed this splitting of the moon.

Quote:
WITNESS OF MOON SPLITTING (A MIRACLE OF PROPHET MUHAMMAD (PBUH)

CHAKRAWATI FARMAS KING OF MALABAR, INDIA

The incident relating to King Chakrawati Farmas is documented in an old manuscript in the India Office Library, London, which has reference number: Arabic, 2807, 152-173. It was quoted in the book "Muhammad Rasulullah," by M. Hamidullah:

"There is a very old tradition in Malabar, South-West Coast of India, that Chakrawati Farmas, one of their kings, had observed the splitting of the moon, the celebrated miracle of the Holy Prophet (pbuh) at Mecca, and learning on inquiry that there was a prediction of the coming of a Messanger of God from Arabia (Detail given below), he appointed his son as regent and set out to meet him. He embraced Islam at the hand of the Prophet, and when returning home, at the direction of the Prophet, died at the port of Zafar, Yemen, where the tomb of the "Indian king" was piously visited for many centuries."

The old manuscript in the 'India Office Library' contains several other details about King Chakrawati Farmas and his travel[1].

The king spent weeks in seclusion. In the midst of his quiet life, he set out on the journey along with the Arab travelers who'd promised him earlier. On the way, they stopped by Koylandi and from there to Dharmapatnam where they halted for 3 days. Then they set out to Shehr Muqalla. On reaching there, they set for the Hajj pilgrimage and thereafter returned to Malabar. He aspired to spread the message of Islam. But on the way, he fell sick and breathed his last.

A tradition of the Holy Prophet has also been reported from one of the companions, Abu Saeed al Kaudri, regarding the arrival of Cheraman Perumel. "A king from India presented the Messenger of Allah with a bottle of pickle that had ginger in it. The Holy Prophet distributed it among his companions. I also received a piece to eat ". (Hakim reports in 'Al Musthadrak)

http://www.understanding-islam.com/related/text.asp?type=rarticle&raid=170



ANALYSIS

Is Cheraman Perumal the same person as Chakrawati Farmas?

The evidence that they are the same people comes from the fact that the above story relates to both Chakrawati Farmas and Cheraman Perumal. Also, the account of Cheraman Perumal is identical or very similar to that of Chakrawati Farmas, particularly with respect to the Hajj (see below).
http://jaihoon.com/watan/perumalfirst.htm
http://www.iio.org/article.php?story=20030925075129438&mode=print

Cheraman Perumal is also thought to be Rajasekhara Varman (820-844). http://www.kerala.cc/keralahistory/index20.htm



What do the Religious Legends say about when Cheraman Perumal lived?

According to the Muslims, Cheraman Perumal lived during Muhammad’s lifetime as they claim he witnessed the ‘splitting of the moon’ incident.

Quote:
There was a Muslim community in Malabar, southwest India as early as 618 C.E. as a result of King Chakrawati Farmas accepting Islam at the hands of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh).

http://www.themodernreligion.com/quotations_muslims_india.htm


Quote:
Cheraman Juma Masjid the first mosque of India.
Built in 629 AD, this is the first mosque in India and the second in the world where Juma prayers were started. People from far and near irrespective of caste and creed visit this holy place and pay their homage. This mosque has a unique specialty. Mosques built all over the world face the direction of Mecca, but this particular one faces along the east.
The first mosque in India is Situated in Kodungalloor, Legend says King Cheraman Perumal of Kodungallur left for Mecca, embraced Islam, accepted the name Thajudeen, married the sister of the then King of Jeddah. Before his death Thajuddeen handed over to the King of Jeddah several letters addressed to Kerala Kings seeking their help to propagate Islam. The Jiddah king came to Kerala and met the then king of Kodungalloor who helped the former to build a Juma Masjid.The first mosque in India.

http://www.members.tripod.com/navaskj/kodungallur.htm

Quote:
The Cheraman Juma Masjid was built by Malik bin Dinar, one of the 13 followers of Prophet Mohammad who reached the ancient port of Musuris on the spice route in Malabar in 629 AD. Legend has it that Cheraman Perumal, a Hindu ruler of Musuris (modern Kodungallur), embraced Islam at the behest of Dinar, abdicated his throne and left for Mecca to meet the prophet. Perumal is reported to have died at the port of Zafar, Yemen, where the tomb of the "Indian king" was a major attraction to Muslim pilgrims for many centuries.

http://www.indiatraveltimes.com/travelogue/mosque.html


A new discovery suggests Cheraman Perumal left for Mecca sometime around 642-643AD.

Quote:
According to Dr. G.S. Khwaja of the Archeological Survey of India, some missionaries led by Maalik Bin Dinaar, a Sufi saint from Basra and a contemporary of the prophet came to Kerala in the seventh Century.

They presented themselves in the court of Cheraman Perumal, a Zamorian dynasty king, in 642-43 AD or Hijia 22 (22 years after the prophet's migration from Mecca to Madina).

