Appeal Court: Uba’s Suit Divides Anambra

Welcome. Please Login, Register, Or Activate! 
type your username and password to login
Date: November 24, 2009, 11:30 PM
432120 members and 299092 Topics
Latest Member: goodielook
Nairaland [Nigerian Forum] Home Help Search Who is currently online? Login Register
Nairaland Forum  |  General | Welcome  |  Politics (Moderator: RichyBlacK)  |  Appeal Court: Uba’s Suit Divides Anambra
Pages: (1) Go Down Send this topic Notify of replies
Author Topic: Appeal Court: Uba’s Suit Divides Anambra  (Read 202 views)
selingel
Appeal Court: Uba’s Suit Divides Anambra
« on: November 04, 2009, 03:19 PM »

Latest NewsNov 4, 2009
By Vincent Ujumadu
AWKA—The suit by Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) governorship candidate for the April 14, 2007 election in Anambra State, before the Court of Appeal, Enugu, in which he is praying the court to declare that his 2007 election stands,  has divided the people of the state.
While the International Society for Civil Liberties and the Rule of Law, a civil society organisation, argued that the matter was capable of generating judicial anarchy, a chieftain of the PDP in the state,  Chief Edwin Okwuosa wants the party to reflect on the contributions of Uba towards the development of the party.
The former presidential aide is seeking for an order of the court, confirming him as the duly elected Governor of Anambra State by virtue of the April 2007 election,  when the tenure of Governor Peter Obi elapses on March 17, 2010.
He had predicated his latest application on the earlier decision of the court, which had ruled that his election stands.
According to the chairman of Intersociety, Mr. Emeka Umeagbalasi, “it is very obvious that supremacy contest now exists between the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal, with respect to the said subject matter. While the Supreme Court had invalidated the said governorship election, the Court of Appeal says it stands.”
     
16 Responses for “A’Court: Uba’s suit divides Anambra”. Gotten from the same source:

C. OFOMA says:
November 4, 2009 at 10:28 am
pdp should have re-fielded andy uba in their 2010 election if they and inec are not having skelleton in the cupboard.
Obasanjo moulded many chains of warms and hung it on Yar adua neck during handover ceremoney at eagle square,but it is left for Yar adua to remove the chains one by one,Anambra is however the heaviest of the chains…the niger delta conflics have not thought aso rock any lesson.
Yar adua personally is not crooked,but pdp is bent on making sure that all good people in nigeria shall regret ever being good from birth when they succed in turning the nation into on party state. GOD FORBID!!



Johnson Ini says:
November 4, 2009 at 10:26 am
First it was Chris Uba that held Anambra nay the whole nation to ransom during the Ngige abduction saga. Now it appears it is going to be turn of Andy Uba to to capture and hold Anambra hostage once again.Now my question; Who will rescue our dear Anambra state from these blood brothers OR is Anambra under a curse?



slimfeet says:
November 4, 2009 at 10:08 am
common this fool is fighting in vain…. Anambra are not meant for UBAH”S family , they’ve really ruined this great state… please go in and build your house first before coming out to the masses…. Just look at what Chris ubah is wasting his energy on soludo who is already the governor of Anambra state…. this family is caused already so there is no way they can rule my state



igweokala says:
November 4, 2009 at 9:57 am
Please can Vanguard choose to give an embargo of news from Anambra my state.
Vanguard seem to have stationed a bad reporter at awka to feed its revered readers all kinds of speculative journalism.
Please let us read good news other than this Uba laundering you guys at the Cannal have ‘codedly’ embarked upon.



vindave says:
November 4, 2009 at 9:53 am
But what is wrong with some people self? Don’t they know that there is seniority in the judiciary.
The Suprem Court according to its name is the APEX Court – Senior to all other courts in the Land. The next senior court is the APPEAL Court which decision can be over ride by the Supreme Court…. just as the Appeal court can over ride the High Court or Federal High Court.
So if the Supreme Court says Andy Uba is not the Governor of Anambra state who are the block head Judges in Appeal court that want to take over the supremacy of the Supreme court. Some of these stupid Judges in Appeal court may one day find themselves in the SUPREME COURT and I wonder how they will feel if a lower court tell them that their rulings cannot over ride their (Lower court) own.
Na wa for Naija.



