White People Are The Descendants Of African Albino's.

A Member? Please Login  
type your username and password to login
Date: July 24, 2008, 04:04 AM
223018 members and 126515 Topics
Latest Member: doseGeororm
Nairaland [Nigerian Forum] Home Help Search Who is currently online? Login Register
Nairaland Forum  |  General Discussion  |  Culture  |  Racism, Tribalism, Sectarianism  |  White People Are The Descendants Of African Albino's.
Pages: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) ... (12) Go Down Send this topic Notify of replies
Author Topic: White People Are The Descendants Of African Albino's.  (Read 6738 views)
shango (m)
Re: White People Are The Descendants Of African Albino's.
« #64 on: August 03, 2006, 03:23 AM »

Thanks for sidetracking by bringing in arguments for another thread. Talk about major sidestep. WHat has what we argue in anothe thread in ANOTHER FORUM got to do with this. Someone got their undies up in a bunch I see, its just a forum dude, take it easy and do not take my arguments personal, when I say you come of as a d*ck and stupid its merely your arguments and how you present them I am reffering to i.e. a stupid poster not a stupid human being, anyway

Quote
And who is doing that? The multiregionalists in many cases do have a racist agenda, but Oppenheimer definitely doesn't. Maybe you could read his works before you draw such unwarranted conclusions.

I never drew any conclusions on Oppenheimer's work. Can you read, I was talking about the scientists that are racist, I NEVER SAID HE WAS OR THAT YOU WHERE FOR SOURCING HIM. Dammit, read what I freaking wrote and quit insinuating rubbish I never said or claimed or argued. JESUS.

My main reply to your thread was to essentially say what you posted and argued where based on theories. Alot of theories including his hold alot of weight obviously and is rooted in alot of facts, archealogical, geographical, etc science. However it is a theory and theories always undergo revisions when new discoveries are made. There where theories even before the TOE and alot where debunked when the TOE came about for example. No matter how solid a theory might be or sets of theories new discoveries can make them revised or debunked, the way you sourced it and put down other peoples speculation on the matter indicates you think they are facts and cannot or might not be revised or are the absolute truth. You already admitted Oppenheimer's theories, like all other theories, have extrapolations, good ones but extrapolations nonetheless, why?BECAUSE ALL THE FACTS ARENT KNOWN.

Kabiyesi's statement is obviously wrong as obviously his theory does not stand up to scientific scrutiny. But for you to put it down the way you do with other theories, although vastly superior, and try to play them off like the theory you are proposing is infact the absolute truth end of discussion shows your ignorance. You could have said there are better theories based on TOE, Geography and CLimatography that explain the cause of the mutations better than his not OH, YOURS IS BULLSHIT, THIS IS WHAT REALLY HAPPENED, because the fact is your theory AINT WHAT REALLY HAPPENED. Its a theory that tries to explain what happened using KNOWN FACTS.

Quote
I'm not aware of me presenting an Ice Age Theory on migration, or even a climatographical one, but I guess you know more about what I wrote than myself. What I presented is the most plausible current explanation for human migration patterns and it flies directly in the face of Welsing's phantasies.
Welsing's theory has been thoroughly falsified, which does not even make it a candidate for discussion.

Again read what I said idiot, I pointed out such theories because they had been falsifiedm and the one you proposed probably will be falsified as more discoveries and facts come along in the future, so your unmuttable belief in Oppenheimer like he has a unique lense into the past and he is not using recent discoveries and current science to propose his theory and back it up is STUPID. If you think Oppenheimers work is not going to revised or maybe even possibly discredited you are living in a dreamworld, as even his theory, while good, has extraploations like any theory. Same with the TOE (which I mention because like a kid taking this discussion to emotianally you brought in topics in the other thread here, don't cry little one, its just words and arguments)
Your blind faith in such theories is ridiculous. Even scientists do not blindly believe their theories and hold it as unmuttable and fact like you do, it makes you come off as silly.

nferyn (m)
Re: White People Are The Descendants Of African Albino's.
« #65 on: August 03, 2006, 09:01 AM »

shango,

1. Can you please stop insulting and shouting. It does not add any weight to your arguments and it is quite irritating
2. I used Oppenheimer as a source for my arguments, you attacked my arguments. What else is there to conclude that you were attacking the source of my arguments, unless of course you wanted to sidetrack this discussion to things that were not even being discussed, if so, you could have clarified that you wer talking about others.
3. Oppenheimers presents a credible, yet not falsified explanation of human migrations that is backed up by multiple concurring lines of hard evidence. Welsings 'theories' are conjecture, based on strawmen of science. Her psychological explanations are rooted in psycho-analytical explanation models, the most unscientific of all approaches in psychology. Freud and all his followers, and that includes Welsing, are nowhere near explaining anything at all in human behaviour.
4. Oppenheimers work is nowhere near being a theory and it is not intended as such. Please stop seeing theories where none are implied
5. I explained why Kabiyesi's explanation was pseudo-scientific bull. It is a fact that that explantion is pseudo-scientific bull. I could have chosen more diplomatic words, but that doesn't change the facts
6. I don't have blind faith in any theory. Please show where I have professed blind faith in a theory. Anyway, the value of a theory lies in it's explanatory power and it's ability to let us make predictions. Theories stand untill they are either falsified, expanded upon or refined. To my knowledge, Oppenheimer's thesis has not yet been falsified

By the way, I juts hope you aren't projecting your own insecurities, it will be hard to beat your count of sneers and insults in just one post:
Quote from: shango on August 03, 2006, 03:23 AM
[SNIP]
Someone got their undies up in a bunch I see
[SNIP]
you come of as a d*ck and stupid
[SNIP]
I am reffering to i.e. a stupid poster not a stupid human being, anyway
[SNIP]
Dammit, read what I freaking wrote and quit insinuating rubbish I never said or claimed or argued. 
[SNIP]
shows your ignorance.
[SNIP]
Again read what I said idiot,
[SNIP]
you are living in a dreamworld
[SNIP]
like a kid taking this discussion to emotianally
[SNIP]
don't cry little one
[SNIP]
Your blind faith in such theories is ridiculous.
[SNIP]
it makes you come off as silly.
naija_diva (f)
Re: White People Are The Descendants Of African Albino's.
« #66 on: August 03, 2006, 07:34 PM »

i know yu guys are into this topic but can ya'll keep it short and simple. i get tired of reading long posts. Embarrassed
shango (m)
Re: White People Are The Descendants Of African Albino's.
« #67 on: August 07, 2006, 03:21 AM »

