|
pilgrim.1 (f)
|
@focused
From the verses, we learnt that the holy spirit would come after Jesus. If holy spirit is being referred to as the comforter to come after Jesus,
has the holy spirit not been in existence and still in existence How many spirits will we be having since it has been in existence before creation and another one is coming. Babs-babs!  Since you have left your arguments in the dust, is this the best you can afford to do? Rather than sweat this out, simply find out who in John's Gospel is referred to as the Comforter. We have been through this until you sadly had to quietly and evasively see that your attempts to smuggle Muhammad into the Bible were a waste. Your answer to that one question will setle your misgivings, if you care.
|
|
|
|
|
|
babs787 (m)
|
@pilgrim.1 Babs-babs! Since you have left your arguments in the dust, is this the best you can afford to do? Rather than sweat this out, simply find out who in John's Gospel is referred to as the Comforter.
We have been through this until you sadly had to quietly and evasively see that your attempts to smuggle Muhammad into the Bible were a waste. Your answer to that one question will setle your misgivings, if you care. Your brother raised it and you may help him out by telling me how many spirits we would be having since one was and still in existence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
pilgrim.1 (f)
|
@pilgrim.1
Your brother raised it and you may help him out by telling me how many spirits we would be having since one was and still in existence. The simple questions to address is this: How many "Comforters" was Jesus speaking of in the Gospel? WHO was He referring to as the "Comforter". The answers to these simple questions settles your query. . . unless you are hell-bent on excusing the facts so you can remain comforted in the fact that Muhammad was not the one being referred to. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
babs787 (m)
|
@pilgrim.1 The simple questions to address is this:
How many "Comforters" was Jesus speaking of in the Gospel? Your response determines that. But let us read your net quote WHO was He referring to as the "Comforter".
The answers to these simple questions settles your query. . . unless you are hell-bent on excusing the facts so you can remain comforted in the fact that Muhammad was not the one being referred to. Good. If Jesus was referring to only one spirit, how come another is coming when we have one existence. Since you claimed that the prophecy is for holy spirit being the comforter, has it been in existence since creation or not?
|
|
|
|
|
|
pilgrim.1 (f)
|
@babs787, Good. If Jesus was referring to only one spirit, how come another is coming when we have one existence. That was simply to show that He was not referring to any other than the same Holy Spirit. If you have where He was referring to more than one, please post it. Since you claimed that the prophecy is for holy spirit being the comforter, has it been in existence since creation or not? Did the Bible claim otherwise, babs787? I am not the one claiming - I have asked you to go there and read and let us know what the Bible says. Is that too hard for you? Or are these such a wasteful exercise to cover up your sad worry that Muhammad was not the Comforter? So sad. . . Allah never referred to Muhammad as the Comforter nor the Holy Spirit; . . . the Qur'an never called Muhammad by those terms; . . . nor did anyone in any hadith refer to Muhammad as such!! Where did Muslims harvest this smuggling habit of trying to make Muhammad what Allah never made him? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
babs787 (m)
|
@pilgrim.1 So sad. . . Allah never referred to Muhammad as the Comforter nor the Holy Spirit;
. . . the Qur'an never called Muhammad by those terms;
. . . nor did anyone in any hadith refer to Muhammad as such!!
Where did Muslims harvest this smuggling habit of trying to make Muhammad what Allah never made him? It is very true that Allah never referred to him as the holy spirit but can you please tell me if the holy spirit has been in existence since creation or not? If you are trying to say holy spirit would be coming after Jesus, how many would we be having since one is already in existence?
|
|
|
|
|
|
olabowale (m)
|
@Focused: Muhammed was not a comforter and will NEVER be a comforter. The comforter that Jesus talked about is the holy ghost, which appeared to his disciples on the day of pentecost. Which was 600 years before Muhammed (The great terrorist) was born. Focused, tell me how do you have the idea of 3 godhead(s) in 1 singularly god, yet you have verses like Mark 12;29 in it? They are so opposite to each other. Which one is to be believed,Mark 12;29 that was spoken by jesus or the trinity concept that was peddled by someone else. Which one 'ABROGATED the Other?' Give me an answer please.