An epigraph about the Islamic mission, written in difficult-to-read, ancient version of Arabic language, was founded executed on a wooden Lintel of the Jami mosque at Kasargod in Kerala…

…The Kasargod mosque lintel inscription bears out the earliest reference to Islam in Kerala in an ancient Arabic book, "Tohafatul Mujahideen" written by Zainuddin Malabari. It narrates the story of arrival of what could be the first Islamic mission to Kerala by sea, led by Maalik Bin Dinaar.

According to the book, a Zamorin dynasty king, Cheraman Perumal, was ruling then and the missionaries presented themselves in his court in the year 642-43 AD or Hijra 22.

The king welcomed the mission and asked about Islam. So impressed was he with Malik's interpretation of the religion that he embraced Islam, the book says.

Cherman Perumal became Abdullah Sameri and undertook Haj pilgrimage to meet prophet Mohammed at Mecca. On his way back, Sameri died at Zulfar, a coastal town in Yemen, where records show that a grave with the name of Sameri engraved on it still exists.

http://muslimsonline.com/babri/keralamuslim.htm

Alas, this Muslim discovery proves the Muslim legend in error as Muhammad the sinful pedophile died in 632 AD, thus making it truly miraculous that Cheraman Perumal could have personally witnessed the ‘moon splitting’ incident at least a decade after the charlatan prophet’s long-overdue death.

The Christians, however, believe Cheraman Perumal lived when St Thomas migrated to Malabar in the fourth century.

Quote:
Knai Thoma and his people were heartily welcomed by Cheraman Perumal, the Emperor. Cheraman Perumal sent his brother, Ramavarma, and his minister, Vettathu Mannan, to receive Knai Thoma and his people. Knai Thoma and his people were given permission to settle down in Kodungalloor and to do business. Later Cheraman Perumal bestowed Knai Thoma and his people with 72 princely privileges and there by elevated them over 17 castes. This proclamation was made on a Saturday in March (Kumbham 29), 345 and it was recorded on copper plates given to Knai Thoma (Knai Thomman Cheppedu).

http://www.knanaya.us/msks.htm

So we have conflicting religious sources as to when Cheraman Perumal lived. If he lived in the period ascribed to him by the Christians, he couldn’t have witnessed the ‘moon splitting’ incident as he would have predated Muhammad by almost three centuries.

Nevertheless, there are conflicting Muslim accounts of when he left for Mecca, namely around 629AD or 643AD.



When did this ‘moon splitting’ incident supposed to have occurred?

Quote:
According to Maududi, the traditionists and commentators have agreed that this incident took place at Mina in Makkah about five years before the Holy Prophet's Hijra (migration) to Madinah.

The Moon had split into two distinct parts in front of their very eyes. The two parts had separated and receded so much apart from each other that to the on-lookers (in Makkah) one part had appeared on one side of the mountain and the other on the other side of it. Then, in an instant the two had rejoined. This was a manifest proof of the truth that the system of the universe was neither eternal nor immortal, it could be disrupted.

http://www.iio.org/article.php?story=20030925075129438&mode=print

As Hijra is traditionally accepted to have occurred in the year 622AD, the ‘moon splitting’ incident must have occurred sometime around 617AD. This means that Malik bin Dinar’s arrival in Malabar in 629AD was about 12 years too late for Cheraman Perumal to have witnessed the ‘moon splitting’ incident. More likely Malik bin Dinar told the king this lie, rather than the king himself witness the incident. Through time, the legend transmutated from Cheraman Perumal being told the incident to him witnessing the incident.



When did the Historical Cheraman Perumal live?
The established historical sources from Kerala suggest that Cheraman Perumal lived in the ninth century.

Quote:
His successor, Rajasekhara Varman (820-844), was a Saivite saint who introduced the Malayalam Era known as Kollam Era in 825 A.D. Sthanu Ravi Varman is sometimes identified with Rajasekhara Varman who in turn is identified with Cheraman Perumal Nayanar. According to Keralolpathi, Cheraman Perumal was the last emperor; he divided the kingdom among his suzerains, embraced Islam, left Kerala for Mecca, married a Muslim princess, and finally died on the Arabian Coast.

http://www.kerala.cc/keralahistory/index20.htm

Quote:
A later king who abdicated his throne in 825 AD was Cheraman Perumal who apparently accepted Islam and went to Mecca.

http://kerala-history.nrksite.com/history2.htm


Quote:
Cheraman Perumal Nayanar, one of the two Nayanars from Kerala, as stated above, has been identified with Rajasekhara Varman (820-844 A.D.), the second of the kings who ruled over the Kulasekhara empire. 

http://www.hindubooks.org/temples/kerala/Introduction/page9.htm

So it would appear that the historical facts do not support Cheraman Perumal ever having witnessed the ‘moon splitting’ incident.


