Roman Catholic Is Not A Church, But A Modernised Way Of Idolatry?

1 peter 1:18
Forasmuch as ye know that ye were not redeemed with curruptible things, as silver and gold from your vain conversations received by tradition from your fathers.

Roman Catholics love and cherish the ambience and organised setting their church has. They easily ignore the commandments of God: not to make any graven image for worship. This includes crucifix, pictures etc. But its ok cos the 'holy father says so' .
I guess if Christ was killed in a firing squad, we'll all be hanging AK47 and Kalashinov around our necks and in our homes.

Rev 18:4
And i heard another voice from heaven, saying, come out of her my people that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not her plagues

Dont get so touchy mister. Yes I have pictures in my house, but non that I give any religious reverence to. Its your choice to make bronze serpent and other whatnots you chose to bow to. Christ never made any graven image nor did he commission any artist to do his picture for his followers to adore nor did his apostles. Ponder on this my Roman Catholic friend.

I wonder if all this Catholics fanatics ever read the Bible by themselves. Their religion practice is absolutely contradictory to the commandment of God, but they are so brain washed that they do not see it nor try to discover where they actually belong. My advice to all those belonging to Catholic fraternity is,  Read the Bible Good and also check out and read the history of the Catholic origin, and repent or else,


I wonder what your problem is. Why are you so daft that you can't back up your arguments with plausible proofs. If you think the Catholics are all going to hell, then why should you worry yourself? Let us be. Come to think of it, Why should it bother you that we are worshipping something else other than God? Is this how your so called leaders are training you to present your cause? I used to think you were educated but now i know you're one of the 'Miss Roads'.

I doubt if any comment or reference is going to really change many RCC members. I think prayers for the many sincere people in RCC is the way out of the great delusion.

Hmmm, there is no disappointment in wat is on ground. For the truth must be outspoken even to everyone. Just to clear your curiosity I'm neither for RCC nor Pentecostal, but you ask where do i belong? I belong to the Truth, For I'm just a Christian just like brother Paul, Peter, Andrew, and many other disciple of Christ were while they were living on Earth. For they neither belong to any Religious organization you have today.
 Just wondering about what you posted as if you don't know your Scripture nor read History on Your foundation. The ordering of POPE, PAPACY, REVEREND and such are like stated from the "DAY OF CONSTANTINE"{1700years} Before the reign of constantine, Christian were meeting inside cave which look more like a hole some like a house underground, Before Constantine  reign,the roman empire kings always give Christian to there beast, even in there Stadium. But NOTHING like CATHOLICISM EXISTED . May I also tell you some of the sect that existed then?
1. The ARYANS. They developed largely in northern Africa and extended to the part of the world
2.Stylite
3. Monks living on colons
4.Holy-Fools traveling around village and talking about Christian in a negative ways and the that does not conform to the gospel.
     I have more to say on that but lets live that for now.

  Now let me skip somethings to save your breath a little, In the roman's temple built by their Emperor were functioning as a court made for there gods e.g goddess of love, Sun god.  Infact there is no different between Politics and Religion in there temple.  But any one that refuse to served in there temple dedicated to sacrifices of animals was put to DEATH on there Stadium. The True Christianity was a Treat to Roman Empire and there Religion. MAY I SAY THIS CHRISTIANITY HAS NEVER BEEN A RELIGION AND WILL NEVER BE THOUGH CONSTANTINE TRIED BUT HE ONLY CAPITALIZE ON THE WEAK SHEEP AND TURNED THEM TO RELIGIOUS OF HIS EMPEROR.
   still more to come

The height of your lack of education is amazing,I dont know whether to say you are stuipid or simply uneducated.

The chuch has always existed from 33CE ,it each town has thier Bishops who were assisted by presbythers and deacons.

The catholic church is only headquartered in Rome because St Peter died as the Bishop of Rome.He was the first Bishop of Rome ,after him were linus, Anacletus , e.tc clement

 Ignatius of Antioch implies that Peter and Paul had special authority over the Roman church.[2] In his Letter to the Romans (Ch. 4) of c. 105-110, he tells the Roman Christians: "I do not command you, as Peter and Paul did."