|
|
|
|
|
|
pilgrim.1 (f)
|
@babs787, @pilgrim.1
It is very true that Allah never referred to him as the holy spirit Thanks for the honest acknowledgement - at last. If you may, please take the bold step further to desist from ascribing things to Muhammad. but can you please tell me if the holy spirit has been in existence since creation or not? He has - and I don't see why you keep pretending like you don't know! If you are trying to say holy spirit would be coming after Jesus, how many would we be having since one is already in existence? Please, babs. . . please.  This is soooo soo comical; but let me cool down for you. That He (the Holy Spirit) is coming does not confuse the fact that He has always existed. These are two different things, but not to be confused. Now, the Holy Spirit has always been in existence - but He had not been given to those who believed on Jesus (see John 7:39). That the Holy Spirit would " come" was in fulfillment of prophecies made about His coming (Joel 2, for instance); but that does not mean that His existence before His coming could be questioned! Let me use an illustration: (a) Jesus existed before Muhammad was born - FACT. (b) Muhammad spoke of Jesus second coming - FACT. (c) even if Jesus has not yet "come", it is FACT that He still exists - FACT. Can you see why your question about the existence and coming of the Holy Spirit really does not bear any weight here? If it does, it still does not divert the FACT that: (a) Muhammad is NOT the Comforter (b) the Holy Spirit is the Comforter (c) Muhammad was never referred to by anyone as either: the Holy Spirit, or the Comforter. These are as simple as anyone can get. Cheers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
pilgrim.1 (f)
|
@olabowale, @Focused: Focused, tell me how do you have the idea of 3 godhead(s) in 1 singularly god, yet you have verses like Mark 12;29 in it? They are so opposite to each other. Which one is to be believed,Mark 12;29 that was spoken by jesus or the trinity concept that was peddled by someone else. Which one 'ABROGATED the Other?'
Give me an answer please. You won't get an answer, because: (a) your are being dishonest about the plurality of godheads - the Bible does not speak of "3 godheads" (plural) - and that has been made clear every single time you posted it. If you find it so, please post the verse, do you care to? (b) there are NO ABROGATION in the Bible, thank you. You can remain embarrassed forever that Allah abrogated, substituted and whatever else with his qur'an - but unless you have a verse in the Bible where God said He abrogated any verse, please save the hat-tricks. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
babs787 (m)
|
@pilgrim.1 Let me use an illustration:
(a) Jesus existed before Muhammad was born - FACT. Is that from the bible or Quran? (b) Muhammad spoke of Jesus second coming - FACT. Jesus spoke of his coming as well or will you deny that? (c) even if Jesus has not yet "come", it is FACT that He still exists - FACT. Is that from the bible or Quran? Can you see why your question about the existence and coming of the Holy Spirit really does not bear any weight here? It is very glaring that it can never be for holy spirit If it does, it still does not divert the FACT that: Ok (a) Muhammad is NOT the Comforter He is and will always be because the verse mentioned another comforter meaning that Jesus is already one and 'another' means one similar to Jesus and in what way os Holy spirit similar to Jesus? ( b) the Holy Spirit is the Comforter The holy spirit has been in existence since creation and cannot be the 'another' comforter coming. The 'another'comforter would be a fresh being that would be like Jesus and if you still try to smuggle in Holy spirit, how many would we be having since one was in existence when Jesus made that statement? (c) Muhammad was never referred to by anyone as either: the Holy Spirit, or the Comforter.
These are as simple as anyone can get.