Quote
shango,

1. Can you please stop insulting and shouting. It does not add any weight to your arguments and it is quite irritating
2. I used Oppenheimer as a source for my arguments, you attacked my arguments. What else is there to conclude that you were attacking the source of my arguments, unless of course you wanted to sidetrack this discussion to things that were not even being discussed, if so, you could have clarified that you wer talking about others.
3. Oppenheimers presents a credible, yet not falsified explanation of human migrations that is backed up by multiple concurring lines of hard evidence. Welsings 'theories' are conjecture, based on strawmen of science. Her psychological explanations are rooted in psycho-analytical explanation models, the most unscientific of all approaches in psychology. Freud and all his followers, and that includes Welsing, are nowhere near explaining anything at all in human behaviour.
4. Oppenheimers work is nowhere near being a theory and it is not intended as such. Please stop seeing theories where none are implied
5. I explained why Kabiyesi's explanation was pseudo-scientific bull. It is a fact that that explantion is pseudo-scientific bull. I could have chosen more diplomatic words, but that doesn't change the facts
6. I don't have blind faith in any theory. Please show where I have professed blind faith in a theory. Anyway, the value of a theory lies in it's explanatory power and it's ability to let us make predictions. Theories stand untill they are either falsified, expanded upon or refined. To my knowledge, Oppenheimer's thesis has not yet been falsified

By the way, I juts hope you aren't projecting your own insecurities, it will be hard to beat your count of sneers and insults in just one post:

I did not attack Oppenheimers theory or its strengths or weaknesses. And ofcourse it is a theory. What do you think a theory is?

Quote
a plausible or scientifically acceptable general principle or body of principles offered to explain phenomena

Quote
Oppenheimers presents a credible, yet not falsified explanation of human migrations that is backed up by multiple concurring lines of hard evidence.

He is explaining or attempts to explain human migrations (phenomena) based on concurring lines of hard evidence (lines of hard evidence). What you are acting stupid and now saying it is not a theory now. Who the mess am I arguing with here, a schizzo? I have to start pulling dictionary definitions from websters for simple elementary terms. Do you know what a thesis is?

Quote
Oppenheimer's thesis has not yet been falsified

Quote
a position or proposition that a person (as a candidate for scholastic honors) advances and offers to maintain by argument

A thesis is NOT THE ARGUMENT. The argument in Oppenheimers case IS the theory. Readup on the scientific method for christ sakes, please.

And didnt I say the other guys theory was bull, I just called you out on how you put him down and the attitude by which you did it. And who the mess mentioned Welsing? WTF are you going on about?

Quote
the value of a theory lies in it's explanatory power and it's ability to let us make predictions.

hahaha, ok and what was the point of this statement, did I say theories have no value? Are you on crack?


And those aren't sneers or insults, I simply call it as I see/hear/read it at the time, all those statements are applicable in the context they where used. When I say you are an idiot in a particular instance you are for making a certain statement or argument, where you are getting your pseudo psycho-analytical explanations for me calling you what you are is beyond me  Grin
nferyn (m)
Re: White People Are The Descendants Of African Albino's.
« #68 on: August 07, 2006, 10:27 AM »

Quote from: shango on August 07, 2006, 03:21 AM
I did not attack Oppenheimers theory or its strengths or weaknesses. And ofcourse it is a theory. What do you think a theory is?
No you didn't, you sidetracked the discussion and didn't discuss the topic of this thread altogether. Seems like you have a chip on your shoulder when it comes to my posts. You posted in a thread only to question the way in which I rebutted somebody else. You didn't discuss the topic of the thread, you didn't discuss the merits of the different explanations presented (except for saying that the explanation presented by my opponent didn't hold water). The only thing you really did is mount a childish personal attack on me.

Quote from: shango on August 07, 2006, 03:21 AM
Quote
a plausible or scientifically acceptable general principle or body of principles offered to explain phenomena
Quote
Oppenheimers presents a credible, yet not falsified explanation of human migrations that is backed up by multiple concurring lines of hard evidence.
He is explaining or attempts to explain human migrations (phenomena) based on concurring lines of hard evidence (lines of hard evidence). What you are acting stupid and now saying it is not a theory now. Who the mess am I arguing with here, a schizzo? I have to start pulling dictionary definitions from websters for simple elementary terms. Do you know what a thesis is?
Maybe you need to inscribe for a reading comprehension 101 class. Explain to me how Oppenheimer presents a general principle or body of principles.

Do you feel better now you've thrown in some insults? If you diagnose me with schizophrenia, maybe I can diagnose you with Tourette's syndrome (the Coprolalia variant, that is). The only difference is that my diagnosis actually has some evidence to back it up.

Quote from: shango on August 07, 2006, 03:21 AM
A thesis is NOT THE ARGUMENT. The argument in Oppenheimers case IS the theory. Readup on the scientific method for christ sakes, please.
Your strawman version of the scientific method probably? The one where laws are above theories?

Quote from: shango on August 07, 2006, 03:21 AM
And didnt I say the other guys theory was bull, I just called you out on how you put him down and the attitude by which you did it. And who the mess mentioned Welsing? WTF are you going on about?
Reading comprehension class anybody? They're waiting. If you would have actually read the thread, you would have understood that the topic was a discussion on one of the ideas of Welsing.

Quote from: shango on August 07, 2006, 03:21 AM
Haha, ok and what was the point of this statement, did I say theories have no value? Are you on crack?
You really have a deeper craving for spewing insults, haven't you?

Quote from: shango on August 07, 2006, 03:21 AM
And those aren't sneers or insults, I simply call it as I see/hear/read it at the time, all those statements are applicable in the context they where used. When I say you are an idiot in a particular instance you are for making a certain statement or argument, where you are getting your pseudo psycho-analytical explanations for me calling you what you are is beyond me  Grin
In you dreamworld, maybe. I just feel sorry for those that attempted to teach you basic manners.
Eurphoria (f)
Re: White People Are The Descendants Of African Albino's.
« #69 on: August 08, 2006, 11:46 AM »

 Embarrassed
Drusilla (f)
Re: White People Are The Descendants Of African Albino's.
« #70 on: August 18, 2006, 01:38 PM »

Eurphoria,

It wouldn't occur to me to be proud of the fact that a people known for their rapes, robberies, homosexuality, oppression, murders and general madness would be something one should be proud of or something that should make one feel better.

