|
Danasco (m)
|
Hey Nairaland Users, somebody just put this one to me now. I am comfused about what to say.
The egg certainly will not come before the chicken, the chiken will not also come before the egg. It is the chicken that lays the egg and the egg becomes the chicken. Please tell me if you have an idea.
|
|
|
|
|
|
dablessed (f)
|
Idea? You don't need that, do you? Na both the egg plus the chicken hatch together Translation: both the egg and the chicked hatched together!
|
|
|
|
|
|
obong (m)
|
The chicken of course
|
|
|
|
|
|
Danasco (m)
|
Obong, how is it the chicken? there was an egg that come before the chicken. Can chicken be without an egg?
|
|
|
|
|
|
hot-angel (f)
|
People don't get it. I get it.
Definitely the chicken, because God made the chicken (he made animals). So I think he made a female animal out of the male animal and he has destined that their children will be eggs before they turn into them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Danasco (m)
|
Hot-angel, na wah for you, you really tried.
But your best is not just good enough. Give it another trial.
Thanks for trying.
|
|
|
|
|
|
hot-angel (f)
|
that's the truth, not a trial. God made the chicken and the chicken made the egg that would turn into a chicken.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seun (m)
|
This is a funny and challenging question to those who believe in evolution, but as hot-angel has demonstrated it's not a difficult question for those who believe in creation.
Most Nigerians believe in creation and so we can simply say "God created them male and female. He created the chicken and the cock and they mated together to fertilize the first egg!" So hot-angel's answer is right!
If you're a believer in evolution, why don't you show yourself and give us your answer to this question?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WesleyanA (f)
|
well i could say the egg came first but it was supposed to hatch into a dinosaur but G0d said NO! and mutilated the egg so it came out being half chicken and half dinoseur. the next time the chicken/dinoseur layed it's egg, God said NO! again and mutilated the egg so this time it came out as a full chicken.
hahahahahahahhahaha
|
|
|
|
|
|
hot-angel (f)
|
Not True. God made the male chicken (cock), and took the female out, then both of them will have hot sex to create a baby chicken. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
adesodgi (m)
|
Not True. God made the male chicken (cock), and took the female out, then both of them will have hot sex to create a baby chicken.  funny,i will say...... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fabian (f)
|
The Chicken!, its like sayin Adam or baby Adam, who came first?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owen (m)
|
According to creation: The chicken came first. and according to evolution well I guess the egg came first cause its predecessor could not have evolved or be mutilated to a chicken while it was already formed and alive... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
fabian (f)
|
But since we believe in the story of creation rather than the story of evolution, then the chicken came first! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
PaypalGod (m)
|
If the male chicken is called COCK, then the female chicken should and must be called ----Y. Fill in the gap. lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
michelin89 (f)
|
If the male chicken is called COCK, then the female chicken should and must be called ----Y. Fill in the gap.  you're such a bad boy! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
WesleyanA (f)
|
he's confusing chickens with cats.
|
|
|
|
|
|
allonym
|
the chicken and egg are in bed together and the chicken is smoking a cigarette with a satisfied look on his face. Then the egg says - I guess we now know who came first.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
michelin89 (f)
|
to believe in what other people have written without trying to find out a personal truth is what I call ignorance! the first testament which contains the creation is surely the less credible of the bible itself! but you know it's much easier to take the word of the bible as the most sacred than disturbing ourselves to find an answer to such a question!
being an atheist I would rather explain it like this! the chicken came first. there is a process on this planet called evolution so i rather consider the hypothesis that a dinosaur-rapture has evolved to define some characteristics that the chicken has today! also many animals are being generated by the evolution of other animals! like the wolf and the dog!
so is my answer satisfactory?
|
|
|
|
|
|
allonym
|
i like my answer better
|
|
|
|
|
|
michelin89 (f)
|
 ok
|
|
|
|
|
|
fabian (f)
|
I also prefer the story of creation to the evolution theory. That is my personal truth!
Please shed more light on your statement ..............the first testament which contains the creation is surely the less credible of the bible itself! but you know it's much easier to take the word of the bible as the most sacred than disturbing ourselves to find an answer to such a question!.............
I'D like to understand your view more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
michelin89 (f)
|
all i'm trying to say is that christians, expecially african cdristians, take the word of the bible too seriously. They live following and believing in everything written on a book without a doubt. if you have a close contact with many people that always use the bible as the key to all their problems you'll find out they are just too lazy to search for a personal opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owen (m)
|
Thats what you think! You're so wrong!
|
|
|
|
|
|
CoolBruno
|
project for school debate defending chicken here are some points i made  • The chicken came first. Because in creation, God made all living things. How would an egg hatch if there is no chicken to warm the egg? Well, when God created man and all living things, the chicken was created first and then these chickens made eggs. • The chicken had to get laid before the egg did • It’s the chicken, tracking the chicken’s biological evolution down to its single cell form, which over millions of years have developed into the chicken we see today that is evolved to lay eggs. Therefore there is no possible otherwise solution, chicken then egg. • In this case, the egg is not assumed to be a chicken egg. In effect this changes the question to: "Which came first, a chicken or any egg
|
|
|
|
|
|
CoolBruno
|
reach me on aim about topic or if you want to give me more good resons for school deabate
aim sn= dress3edtothr1ll
|
|
|
|
|
|
UsherGurl (f)
|
I remember this topic last year when we were debating about it at school  ;Dlol People were saying that the egg came first while others said if the hen wasn't first so how did the eggg came and so on, For me I think that the egg came first and that it was to a kindda biological transformation. I mean that maybe there was an ancestor of the hen that created the egg which becomes the chicken  It's just like the homo sapiens , homo erectus and stuffs like that, Because we all know that Human's ancestor was a kindda monkey so maybe that chicken's ancestor was another bird  So for me , i think that the egg came first 
|
|
|
|
|
|