What the Muslim Historian said about Cheraman Perumal
Muslims claim that Cheraman Perumal aka Chakrawati Farmas personally witnessed the ‘moon splitting’ incident, based on legend.

At least one historian disagrees. In fact, it is undeniable that far from witnessing the incident, Cheraman Perumal was told of it and this gullible king converted to Islam on the basis of this supernatural tale. The folly of humans, even kings, is boundless, as evidenced by the number of Muslims past, present and future. How do we explain this? Easily. Allah made some people idiots and called them Muslims.

Quote:
The tradition account of the introduction of Islam to the Malabar coast is recorded by Zayn-us-Din, an historian of the sixteenth century. He states that the conversion of Cheruman Perumal occurred during the lifetime of the Prophet. A company of pilgrims from Arabia were making a journey to visit Adam’s footprint in Ceylon. On their arrival at Cranganore they paid a visit to the raja, and told him of the miracle of Muhammad’s having split the moon. Perumal was captivated by this report of the exhibition of such supernatural power. He was converted; and when the pilgrims returned from their journey he secretly joined them, and went with them to Arabia to visit the Prophet, who had not yet fled to Medina." (Titus, 1936, pp. 32-33).

http://www.hindunet.org/saraswati/dharma/history4.htm

This fits with the time frame of the historical facts of Cheraman Perumal’s lifetime and the discrepancy between the arrival of Muslim missionaries in Malabar and the putative date of the ‘moon splitting’ incident.


CONCLUSION
Religious sources seem contradictory with respect to when Cheraman Perumal lived and whether he did witness the ‘moon splitting’ incident. It must be noted that Cheraman Perumal was a legendary king of Kerala and it is unsurprising that various religions, Hinduism, Christianity and Islam, try to associate themselves with his renown, regardless of historical facts.

It is apparent that the historical facts do not support the Islamist legend that Chakrawati Farmas (aka Cheraman Perumal aka Rajasekhara Varman) personally witnessed the ludicrous ‘moon splitting’ incident as he is thought to have lived about two centuries after the death of the delusional homicidal pedophile, Muhammad bin Abdallah, who made up the ‘moon splitting’ so-called miracle to fool gullible Muslims past, present and future.

Only stupid Muslims believe that a man living in the ninth century can personally witness a supposed miracle performed by a murderous, pedophilic and false prophet in the seventh century, an event not witnessed by anybody else. Truly a miracle of Islam.

Source: http://www.faithfreedom.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=7509&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=0
Frizy (m)
Re: The Legacy Of A Prophet
« #33 on: April 16, 2008, 04:06 PM »

@nossycheek
I read all your information. I must tell you that this is not in the hadith. The Indian king as you continually stated wasn't recorded in the hadiths(and if it was kindly post the hadith with the chain of narration). So how do you want Mus'lims not to believe that this evidences of yours wasn't from people who love framing up stories based on the hatred they have for the Mus'lims and Mu'hammed our leader himself?

I remember you saying: 
Quote
How do we explain this? Easily. God made some people idiots and called them Great Ones.


Nay, it is they(those who disbelieve) that are foolish though you perceive not! You may call us names because we believe that there is no god save Alla'h and Muhamm'ed is His Messenger. At the end, we'll surely know who is deluded/unfortunate from who is not.

From the Ko'ran: On that day, some faces will be whitened and some faces- blackened. . . and for those whose face are blacken, their home is the Fire!An heartless journey's end.

I only warn you that your case don't end that way. The words of the Ko'ran are very true even though most men believe not.
kola oloye (m)
Re: The Legacy Of A Prophet
« #34 on: April 16, 2008, 04:20 PM »

PEOPLE ARE PERISHING BECAUSE THEY LACK KNOWLEDGE
You shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free
Jesus said` I`M THE WAY,THE TRUTH AND LIFE, ` Cheesy
nossycheek (f)
Re: The Legacy Of A Prophet
« #35 on: April 16, 2008, 04:45 PM »

from Frizy
Quote
I remember you saying: 
Quote
How do we explain this? Easily. God made some people idiots and called them Great Ones.

Pls provide quote/thread and stop wiping up sentiments against me.

I don't know about your hadith and koran but my Bible tells me that Christ is the way, the truth and the life and no one comes to the father except by him.

His testimonies are so sure and holiness befits his house O Lord Our God!

Frizy (m)
Re: The Legacy Of A Prophet
« #36 on: April 16, 2008, 05:18 PM »

Quote from: nossycheek on April 16, 2008, 04:45 PM

I don't know about your hadith and great book but my Bible tells me that Christ is the way, the truth and the life and no one comes to the father except by him.

His testimonies are so sure and holiness befits his house O Lord Our God!