In fact when thinking along those terms, it is far better to agree that they are not the descendants of Africans but in fact the descendants of mutated Albino Africans, who suffered from illness.

This is not a self-esteem program showing relation of whites to Africans but rather something that explains why they alone have the pyschologically makeup to do what they did.

Let us go back to premise of this theory of the colors:
Quote
1. Africans would be scared of Albino babies. They would give the baby to the 'witchdoctor' (whathaveyou).  You know how valuable children were to people back then, the witchdoctors would gleefully take this 'gift'. (things fall apart)

2. As the albino children grew up together at the witchdoctors property, they of course married each other, since they were throughly rejected by all other Africans.

3. Being handicapped physically -- Albino's as you know are smaller, have weaker bones, eye sight and hearing is worse and of course they are Allergic to the sun (this is still true physically of all white people).
4. First things these physically hurting people got to do? They got to get somewhere, out of the sun. Your likely to find these people lived in caves. It would extend their life. So they left Africa and found a good place for themselves.

5. If your not in great physical condition, your going to have to do something. Necessity is the mother of inventions.

6.  Albino people might remember that rejection from Africans, long after you were gone. You know how you hate somebody for years after they embarrass ya? And will even tell your kids about it? 

Under the physical limitations that their 'genetic mutation' put them, these people would have to come up with a way to undo somethings known about them around the world.


This is where convincing the Africans that even though Africa as a continent has more natural resources than other areas --Africans are poor because they are inferior comes in.

This is where convincing the Africans that even though Black skin is HEALTHIER, you should get ill using creams to get a skin color that is not as healthy comes in.

This is where convincing Africans that it was not our guns, slaughter, and oppression that harmed you, why it was the fact that you are dumb and backward that hurt you.

Understanding psyhcologically why these lies are necessary for them, can lead to healing in the future. This is why this is important to us.

Imagine a psychologist accepting the excuse from a mass murderer that his superiority and his victims inferiority gave him a natural right to decide who should live and die amongst them.

That type of nonsense is exactly what whites ask you to accept with their theory's of where they and others come from.

We need the truth to get healed, both the mass murderer and the victims, whites and blacks.
Eurphoria (f)
Re: White People Are The Descendants Of African Albino's.
« #71 on: August 20, 2006, 04:13 AM »

Drusilla
sorry but you lost me, what exactly are you addressing to me? please do explain(short and sweet)ty my brain can't do too much reading right now Smiley
Drusilla (f)
Re: White People Are The Descendants Of African Albino's.
« #72 on: August 20, 2006, 05:25 AM »

Euphoria,

Sorry. Smile. You stated this at the end of your post:

Anyway like my girl desiree said does it make us feel better if they are our descendants? i think not and i hope people are not thinking along that line. 

I was making plain that this discussion is not about making anybody feel better but was about gaining truthful knowledge of what has happenned to us as black people and using that truth to bring some correction to this world.

i.e. our feelings whether good or bad are irrelevant, it is the truth we are trying to get at.
Drusilla (f)
Re: White People Are The Descendants Of African Albino's.
« #73 on: August 20, 2006, 08:56 AM »

Afeni,

You must be mixed up.

Quote
Drussilla, hopefully you get this message before you go. I am wondering what the reasoning behind this thread is. I see that you are insinuating that racism is just retaliation for albinos (In your opinion, the ancestors of White people) being treated as out kasts. Now, if that is true, by your own reasoning, is racism not justified then?

Is the mass murderer who suffered abuse at the hands of his father justified when he kills complete strangers, who look like his father?

Quote
Another point I would like to make, do you have any idea how unlikely it is for mutational bias to exist for hundreds of thousands of years? Unless you are one of those silly people that believe human beings have only existed for 5 thousand years.

You and I both might find that unlikely that such a bias could exist, but there are already many evolutionary psychological ideas of bias existing in the genes of humans that are accepted in the psychology community. So Dr. Welsing is not being radical in that regard.

Quote
Lastly, I see that you complain a lot about racism. Well, here is a thought, blame your fucking GOD! He has all the power. Tell him to stop being a fuckin jackass and fix sh it. Of course, he really is not as nice as the "chosen" (Think: people like you) make him out to be. In all honesty, if I saw your "GOD" I will cut off his head.

I bet you also like to bump your own head, over and over again. Feel free to fight the wind and cut off the wind's head if you want. I won't stop you. God does not need saving by me, I need saving by Him. Smile
Drusilla (f)
Re: White People Are The Descendants Of African Albino's.
« #74 on: August 20, 2006, 09:05 AM »

Alarinjo,

I am a Christian, and when a theory basically starts with the idea that Black people are gods, I stop reading it, so I have never went that far in trying to understand such things as Melanin making us gods or 5 percenters, etc, etc.

But since you accuse me of belonging to such groups, maybe you will explain their thinking to me.
Eurphoria (f)
Re: White People Are The Descendants Of African Albino's.
« #75 on: August 20, 2006, 07:19 PM »

Drusilla

Gotcha !  Wink   ,however i do disagree with some , just a teeny weeny bit of your posts, but i leave it at that, i am so drained these days, can't be bothered typing any more  Cheesy no offense ok.

Thanks for clearing up my puzzled mind about your last post, i agree with where you coming from, interesting stuff.

Cheers
omonozozo (m)
Re: White People Are The Descendants Of African Albino's.
« #76 on: August 21, 2006, 08:14 PM »

@topic,
Interesting. Undecided


* 0moeder.jpg (77.75 KB, 399x600 )
tpia
Re: White People Are The Descendants Of African Albino's.
« #77 on: August 22, 2006, 05:15 AM »

Seriously, after reading some of the information presented as fact on this thread, is there a "conspiracy" to "dumb down"  blacks in general and Nigerians in particular?
hot-angel (f)
Re: White People Are The Descendants Of African Albino's.
« #78 on: August 22, 2006, 05:26 AM »

This is an interesting thread. I'm listening.
Sista (f)
Re: White People Are The Descendants Of African Albino's.
« #79 on: August 22, 2006, 06:15 AM »

@ Drusilla

This is a wonderful topic Drusilla.