Cheers. Read my above explanation. Did Jesus not say that he didnt come to annul/[b]abrogate??[/b]
|
|
|
|
|
|
pilgrim.1 (f)
|
@babs787, @pilgrim.1
Is that from the bible or Quran? From 4 veriable sources" (a) the Bible (b) the Qur'an (c) the Hadiths (d) history. Now, which of these sources can you deny? Jesus spoke of his coming as well or will you deny that? Whose coming? Is that from the bible or Quran? From the same sources as above. You're already beginning to sound ever more childish, babs787. Can I ask you to simply say that you have no real issues so that you save your internet resources? It is very glaring that it can never be for holy spirit Who then is it for? He is and will always be because the verse mentioned another comforter meaning that Jesus is already one and 'another' means one similar to Jesus and in what way os Holy spirit similar to Jesus? Don't cheapen your scholarship, please. We already know that Muhammad had no siginificant "similarity" to Jesus. QED. The Holy Spirit as the parakletos had remarkable evidence of tessellating with what Jesus described Him as. The holy spirit has been in existence since creation and cannot be the 'another' comforter coming. The 'another'comforter would be a fresh being that would be like Jesus "Another" does not mean "a fresh being" . . . take style dey fabu O!  If it means "a fresh being", please show us from the Greek, abeg eh? and if you still try to smuggle in Holy spirit, how many would we be having since one was in existence when Jesus made that statement? (a) I did not smuggle in the Holy Spirit into John's Gospel. That the Comforter is the Holy Spirit is already made clear in John 14:26. (b) the one who has been trying to smuggle in Muhammad is not me, but you and your poor and desperate Muslim apologists - sad that they all have failed to convince even you with evidence for their poor reading skills. (c) the word "another" does not mean that it refers to someone who never existed before that time - if it did, Muhammad never existed before that time; nor was Muhammad being referred to there. Read my above explanation. It was rather an excuse than an explanation - unless you have where anyone called Muhammad by those terms. Did Jesus not say that he didnt come to annul/[b]abrogate??[/b] I have addressed this issue in the relevant thread. People like olabowale tried to smuggle that issue in here to save face for the Muslim cover up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
babs787 (m)
|
@pilgrim.1
If you still do not want to admit that the verse was not referring to Holy Spirit, has the holy spirit not been in existence or not because according to that verse, we learnt that comforter would come after Jesus meaning that the comforter has never been in existence but would be coming and we read from the bible that the holy spirit has been since creation. So how many would we be having if one is in existence and another would becoming?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
pilgrim.1 (f)
|
@babs787, How body? @pilgrim.1
If you still do not want to admit that the verse was not referring to Holy Spirit, Please babs, please. There are no excuses you can project to keep denying the obvious. Just simply say you are too embarrassed to admit the simplicity of clear statements recorded in the Bible. QED. It is not up to me to "admit" your denial - because I cannot begin in this age to start "admitting" the denial that Muslims keep making about the fact that the Comforter was referring to the Holy Spirit and to none else. That is why we have it clear in John 14:26 - " But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you." No one can confuse the clear meaning of the clause " the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost". As long as you keep making excuses to see the obvious, you have not made any sense. When you do, I'll be interested in anything further you have to say. For now, save the excuses and denials and let's move on to better things. Shalom.
|
|
|
|
|
|
babs787 (m)
|
@pilgrim.1 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you."
No one can confuse the clear meaning of the clause "the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost". As long as you keep making excuses to see the obvious, you have not made any sense. When you do, I'll be interested in anything further you have to say. For now, save the excuses and denials and let's move on to better things. You are confusing yourself because the bible translators wrote holy spirit and if it going to be holy spirit, has it been in existence or not?
|
|
|
|
|
|
pilgrim.1 (f)
|
@babs787,
You did not confuse yourself when you referred to Muhammad as the Holy Spirit in John's Gospel, abi?
You really have no shame.
|
|
|
|
|
|
babs787 (m)
|
@pilgrim.1
Answer my simple question
|
|
|
|
|
|
babs787 (m)
|
@pilgrim.1
Has the holy spirit been in existence since creation or not?
|
|
|
|
|
|
pilgrim.1 (f)
|
@pilgrim.1
Answer my simple question
@pilgrim.1
Answer my simple question
This is how you duck questions and issues raised by others: "answer my simple question" - and in another thread, you were whining about this very attitude, not so? Go back and read through my posts where I raised issues for your consideration. If you can't address them, I won't entertain this dishonest attitude you often employ to cover your shame.
|
|
|
|
|
|
+osisi
|
@pilgrim.1
Has the holy spirit been in existence since creation or not?
are you still trying to figure out how Mo was the holy spirit to come Or how by the Miracle of allah,mary was substituted for the holy Spirit?