Now let me explain sometime. Christ will never have said this. What Christ said was that you should worship God alone. There has been no record of a God chosen man to say worship me instead of God. I don't know why christains find it hard to believe that christ was just a man, a man that God created as he created you and I. The difference between Christ and anyother person is that he was a messenger.QED. The believe that christ is the way, truth and life- meaning without him no one will be saved and all these are fabrication by Paul which was just to lore(drive) more people to Hell.

If christ is the way and not God himself, why has there been people in the past before christ who worshipped God alone and were eventually saved.
All these belief system that he was his son or God Himself is baseless because God Himself denys it. On the day of reckoning when everyone will come to know the truth. I testify that this is true, Christ himself will deny that he was God's son, or God, or that he commanded you people to worship him by saying in Jesus' name; instead of invoking in the name of God.
Islam is straightforward. Worship God, don't idolize, live a righteous life and be good in your character- Heaven is guaranteed. No intercession of anybody just worship God alone and you're assured of paradise.
Please think about this, does God have to disguise as a human before He knows what happens anywhere? Or can God die?(Astgarfu), the same God = another god son- when the god son was only given birth to by a woman like you!
samba123 (m)
Re: The Legacy Of A Prophet
« #37 on: April 16, 2008, 06:30 PM »

@kola oloye
Quote
Jesus said` I`M THE WAY,THE TRUTH AND LIFE,

wow which way and the truth and life ? can you specify briefly? Cheesy
nossycheek (f)
Re: The Legacy Of A Prophet
« #38 on: April 17, 2008, 10:47 AM »

Quote from: Frizy on April 16, 2008, 05:18 PM
Now let me explain sometime. Christ will never have said this. What Christ said was that you should worship God alone. There has been no record of a God chosen man to say worship me instead of God. I don't know why christains find it hard to believe that christ was just a man, a man that God created as he created you and I. The difference between Christ and anyother person is that he was a messenger.QED. The believe that christ is the way, truth and life- meaning without him no one will be saved and all these are fabrication by Paul which was just to lore(drive) more people to Hell.

If christ is the way and not God himself, why has there been people in the past before christ who worshipped God alone and were eventually saved.
All these belief system that he was his son or God Himself is baseless because God Himself denys it. On the day of reckoning when everyone will come to know the truth. I testify that this is true, Christ himself will deny that he was God's son, or God, or that he commanded you people to worship him by saying in Jesus' name; instead of invoking in the name of God.
The Great Religion is straightforward. Worship God, don't idolize, live a righteous life and be good in your character- Heaven is guaranteed. No intercession of anybody just worship God alone and you're assured of paradise.
Please think about this, does God have to disguise as a human before He knows what happens anywhere? Or can God die?(Astgarfu), the same God = another god son- when the god son was only given birth to by a woman like you!

There is no need for your so called explanation because we Xtians know better. Jesus saying that he is the way, the truth and the life did not say you should ascribe the worship of God to him but he clearly states that whoever does not believe in his name (Jesus) and accept him (Jesus) cannot be saved.

MO can be an ordinary man but Jesus Christ is the messiah, the chosen one of Isreal and not begotten by immaculate conception and not the way You and I and MO were conceived.

Jesus Christ remains the son of God, chosen to die for our sins (I don't need you to believe) and rose again on the 3rd as was foretold before his birth.  FYI Paul did not fabricate anything as the words were spoken by Christ himself.

As for muslims we all know that they worship belial or allah but definitely not God so I don't know the paradise you are talking about or is it the one full of sexual orgies? What with the several virgins with self regenerating hymen. The religion of islam is one of calamity and falsehood.  What more, we can't even rely on what MO said he did, saw or heard because of the hallucinations he suffered while on earth or how do we know when he was in lucid period to take him serious?
Frizy (m)
Re: The Legacy Of A Prophet
« #39 on: April 17, 2008, 05:26 PM »

Quote from: nossycheek on April 17, 2008, 10:47 AM


I don't know the paradise you are talking about or is it the one full of sexual orgies? What with the several virgins with self regenerating hymen.
Is it that is paining you? Grin Grin Grin. Ah! I pray I make it. Wink

 
Quote
The religion of the great religion is one of calamity and falsehood. What more, we can't even rely on what MO said he did, saw or heard because of the hallucinations he suffered while on earth or how do we know when he was in lucid period to take him serious?

Seriously speaking, it is only Isl'am that is straight-forward. It is only your believe that Mus'lims don't worship God but we are the ones truly worshipping Him the way the commanded. There is no religion that has a perfect praying pattern that is uniform all over the world, Isl'am has that. I don't have to think that it is weird for people saying things like Mohamm'ed was mad or deluded (which I strongly oppose). There are several parts of the great book that not only declares his sanity but also prove that it is those you claim such about him are the blindfolded. And God Himself says: They will come to know (O Muhamm'ed) in a manner of time who are the deluded ones.