St. Irenaeus of Lyons stated definitively that Peter and Paul founded the Roman church. Irenaeus was a disciple of St. Polycarp of Smyrna, who was himself a disciple of the St. John the Apostle, which puts Irenaeus not far from the authentic teachings of the Apostles. In c. 175-185, he wrote in Against Heresies (Book III, Chapter III, paragraphs 2–3):

Since, however, it would be too long to enumerate in such a volume as this the succession of all the churches, we shall confound all those who, in whatever manner, whether through self-satisfaction or vainglory, or through blindness and wicked opinion, assemble other than where it is proper, by pointing out here the successions of the bishops of the greatest and most ancient church known to all, founded and organized at Rome by the two most glorious apostles, Peter and Paul, that church which has the tradition and the faith which comes down to us after having been announced to men by the apostles. With that church, because of its superior origin, all the churches must agree, that is, all the faithful in the whole world, and it is in her that the faithful everywhere have maintained the apostolic tradition.

The blessed apostles, then, having founded and built up the Church, committed into the hands of Linus the office of the episcopate. Of this Linus, Paul makes mention in the Epistles to Timothy. To him succeeded Anacletus; and after him, in the third place from the apostles, Clement was allotted the bishopric. This man, as he had seen the blessed apostles, and had been conversant with them, might be said to have the preaching of the apostles still echoing [in his ears], and their traditions before his eyes. Nor was he alone [in this], for there were many still remaining who had received instructions from the apostles. In the time of this Clement, no small dissension having occurred among the brethren at Corinth, the Church in Rome dispatched a most powerful letter to the Corinthians, exhorting them to peace, renewing their faith, and declaring the tradition which it had lately received from the apostles…

Tertullian also writes: "But if you are near Italy, you have Rome, where authority is at hand for us too. What a happy church that is, on which the apostles poured out their whole doctrine with their blood; where Peter had a passion like that of the Lord, where Paul was crowned with the death of John (the Baptist, by being beheaded)."

Dionysius of Corinth also serves as a witness to the tradition.[2] He wrote: "You (Pope Soter) have also, by your very admonition, brought together the planting that was made by Peter and Paul at Rome and at Corinth; for both of them alike planted in our Corinth and taught us; and both alike, teaching similarly in Italy, suffered martyrdom at the same time" (Letter to Pope Soter A.D. 170, in Eusebius, History of the Church 2:25:.

Later tradition, first found in Saint Jerome, attributes to Peter a 25-year episcopate (or apostolate) in Rome.[2]

 
Hmmmm, anyone you say is acceptable. Just wondering why you came up in aggressive way of realising venoms words in the name of conterracting the truth. Have I become an enemy because of what i posted? Well, blessed be God, for not many educated people were called. infact, He chooses the foolish things of the earth to comfound the wise.
Please can you defend that? Who are the people that were really called bishop or presbyther in the early Church? Are they not the same as Pastor? Please don't quote your doctrine for me but tell me what the Lord has taught you about that.
And yet you came up with another lie, where was that written? When did peter died as Bishop of Rome? Where was it written that the Headquater of the Church is Rome? Please Prove your Point from the Scripture.

@wackhack
 Mr man please I don't practise "bible Alone" besides there is no whrer in the Bible that was recomended because the Bible itself quoted outside the Bible.

Ther book of Jude actually quoted the  non-canonical book of Enoch,and the books of Joshua and Samuel referred us to the lost book of Jashar.

I can go on and on the list is endless.

The Bible did not exist until the fourth century CE,it was the roman catholic church at the synod of hippo that selected the books that got into the bible.

The christians of the first four centuries actually used more scriptures than we today.

The letters of Ignatius of antioch,polycarp of smyrna,clement of Rome were regarded with the same authourity as the letters of paul by the early christians.

If I may ask when did scripture writing end? what qualifies a writing to be called scripture?

It might interst you to know that the scriptures does not tell us the authours of the four gospels,acts of the apostle and the letter of hebrews,it is by catholic tradition that we know the authours ,so you see why you cannever  do without catholic tradition.

I was expecting you to bring me quotations from christians living in the 2nd 3rd and 4th centuries CE disproving the writings of ignatius,irenaeus ,tertulluian.

What I have here is quotations from scriptures the catholic church canonised.

If these books were not cannonised by the catholic church you won't be quoting from them Today



since you have studied extensively on the .catholic faithyourself why don't you educate me.
Give me quotations from christians that lived in the 2nd,3rd and fourth centuries CE