Udoka frank says:
November 4, 2009 at 9:40 am
Be it Andy uba or Pdp, we the people of anambra dont need you. The election uba claim he won,was rigged.Pls for the love of God, give peace a chance in my belove state



http://www.vanguardngr.com/2009/11/04/acourt-ubas-suit-divides-anambra/
selingel
Re: Appeal Court: Uba’s Suit Divides Anambra
« #1 on: November 04, 2009, 03:23 PM »

I just hope this matter is resolved amicably.
Enjoyment1 (m)
Re: Appeal Court: Uba’s Suit Divides Anambra
« #2 on: November 04, 2009, 07:14 PM »

The whole world is watching what the Appeal Court will do on thursday. I am keeping my finger crossed!.
*jona
Re: Appeal Court: Uba’s Suit Divides Anambra
« #3 on: November 04, 2009, 08:05 PM »

drama in Anambra state. Grin
Oboma1
Re: Appeal Court: Uba’s Suit Divides Anambra
« #4 on: November 05, 2009, 12:07 AM »

Real Drama!
chosen04 (f)
Re: Appeal Court: Uba’s Suit Divides Anambra
« #5 on: November 05, 2009, 09:53 AM »

just pray the result of the appeal unifies the state.
Oboma1
Re: Appeal Court: Uba’s Suit Divides Anambra
« #6 on: November 05, 2009, 10:11 AM »

I lèarnt ruling has been post-poned till next week friday. Perhaps, they wanted to decide it in favour Andy Uba, but they later discover that it will tear the country apart, and rubbish their records.
Oboma1
Re: Appeal Court: Uba’s Suit Divides Anambra
« #7 on: November 05, 2009, 10:12 AM »

I lèarnt ruling has been post-poned till next week friday. Perhaps, they wanted to decide it in favour Andy Uba, but they later discover that it will tear the country apart, and rubbish their records.
chosen04 (f)
Re: Appeal Court: Uba’s Suit Divides Anambra
« #8 on: November 05, 2009, 03:43 PM »

Quote from: Oboma1 on November 05, 2009, 10:12 AM
I lèarnt ruling has been post-poned till next week friday. Perhaps, they wanted to decide it in favour Andy Uba, but they later discover that it will tear the country apart, and rubbish their records.

So while postpone the evil days?
Dede1
Re: Appeal Court: Uba’s Suit Divides Anambra
« #9 on: November 05, 2009, 05:03 PM »

If the cesspit called Nigeria will break into pieces because of rightful carriage of justice, I say so be it. The unfortunate justices at the so-called supreme court of the hopeless country known as Nigeria started this ball rolling. Courts do not conduct elections and returning Mr. Obi to serve a term after the legitimate authority had concluded elections in Nigeria is a miscarriage of justice of the highest order. 

It is funny that the same Supreme Court later ascertained that conducting elections does not fall within its jurisdiction in Nigeria when its decision on the gubernatorial election in Anambra State was challenged before the justices of the unfortunate apex court. Court of Appeals are the highest courts in the land to handle electioneering matters unless there is a constitutional conflict. In this case, there was no constitutional conflict with Obi and Ngege and would have allowed the ruling of Court of Appeal to stand in this matter.

mikeansy
Re: Appeal Court: Uba’s Suit Divides Anambra
« #10 on: November 06, 2009, 02:26 AM »

Some have simply refused to recognise the difference between questioning the existence of an event and questioning whether the event was conducted according to laid down rules.
The jurisdiction of the electoral tribunal whose highest court for Guber elections is the appeal court covers assessing whether an election was conducted according to laid down rules. i.e. Were there malpractices? were all who intend to vote allowed to vote? etc. The rules are covered by the Electoral act.
But the duration of executive tenures, as well as whether elections were conducted at the right time relative to end of tenure for that particular office is a constitutional matter and it is dealt with in the Nigerian constitution.

So the Supreme court was right to have ruled that Peter Obi had not concluded his tenure and as such an election should not have been conducted in 2007. This is about Peter Obi's duration in office and it is a constitutional matter. The Supreme court is also right to suggest that electoral matters are not within its jurisdiction for the Guber office.

So the appeals court trying to return Uba to office is simply playing with fire. They have no business entertaining the uba matter again. Its a constitutional matter that has already been resolved by the SC. All they had power to do was to validate the process that brought Uba to office and that is within their right. But whether that process should have existed at all and whether the process is recognised by law is a constitutional issue which the highest court in the land has already decided.

