A Difficult Decision

Is the solution not in the Bible?

Why      afraid of the truth



There is a direct answer in the Bible

According to the Old Testament, Abraham "the friend of God" had more than one wife, David had one hundred wives, and Solomon is even said to have had 700 wives and 300 concubines.

If polygamy is immoral per se, then these and other leading figures in the Biblical traditions are immoral. In this case, there would be no sanctity attached to the Bible, its Prophets, or it teachings! No sincere Jew, Christian  would regard God’s chosen Messengers as immoral persons!

It was concerning the Old Testament laws and Old Testament Prophets that Jesus (as) said plainly that he came not to destroy the Law or the Prophets but rather to fulfil.

In addition, there is no passage in the New Testament that clearly prohibits polygamy. This was the understanding of the early Church Fathers and for several centuries in the Christian era.

Note that polygamy in Is'lam as well as in Christiannity is:

 neither mandatory, nor encouraged, but merely permitted.

Speaking for my own understanding of scriptures (I mean the Holy Bible), I believe since the man married the two women when not a believer and both are now with children for him, he (the man) has the sole obligation to be responsible for their daily need till they die. Leaving them to suffer due to the excuse of faith is an height of foolishness and wickedness.

1 Tim 5:8
But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.
KJV
Every man who claims to be in faith must be responsible for his house, either second wife or their children. He is the principal convict of the act! No woman can live under his roof except with his permit, moreover where the evidence of permission is seen in the children delievered.

The issue of one man-one wife injunction will only be respected in the aspect of sexual relationship with the first wife since only two can become one flesh. The reason also being the second wife is not the wife of his youth.
 
Mal 2:14,16
Yet ye say, Wherefore? Because the LORD hath been witness between thee and the wife of thy youth, against whom thou hast dealt treacherously: yet is she thy companion, and the wife of thy covenant.
16 For the LORD, the God of Israel, saith that he hateth putting away: for one covereth violence with his garment, saith the LORD of hosts: therefore take heed to your spirit, that ye deal not treacherously. KJV

I believe his first wife is refered to as the wife of his youth in this passage and this he cannot divorce or deny.

Nevertheless, if the second wife intends to leave him and re-marry, she should not be disallowed and neither also has she done anything wrong except she's marrying a married man again. She is only trying to correct her steps since there is nothing wrong as a single man/woman marrying someone already with children for another person.
For example, Gloria is not the first woman to bear children for Kenneth Copeland, yet they are doing greatly not only in ministry but also in their home.
That only puts a stop at the first man's responsiblity towards her need but never that of her children. The care of the children still belong to the first man(or lets say both of them) without any partialty.

Moreover, let him pray for God's guidiance, He is always available to help in such time like this.

try to search polygamy in colorado city USA, you can find such enormous comment regarding this teaching of the church.

For your mind u bi pastor?