I skimmed through the Isis papers because I am reading so many books at one time but from what I have read, that black woman did something no other black man did when she wrote that book. Just imagine what black people could accomplish if we learned to appreciate the need for balance between man and woman.

I was just talking about this subject with a friend of mine last night, white people are Albinos descendants from African albinos.

We got on this subject because we watched a visual documentation by Saa Neter, he said he is sick and tired of black people saying white people came from us. His problem was if we say they came from us, that means we are saying we are like them. My friend agreed with him and she believes that Yacub grafted white people from human DNA and waist. I disagreed with her because I felt that Welsings theory is more logical.

If you look at the bloodtypes,  Type O is the oldest blood-Type A Type B Type AB These are the blood types. Look at how many there are, there are 4 Types.
The Albinos are covered in both Welsing and Neters theory's but we keep forgetting about the Red man, Native Americans. In Egypt on the walls, the hieroglyphics show a lotus flower coming up out of Africa and inside the flower is for men. The colors of these men went in this order showing the first man to the last. #1-Black-#2-Red-#3-Yellow-#4-White.

Egypt is the sum total of the entire continent of Africa. Imhotep the first recorded world doctor an Egyptian Native. What does this all show? It shows that Africans already knew of the four races, how? Because they gave birth to them. Egypt is the only place that historically acknowledges all races in their ancient hieroglyphics.

Just wanted to give the red man some credit in the above.

Getting back to white people. I saw that someone in this post was wondering about the languages. I suggested recently to a Nigerian that languages gave birth to other languages she disagreed. We as black people are still creating words today and those words are giving birth to full sentences. The first Adam and Eve or the first Ausar and Auset which ever you prefer. They were the genesis a Greek word for the beginning. Genesis can be used as an example of root words giving birth to full words. For instance Gen is the root word of Genesis. Genesis derived from Genes and Genes derived from Genitalia and so fourth Genitals, Genetics and Genealogy. We can go further into this but the point is words are invented everday if a need to differentiate comes about.

Look at all the African people on the African continent. They all came from the first man and woman but they have some distinction in characteristics. As the characteristics changed, the language change because a human evolution in first characteristic and then language took place. There are Africans who are really tall I think they are called the Matsi, and then the short ones once called the Twa now called the Pigmes. I am pretty sure you get the point.

Now Albinos at the time who were born to those different Africans that gave birth to the white race would give an explanation for the white people who are different in Characteristics. There are many white races as well. This is all my theory and it does not have to be taken for gospel but the Asiatics who gave birth to Albinos may have removed their children from them to. Who knows, this could also be the result of race mixing amongst African Albinos and Asian albions which may have contributed to the different characteristics in white people.

Welsings book deals with being objective about the psychology of white people. After all white people have been objective about black peoples psychology for many years. knowing their origin and how they became is the beginning to understanding their psychology. If we understand their psychology maybe we can beat them at their own game.

White people being removed from black people or Asian people can explain why white people feel the need to go around the world and when they can't figure out their origin here on earth they attempt to go into outer space. They are trying to fit in, can you imagine that? They are the only people who go around the world and try to mix back in, at first by force now by manipulation. When they look around and see that they are the only ones who have no color, that can be pretty upsetting. They are the only ones that have practically stolen everything they supposedly accomplished on their own. They are the only race that had no problem with letting black people breast feed their white children. White people are still stealing from black people to this day and claiming what they steal as their own discovery. White people so desperately want to fit in and when they see that they can not, that is when their barbaric behavior kicks in. This theory also explains why they more than any race of people advocate race mixing.

New (m)
Re: White People Are The Descendants Of African Albino's.
« #80 on: August 22, 2006, 12:05 PM »

Quote from: Sista link=topic=19228
@ Drusilla
Afeni,

I forgot this thing you were wrong about also.


Quote
and even if 2 albinos have a baby, the baby is still not likely to be one.

In fact it is just the opposite.

Albino's lack all the genes and therefore can not pass down something, they do not have!

2 albino's can only have Albino's.

This is how white people formed as a separate group from Africans. I think.

1. Africans would be scared of Albino babies. They would give the baby to the 'witchdoctor' (whathaveyou).  You know how valuable children were to people back then, the witchdoctors would gleefully take this 'gift'. (things fall apart)

2. As the albino children grew up together at the witchdoctors property, they of course married each other, since they were throughly rejected by all other Africans.

3. Being handicapped physically -- Albino's as you know are smaller, have weaker bones, eye sight and hearing is worse and of course they are Allergic to the sun (this is still true physically of all white people).

4. First things these physically hurting people got to do? They got to get somewhere, out of the sun. Your likely to find these people lived in caves. It would extend their life. So they left Africa and found a good place for themselves.

5. If your not in great physical condition, your going to have to do something. Necessity is the mother of inventions.

6.  Albino people might remember that rejection from Africans, long after you were gone. You know how you hate somebody for years after they embarrass ya? And will even tell your kids about it? 

Sumthin like that.

If Europeans are white because they are descendants of Albinos as you claim and not beacause they evolved to suit their environment,
1. how come they haven't got afro hair,
2. why are their facial features different (i.e. lips, nose, eyes, cheekbones, etc),
3. why are their forearms smaller,
4. why have they got less muscles in their butt cheeks (excuse the scientific phrase)
5. why are their ankles chunkier. (blacks have slim, well defined ankles).
6. why are their ears bigger?

Also, I thought this might be of interest -
'People with albinism are generally as healthy as the rest of their species, with growth and development occurring as normal. Many animals with albinism, however, lose their protective camouflage and are unable to conceal themselves from their predators or prey. The survival rate of animals with albinism in the wild is usually quite low. The main problem that people with albinism face is social, as the condition is sometimes a source of teasing during adolescent years.