I think it is a shame on all our Justice System that some people are confused about this or should I say engage in this kind of mis-adventure just because they have been paid to do so.

Finally I feel very good right now because it feels like the Uba political dynasty is headed for a cul-de-sac as far as Anambra politics is concerned. PDP has dissolved the PDP loyal to Chris while Andy is about to fail again at the courts. Xmas could not come any earlier for Anambra people. Anybody who honestly believe they are a political godfather should form their own party and test their popularity at the polls
rhymz (m)
Re: Appeal Court: Uba’s Suit Divides Anambra
« #11 on: November 06, 2009, 03:04 AM »

Dede1,for the first time I am going to disagree with your stance.mikeancy has said it all.
rhymz (m)
Re: Appeal Court: Uba’s Suit Divides Anambra
« #12 on: November 06, 2009, 03:04 AM »

Dede1,for the first time I am going to disagree with your stance.mikeancy has said it all.
wirinet
Re: Appeal Court: Uba’s Suit Divides Anambra
« #13 on: November 06, 2009, 11:56 AM »

Dede you are turning logic on its head. Supreme court did not make any pronouncements on electioneering  matter. It only ruled on the tenure of a sitting governor.

Even if the Appeal court pronounces that Uba should take over as a result of the last election, the matter would still goes to the supreme court to determine whether it is constitutional for INEC to conduct an election 3 years to the expiration of a governor.

Another anomaly that would be thrown up if Uba wins at the Appeal Court would be when INEC should hold the next election, would it be 30 - 60 days before Obi's tenure as stipulated in the constitution, whereby we would have another governor in waiting. Or is Inec to wait until n Uba's tenure would empire's. The Appeal court would have to clarify.
Dede1
Re: Appeal Court: Uba’s Suit Divides Anambra
« #14 on: November 06, 2009, 02:26 PM »

I am not a legal operative but this case does not take a lawyer to understand that the entire political shenanigans and court proceedings involving Ngege and Obi were con jobs. The Ngege or Obi has no legal standing to declare that either person was the winner of an election or had the wherewithal to ascertain that electioneering fraud had taken place during the process without dwelling on hearsay or conjectural evidence.

The so-called Supreme Court did fathom that it is not the legal responsibility of the respondent to prove a case but petitioner. In the case involving Ngege, Obi and INEC, the respondents were Ngege and INEC and Obi was the petitioner. However, the unfortunate Supreme Court wanted the INEC to prove the results.

It is a shame that it took two years for entire county of Nigeria to recount a ballot numbering less than 650,000 votes. The Supreme Court would have weighed heavily why it took that time for the brains in Nigeria and INEC to recount a mere 650,000 votes. It did not occur to the Supreme Court that so-called statisticians employed by the INEC suddenly lost the value of numerical differences between 245,000 and 175, 0000 after Ngege had fallen out with Obasanjo, Uba and PDP.

What stopped Obi from going to court in seeking injunction against the gubernatorial election in Anambra State? Was Obi not impeached by legally constituted body? When has it become the duty of Supreme Court to determine the term limit of office holders in Nigeria?

The paramount of electing candidates into offices in Anambra State lies with the electorates. In this case, election has been conducted and a winner declared. My stand remains that the corrupt and activist justices of the so-called Supreme Court had no business truanting electoral wishes of Anambra State people. It is funny to read that the only constitutional matter in this case was Obi’s term of the office.

I care less if Obi, Ngege or Uba is declared the holder of any office in Aanmbra State or Nigeria for that matter but very much concerned about unfortunate decisions in cesspit called Nigeria stemming from judges, elected individuals or commoners.   
wirinet
Re: Appeal Court: Uba’s Suit Divides Anambra
« #15 on: November 06, 2009, 03:40 PM »

Quote from: Dede1 on November 06, 2009, 02:26 PM
I am not a legal operative but this case does not take a lawyer to understand that the entire political shenanigans and court proceedings involving Ngege and Obi were con jobs. The Ngege or Obi has no legal standing to declare that either person was the winner of an election or had the wherewithal to ascertain that electioneering fraud had taken place during the process without dwelling on hearsay or conjectural evidence.

The so-called Supreme Court did fathom that it is not the legal responsibility of the respondent to prove a case but petitioner. In the case involving Ngege, Obi and INEC, the respondents were Ngege and INEC and Obi was the petitioner. However, the unfortunate Supreme Court wanted the INEC to prove the results.