The definition of deluded according to the Ko'ran may mean the example of someone who is every thirsty and needs water. Then he sees from far away that he could get the water from the top of somewhere but in truth- after getting to the spot he found nothing(just a mirage).
But the right thinking sees whatever he spends right with All'ah and even in folds.
God promises those who do not bow down in prayer (to Alla'h)or when the Ko'ran is read everlasting torment. Moh'ammed describes this by saying that just about sixty sometime(maybe 65) part of it that is just what we use on earth. And if the flames only are released for a short while to the earth(assumingly) no one will survive.

So please I beg you to have a change of heart and stop saying things that are incurring wrath upon yourself.
kola oloye (m)
Re: The Legacy Of A Prophet
« #40 on: April 18, 2008, 03:15 PM »

Quote from: samba123 on April 16, 2008, 06:30 PM
@kola oloye
wow which way and the truth and life ? can you specify briefly? Cheesy


John 14 (King James Version)


 1 Let not your heart be troubled: ye believe in God, believe also in me.

 2 In my Father's house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you.

 3 And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto myself; that where I am, there ye may be also.

 4 And whither I go ye know, and the way ye know.

 5 Thomas saith unto him, Lord, we know not whither thou goest; and how can we know the way?

6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.
 7 If ye had known me, ye should have known my Father also: and from henceforth ye know him, and have seen him.

 8 Philip saith unto him, Lord, show us the Father, and it sufficeth us.

 9 Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Show us the Father?

 10 Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in me? the words that I speak unto you I speak not of myself: but the Father that dwelleth in me, he doeth the works.

 11 Believe me that I am in the Father, and the Father in me: or else believe me for the very works' sake.

 12 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also; and greater works than these shall he do; because I go unto my Father.

 13 And whatsoever ye shall ask in my name, that will I do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son.

 14 If ye shall ask any thing in my name, I will do it.

 15 If ye love me, keep my commandments.

 16 And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever;

 17 Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you.

 18 I will not leave you comfortless: I will come to you.

 19 Yet a little while, and the world seeth me no more; but ye see me: because I live, ye shall live also.

 20 At that day ye shall know that I am in my Father, and ye in me, and I in you.

 21 He that hath my commandments, and keepeth them, he it is that loveth me: and he that loveth me shall be loved of my Father, and I will love him, and will manifest myself to him.

 22 Judas saith unto him, not Iscariot, Lord, how is it that thou wilt manifest thyself unto us, and not unto the world?

 23 Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.

 24 He that loveth me not keepeth not my sayings: and the word which ye hear is not mine, but the Father's which sent me.

 25 These things have I spoken unto you, being yet present with you.

 26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.

27 Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you: not as the world giveth, give I unto you. Let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid.

 28 Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come again unto you. If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is greater than I.

 29 And now I have told you before it come to pass, that, when it is come to pass, ye might believe.

 30 Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me.

 31 But that the world may know that I love the Father; and as the Father gave me commandment, even so I do. Arise, let us go hence.
focused123 (m)
Re: The Legacy Of A Prophet
« #41 on: November 06, 2009, 07:35 PM »

When I read the response of Olabowale and other muslims on this thread. I can't stop laughing  Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin.

Ignorance is indeed a disease.  Grin Grin Grin Grin

First of all, lets ask ourselves questions of who a prophet is :

The Arabic term for prophet is (Nabi) and is a loan word plagiarised from the Hebrew (Nabi); Admonisher/Prophet.

The characteristics of the prophets as portrayed in the Bible are:


1.         Impassioned poetical utterances


2.        Intense preoccupation with God, morality and above all, justice


3.        An inordinate and fearless compulsion urging him to declare the will of the Almighty.


Prophethood should be seen as a sort of spiritual and mental compulsion - in the order of genius - peculiar to extraordinary and visionary individuals who in the depth of their soul and mind conceive the idea of an Absolute Deity Who is inspiring them.

The title of a NABI/ Prophet - like so many others taken from the Bible - did not exist in the Arabic language since the concept itself was alien to them. Just as the whole history of Israel centered upon the prophets so has - in emulation - Muhammad created in his Quran.


God did not appoint Muhammed as a prophet. All the prophets in the bible were divinely appointed.Muhammad's preaching in Mecca was a copy-cat of concepts and ideas plundered  and pirated from Jewish and Christian traditions and beliefs

While Moses performed miracles in plain view of hundreds of thousands of people, Muhammad had not one single witness to any of his alleged 'revelations' and encounter with the angel Gabriel.

While Moses spoke directly to God, Muhammad had his alleged messages 'revealed' to him second hand by presumably the angel Gabriel.

Revelations, according to Muhammadan scholars occur in three forms:


1        Wahi/Inspiration such as happened to most of the Hebrew prophets, is direct and without intermediaries but also without 'verbal' communication.


2        Behind a Veil as happened between God and Moses 'from behind a burning bush'.


3        Through a Messenger as with all the angels, most of the prohets and especially Muhammad & Gabriel.


42: 51  It is not fitting for a man that Allah should speak to him except by inspiration of from behind a veil or by the sending of a Messenger to reveal with Allah's permission what Allah wills: for He is Most High Most Wise.   
           