As albinism is a recessive gene, the chance of offspring with albinism resulting from the pairing of a creature with albinism with a creature without albinism is very low. Source - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albino

nferyn (m)
Re: White People Are The Descendants Of African Albino's.
« #81 on: August 22, 2006, 12:17 PM »

Quote from: tpia on August 22, 2006, 05:15 AM
Seriously, after reading some of the information presented as fact on this thread, is there a "conspiracy" to "dumb down"  blacks in general and Nigerians in particular?
Apparently I'm part of that conspiracy. After all, what can you expect from "the man"?
Drusilla (f)
Re: White People Are The Descendants Of African Albino's.
« #82 on: August 22, 2006, 03:12 PM »

Sista,

I started this topic with the idea that "there is something different about being Black".  I asked a question: How can white be God, if Blacks are not the devil?

Think on what white people found in this world, when they left Europe proper (Britain, France, Portugal, Germany, Scandinavia, etc).

This is what white people found:

CONGO

"The indigenous peoples of the Congo," he wrote, "are all black in color, some more so, some less so. Many are to be seen who are the color of chestnut and some tend to be more olive-colored. But the one who is of the deepest black in color is held by them to be the most beautiful. Some are born somewhat light-skinned, but as they grow older they become darker and darker. This occurs because their mothers make use of the artifice of an ointment,  with which they anoint their infants, exposing them once they have been anointed, to the rays of the sun, then leaving them there for long periods, and repeating this action over and over,  There are some children who although their parents are black, are born white skinned and although they anoint them and use all manners of artifice they can never be transformed into blackskinned people. And these are regarded by the Congolese as monsters. They have the same features and the same tightly curled hair as the black Congolese, but their skin is white and they are short-sighted, As a result, children in those areas, where a white has never been seen before, would become terrified, fleeing in horror from us, no less than our children here are terrified by the sight of a black also fleeing in horror for them.

But they do not want us to call them Negroes (negros) but Blacks (Prietos); amongst them only slaves are called Negroes and thus amongst them it is the same things to say negro as to say slave."

[Teruel, Antonio de, Narrative Description of, the Kingdom of the Congo (1663-1664) Ms. 3533:3574/National Library, Madrid, Spain]

SOUTH INDIA

"It is a fact that in this country when a child is born they anoint him once a week with oil of sesame, and this makes him grow much darker than when he was born. For I assure you that the darkest man is here the most highly esteemed and considered better than the others who are not so dark. Let me add that in very truth these people portray and depict their gods and their idols black and their devils white as snow. For they say the God and all the saints are black and the devils are all white. That is why they portray them as I have described. And similarly they make the images of their idols all black."

[Marco Polo, The Travels, translated and with an Introduction by Ronald Latham, Middlesex: Penguin Books, 1958]

SOUTHEAST ASIA

"For the complexion of men, they consider black the most beautiful. In all the kingdoms of the southern region, it is the same."

[Nan Ts'i Chou, quoted by Rene Gaston Georges Maspero, The Kingdom of Champa. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1949]


Whites found a world, where they were considered the least beautiful, where they were the least physically and the least spiritually. And most importantly -- they had the least materially, all the best resources of wealth was in the lands, where they were considered the least.


Whites naturally felt that they had to change this, if they were to have any chance of obtaining some of the materials from the world, that they desparately needed.

I say desparately because unbeknownst to most in the world because of historical lies, there was actually, no such thing as a renaissance, it was a myth made up in the 19th century by racists who did not like the obvious implications of the world finding out that whites were in fact experiencing one of the worst periods in their history: their cities were on fire, they were racked by disease, starvations, slavery, oppression, etc recovering from what are called mini-ice ages, famine.

This was their condition that made them desparate enough to want to go and see past their lands. I repeat the renaissance is a myth, a delusion, a cover up, it never happenned and many a white historian now admit that.

So you are desparate to survive and you find a world that says: Blacks are the most beautiful.

Now you begin to see the true factors going into why whites did what they did.

The answer to my question is simple: Whites felt they could not allow for a world where Blacks were the most beautiful and had everything going for themselves.

Whites had to make Blacks into the devil of the world.

This is the reason, no matter where you go in this world, you will find Blacks held at the bottom of all society's.

All any other race has to do, is basically agree to this system whereby whites get the material goods and the blackman is the lowest and they will be allowed to semi-prosper.

Whites know the Blackman is different, the Blackman is their enemy. It's been that way since they first went to see what else was in the world.

So for the last 600 years, they have been trying to get the whole world, themselves and even the Blackman, to believe that the blackman is the inferior one.

The Blackman must be the devil, for whites to have any chance of being God.

Every race in the world will be doing good and living good but not the blackman.

The whole system of Global white supremacy is built on removing the blackman and replacing him with the whiteman.

If you understand this, you will understand why, Africa has more college educated people, more christian people, more intellectuals than ever before and Africa is getting worse.

The system requires the destruction of the Blackman, anybody trained for that system, is going to continue those policy's, even if they do not understand that it is what they are doing.
Drusilla (f)
Re: White People Are The Descendants Of African Albino's.
« #83 on: August 22, 2006, 03:26 PM »

Tpia,

Seriously. We are in the year 2006 and somewhere in Africa or Europe or America.

Black and African children are learning to repeat and believe these words:

"Our anscestors the Gauls"

"Human anscestors were cavemen"

"The Niger river was discovered in the 1800's, when whites came there
(whatever)"

A person would have to be ignorant of what was going on in this world, to only discover a conspiracy to make the Blackman and the Nigerian dumb in this thread.

It would be even worse if they remained that ignorant.
Drusilla (f)
Re: White People Are The Descendants Of African Albino's.
« #84 on: August 22, 2006, 04:02 PM »

Quote
If Europeans are white because they are descendants of Albinos as you claim and not beacause they evolved to suit their environment,
1. how come they haven't got afro hair,









New, Please admit  that the Bible is a book written by Black people, for Black people and to Black people, it is a message sent to Black people because we can clearly see that even though Jews have white skin, they retain Afro Hair and Afro hair is clear proof of a person being descended from Africans.

Thus we can rest assured that the Bible is a Blackman's book.

Thanking you ahead of time for admitting that you believe this, since you clearly believe that Afro-hair alone determines a persons descent from Africans.


Quote
2. why are their facial features different (i.e. lips, nose, eyes, cheekbones, etc),

For the same reason that in one human generation, a child's facial features are different from their parents. Does it surprise you when your child does not look exactly identical to you? Well map this out after thousands of years. Do you really think that thousands of  years from now, you will be able to pick out the child who is your related to you? Because their facial features stayed the exact same?