|
|
|
|
|
|
+osisi
|
Yes babs,the Holy Spirit has been in existence since creation At creation,the Bible said the Spirit of God aka Holy Spirit moved over the face of the waters. Several accounts in the Bible talk of the Sprit of God leading several prophets and judges and priests of old however Joel and Ezekiel prophesied of the indwelling outpouring that'll only happen after the work of salvation is completed. This happened in Acts of the apostles. Now tell me about John 7:39 from your Muslim apologists site  where we know Christ was referring to the outpouring of the Holy Spirit as in the day of Pentecost and now. You see how I predicted you well ? But go ahead anyway,you're about to learn something from the people of da book just like Mo advised
|
|
|
|
|
|
luvus
|
@babs
Posts: 1807 Re: Bounties Of Jannat (paradise) #640 on: January 22, 2008, 08:41 PM »
D__D and i r waiting for this
Do you care for some prophecies of Muhammad that came to pass? Do you care for prophecies of Jesus that never materialised?
|
|
|
|
|
|
olabowale (m)
|
@+Osisi Yes babs,the Holy Spirit has been in existence since creation At creation,the Bible said the Spirit of God aka Holy Spirit moved over the face of the waters. Several accounts in the Bible talk of the Sprit of God leading several prophets and judges and priests of old however Joel and Ezekiel prophesied of the indwelling outpouring that'll only happen after the work of salvation is completed. This happened in Acts of the apostles. The Spirit of God aka Holy Spirit is an instrument of God, like 'the resident abunna' of the woman. (I have to shock you to reality, +Osisi!) Afterall, it the instrument that the woman can use at will! Or a more direct example, the staff of Moses. See the staff is not Moses but a tool that acts according to commands! Get real girl. And don't tell me tht I should let my better halves come to NL. They know about you already. Now tell me about John 7:39 from your Muslim apologists site where we know Christ was referring to the outpouring of the Holy Spirit as in the day of Pentecost and now. You see how I predicted you well ? But go ahead anyway,you're about to learn something from the people of da book just like Mo advised The people of da book should learn a thing or two about Mark 12 Verse 29, first before coming to the Mumiin. Afterall, Qur'an already abrogated the book of the people of da book. And the Baby should be named Muhammad or Ahmad if a boy or twins. Aisha or Hafsah if girl or twins. lol. I wish you well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
pilgrim.1 (f)
|
@olabowale, @+Osisi The Spirit of God aka Holy Spirit is an instrument of God, like 'the resident abunna' of the woman. (I have to shock you to reality, +Osisi!) Afterall, it the instrument that the woman can use at will! Or a more direct example, the staff of Moses. See the staff is not Moses but a tool that acts according to commands! Get real girl. And don't tell me that I should let my better halves come to Nairaland. They know about you already. A friendly advice: be carefull as to what you connote by reference to the Holy Spirit. Even if you don't believe in Him as revealed in the Bible, I'm sure that God-fearing Muslims would not go out of their way to make such caricature of the one they interpret as the holy spirit in Islam! Either way, whether Judiasm, Christianity or Islam, whoever is being referred to as the Holy Spirit deserves respect. You're welcome to be my guest and throw caution to wind when you use such derogatory inferences for Him. The people of da book should learn a thing or two about Mark 12 Verse 29, first before coming to the Mumiin. Muslims should go and find out what Mark 12 v 39 was pointing to in quoting Deuteronomy 6 v 4 (Elohim and "echad") before seeking to pass on their illiterate comments for scholarship that they clearly do not possess! Afterall, Qur'an already abrogated the book of the people of da book. Hehehe. . . what a laugh!  Keep lying for 'Allah' - I'm sure one day he will have to ask you to account for your mendacity as to where he ever told you such a thing. 'Allah' can abrogate the whole of his Qur'an for all I care - Muslims cannot tell you how many verses of 'Allah's' Qur'an are still remaining as "unabrogated". The day you find out, please let us know! And the Baby should be named Muhammad or Ahmad if a boy or twins. Hmm, no comments! When a teddy bear was named "Muhammad" after a schoolboy, the perpetually restless Muslims sought the head of the school-teacher!
|
|
|
|
|
|
+osisi
|
@+Osisi The Spirit of God aka Holy Spirit is an instrument of God, like 'the resident abunna' of the woman. (I have to shock you to reality, +Osisi!) Afterall, it the instrument that the woman can use at will! Or a more direct example, the staff of Moses. See the staff is not Moses but a tool that acts according to commands! Get real girl. And don't tell me that I should let my better halves come to Nairaland. They know about you already. The people of da book should learn a thing or two about Mark 12 Verse 29, first before coming to the Mumiin. Afterall, Qur'an already abrogated the book of the people of da book.