It is a shame that it took two years for entire county of Nigeria to recount a ballot numbering less than 650,000 votes. The Supreme Court would have weighed heavily why it took that time for the brains in Nigeria and INEC to recount a mere 650,000 votes. It did not occur to the Supreme Court that so-called statisticians employed by the INEC suddenly lost the value of numerical differences between 245,000 and 175, 0000 after Ngege had fallen out with Obasanjo, Uba and PDP.

What stopped Obi from going to court in seeking injunction against the gubernatorial election in Anambra State? Was Obi not impeached by legally constituted body? When has it become the duty of Supreme Court to determine the term limit of office holders in Nigeria?

The paramount of electing candidates into offices in Anambra State lies with the electorates. In this case, election has been conducted and a winner declared. My stand remains that the corrupt and activist justices of the so-called Supreme Court had no business truanting electoral wishes of Anambra State people. It is funny to read that the only constitutional matter in this case was Obi’s term of the office.

I care less if Obi, Ngege or Uba is declared the holder of any office in Aanmbra State or Nigeria for that matter but very much concerned about unfortunate decisions in cesspit called Nigeria stemming from judges, elected individuals or commoners.   


I am still yet to understand your grouse with the supreme court.  The tribunal after two and a half years declared that Obi and not Ngige won the election and Obi was subsequently sworn in. A little after one year INEC was preparing to conduct another election. So Obi went to the court to determine what the constitution says about the term of office of a governor. And the case went to the supreme court and the supreme court interpreting our constitution says the term of office of a governor should be four years after the date he was sworn in. So i do not know what you have against the interpretation of the Nigerian constitution by the supreme court. If you have a different interpretation please share it with us.

Yes we know that the whole shenanigans Ngige's removal was to remove him at all cost by OBJ/Chris Uba for disloyalty, and they were too blind to see the far reaching implication of their manipulations. But that should not be blamed on the supreme court judges.

Yes every body agrees that  Anambra people that should be free to elect their representatives, but it should be done according to the constitution and the relevant laws, except you are telling us that Anambra should be exempted from the Nigerian constitution. If Anambra people love Uba so much, what stops them from voting him again in an election conducted according to the stipulated laws.  He is free to re-contest under PDP or any other party of his choice.

 
selingel
Re: Appeal Court: Uba’s Suit Divides Anambra
« #16 on: November 06, 2009, 06:10 PM »


Andy Uba Plans to Buy Justice - News


Re: unprecedented abuse of judicial process and mischievous ploy to manipulate the justices of the court of appeal by Mr. Andy Emmanuel Uba.

 
 
1.      Mr. Andy Uba’s inordinate quest to rule Anambra by hook or crook is now public knowledge, and his desire to use his enormous wealth to purchase anyone on his way to the Government house is also known.  When Andy Uba had tried for the third time to ridicule the Supreme Court by trying one trick after another and boasting of his financial inducements to the justices, the Chief Justice personally intervened in the matter and thoroughly berated Andy Uba and his lawyers for abusing the court.
 
2.      Andy Uba has now moved to the Court of Appeal, apparently to get what the Supreme Court has denied him. He wants the Court of Appeal to declare him “Governor in waiting” and for him to take over from Mr. Peter Obi on March 17, 2010 . In terms of the law and the Nigerian Constitution, this is obviously ridiculous, but for a man with excess cash, nothing is impossible with money!
 
3.      He has boasted to many people that Justices of the Court of Appeal are “more amenable”, and that he has concluded arrangements with the President of the Court of Appeal (who retires in a month’s time and Uba claims he would guarantee him a life of bliss) and the Justices to deliver ‘suicide’ judgment on the matter. According to him, if the current Justices in Enugu prove difficult, the President of the Court would set up a new panel of his choice. Anambra people are worried and scared not only about the prospects of an Andy Uba as governor, but more so about the possible scandalisation of the judiciary.
 
4.      We therefore petition your Lordships to please save the good names you have personally built for decades and also save the Nigerian judiciary. Several Justices and police who tried to soil their hands with Andy Uba have received natural justice (what happened to Justice Okechukwu Opene; Justice Wilson Egbo Egbo; AIG Ralph Ige who masterminded Ngige’s abduction to make way for the Ubas, etc). We petition you to intervene now, and for President of Court of Appeal to reassure Nigerians that the wild boasts by Uba are not true.
 