Quote
3. why are their forearms smaller, 4. why have they got less muscles in their butt cheeks (excuse the scientific phrase)

Quote
5. why are their ankles chunkier. (blacks have slim, well defined ankles).

All blacks even fat ones? LOL

Quote
6. why are their ears bigger?

Really? Amazing that they can not hear as well as Blacks even though their ears are much bigger. LOL I guess that is another mistake by mother nature, like white skin, evoling something that gave them no benefit.


Quote
Also, I thought this might be of interest -
'People with albinism are generally as healthy as the rest of their species, with growth and development occurring as normal. Many animals with albinism, however, lose their protective camouflage and are unable to conceal themselves from their predators or prey. The survival rate of animals with albinism in the wild is usually quite low. The main problem that people with albinism face is social, as the condition is sometimes a source of teasing during adolescent years.

As albinism is a recessive gene, the chance of offspring with albinism resulting from the pairing of a creature with albinism with a creature without albinism is very low. Source - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albino

I do not understand this. When it says that people with albinism are generally as healthy as the rest of their species. Are they calling Albino's a separate species? 

And of course Albino's having babies with Albino's is what brought forth white people. So the point about their offspring with normal humans, would not be relevant.
Drusilla (f)
Re: White People Are The Descendants Of African Albino's.
« #85 on: August 22, 2006, 04:27 PM »

Quote
Apparently I'm part of that conspiracy. After all, what can you expect from "the man"?

Nferyn,

I have seen many a white liberals run away from black boards. Never understanding why they were judged to be of the same white supremacy as other whites.

However, in the 21st century, some white liberals are growing up and learning how to interact with other races.

Notice the statement, I have highlighted and then think of your behavior here on these boards, let the critiques of your behavior be a guide to helping you honestly think of your behavior here.

CURE Statement of Belief
We, an organization of white Americans, express our deep remorse for the ongoing wrongs committed by our people against Black men, women and children in the US. and throughout the Diaspora who are descendants of enslaved Africans.

We see the United States of America as immoral from its very foundation because of the lie of white superiority and the commission of the crime of slavery, and we dedicate our lives to fundamental change within ourselves, and in our society.

We dedicate our time, energy, talent and resources to support and advocate, without reservation, the movement for full and complete reparations to the descendants of enslaved Africans in the US. and throughout the Diaspora.

We support and advocate reparations proposals put forward by Black leaders, recognizing that white Americans have no part in deciding what is required to repair and restore the descendants of enslaved Africans individually and collectively, and that these decisions belong to Black people alone.

We state that full and complete reparations must be paid not only for slavery and the atrocities that flowed from slavery, but for the ongoing effects of slavery that exist today.

We mourn the fact that many things can never be restored to the descendants of enslaved Africans: the lives of countless people, the connection to family lineage and home, and the mother tongue and original identity.

We appreciate the efforts of white abolitionists toward emancipation, while realizing that true emancipation of the enslaved Africans will not be achieved until their descendants enjoy the freedoms that reparations will provide.

We state that the US. Government is obligated to provide financial and other support for citizenship choices of the descendants of enslaved Africans, whether they choose full and equal US. citizenship, semi-autonomous or autonomous self-government, dual citizenship or migration/repatriation.

We express our intent to call upon the families of the white American aristocracy that directly benefited from slavery, to voluntarily pay their fair share of the reparations debt with wealth gained from slavery, the slave trade, and slavery related enterprises.

We are truly grateful to the Black community for allowing us an opportunity through the reparations movement to make amends, however inadequate, for the crimes of chattel slavery and slavery's ongoing effects - crimes most unconscionable, most damaging, and most burdensome to the human spirit.

We express remorse for all crimes committed in the name of white supremacy and we pray for justice to be done in the United States of America and around the earth.

http://www.reparationsthecure.org/

I hope this helps you at least a little, to get in where you fit in among Africans, whom I sincerely believe you would not want to be 'the man' over.
Sista (f)
Re: White People Are The Descendants Of African Albino's.
« #86 on: August 22, 2006, 07:41 PM »

@ Drusilla


Quote
I started this topic with the idea that "there is something different about being Black".  I asked a question: How can white be God, if Blacks are not the devil?


Drusilla, I wasn't trying to answer that question, however I was trying to demonstrate that the white man must be the devil. I didn't try answering that question because in essence if the white man came from African Albino's and African albino's are African, that means the white man must be African as well.

The white man is just a truly messed up defect. The white man does not want to claim  he is African because his ego Fueled by rejection from black people won't let him. Instead he intends to go on with his plan to make his self appear to be God when infact he is the devil. If he came from us, he must be here to teach us something. We just have not figured out what that is. As long as we stay seperate we won't be able to figure it out.

Drusilla, you are doing excellent with this topic. Teach! you know what you are talking about, I am so proud of you Grin
nferyn (m)
Re: White People Are The Descendants Of African Albino's.
« #87 on: August 22, 2006, 08:07 PM »

Drusilla,

I was getting rather tired with you repeating the same old disproven arguments over and over again, that's why I didn't bother to reply to your last contributions. However, as you're addressing me personally and more specifically concerning reparations, guilt and responsability, I will give you my opinion on the content of your last post. Please understand that I consider this last post of yours as an invitation to genuine dialogue, I cordially ask you return the favour and to reply in kind.

Prior to making my statement of belief, I want to make it crystal clear that mythology, pseudo-science and prejudiced historical revisionism are not the way to heal the wounds. Even though I may recognise the underlying emotions and motivations, these are bariers that prevent a genuine dialogue. On the contrary, they perpetuate a cycle of misunderstanding, prejudice and hate.
That is the reason why pseudo-scientific babble, such as presented by Welsing is not helping anyone. These kind of mythological emotional band aids may help (some) black people to gain an increased sense of (collective) self-worth, but only truth and genuine knowledge can help in the long run. There is far more value in celebrating the real accomplishments of African civilisations and the richness of Africa's diverse cultures than brushing this under the carpet in favour of a utopian unitarian idea of Africa. I have noticed that your unwillingless to recognise and respect the diversity of African cultures (e.g. your rude comparison of African nations to gangs) is what causes the strife between you and many Nigerians on this board. Your behaviour mimicks the air of superiority many Europeans project regarding Africa and is comparable to one of the reasons the Liberian experiment failed miserably. Don't try to lecture those poor Africans, but rather listen to what they have to contribute first.