And the Baby should be named Muhammad or Ahmad if a boy or twins. Aisha or Hafsah if girl or twins. lol. I wish you well.
I love your humor but like pilgrim cautioned,don't blaspheme the Holy Spirit. Please get your wives to nairaland,especially the one you captured from Igboland I can't wait to meet them and I promise to be nice and loving.
|
|
|
|
|
|
+osisi
|
Olabowole the Spirit of God is part and parcel of God not just an instrument. Just like the Spirit of olabowole is part and parcel of olabowole and indivisible from him. I can't make it any simpler.
|
|
|
|
|
|
olabowale (m)
|
@+Osisi: Olabowole the Spirit of God is part and parcel of God not just an instrument. Just like the Spirit of olabowole is part and parcel of olabowole and indivisible from him. I can't make it any simpler. I do not need simplification, but truth in speech. If you do not know the absolute truth, then it is better to say nothing! You have not been able to identify to us, the Spirit, either by its nature or by its characteristics. You just say spirit and you want us to just swallow it, like the way you swallow 'Trinity,' a word that you are not familiar with, in your Bible or any supplimentary book! Before I say anything, I am curious about that word, 'Indivisible.' Was just part of this 'indivisible?' You remember what I have been saying about your 'death' of Jesus? If they are indivisible, that is, father, son and holy ghost, then when son died, the other parts died with him! Then there was no one left alive in the 3. It will mean that there was no one left among them to oversee the conditions of the UNIVERSE. Tell me, how did the earth kept its prescribed course, the same that it had kept before this ' death of the indivisible' godheads of the Christians? We will see that the death did not mean anything to the stability/equilibrum of the Universe! Perhaps, the true God Who is Lord, is not attached to Jesus or spirit. Parhaps, these two are not more than errand entities to Him, the Awesome Creator! Perhaps the Spirit is not more than Archangel Gabreil (a spiritual being) and of course Jesus is a Prophet (a human being), a mere mortal. But God is unlike Olabowale. Olabowale is a mere mortal, acreation of God! God does not look like us and nothing we have is like what He has! Hence, Spirit of God is not attached to God, while the spirit of Olabowale is the soul that makes him a living person, because it is attached to the body! So your hypothesis of part and parcel, may apply to Olabowale, but not to God! Further proof, is when you speak about the Spirit over water, etc. We notice that God was not hovering over it. We see that when John 1/19 declares that the holy spirit is the agent responsible for Mary's pregnancy, we realise, Jusus was not responsible for his own pregnancy inside his mother.
|
|
|
|
|
|
+osisi
|
But God is unlike Olabowale. Olabowale is a mere mortal, acreation of God! God does not look like us and nothing we have is like what He has! Hence, Spirit of God is not attached to God, while the spirit of Olabowale is the soul that makes him a living person, because it is attached to the body! So your hypothesis of part and parcel, may apply to Olabowale, but not to God! Further proof, is when you speak about the Spirit over water, etc. We notice that God was not hovering over it.
The Bible says in Genesis 1:26-27; " Then God said, 'Let us make man in our image, in our likeness, and let them rule over, all the creatures, So God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them."
