|
pati (f)
|
oracle, come on who wouldn't deny this? its really disgusting and moreover she is not such a beautiful sight to look at . This pictures are real .Shame on her  |
|
|
|
|
|
bluenubian (f)
|
yes i believe she did it, but i still don't see the big deal, its her life and this days, there are camera's everywhere. it cud happenm to anyone of us during our private moments, her boyfriend cud have taken that pic during times that they shared together, or worse maybe she did it for money, soooooo?, its her life. let her do what she wants with it
|
|
|
|
|
|
bluenubian (f)
|
@emmy
well if the guy I'm the pic is her husband to-be, the best thing for her will be to go ahead and get married and produce pics of her lovely wedding to prove to the worldlike the world cares, that they are really a couple
|
|
|
|
|
|
debosky (m)
|
obviously she's ashamed of what she's done (if thats her in the picture) cuzz she's denying it, i don't know what she has to gain by this, those pictures aren't even sexy, they are just showing her stuff like its meat or sumn. if she ever wanted to be a sex symbol she should've gone for some professional nude shots, not some cheap ass photos taken by a skinny white dude.
thats how she's made her bed, and she'll have to lie on it like that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
G-reycells (m)
|
Anita's critics should please buldoze emmydee's submission on Anita before swiping at her. I agree with him totally. PM nEWS JUS TOOK ADVANTAGE OF THE POOR GIRL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
spikedcylinder (f)
|
I think the problem started when she denied she was the one in the pictures.Even a blind nun can see that that person in the picture is Anita.
EMMYDEE,are you a personal friend of Anita's or better still,are you Anita?Seeing your post has made me look at the whole thing from a different point of view.
|
|
|
|
|
|
superman (m)
|
na wahoo! some people are sayin hell its her life! of cause it is. but does that mean u have to turn to sucide bomber or something! hey i smell something
|
|
|
|
|
|
salsera (f)
|
emmydee
thank you for clarifying quite a bit
at least some of us are thinking sensibly not like a mob
the only reason why this is an issue is because her face is known unlike the rest of us
kai , no wonder tabloids never run out of business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lafem (m)
|
I can argue it out till tommorow, that body in the pix is not Anita's. If you look closely, you'll discover the shade on the head and that of the body does not match. this can only happen when two images are brought together with the aid of a photo manipulating software like Adobe photoshop. Don't base your judgement on the black and white pix on the magazine, check out the coloured one on the Internet. KPOM!!! Seye has said it all. |
|
|
|
|
|
Conqueror (m)
|
After careful scrutiny, I conlude that is her, but it was done earlier in her career and she doesn't regret it, but regrets the fact that the picture was exposed!
|
|
|
|
|
|
katherinae (f)
|
all of u should shut up and get over it, big freaking deal. u guys have all watched porn and i am so borrrrrrrrrrrrrrred with u hypocritical nigerians, and all ur nonsense. of course its her we are not blind, she took some pictures, unfortunately for her they got exposed oh well s%$# happens. i know for fact the nonsensical things that go on in nigerian campuses. so to sit down there and judge man just typical. u all clearly don't live exciting lives.  Here is 12 word for u guys. U ALL ARE HYPOCRITES AND I AM A BIT DISGUSTED BY IT. |
|
|
|
|
|
idea (m)
|
hi y'all, i'm more or less out of another planet, it was just yesterday night that i heard of the whole story of someone being in the dailies "NUDE". after going through the pics this morning,i observed that the 3 pics were taken differently and my conclusion is:
1. the 3 pics might have been taken at different times and place.
2. it is either the work of an ex lover or a digruntled "friend" who is the middleman to the business called prostitution.
3. she has beads on her neck in the 1st pic which is not in the other 2.
4. the second pic is that of an "Anita" with a clean shave.
5. the 3rd shows some hairs on her pubic region.
6. the white man is at a totally different location from her.
Well, i can't really tell what conspired but if she is the one in the pics, she must be crazy(maybe in love then) to have allowed those pics to be taken.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seye (m)
|
hi y'all, i'm more or less out of another planet, it was just yesterday night that i heard of the whole story of someone being in the dailies "NUDE". after going through the pics this morning,i observed that the 3 pics were taken differently and my conclusion is:
1. the 3 pics might have been taken at different times and place.
2. it is either the work of an ex lover or a digruntled "friend" who is the middleman to the business called prostitution.
3. she has beads on her neck in the 1st pic which is not in the other 2.
4. the second pic is that of an "Anita" with a clean shave.
5. the 3rd shows some hairs on her pubic region.
6. the white man is at a totally different location from her.
Well, i can't really tell what conspired but if she is the one in the pics, she must be crazy(maybe in love then) to have allowed those pics to be taken.
You have spoken well. Let me support your discovery with some picture fact. The first pix (Anita 1a)"The shade on the head is lighter it is placed perfectly on the body. The Second pix (Anita 1b)The Shade of the head is different and also the shade of the breast is different from the body. Pix 3 (Anita 1c) In one pix her pubic area was shaved in another it was hairy. You can see that this is an act of a con artist. Why are we being wicked to one another. Irrespective of what we say here, She's not going to be able to get out of this easily. It's just unfortunate. But let's compare issue before we start castigating her. |
|
|
|
|
|
mamaput (f)
|
That says nothing maybe they were at different times of the day. .