The implication is that Allah does not communicate with his slaves/creation directly which of course is contrary to the stories in the Bible between the God of Israel and His chosen leaders such as Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and Moses.

Muhammad's concept of the relationship between Allah and his creation is exactly the same as that between a Master and his Slave which is based entirely on FEAR and OPPRESSION.

This is the exact opposite to the Judeo-Christian one which is based upon LOVE of God and JUSTICE to Mankind.

It is alleged by Muhammadan 'tradition', that Muhammad had about FORTY scribes 
- in different places and times - writing down his revelations.

It is also alleged, that after his death, it was decided to collect all his sayings that were written on chalk, bones, palm bark, memories of men etc before all the 'memorisers' would have been killed in the internecine wars that followed.

But, if the scribes - who presumably were waiting for his 'revelations' at his beck and call over a period of almost 23 years - were truly writing everything down, why then worry about the extinction of the memorisers?

Did the memorisers have different verses in their brain to those that were allegedly written down?

If so, then it is obvious that the Quran that we have at hand is NOT COMPLETE and TRUE.

Sahih Al-Bukhari HadithHadith 1.78        Narrated byIbn Abbas
that he differed with Hur bin Qais bin Hisn Al-Fazari regarding the companion of the Prophet Moses. Meanwhile, Ubai bin Ka'b passed by them and Ibn 'Abbas called him saying, "My friend (Hur) and I have differed regarding Moses' companion whom Moses asked the way to meet. Have you heard Allah's Apostle mentioning something about him?" Ubai bin Ka'b said: "Yes, I heard the Prophet mentioning something about him (saying) while Moses was sitting in the company of some Israelites, a man came and asked him: 'Do you know anyone who is more learned than you?' Moses replied: 'No.' So Allah sent the Divine Inspiration to Moses: 'Yes, Our slave Khadir is more learned than you.'  Moses asked Allah how to meet him (Al-Khadir). So Allah made the fish a sign for him and he was told when the fish was lost, he should return (to the place where he had lost it) and there he would meet him (Al-Khadir). So Moses went on looking for the sign of the fish in the sea. The servant-boy of Moses said: 'Do you remember when we betook ourselves to the rock, I indeed forgot the fish, none but Satan made me forget to remember it.' On that Moses said, 'That is what we have been seeking.' So they went back retracing their footsteps, and found Khadir. (And) what happened further about them is narrated in the Holy Qur'an by Allah." (18.54 up to 18.82)       


       *** 18:63        He replied: "Sawest thou (what happened) when we betook ourselves to the rock? I did indeed forget (about) the Fish: none but Satan made me forget to tell (you) about it: it took its course through the sea in a marvelous way!"


The story above is of course not found in the Bible. It was created by Muhammad so that he would cover up the fact that he used to forget many of the allegedly revealed Ayat/Verses by implying that Moses – among all previous prophets - also, was forgetful due to Satan’s interference; which of course is not the case, as recorded in the Bible.

The followers of Muhammad, throughout their history and even today, just like Muhammad used to do,  BLAME all 'OTHERS' for their own MORAL, INTELLECTUAL and ECONOMIC failures

Abuzola (m)
No subject
« #42 on: November 07, 2009, 12:44 AM »

You are just blabbing and this is the right respond for you


'A party of the people of the scripture (jews and christian) wish to lead you astray, but they shall not lead astray anyone except themselves and they perceive not' Quran 3:69
focused123 (m)
Re: The Legacy Of A Prophet
« #43 on: November 07, 2009, 07:18 PM »

@Abuzola :

Na you and your papa (Muhammed) are the ones who are blabbing.

It is not in your place to determine whether anyone is going to hell. If I am judge based on what is going on, All muslims are candidate for hell fire.

Demonic people just like their father Muhammed ( The Mafia boss)

 Grin Grin
Abuzola (m)
No subject
« #44 on: November 08, 2009, 01:18 AM »

As if the imbecile doesn't have a father he goat.
focused123 (m)
Re: The Legacy Of A Prophet
« #45 on: November 09, 2009, 01:15 PM »

Quote
As if the imbecile doesn't have a father he goat.
@Abuzola :

Stupid Imbecile. Your Father Muhammed is a paedophile, a warmonger and a hate monger.

Imbecile. The truth hurts but I have to say it,

 Crazy bastard Grin
kola oloye (m)
Re: The Legacy Of A Prophet
« #46 on: November 09, 2009, 01:50 PM »

Quote from: focused123 on November 09, 2009, 01:15 PM
@Abuzola :

Stupid Imbecile. Your Father Muhammed is a paedophile, a warmonger and a hate monger.