Now, back to your post, as I'm not American, I cannot really subscribe to that statement of belief, although I probably would if I were American.

As a European, married to a Nigerian lady, I will give an overview of tthe actions Europe (collectively) can take to start reparing the damage it caused to Africa and it's people. Please bare with me, as it will take some time to compile such an overview, so you'll see it in another entry, probably late this evening (CET).

I do recognise the collective guilt Europe has and the collective effort it should make to ammend past and present wrongs. I want to stress the word collective here, because it is quite futile to assign individual blame for the wrongs committed by states and institutions.
Sista (f)
Re: White People Are The Descendants Of African Albino's.
« #88 on: August 22, 2006, 10:19 PM »

@ Drusilla









* albinomanwoman.jpg (2.93 KB, 134x97 )
Drusilla (f)
Re: White People Are The Descendants Of African Albino's.
« #89 on: August 23, 2006, 06:52 AM »

Nferyn,

Again.

"""recognizing that white Americans have no part in deciding what is required to repair and restore the descendants of enslaved Africans individually and collectively, and that these decisions belong to Black people alone. """

So save your speeches about what will and will not work for Africans and Africa.

And please do not try any more divide and conquer tactics on Nairaland. Their very easily seen through.

This is exactly why white liberals are sent running from Black boards.

They use the exact same tactics as 'white supremacy' folks LIKE -- we get to tell you what is good for you and what will and will not work, and if we can't we will try to divide you guys and conquer you.

The type of stuff your trying to pull is very easily seen through.

I suppose you think because you reminded people that I called modern tribes: gangs, that the Nigerians here are going to pull out guns and begin to shoot me.

Next you will be reminding the AA that Nigerians have said some equally terrible things about them and sit there praying you can get the AA to go after Nigerians.

So typical of white divide and conquer tactics. Yawn.

Nferyn, you should be ashamed of yourself. Really. 
Drusilla (f)
Re: White People Are The Descendants Of African Albino's.
« #90 on: August 23, 2006, 07:38 AM »

Quote
however I was trying to demonstrate that the white man must be the devil.

LOL Alright, I did not catch that the first time around. Smile

Quote
I didn't try answering that question because in essence if the white man came from African Albino's and African albino's are African, that means the white man must be African as well.

I am not sure that it naturally follows. For instance, the devil of the bible (if there is a difference between biblical devils and human devils) is from God, God created him.

Yet nobody believes that because the devil came from God then the devil must be God. (excepting the few wackos)

Evolutionist believe that humans and jellyfish have a common anscestor but they do not believe that in anyways makes humans and jellyfish the same species.

And as you say, the whiteman by his own theories believes that all people, thus his people came from Africa, a very long time ago. Yet he does not believe that this in anyway makes him and Africans the same species, well he didn't until recently (the last 30 years).

Think on this-- Ancient Black people--600 to 5000 years ago:

Evidence from Egyptians rejecting some foreigners as homosexuals who worship the devil.

Evidence from Blacks in Asia, India and Congo rejecting white skin on humans as monsters and portraying those with white skin as the devil.

Black people ruled the world. Black was considered the most beautiful everywhere you went.

Think on this-- Modern Black people--600 years to present age:

Welcomed the white traders, sang songs about them, signed friendly treaties with them giving the whites rights to use land, to do business and trade with them. Sending their African sons to interact with them.

Total disaster. Black people rule has ended every where, Black people are considered the most beautiful but the least desired everywhere.

White people might have something to teach us, alright.

But it just may be that we should have listened to our Black Anscestors.
nferyn (m)
Re: White People Are The Descendants Of African Albino's.
« #91 on: August 23, 2006, 10:15 AM »

Quote from: Drusilla on August 23, 2006, 06:52 AM
Nferyn,

Again.

"""recognizing that white Americans have no part in deciding what is required to repair and restore the descendants of enslaved Africans individually and collectively, and that these decisions belong to Black people alone. """
Agreed, goes for white America. Your point?

Quote from: Drusilla on August 23, 2006, 06:52 AM
So save your speeches about what will and will not work for Africans and Africa.
Seems obvious you're not willing to dialogue, you're only here to lecture.

Quote from: Drusilla on August 23, 2006, 06:52 AM
And please do not try any more divide and conquer tactics on Nairaland. Their very easily seen through.
The only ones seeing my contributions as divide and conquer tactics are the black supremacists like yourself.

Quote from: Drusilla on August 23, 2006, 06:52 AM
This is exactly why white liberals are sent running from Black boards.
I don't associate in any way with white liberals. Just your myopic American vision at work.

Quote from: Drusilla on August 23, 2006, 06:52 AM
They use the exact same tactics as 'white supremacy' folks LIKE -- we get to tell you what is good for you and what will and will not work, and if we can't we will try to divide you guys and conquer you.
Maybe they do, I wouldn't know. You probably see conspiracies where there aren't any. People do all kinds of weird things out of ignorance and you seem to be here to remind me of that fact.

Quote from: Drusilla on August 23, 2006, 06:52 AM
The type of stuff your trying to pull is very easily seen through.
Ellucidate me. What kind of stuff am I trying to pull?

Quote from: Drusilla on August 23, 2006, 06:52 AM
I suppose you think because you reminded people that I called modern tribes: gangs, that the Nigerians here are going to pull out guns and begin to shoot me.
Obviously they are not going to shoot you, they're far more civil than that.

It's just that you both lack understanding and respect for African cultures when you make statements like these:
Quote
Please everybody stop calling yourself Yoruba tribe or Ibo tribe or the even bigger lie: Ethnicity's.

Calling them tribes is too damn good for them.

Call them gangs, that is all they are.

Then put an end to the gang violence of Africa.
and
Quote
I think we are going to have to face the fact that our African anscestors were tribe members and the only thing that exist in Africa that very slightly resembles the tribes of ancient times is a useless skeleton of gangs that is more of an albatross around the African neck, than a benefit that our anscestors intended.

A modern African trying to claim some relationship to the ancient tribes of our African anscestors, is telling a lie. A big one.