5.      We raise the following issues which border us as ordinary people and wonder how in spite of these, the Court of Appeal could go ahead to deliver what Uba calls “suicide” judgment since the President of the Court would retire soon.
 
(a)  Can the Court of Appeal override the judgment of the Supreme Court IN SC. 123/2007 MR PETER OBI(GOVERNOR OF ANAMBRA STATE ) V. INEC &ORS.?
The landmark judgment of the SUPREME COURT OF NIGERIA as the apex court in this country which was acclaimed as one of the highpoints of the enduring contributions to the growth of democracy in Nigeria is reported as OBI V. INEC & ORS 2007  NWLR (PT 104) 560
As your lordship will remember, by the said judgment in OBI V. INEC, the Supreme Court of Nigeria authoritatively determined that as at 14 APRIL 2007, the tenure of Mr PETER OBI as the Governor of Anambra State was not vacant and in accordance with the provisions of Section 180(2)a  of the 1999 Constitution, the tenure of the office of Mr OBI as Governor of Anambra  State will EXPIRE ON 17 MARCH 2010. Indeed the leading judgment of the Supreme Court per ADEREMI,JSC  clarified the position “that as at 14 th April 2007 when the 1st Respondent (INEC) was conducting gubernatorial election in Anambra State , the seat of the governor of that State was not vacant. The election was a wasteful and unnecessary exercise” .
 
Since the delivery of the above final judgment in OBI V. INEC, Andy UBA has  repeatedly made spirited efforts to thwart the final decision of the Supreme Court by the filing of one motion after the other intending to hoodwink the Supreme Court into setting aside its binding decision. It is, to the eternal reputation of your lordship, that the Supreme Court ably presided by the Chief Justice boldly told Andy Uba and his team of lawyers that they cannot ridicule the judicial process and that the mischief propelling their motion before the Court was condemnable. In clear, but stringent terms, your lordship in open court reprimanded Uba’s lawyer.
 
Since the Supreme Court could not play ball, Andy Uba has now moved his theatre down to the Court of Appeal, and is confident that he has captured a willing segment of the Judiciary.
 
Andy Uba has changed from one Senior Advocate to as many as his enormous wealth can purchase. Having realised that the Supreme Court came down very heavily on his lawyer when he tried his gamble, he has before the Court of Appeal engaged about two Senior Advocates of Nigeria.
 
Before the Court of Appeal Enugu, Uba’s newly engaged Senior Advocate of Nigeria has brought a motion pretending to be asking the Court of Appeal to VARY ITS JUDGEMENT in Appeal No CA/E/EPT/7/2007 DR EMMANUEL ANDY UBA V. DAME VIRGY ETIABA&ORS which was delivered on 18 February 2008 .
 
However, in reality the present motion before the Court of Appeal Enugu is aimed at mischievously obtaining through the back door what has been rightly refused Uba at the front door. In the motion filed before the Court of APPEAL on 10th September 2009, Uba is once again seeking to be granted “consequential Order upholding him as the Governor of Anambra State vide the election held on 14th April 2007” which the Supreme Court described as “a wasteful and unnecessary exercise”.
 
 
(b) Is Section 178 of the 1999 Constitution of Nigeria no longer valid?
 Section 178 (subsections 1 and 2) state as follows:
(1) An election to the office of Governor of a State shall be held on a date to be appointed by the Independent National Electoral Commission. (2) An election to the office of Governor of a State shall be held on a date not earlier than sixty days and not later than thirty days before the expiration of the term of office of the last holder of that office. If the Supreme Court has declared that Peter Obi’s tenure expires on March 17, 2010, how can Andy Uba replace him following the result of an election held almost THREE YEARS earlier?  By virtue of Section 178 of the Constitution, no election held earlier than 60 days before March 17, 2010 would be valid for the purpose of replacing Peter Obi.  Of course, in Andy Uba’s mind, money can do anything.
 
©  Is Peter Obi not entitled to a second term in office since the Supreme Court ruled that his legal term comes to an end on March 17, 2010 ?
 
If the stupid request of ‘Governor in waiting’ is answered, would Peter Obi’s right to contest for a second term not be impeded?
 
(d) If Andy Uba’s request is answered, what happens to the result of the forthcoming elections scheduled by INEC for February 6, 2010 in compliance with the Supreme Court Ruling and Constitutional Provisions?
 