It takes only a few min to shave
|
|
|
|
|
|
mamaput (f)
|
If one pic is taken with flash and the other not .
It also dependes the time of the day and were the sun is standing and from what direction the oic is taken.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ozobemem (m)
|
What are we talking about, she did it, though a kind of set up might be there, but i strongly believe that there is no computer work there, she might have posed nude not for money sake but, all i know is that she really pose nude, don't expect her to come and say she did it ok, let her alone guys, she did it to be more popular  |
|
|
|
|
|
Seye (m)
|
anita did not do these thing, i did not believe until this morning when i zoom close to the first pic,
the head of Anita was cropped and placed on another body, this is possible through ADOBE PHOTOSHOP, I work in a creative dept, where a lot of photo manipulations take place so i know what i am saying. The closest part of the body to the light is always the lightest, but in anita's case the farthest which is the head as in the pose is the lighter which is contrary to reality and the principle of light and shade in photography
|
|
|
|
|
|
mamaput (f)
|
The angles are so stupid she may have even taken them herself with a "self (what do they call it) when the camara only snaps after a few seconds )
And someone stole them.
What ever its to bad her name is spoiled i do not think she will find husband again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
cross16 (m)
|
In my opinion, the issue is not whether the woman in the picture is Anita Hogan or not. The main issue is how Nigerians like to play Accuser, Judge and Jury in cases like these. Big deal she posed for someone in her private time and was careless with the pixs, I can bet my bottom dollar that half the women that criticise her have done the same thing, even worse. Its a fun thing to do, you have a woman with a great bod, make sweet love, take pics of both of you, ENCODE them.
We've all been naughty and a lot of us still are.
LEAVE THE GIRL ALONE!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
blackeye (m)
|
If Anita really did this, I don't think she did it for anyone to spread out on the pages of the newspaper, very bad for her image anyway. She has already denied so she can't even sue the newspaper. Pity she needs to do alot of laudering |
|
|
|
|
|
mamaput (f)
|
I have never heard of a "Star" that is left alone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ozobemem (m)
|
my people whatever it maybe, either she snap the pix herself or another person did it, i know it is too bad, nigerians are doing worst things this days, but it is not suprised anyway, Nigerians are doing porn, so posing nude can not be all that strange to me
|
|
|
|
|
|
temmytanny (m)
|
please, i need to see her muscles |
|
|
|
|
|
osteen (m)
|
Really don't know the lady in analysis but i think she did nt deny the fact in question, thou her privacy should hav been preserved. a Big minus for PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christino (m)
|
I agree with seye, this is the work of some graphic artist who thinks he is smart. Its not Anita. Haven't you seen Obj's pix on Arnold's muscular body? Looks so real you'D fall for it. Gullible peeps, smart Journalists.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hugoboi (m)
|
@ christino
i totally disagree.This is no graphic artist stunt.I go compo grahics and i assure you, for one to produce a job of such quality will be almost impossible considering the stuff we use in naija.look again !! those pics are real !!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
under18 (f)
|
So she is a whore? those pix are real
but she looks hot men how do u feel now?
free porno
|
|
|
|
|
|
ozobemem (m)
|
I beg guys make we dey look on our own she feel no concern about it, read her interview and confirm what i am saying, who said is a lie? let her sue PM news to court if is a computer work, she did it my people, is she the only actress, the most popular ones are not mention why she? and no one will publish that if it is fake, PM news have everything to back it up that is why they can publish that. I beg let the poor girl jubilate because she is getting more popular
|
|
|
|
|
|
saints_1 (m)
|
Hmm what can i really say?I will say this is ridiculius and uncalled for,Absoluately Unbeliveable. Those Pixs are real and she is dening it.Am disappointed in Her.  |
|
|
|
|
|
mo money (m)
|
damn, did u  that? that guy looks too poor to pay her 4 that if she really did it anyway (anything is still possible ie computer graphics or something but that actually looks real), and if she had sex without CD with that same guy i c there then she should go 4 HIV test or better still start treating herself 4 AIDS. all the ladies in the house please help us hide those u**y "THINGS" of yours so we can still get erection for you when you pull those clothes. for Anita Hogan, no erection 4 her no no nooooooooooo |
|
|
|
|
|
commyjay (m)
|
People let us leave the poor babe alone, agreed she did something wrong, but I am sure a lot if babes condemning her most have done things worse than this with their boyfriends or lovers as the case may be, just that her's fell on the wrong side, that is why everybody is now crying foul. She should be more careful next time when doing some wired things. And for the rest of us, lesson should be learnt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
commyjay (m)
|
People let us leave the poor babe alone, agreed she did something wrong, but I am sure a lot of babes condemning her most have done things worse than this with their boyfriends or lovers as the case may be, just that her's fell on the wrong side, that is why everybody is now crying foul. She should be more careful next time when doing some wired things. And for the rest of us, lesson should be learnt
|
|
|
|
|
|
![Nairaland [Nigerian Forum] Home](http://www.nairaland.com/Themes/default/images/english/home.gif)
Poll
Author
Anita1a.jpg (8.81 KB, 288x159 )