Imbecile. The truth hurts but I have to say it,

 Crazy bastard Grin
Well done  Grin
3 / 2 on point aggregate.
Yes, next  Huh
focused123 (m)
Re: The Legacy Of A Prophet
« #47 on: November 09, 2009, 02:21 PM »

Quote
Well done   
3 / 2 on point aggregate.
Yes, next 

@Kola Oloye :

 Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

All these Muhammedans here thinks they have a big mouth. They cannot engage in a civilised open debate with someone without resorting to violence. Abuzola is carrying out his Jihad here and he will be totally defeated.

All I know is that Islam is for idiots and Muhammed is a mafia boss. There is nothing any Muhammedans can do to change that

 Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin
Abuzola (m)
No subject
« #48 on: November 09, 2009, 06:29 PM »

Hahaha, i never knew mama sikira has a brother, welcome kola,


@focus, go and tell your stupid wife mama sikira that by sending you here won't do any good, tell her that if she dare, let her be my guest.  As for you mind what you say else your premolar tooth will suffer from fraction 
focused123 (m)
Re: The Legacy Of A Prophet
« #49 on: November 10, 2009, 11:50 AM »

Quote
Hahaha, i never knew mama sikira has a brother, welcome kola,


@focus, go and tell your stupid wife mama sikira that by sending you here won't do any good, tell her that if she dare, let her be my guest.  As for you mind what you say else your premolar tooth will suffer from fraction 

@Abuzola :

 Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

Confused beast.

Do you think you can beat me? . I will single handedly defeat all the muslims and all the boko Harams

 Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

olabowale (m)
Re: The Legacy Of A Prophet
« #50 on: November 10, 2009, 01:57 PM »

focused123, just because Muslims dont say anything as a personal attack on your leadership or gods, is not to be taken that we dont see fault and can do tit for tat. we take command from Quran that says "dont abuse their "gods or god" for they may retaliate and abuse your God". imagine that. abuzola has not insulted your gods, except to use what you agree as his fate (death on the cross, etc) to remind you of his human being position instead of calling him God, wrongly. with all of that, you have lied on Muhammad (as).

Has any husband been accused of pedophilia for just sleeping with his legal wife? a woman who never complained about her marriage to the husband? Are you okay, man?
Abuzola (m)
No subject
« #51 on: November 10, 2009, 02:20 PM »

@focus, hahahaha, do you know how many pounds i weigh, if i slap you with my index finger alone you will know that God never die not even once talk of resurrecting.
dexmond
Re: The Legacy Of A Prophet
« #52 on: November 10, 2009, 05:11 PM »

These are the true teachings of the Quran and the Hadith on women. Never mind what you hear but rather investigate.



Wife Beating

Quran 4:34
Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allah has made one of them to excel the other, and because they spend (to support them) from their means. Therefore the righteous women are Qanitat, and guard in the husband's absence what Allah orders them to guard. As to those women on whose part you see \[suspect\] ill conduct, admonish them, and abandon them to their beds, and beat them, but if they return to obedience, do not seek a means against them.

Muhammed Struck Aisha

Sahih   Muslim 4:2127
, He (Muhammad b. Qais) then reported that it was 'A'isha who had narrated this: Should I not narrate to you about myself and about the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him)? We said: Yes. ,  he (the Holy Prophet) entered the (house), and said: Why is it, O 'A'isha, that you are out of breath? I said: There is nothing. He said: Tell me or the Subtle and the Aware would inform me. I said: Messenger of Allah, may my father and mother be ransom for you, and then I told him (the whole story). He said: Was it the darkness (of your shadow) that I saw in front of me? I said: Yes. He struck me on the chest which caused me pain, and then said: Did you think that Allah and His Apostle would deal unjustly with you?



Women's testimony equal to half of man's

Sahih   Bukhari 1:6:301
Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: Once Allah's Apostle went out to the Musalla (to offer the prayer) of 'Id-al- Adha or Al-Fitr prayer. Then he passed by the women and said, "O women! Give alms,  I have not seen anyone more deficient in intelligence and religion than you. A cautious sensible man could be led astray by some of you." The women asked, "O Allah's Apostle! What is deficient in our intelligence and religion?" He said, "Is not the evidence of two women equal to the witness of one man?" They replied in the affirmative. He said, "This is the deficiency in her intelligence.

What women will be in paradise

Sahih Bukhari 6:60:402
Narrated Abdullah bin Qais: Allah's Apostle said, "In Paradise there is a pavilion made of a single hollow pearl sixty miles wide, in each corner of which there are wives who will not see those in the other corners; and the believers will visit and enjoy them.


Confirm at an online hadith site, ok.

