|
Ndipe (m)
|
At first, I resented the intrusion of the USA in affairs of other countries. Commonly referred to as the "Global Policeman" of the world, the USA has such a vast influence in today's society, that has been met with resentment and repercussions. Their effort in installing peace in Somalia resulted in the death of at least one of their soldiers in Somalia. I can recall seeing a picture of the soldier being dragged on the streets of Somalia. But lately, the same resentment that I had towards them has quietly evolved into an admiration. Their unofficial thumb of rule "If don't tow our line, we are not going to assist you" has sometimes led to the introduction of policies that have been beneficial to the economy. When the USA invaded Iraq, the oppostion (including myself) cried foul, accusing them of creating instability in the country. While the war has generated a horde of complaints and created dissidents, the abuse of power, metted out by Saddam Hussein is now history. In place is a newly elected president, while the former tyrant is languishing in jail. At other times, others have called off their bluff, clinging tight to power and furthermore imposing some draconian measures to quell civil unrests in the country. Zimbabwe under Mugabe have ignored those bluffings and as some of you may know, the country has descended into chaos with Mugabe still plotting on how to extend power, even past his 70's. So, while the USA's intrusion in foreign affairs at the risk of neglecting their domestic issues like rebuilding New Orleans, eradicating homelessness, can be compared to constant meddling of the dreaded mother inlaw, detested by her daughter in law, what role do you think the USA should play in foreign affairs? Abandon a foreign country to decay into crumbs, like the present tragedy in Darfur, Sudan or risk the ire of its critics and invade Iraq? Do you think that every country should install democracy, or should every country practise their own system of government without the prying eyes of the USA?
|