@KG1
Its news to me that NITEL was doing so well and not in coma until it was bought by Transcorp, but then you
may be right as you seems to know a lot of internal stuff
Don't get it twisted, I only replied your previous post.
"they were not in coma when they bought a comatose NITEL" simply means they i.e. Transcorp was not in coma when it bought NITEL and so they should rise up and start producing results that will speak for themselves, afterall that was why it was sold in the first place- RESULTS, quality service at an affordable price.
Gone are the days of the NITEL monopoly, there is competition out there!
The only thing that is still keeping NITEL is (B2B) the services they render to other telecomms companies in naija and the truth is there is more money in it. When it comes to the service they render to subscribers i.e individuals and businesses they have failed woefully.
Yet in all of these it's not too late, NITEL is still a goldmine anytime anyday, time will tell. Besides I'm aware of three major projects that if well implemented will turn things around for good. Two of them almost done(started and paid for by the previous NITEL) and the third a Transcorp idea.
So far transcorp has not done well, they are too slow for me but I choose to be hopeful because there is no reason why they should not do well. There is no amount invested that they can't recover if the mgt is good and the right decisions are taken on time.
Your statement in bold does not reflect the events that led to the sale of NITEL to Transcorp.
Was it Transcorp that prevented IIL from paying up when they bidded for NITEL?
Was it Transcorp that prevented Pentascope from turning NITEL arround?
Was it Transcorp that prevented Orascom from submitting a bid above the reserved price?
You mean all the time that IIL won the bid for NITEL you already saw through the crystal ball that NITEL would be sold to Transcorp?

??
What you don't know is that beyond the scenes you get to watch alot has happened behind the scene.
Don't forget that the same IIL turned out to be what you know as Globacom today, was it really a money problem that stopped them?
Pentascope could not have turned NITEL around because that was not their mission- they were supposed to kill, steal and destroy and that was exactly what they did! As soon as their mission was accomplished they fled to their country. Several billions were stolen, NITEL pension reserve was tampered with and loans were gotten from banks. The National Assembly took up the matter but eventually it was all buried. El- Rufai, baba's son was involved.
Before they came the Union of NITEL had traveled to their country to verify their claims and discovered that Pentascope was just a mushroom die minute arrangement. As a matter of fact they were not a tel. company like they claimed. A comprehensive report was passed to the Minister of communication and the then BPE boss El-Rufai. Still they went ahead because Pentascope was not coming to the nation on their own, some Nigerians were behind them and looting was the whole idea.
Orascom, you know because they were allowed to get to the bid table, how about those who did not come close to the bid table, not because they were not good enough but because they posed a threat to the pre-written script.
No Crystal ball, the whole NITEL privatization agenda had differnt phases, I was refrring to the last phase that had players like Transcorp, Orascom and the rest.
Look when Tom join transcorp i wrote on Nairaland. That he would not perform. And look the way the stock have gone down.
Tom Isegohi is just coming in and I think he should be given a chance, he only needs to surround himself with people with solid ICT knowledge and take bold steps.
As for the share price slump it was simply inevitable!
It happened as a result of the lifting of the technical suspension on it which was long overdue. Mr Tom has nothing to do with it. Besides Trancorp never promised any short term miracle returns so the fall in share price should not be a surprise, it happens to all stocks at different stages for different reasons.