Abuzola (m)
Subject ? No subject
« #53 on: November 10, 2009, 06:53 PM »

It is only a deluded woman that will be obsess by your rant,

prevention is better than cure

more women will be in hell than men, why ? Because they are unfaithful to their husband, now that our women know this they will avoid it, is this not a glad tiding ? It is tantamount to saying if you pass through Oshodi you will be arrested, what do you do ? You avoid oshodi route. Allahu akbar


as for the rest of the hadith you quoted they have spoken good for themselves i need not to explain
dexmond
Re: The Legacy Of A Prophet
« #54 on: November 11, 2009, 08:18 AM »

Why then do Muslims keep telling us that women are accorded wonderful privileges in Islam when it is the contrary that we have in the books? Imagine, a prophet striking his wife! Imagine making women sex object in paradise, even  chained to stock. There are duty in paradise is to gratify Muslims insatiable sexual appetite! Jesus said,In the resurrection that human will put on immortality, they will not be able to have sex because they are now spirits. I'm sure you will tell me that Muhammad's teaching is superior to Jesus'. But common sense will judge who is right.
dexmond
Re: The Legacy Of A Prophet
« #55 on: November 11, 2009, 08:35 AM »

Quote
The Great Prophet was a model character,he was both a spiritualist and a tested admistrator at a time when the arab and the rest of world was in total chaos,world of injustice and oppression,just like today,his message gave the weak hope,the fight was against those who detest justice,he was not necessarily the agressor but the defender.

"Truth" As an outsider, which of his numerous good "characters" will  I follow? I can't spill the blood of innocent people shouting Allahu akbar. I will not marry a 6yr old in order to emulate the prophets sunnah. I will not fight the Jews from whom all the past prophets came, for what crime? If the prophet asked, "who will rid me of bint marwan, I will sure be a bad muslim for not showing interest in what my prophet wants. The prophet made everyone my enemy, christians, jews and all who do not follow him-THEY MUST DIE!

No this can not be my prophet. Jesus said love your enemies, pray for them that dispitefully use you. Treat others as you want them to treat you. Jesus' message looks like the message of a TRUE SON OF GOD.
muhsin (m)
Re: The Legacy Of A Prophet
« #56 on: November 11, 2009, 12:26 PM »

You are pitiful, dexmond.a

I kinda feel bored @ your babbling copy and paste posts.

May Allah guide u to d right path, amen.
dexmond
Re: The Legacy Of A Prophet
« #57 on: November 11, 2009, 02:16 PM »

@Muhsin

You are supposed to answer or defend my allegations but you did not do it. You can still do that instead of attacking my person.
muhsin (m)
Re: The Legacy Of A Prophet
« #58 on: November 11, 2009, 02:35 PM »

I wonder whats there to be answered, dexmond?

The words aren't yours. And they--authors of the words--very well know that that is nothing more than fraudulent lies.

Get that? Grin Grin
dexmond
Re: The Legacy Of A Prophet
« #59 on: November 11, 2009, 03:22 PM »

I have won the debate. You guys did not raise valid objections. Thanks again for your admission. Cool
muhsin (m)
Re: The Legacy Of A Prophet
« #60 on: November 11, 2009, 03:36 PM »

Wallahi you had me laughing, dexmond.  Grin Grin Grin

Who do you think you can fool. . .only yourself. Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Get more rationale, pal. You get a great deal to do.
focused123 (m)
Re: The Legacy Of A Prophet
« #61 on: November 14, 2009, 03:37 PM »

Quote
hahahaha, do you know how many pounds i weigh, if i slap you with my index finger alone you will know that God never die not even once talk of resurrecting.

@Abuzola :

I don't care if you look like the Japanese Yokozuna, that does not stop me from beating hell out of you. After i have finish beating you, all the Muhammedan madness in your bloodstream will be completely eradicated.

Madman

 Grin
Abuzola (m)
Re: The Legacy Of A Prophet
« #62 on: November 14, 2009, 08:13 PM »

                              Quran 36

10 It is the same to them whether you warn them or you warn them not, they will not believe.   
 11 You can only warn him who follows the Reminder (the Quran), and fears the Most Beneficent (Allah) unseen. Bear you to such one the glad tidings of forgiveness, and a generous reward (i.e. Paradise). 
 You Can't Make ur Faith Luk Good By Makin Islam Luk Bad - Wat Xtians Must Know  Just A Tip Of The Iceberg: Serious Contradictions In The Quran  How Can Islam Be A Religion Of Peace ?  Page 2
Pages: (1) (2) Go Up Send Topic to Friend by E-mail Reply 


Sections: Autos/Cars (2) Jobs/Vacancies (2) (3) Career Talk Education General(2) Politics Romance Computers Phones Travel
Sports Fashion Health Religion Celebrities TV/Movies (2) Music/Radio (2) Books Webmasters Programming

Links: Page1 Page2 Page3 Page4 Page5 Page6 Page7 Page8 Page9 Page10

Nairaland is owned by Oluwaseun Osewa. See also: Nairalist Classified Ads
Nairaland Forum | Powered by SMF 1.0.12.
© 2001-2005, Lewis Media. All Rights Reserved.