Question To Evolutionists

Misright,


I don't know why you are going but what are these challenges that the Theory Of Evolution fail to meet? Please state real scientific questions that is not answered yet by biologist,chemist and physicist.I would like to know how you would prove that creation happened,please don't give me "I believe it" answer.

Sigh, not again. This subject has been beaten to death on this board and there are still so many people who don't get it.
Have a look at these threads:
http://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-6208.0.html
http://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-5432.32.html
http://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-11284.480.html

Indeed it isn't. Laws are descriptive and theories are explanative. Please read this essay by Stephen J. Gould, it's very insightful.

By it's descriptive nature it must indeed be % correct. The same principle of falsification applies to theories as well. Scientific theories are only provisionally correct and the strength of a theory lies in it's predictive value. The TOE is a very strong theory with a high predictive value. There are currently no alternatives to the TOE, as those opposing schools of thought (calling them theories is giving them too much credit) cannot be falsified in principle. E.g. there is no data that can possibly falsify Intelligent Design, therefore, it is not science.
You can read about the scientific method on wikipedia. Do focus your research on the principle of falsifiability as proposed by Popper


Well, then you're in for a Nobel Prize, no one has been able to do that yet, so go ahead, present your challenges and proofs, but read Talkorigin's Index to Creationist Claims first in order not to propose already refuted challenges to the TOE


Of course it won't but not because of what you say. Theories serve different purposes from laws

Please, what is that infamous missing link? Who exactly announced finding that missing link you are talking about and when? What do you mean by claiming scientific support where none exists? It seems you're talking straight out of your neck, why don't you substantiate your misguided innuendo?

If you would know anything about the scientific method, you wouldn't be asserting such blatant nonsense.

Which errors does the TOE have? Name one.

Before you continue making a fool of yourself, please familiarise yourself with the subject you're trying to critique. You could start with the basic introduction at Berkeley University. At least you'll know what you're talking about.

My experience of the critics of evolution on this forum is that they are seldom prepared to review or study the material they are referred to.  This is a disgrace. It is incalculable how religious dogma addles the  mind.

Evolution is a religion. Evolutionary scientists are priests and pastors of this religion.

We are supposed to READ one or two documents and BELIEVE that they explain things that happened over 60 million years ago and beyond.

We need a lot of faith for this exercise.