|
jennyb (f)
|
as long as he's getting fatter and fatter....LOL
|
|
|
|
|
|
jennyb (f)
|
I really don't think he cares !!
|
|
|
|
|
|
larger_20 (m)
|
I really don't think he cares !!
I am just curious ..I be like say na u dey rape your man...You like it a lot this girl...Naughty head  lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
billie
|
okay... i stumbled across this site by accident - thanks google  - but while i'm here i may as well post. i personally wouldn't say i'm thin at all, but people nag me when i say i'm not... but that's not the point. I am currently dating a very very very very very very - you get the idea - very skinny man..... all i can say is, it does nothing for me - feels like i'm sh*gging a skeleton. Unfortunately, he isn't even that nice, so i can't see anything happening.  But i digress, i think in some ways this topic makes sense... but in others, it is nonsense. When i walk home from work in the evenings, i watch people. just observing. and it's so fantastic, you can learn so much about people without even knowing them. If they're happy, if they're sad, anxious or just p*ssed off. Anyway, back to the subject, most of the time the people i see walking together, are aesthetically opposite... i.e. thin and fat, pretty and ugly. I guess that's what makes love such a beautiful thing..... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
larger_20 (m)
|
Fat men have better thrust during sex....that is why.....skinny guys only have the d.i.ck
|
|
|
|
|
|
loveth (f)
|
What kind of trust  nawaa ooo
|
|
|
|
|
|
allonym
|
Fat men have better thrust during sex.that is why.skinny guys only have the d.i.ck
lies people tell themselves the amount of "thrust" a person could develop depends not only on the fat/thin ness of the man, but the relative size of the woman. If both are extremely fat, there would be zero thrust.
|
|
|
|
|
|
larger_20 (m)
|
lies people tell themselves
the amount of "thrust" a person could develop depends not only on the fat/thin ness of the man, but the relative size of the woman. If both are extremely fat, there would be zero thrust.
allonym did u read the header? it says fat men vs "thin" girls. Now u tell me, if i am wrong or not.read again.... are u an engineer?
|
|
|
|
|
|
allonym
|
you are wrongplease, show me where it says fat men vs thin girls. As an engineer, I've been trained to read the english language, perhaps you are not an engineer?
|
|
|
|
|
|
allonym
|
oh, and in case you were confused, if the man was very very fat, unless the girl or the man or some other person was holding back the person's layers of fat, zero thrust would be developed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
larger_20 (m)
|
Alloyn what is this >>> " Re: Why Do Thin Girls Prefer Fat Men?" Did u see fat vs fat? Re-think..If you're trully an engineer, I will not employ u because u lack communication skills, which is part of the ethical studies to get Engineering Licensing in the United States. B/W I am an engineer too!
|
|
|
|
|
|
allonym
|
no, i don't see fat vs fat or fat vs thin. So, unless the text is being rendered differently in our browsers, please tell me, what are you talking about?
|
|
|
|
|
|
larger_20 (m)
|
well if u can't see fat vs fat or fat vs thin..u can atleast see what I am replying..........fat vs fat or fat vs thin can be written in many ways............the header is arguining why "thin" girls prefer "fat" men...not the other way round. This is a simple ABC sentence. A high school kid can change this sentence to many diffrent way and it will still retain its meaning without creating an ambigious meaning, so if u call your self an engineer, u should see the diffrence. I am not saying your analysis is wrong..I am saying that due to communication problem..u kind of got me wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
allonym
|
ok, so you are saying that if in the course of posting a reply to this topic, someone said that all fat men are geniuses, my reply must be constrained to only reference fat men and thin women. If I talk about fat men and fat women, or thin men and thin women, then I'm violating the "fat vs thin" ness of this topic? If so, I apologize for going off topic. So, my proper response to your "thrust" post should be: oh, and in case you were confused, if the man was very very fat, unless the girl or the man or some other person was holding back the person's layers of fat, zero thrust would be developed.