Quote from: Drusilla on August 23, 2006, 06:52 AM
Next you will be reminding the AA that Nigerians have said some equally terrible things about them and sit there praying you can get the AA to go after Nigerians.
So typical of white divide and conquer tactics. Yawn.
You're seeing ghosts and intentions I don't have. Projection at it's best.

Quote from: Drusilla on August 23, 2006, 06:52 AM
Nferyn, you should be ashamed of yourself. Really. 
And why is that?

On another note, I'm still willing to make my statement of belief, but only for those with a willingness to listen and dialogue. It seems obvious Drusilla isn't interested as it would distract from her indoctrination efforts.
New (m)
Re: White People Are The Descendants Of African Albino's.
« #92 on: August 23, 2006, 11:46 AM »

Quote from: Drusilla on August 22, 2006, 04:02 PM








New, Please admit  that the Bible is a book written by Black people, for Black people and to Black people, it is a message sent to Black people because we can clearly see that even though Jews have white skin, they retain Afro Hair and Afro hair is clear proof of a person being descended from Africans.

Thus we can rest assured that the Bible is a Blackman's book.

Thanking you ahead of time for admitting that you believe this, since you clearly believe that Afro-hair alone determines a persons descent from Africans.


For the same reason that in one human generation, a child's facial features are different from their parents. Does it surprise you when your child does not look exactly identical to you? Well map this out after thousands of years. Do you really think that thousands of  years from now, you will be able to pick out the child who is your related to you? Because their facial features stayed the exact same?




Really? Amazing that they can not hear as well as Blacks even though their ears are much bigger. LOL I guess that is another mistake by mother nature, like white skin, evoling something that gave them no benefit.


I do not understand this. When it says that people with albinism are generally as healthy as the rest of their species. Are they calling Albino's a separate species? 

And of course Albino's having babies with Albino's is what brought forth white people. So the point about their offspring with normal humans, would not be relevant.

Simply because less than 1 percent of Jews have curly hair (large curls and not tiny curls like sub saharan Africans have) doesn't mean that their ancestors were Albinos, it just shows the level of integration that occurred over the years.

How many swedes have Afro hair?

Drusilla, your ignorance is demoralising and Its time I left this thread. You are the first wholly racist person I have ever come across in my life.

Quote
All blacks even fat ones? LOL
Relative to size (thought you were intelligent)
Drusilla (f)
Re: White People Are The Descendants Of African Albino's.
« #93 on: August 23, 2006, 06:14 PM »

Nferyn,

It is almost as if the words:

Belgium Congo
Belgium DRC
Belgium Rwanda
Belgium Burundi

Have no meaning to you and you mistakenly think that America is the only one guilty of crimes against Africans and Africa.

And some how that leaves you free and clear to come around and tell Africans what they should do and should not do.

That is weird.

By the way, your divide and conquer tactics still won't work, no matter how desparate you get.

I would like others though to notice how you keep pounding the idea in, that Africa's are DIVERSE and have many CULTURES.

The same reasoning that people have used for years to tell people to give up on the idea of Africans being at peace with one another and united against their true enemy.

Mahmood Mamdani -- a Great Continental African scholar, has written many college textbooks showing how every country and tribe in Africa suffered the same oppressions and systems, including South Africa.

Well, not just him but many a Continental African scholar has written extensively that all African cultures despite their cultural diversity, are more similar than they are different.

I personally like the scholars who concentrate on the so called religions of Africans. It is beautiful how they show, that Creation beliefs are similar across the continent, relations with God are similar and beliefs are similar. Despite the fact that one might find slight differences from area to area, the differences between ATR (african traditional religions) across the continent are less than the differences between Christian denominations.

The more you talk, the more people's eyes are going to be open to the fact that 'emphasizing' African cultural diversity, is a big part of the divide and conquer tactics.   This is why it is emphasized especially in school settings that teach African children.

Intellectual colonialism was the Europeans only hope of retaining Africa, after physical colonialization was lost.
Drusilla (f)
Re: White People Are The Descendants Of African Albino's.
« #94 on: August 23, 2006, 06:19 PM »

New,

I knew you would back quickly away from the idea that having Afro- hair was by itself a sign of Africanness. If I showed you whites who did have Afro-hair, namely the Jews.

Losing a point, then insulting the other guy and then leaving the thread in a huff.

Are not new behaviors on the internet, their quite standard but if you think you got us fooled.

More power to you.

Have a good day.
nferyn (m)
Re: White People Are The Descendants Of African Albino's.
« #95 on: August 23, 2006, 09:10 PM »

Drusilla,

You take the art of misrepresenting one's words and position to a whole new level.


Quote from: Drusilla on August 23, 2006, 06:14 PM
Nferyn,

It is almost as if the words:

Belgium Congo
Belgium DRC
Belgium Rwanda
Belgium Burundi

Have no meaning to you and you mistakenly think that America is the only one guilty of crimes against Africans and Africa.
1. I have demonstrated to you on several occasions that I do not ascribe to that assasine position. Your failure to read and comprehend that simple fact is telling. You're not here to dialogue, you're here to lecture.
2. I have shown a willingness to debate every point you raised, the only willingness you have shown is to ascribe motivations to me that I do not hold
3. I can tell you with a near certainty that I know far more about the history of the Belgian colonial territories pre-, post- and during colonialism. Your ill informed opinion of the rise of the FRP only shows that you don't really know what you're talking about, but does that matter, really, as you're not here to dialogue or learn from the Continental Africans, but rather to lecture them
4. I have, in this thread, shown that I'm prepared to give you my opinion on what Europeans can do to heal the wounds and make first steps to repare the damage they caused. You on the other hand have shown no interest in this. It might blur your stereotype of the perpetual eternal white devil (the European) and that's the last thing you seem to want
5. I am still ready to ellaborate on that, but I rather you didn't spit in my outstretched hand and show a willingness to enter into dialogue.

Quote from: Drusilla on August 23, 2006, 06:14 PM
And some how that leaves you free and clear to come around and tell Africans what they should do and should not do.

That is weird.
And where might I have done that? Since when is pointing out your lack of tact and rude behaviour telling Africans what to do?

Quote from: Drusilla on August 23, 2006, 06:14 PM
By the way, your divide and conquer tactics still won't work, no matter how desparate you get.
Projection

Quote from: Drusilla on August 23, 2006, 06:14 PM