@
Backslider,
Thank God you Quoted the bible.
Now Let us Look closely what you quoted
1Cor. 3:1-3
"And I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal, as unto babes in Christ. I fed you with milk, not with meat; for ye were not yet able to bear it : nay, not even now are ye able; for ye are yet carnal: for whereas there is among you jealousy and strife, are ye not carnal, and do ye not walk after the manner of men?"
Yes. Thank God i quoted the bible. I would have also thanked God on your behalf had you done the same rather than try to append your own misunderstanding to a scripture that is
very clear - because it doesn't tally with your mindset.
Paul was using what you call tact inspired by the holy Ghost.
Good terminology. I clearly showed you two words in that quote; and i'd glady refer you to them again.
"
And I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal, as unto babes in Christ."
Can you see the words in
red? "Tact inspired by the Holy ghost" will not cause Paul to call
sinners christians ("in Christ"), or to call unbelievers brethren. Paul never did that. Maybe you can refer me to scriptures where he did.
When you have successfully addressed that, then we can have a discussion. There's no need for skirting around scriptures that are very clear.
Beyond that i also referred you to Romans 7. Was Paul also a "sinner" when he described those things that took place in Romans 7 from verse 7?
He was Using the Analogy of Child needs the Milk to grow to survive into adulthood.
Ok? Good. Although it is an anology, it drives home the point. Two categories:
(a) infant/babe, milk, carnal etc
(b) mature, meat/solid food, spiritual etc.
whereas the Corinthian Church was in sin and what would you give to them. If you read the corinthians you will see that there could be no way this people be called saved.
Maybe its a different Corinthians than the one in the bible. First, can you show me anywhere in that book that Paul referred to them as sinners or unbelievers?
Second, i'd show you some scriptures; and anticipate that you would likewise sweep them aside as "tact inspired by the Holy ghost".
1Cor. 1:4-9
I always thank God for you because of his grace given you in Christ Jesus. For in him you have been enriched in every way—in all your speaking and in all your knowledge— 6because our testimony about Christ was confirmed in you. Therefore you do not lack any spiritual gift as you eagerly wait for our Lord Jesus Christ to be revealed. He will keep you strong to the end, so that you will be blameless on the day of our Lord Jesus Christ. God, who has called you into fellowship with his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, is faithful.According to you, this was addressed to "sinners". No wonder there are no christians in your book. May God have mercy.
They had the knowledge of salvation and they were living in sin. Can you give a dead baby Milk to grow. The people of the Church in Corinth had heard the word but were backsliden. There sin in the church and it was so rife that fornication was rife.
The question is "were they saved?" "Had they "lost" their salvation?" "Were they sinners?" Please show us from the scriptures.
Can you please refer to
1Cor5 and see that it was
one person who was committing fornication? Fornication was
not 'rife'. Their problem was that they
tolerated it rather than to have confronted the sinner. Again, here are some scriptures:
1Cor5:1-2, 9
"It is actually reported that there is sexual immorality among you, and of a kind that does not occur even among pagans: A man has his father's wife. And you are proud! Shouldn't you rather have been filled with grief and have put out of your fellowship the man who did this? . . . "9:
"I have written you in my letter not to associate with sexually immoral people"The other place, to my knowledge, where Paul refers to sexual immorality being common was in 7:2, and he was talking generally (he didn't say "among you" there) - not particular to the church. Just like there is sexual immorality in the country i live in - that does not mean you can't be a christian and refuse to partake in such things.
What would as an evangelist preach to a backsliden Church ?
Seven steps on how to receive the holy Ghost?
10 way of how to make money?
3 ways to be risch ?
5 principle of a good marriage life?
As a flaming evangelist you deliver the word of Salvation to a backsliden church. Now that is the milk of the word of God.
No Carnal man will enter heaven. There is nothing like Carnal Christian. Was Jesus Carnal? Child that seeks the hard truth of the word of God is a TRUE CHILD.
NOTE A CHILD THAT STOPS TO GROW IS NO CHILD.
All this rambling is unwarranted; i quoted
scriptures, you're offering me your own opinion. What i should ask
you is: is there anything like an
uncarnal man? Since you are so willing to formulate the new term "
carnal man". What of the uncarnal man? they will go to heaven eh?
All those aside, if there had not been any scriptures that addressed the issue, then there might have been a need for human reasoning and/or subjective opinion. The way it stands, the scriptures are clear.
Cheers
