Which is Better:The Pentium or the AMD?

Hi guys.

Sorry I just saw this (I know it's been long forgotten).

But is anyone still doubting that Intel makes better processors than AMD?

Even in terms of graphics, AMD is loosing out.

After taking over ATI, ATI's market share dropped further, relative to nVidia,

the type of processor used these days do not really matter much. Both are great in their own way.

Also keep in mind majority of computer users, they

go online (email, community, etc)
chat
document processing (word, excel)

that is all majority of people use pc for
Obviously if you are into hardcore gaming, graphic design, photo editing, then you may be concerned about what type of process used.

Regardless of that, most people only do simple graphic design, photo editing and gaming, which both can easily satisfy.

It doesnt matter if you are a basic user, average user. Then people will say they are power users lol. No matter what type of processor you get, your computing power needs will be satisfied. except you are running applications for Nasa or something crazy. nothing much is needed.

You can pretty much buy any new computer these days and be satisfied. Major difference is in design, presentation, and packaging simple. and sony rocks in this aspect lol.

Previously people ask me I am looking for a computer, I want this much power, I want this much space. well I give them a good specification. But now if someone ask me what computer should they buy. My first question is always how much do you want to spend?

For $500 you can get a kickass system. to me for an average user it doesnt matter.

I generally use AMDs but Intels have always ruled the market. But anyday, gimme my AMD processor (been using AMD for 7 years now), Gigabyte board, 512GB+ system RAM (>333MHz), NVidia with 256MB+ dedicated RAM - we have a party!

Asides the Duo cores & Turioins (in which Intels outperform AMDs generally speaking), the corresponding AMD have always floored equivalent Intels, time and time again. Nonetheless, Intel will continue to outsell AMD 4:1 largely because people don't know better (AMDs are cheaper, quieter and run more efficiently). Also because it doesn't matter. Asides those of us who game, you're hardly likely to even nearly push your core to the limit.

Forget FSBs, pipelines, chipset types and so many other variables. While in truth they largely impact performance, they become significant for power-users, not the run-of-the-gamut everyday folk. Get it?

And  thanks to other people who's posts have gone a long way to try to clarify things. Thanks to those who muddled things up as well - we'D be out of a job if it weren't for you.

Cactus, I disagree a bit.

That is just a myth (processors not being a major consideration in setting up a PC).

Look at what they are saying in "PC Format" forums or even "PC Zone" forums. These asre the magazines I read regularly

I do a lot of gaming and believe me, that pretty much deifnes how I set up my PC.

I can't even consider an AMD because I don't even think the guys who wirte codes for the kinds of games I play even consider them,

Tell me which AMD can run FSX or BioShock,

If you just browse and do word processing, then maybe it might not matter.

But for the rest of us who do hard core gaming and everything esle, we won't even touch an AMD (or ATI graphics cards for that matter).

Na2day?

There's no need for insults and mudslinging,  I was only airing my opinions which I'm entitled to.

By the way, I run 3DMark and PCMark for benchmarking.

I've told you what I do with my PCs, I don't know any hard core gamer who uses AMD or evn runs ATI Graphics.

One of my desktops came with a Radeon (ATi) which I have since chocked,

COOL TOPIC 

Use AMD Mobile Sempron. . . . . . .  whats its Intel equivalent