|
|
|
|
|
|
+osisi
|
I don't expect you to understand spiritual things. They are spiritually descerned. You can cry all you want about Jesus,his death and resurrection and manifestations of God. babyosisi cannot help you there. I truly can't your case is turning to an obsession,calm down o That's how it starts We don't anyone comoting their shokoto and running down the streets of Manhattan. That won't be halal
|
|
|
|
|
|
olabowale (m)
|
@+Osisi: The Bible says in Genesis 1:26-27; "Then God said, 'Let us make man in our image, in our likeness, and let them rule over, all the creatures, So God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them." How you never punder about 'His own Image,' to actually bring to your inner thought that 'us make,' 'our image,' and 'our likeness,' are simply majestic pronouns, and not because the Speaker is referring to Somebody or Somebodies along with Himself. And not that He needed any permission from those who are the audiences or listeners! They had no choice. There was no opinion requested or required from them. See, even the audiences or listeners were silent, gave no response! See, if Jesus and holy ghost were there, they had no say in anything. In the creation of the earth, from your Bible, and notice I have not referred to the Qur'an, the holy ghost/spirit hovered over water. That was an errand that he was sent. Jesus never did anything as a third of this 'christian godheads for One God.' What he did are after he had became flesh, and it was not a special case because Moses had did even greater things or at least similar: Staff becoming snake, in three occassions, drowning the Egyptians and saving the Israelites, providing food from heavens, providing guiding light from heaven, raising a dead person by his instructions of touching the dead body with part of the slaughtered cow (This is in the Qur'an and the tafsir of Surah baqarah, in the Qur'an), giving the order for the Israelites to kill some of them. Yet we see in Mark 12 Verse 29 (And I have to thank God here, Who directed your fingers to type that Verse for my attention. Keep it up.), that Jesus declared that he was also subjected like every human under the Lordship of the singly God! Now in the Qur'an we learn that Allah the Almighty Creator declares to the audience (the community of the Angels; ArchAngel, Gabreil, Michael and the rest of the Angels), that He was about to creat a vieroy for the earth. And we know that Allah calls Jibril in many attributes; Holy spirit, spirit among them. So you see that there was an audience, Jesus was not one of them, because Adam, his father, from whom the souls of all man is takingout, was not yet created whe the dialogue took place! Finally, Allah will protect me from all types of Fitnah (trials). There is no traces of madness in my bloodline and I am truly Allahs slave. He will protect me, always. Amin. I also supplicate to Him that He protects you and soften to your heart to receive guidance. Amin. Am expecting a little Ahmad, or Muhammad or Aisha to be crawling soon. Let me know so that I can rejoice with you, but thank your Creator for making it easy for you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
olabowale (m)
|
@+Osisi: While you pray for me, don't mention Jesus or any other entities' name. Go to God directly and talk to Him! Finally, tell me what is meant by the Bible when it say 'our own Image,' and 'His own Image?' In the Our, does that mean ( Gods, Jesus and Holy ghost Images or is it Image?) all the composition of each one? If it is then we will realise that Jesus was always, prior to the creation of man. And that will be impossible! We will also know that the Holy spirit and change to physical being, otherwise his hovering over water during creation of the earth, would have just being in Spirit and could not have described as a physical manifestation. I just do not see man, who is physical changing at will. Hence the idae of our Image to include the holy spirit's image will be incomplete. Or is the holy spirit also physical like Jesus, too?
Finally, we come to God's image as stated in the Bible: Is this image or likeness like that of man? Is man miniaturised physicality of God? Is whats onman what is o God, too. Which gender is God, then?
+Osisi, you have a lot of explanation to do! And I bet, if you go to the'Scripture (lol and rofl), you will be wrong.Go to Qur'an and realise that God is completely different from His creation. Their Images are not similar in any way! But am waiting for your diversion(s), which you will call reply or replies from the locust cloud!
|
|
|
|
|
|
cgift (m)
|
Hey! You guys are too militant! Please calm down  You have all gone 'astray' from the topic. Olabowale, dont you think that it is wrong to describe something too esoteric for you with derogatory words? I mean, the bible itself calls the relationship and workings of the Godhead a mystery in 2 Timothy where it says Great is the mystery of godliness, , . Hence, you are not expected to ordinarily understand it. The quran on the other hand has no esoteric stuffs - i mean, you can read it and understand what it is saying because it is purely written in literary manner without parables or tough to crack sayings and relationships because that is how "Allah" wanted it. abi? So, if you understand that, respect what the bible says it is: mystery and therefore difficult to understand (at least to you) and not try using your mind to decipher it when those who are even the children of the Father are still getting new revelations of scriptures of the Bible. All the best.
|
|
|
|
|
|
olabowale (m)
|
@Cgift: From the mouth of babes and the mouth of Timothy as quoted above: The verse gave a 50/50 probability of maybe or maybe not!
By cgift, you did not use the words of Jesus himself, in Mark 12 Vese 29 (Bless you and God guidiance of your heart, +Osisi), the Gospel, rather you are quoting Timothy a simple epistle/letter, to encourage a group. You can write anything, including your own opinions, like what Paul did!
Iyen iwo, where did you ever respect Allah, the Prophet and the Qur'an a book that is firmly writing down, yet you want me to respect an ever changing and never stable Bible? I do respectyour book by writing the B in capital. But I disagree with any lies that is against Jesus! And that is what we are point out to you guys.
|
|
|
|
|
|