Neville is the only one really absent from that list. JM was correct
1. Heinze not your player ( in his head) besides he would have been on the bench - Evra is beta
2. Saha - is he eva fit, he's no more an integral part of the team
3. JS Park - come next to Saha on that list
4. Solskjaer - is more of a Geremi, meanwhile when last was he not injured, he's old man
5. Tevez - He's your player?
6. Hargreaves, Anderson - New players that have hardly make mark, since when did these ones classify as part of Manure percentage.
WE have
Terry and Drogba, none of those on your list compares to these ones in terms of the effect they have on the team and the role they play.
We have Robben, Ballack, Kalou, Shevshenko, Bridge, Maka.
I've left out new players because they have no bearing on the team for now.
If Scholes, Giggs, Ronaldo, Rooney, Rio, Vidic goes injured then you have a problem.
UNCLE SOMZE,
I can't believe u let Jose sold u into believing United were almost 100% full -strength.
Gabriel Heinze.
Heinze would have started because his defensive qualities is much better than Evra's.
Heinze is better than Evra aerially as Patrice is a midget. How would a midget cope with Drogba's aerial prowess.
Evra is only good going forward and when he loses the ball, he causes all problems for the back 4.
Why was Heinze chosen in the Cup final in May ahead of Evra?
Gary NevilleGary Neville is definitely a starter. I don't need to write much about him.
His runs and crosses would have created chaos in the Chelsea defence without Terry if he had played.
PAUL SCHOLESI don't have to stress his contribution in the Man Utd team.
He is by far the player of the season for Man Utd in 2006/7, i don't know why the plonkers voted Ronaldo.
Scholes is a legend and Chelsea's defence would have been unlocked with Scholesy if he was FIT.
Louis SahaSaha would have started if he was fit.
A Rooney-Saha partnership would have been prefered by the manager than Rooney-Giggs partnership.
Ryan Giggs is not a striker and it showed when he blasted his shot against Petr Cech when he could have chipped the ball to score.
JS Park, Solskjaer, Tevez, Anderson and HargreavesEither one or 2 players from this lot would have come in as a substitute to change the course of the match.
There's nothing as pleasing to a manager than a good starting 11 and a quality bench.
Sometimes u rely on the bench to win a match for u and Solskjaer often provides that service.
JS Park could have replaced anyone as he is an utility player.
The newbies would have been given a run.
Afterall, Chelsea displayed all their new buys in Malouda, Sidwell, Ben Haim and Pizarro.
What makes u think Tevez or Anderson wouldn't have scored if they were given the chance to feature in the match.
Mourinho will never stop whinning. . . . . . .Both teams lost good players to injuries and fitness.
Jose's theory is dud.
![Nairaland [Nigerian Forum] Home](http://www.nairaland.com/Themes/default/images/english/home.gif)
Poll
Author
