Ladies in Nigeria Not Covering up their Bosoms

not all that glitter is gold like not who dresses normal is a saint

Goodguy you seem to be implying that  sexily dressed woman invite and justify rape.  First of all,  rapists are calculating predators who will stalk and attack women regardless of the manner in which those women are dressed, and whether such snivelling, cowardly men deserve understanding as you imply, or retaliation with deadly force as I see fit, is the subject for another discussion thread.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with sexy dressing women that cannot be alleviated by simply ignoring them, if that is your choice, Goodguy.   I LOVE to watch them, as I always have and always will.   Maybe someday when you leave the shores and narrow minded prudishness of Nigeria for a visit to the FREE west, you might learn to agree with me, or at least to restrict you concerns to your own affairs,  and to leave others alone to live their lives and dress any way they choose without you getting all strung out and hypertensive over those choices.

no saint would expose her body - in your mouth, that is a cyclic definition.

You would never call someone who exposes their body a saint, so therefore, you would always be correct.

So essentially, you just made a statement that has no meaning for anyone else.

As long as woman's body is something that men enjoy seeing, the sight of it will catch their eye.  I'm sure if Denzel Washington were to walk by some women everyday, their eyes will never fail to follow him.  it is human nature to look at things that interest and please you.

I don't see what's unfair about it.

hmm... *exhales*...WWJD?? 

Someone should pls define "SEXY".

Now tell me, WWJD when HE comes in physical contact (as in meeting on the way) with a girl whose dressing is marked by or tending to arouse sexual desire or interest??

That was the meaning of my previous post.

hey!!!! I'm so sorry but u really don't understand my post. I am not talking of Jesus being aroused or not. What I simply meant was this:

If Jesus met a girl whose dressing is marked by or tending to arouse sexual desire or interest, do u really think he'd welcome such a girl warmly and say, "It's only a dressing, she's wearing what she feels comfortable in, there's nothin absolutely wrong with that".

That's exactly what I'm trying to say.

I think he'll say, "poor woman, look at her tattered clothes: all the parts of her body are showing!  Can someone get her a real dress?  Blessed is he that clothes this woman - whose clothes are not even sufficient to cover her body!"

Body-lotion and sunscreens are also designed to 'cover' the whole body, but you don't see women putting lotion all over their body and going outside saying "I am fully dressed in body-lotion".

When we say, "cover", we mean cover.  The delicate parts of your body ought to be protected and hidden under your clothes.  That's what we mean by clothing.

i see.  men sin. . women's fault. . . sounds familiar. .

that is wrong.

When you sin, you are doing it on purpose.  You are not going against your own will.  So that is just bull.  The girl dressing sexy is just your excuse for your sin.

I gave you the definition of sexy, however, what is sexy varies from person to person.  There are many people who find a nun's habit sexy.  Should nuns change the way they dress for that person?  What about the person who finds nurse's uniforms sexy?

Aside from having everyone dress in square boxes, you cannot eliminate sexy from a mode of dress.

So,

1) No matter how you dress (expect for maybe the square box), there will be someone who will find that sexy
2) A person commiting a sin does so of his own accord.  I supposed you could be tricked into doing something like lying, but you cannot be tricked into something like committing adultery or any sexual sin.  And those are definitely not things you do against your will.  If its against your will, you're suggesting to me that the girls are raping those men.

When you sin, you do it on purpose. - Definitely.
You are not going against your own will. - Agreed.
The girl dressing sexy is just your excuse for your sin. - This is not about me.

You actually got me wrong earlier. I wasn't talking about the sinner going against his own will. Read this again:
...knowing that she's doing something that will make man go against HIS (Jesus') will.

You're very right. A man only chooses to sin because he's tempted to. And who causes the temptation (in this concept)? - The woman who dresses to arouse sexual desires. (sexy).

Goodguy, I'll have to pick on you again because your posts harp on the recurrent theme of linking sexual arousal with sin.  Hey, snap out of it.  There is nothing to be gained by burdening your conscience with such cumbersome baggage, brother man, so accept that women are sexy, and that if they are kind enough to accentuate those features that men like to see by dressing lightly,  then who are we to complain ? Those young women posses the goodies, and when all is said and done, there ain't a damn  thing you or I can do to stop them dressing as they please, so why not sit back and enjoy the fact that you have 20-20 vision to see and appreciate the wonders of life. 

Any straight male with a healthy hormonal levels is going to be attracted to women. I wouldn't be here to contribute to this discussion if my dad didn't look at my mom all those years ago and say to himself " Man oh man,  I have got to get some of that."   

Life is complicated enough without us burdening our minds with guilt every time a scantily dressed woman walks by, causing our pulse to quicken and our pants to feel a size too small.  The concepts of guilt and sin should be left to the police and judiciary.

I therefore put it that the accused (Women/Ladies) Not Guilty and to the men GUILTY