Following the Supreme Court judgment that Peter Obi’s tenure ends on 17 March, 2010 , and constitutional provision about time table for valid elections into office of Governor, INEC has scheduled the next election for February 6, 2010 . By law, the election must hold within 60 days to the expiration of Obi’s tenure. Would the winner of that election then be ‘Governor in waiting’ also, and to take over after Andy Uba? This would be ridiculous!
 
(e) Even Andy Uba knows that his case before the Court of Appeal is baseless and frivolous.
Even while Andy Uba was praying the Court of Appeal to give him what the Supreme Court refused, he was busy lobbying the PDP to adopt him as the party’s candidate for next year’s election. He wrote a letter to the PDP pleading with the party to adopt him as the candidate since his 2007 election was botched, and by virtue of Section 178 of the Constitution is now a nullity.  Of course, the PDP refused his request since he did not participate in the processes for the selection of a gubernatorial candidate. If Andy Uba was convinced that he had a genuine case in court, why would he be requesting for automatic ticket of PDP or making arrangement with a small political party to offer him a platform to contest the election?
 
(f) Has PDP as a Political Party not explicitly abandoned the Andy Uba’s quest?
 
By the Supreme Court ruling on Amaechi’s case, it is clear that it is the Political Party that wins the election and not the candidate. Thus, the Andy Uba’s ‘victory’ was PDP’s victory. But PDP has, in compliance with INEC’s call for nominations, fielded a candidate for next year’s election. Is Andy Uba fighting for the ticket as Andy Uba or on behalf of the PDP which is the bona fide owner of the mandate?
 
(g) What happens to all the candidates in that election of 2007 who dropped their legal challenges of the election following Supreme Court’s judgment and subsequent judgment by the Election Tribunal?
 
As you may be aware, there was literally no election in Anambra on April 14, 2007 . Major candidates for the election such as Dr. Chris Ngige were excluded from the ballot for no reason. Other candidates had petitions on accounts of irregularities and illegalities trailing the election. At best, the election would have been cancelled and a re-run ordered if the legal processes at the Tribunal and Court of Appeal went normally. However, once the Supreme Court pronounced its judgment in June 2007 in respect of Peter Obi’s tenure, there was no longer a life issue to determine at the Tribunal and Court of Appeal, and hence several of the candidates abandoned the legal processes. Recall that the Tribunal threw out the case on the basis of the Supreme Court judgment.  Now, if Uba wants the Court of Appeal to award him the Governorship, would it not be common sense that the case be sent back to the Tribunal to be tried on its merit, if possible, as there are many parties to the case?
 
There are several other issues that border us but enough of this for now.  We have heard that money is the root of all evil but the good name and integrity of the Nigerian Judiciary is priceless. ANDY UBA SHOULD BE TOLD THAT MONEY CANNOT BUY NOR RUBBISH THE JUDICIARY!
PLEASE URGENTLY INTERVENE BEFORE UBA SCANDALISES AND MAKES A MOCKERY OF OUR JUDICIARY.
 
Thank you.



http://www.saharareporters.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=4099:andy-ubas-plan-to-buy-justice-open-letter-to-the-chief-justice-of-nigeriachairman-national-judicial-council-and-the-president-of-the-court-of-appeal-&catid=116:sr-readers-letters&Itemid=393
selingel
Re: Appeal Court: Uba’s Suit Divides Anambra
« #17 on: November 07, 2009, 02:07 PM »

Why did they postponed their kangaroo judgement? What do they take Nigerians for?
 Should Lagos Airport Be Shut Down?  Babaism!  Is Obasanjo Corrupt Or Not?  Page 2
Pages: (1) Go Up Send Topic to Friend by E-mail Reply 


Sections: Autos/Cars (2) Jobs/Vacancies (2) (3) Career Talk Education General(2) Politics Romance Computers Phones Travel
Sports Fashion Health Religion Celebrities TV/Movies (2) Music/Radio (2) Books Webmasters Programming

Links: Page1 Page2 Page3 Page4 Page5 Page6 Page7 Page8 Page9 Page10

Nairaland is owned by Oluwaseun Osewa. See also: Nairalist Classified Ads
Nairaland Forum | Powered by SMF 1.0.12.
© 2001-2005, Lewis Media. All Rights Reserved.