|
edikan.vic (m)
|
Please i want you to help me get the answers for this question below; "Logic as a science of reasoning does not thrive without a framework of logical tool" In the Light of the above statement, briefly and with examples identify the features of the arguments. umohedikan@yahoo.com |
|
|
|
|
|
maduebulem
|
One that solves logical( or scientific problems) must have been thaught or given the guidelines basicaly on hw to tackle logical ,
|
|
|
|
|
|
maduebulem
|
A logical problem( or question) can only be solved by one who has already been thaught basicaly on hw to tackle or solve logical questions ( or problems) ,
|
|
|
|
|
|
SEFAGO (m)
|
Well I think it is trying to say:
Logic is predicated on traditional methods- which have been tested and accepted- on reasoning. To engage in logical arguments, one must be versed in these tenets of logic, because a lack of knowledge of conventional styles of logic would make one unable his or her argument as precisely as they would want to.
you could give examples of what happens when someone cannot understand the flow of an argument/misconstrues an argument.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![Nairaland [Nigerian Forum] Home](http://www.nairaland.com/Themes/default/images/english/home.gif)
Author