Is that better? Does that fall within the boundaries of "fat vs thin" or am I missing the point of your argument?
|
|
|
|
|
|
larger_20 (m)
|
ok,
so you are saying that if in the course of posting a reply to this topic, someone said that all fat men are geniuses, my reply must be constrained to only reference fat men and thin women. If I talk about fat men and fat women, or thin men and thin women, then I'm violating the "fat vs thin" ness of this topic?
If so, I apologize for going off topic. So, my proper response to your "thrust" post should be:
Is that better? Does that fall within the boundaries of "fat vs thin" or am I missing the point of your argument?
You are entitiled to your own opinion and u have the right to say what u want to say. We r both right in general sense but when you reference someone's posting...u should have made sure u read and understood the topic before corrections.
|
|
|
|
|
|
allonym
|
exactly what is it that I misunderstood? I've posted here before you. You seem to be confused. If your post cannot stand on its own and requires further explanation, then that is up to you to provide. Don't post crap and expect me to read your mind or determine any nonobvious context. You posted something about fat men developing more thurst. . . I posted a counter example, apparently, you only meant they get more thrust with thin girls, fine, I still have a counter example. Your point . . other than you don't like my counterexamples?
|
|
|
|
|
|
larger_20 (m)
|
You should not have inserted my posting when u made your counter example..that will settle the whole issue. Inserting my qoute means calling my attention..just like u said..counter argument right? then there is need for counter surport.......
|
|
|
|
|
|
allonym
|
yeah, i agree that by quoting you, I'm calling your attention to it
however, instead of trying to defend your post based on what I said, you tried to pretend that my post was totally irrelevant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
larger_20 (m)
|
You started it all , why did u say am telling lies? Read your first comment again....
|
|
|
|
|
|
allonym
|
i didn't say you are telling lies, i'm saying that people who claim that fat men can get a better "thrust" are lying to themselves. Now, if you are such a person, then yes, you are telling lies. If you just happen to be putting up that argument and it has nothing to do with you personally, then no, you are not telling a lie.
|
|
|
|
|
|
larger_20 (m)
|
Such statement should stand on its own....if u belived ealier that you are calling my attention by inserting a quote, then it is obvious that your comment was meant for me. However, now you're saying the statement is for anyone who belives that fat men have better thrust. That is an incomplete statement based on my assertion. You will not make a good engineer from the ethical point of view. Good luck in your carrer endeavour..
|
|
|
|
|
|
allonym
|
you are not the only person on this forum. You are not the only person who will read my thread. What if you realized something was wrong and changed your thread to say something else. Then, my reply would be meaningless. I quoted it so that there can be no question what I was talking about. Obviously, you are pretty new here. If I was agreeing with you, I might have quoted you too!
|
|
|
|
|
|
larger_20 (m)
|
you are not the only person on this forum. You are not the only person who will read my thread. What if you realized something was wrong and changed your thread to say something else. Then, my reply would be meaningless. I quoted it so that there can be no question what I was talking about. Obviously, you are pretty new here. If I was agreeing with you, I might have quoted you too!
If u realize something is wrong in my statement and change it..that is 100% accepted. Even if u try to amend what another has posted, it is 100% accepted. Your posting is a destructive criticism. Get it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
allonym
|
how is my post destructive criticism? It seems wrong to me to let someone delude themself. I suppose to the person suffering from a delusionit would seem like destructive criticism. . . since they already have a warped view of what is right and what is not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
larger_20 (m)
|
I don't need to redefine destructive critism. Consult your dictionary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tali-Tali (m)
|
I bow to you all 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mamba (m)
|
this topic should have been "why do fat men prefer thin girls?" the fat men are usually rich and run after the thin girls with their irresistible fat wallets..
|
|
|
|
|
|
loveth (f)
|
That is true,but lets answer we see.
|
|
|
|
|
|
IAH (f)
|
this topic should have been "why do fat men prefer thin girls?" the fat men are usually rich and run after the thin girls with their irresistible fat wallets..
Exactly! Especially those fat Igbo men.
|
|
|
|
|
|
mamba (m)
|
igbo men? well, i guess they get the thin girls because they are ready to spoil them with money anytime.. they are usually very generous when spending on ladies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
loveth (f)
|
abeg not igbo,but yoruba men.
|
|
|
|
|
|