|
Shine
|
divadarlin, I believe we are on the same page. I also agree with your last statement regarding the outcome of the judges were black. Unfortunately, the evidence is everywhere. I currently live in Chicago, Illinois, USA - and have also lived in all time zones of the US, spent years living in Canada as well as sometime in the West Indies. I have always loved the look, taste and feel of dark skinned black men near me. Dark skin has always signified warmth to me. But it seems the sentiment is not often reciprocated. When I visited a few countries in the UK a couple of years ago I traveled with a friend who is strikingly beautiful. She is South Indian and Black. She received so much attention in many of the places we went , until Amsterdam. When we got there, it was like she was invisible and people would constantly compliment me. Both Black and white men. Of the many things I found fascinating, was how blacks (namely women) were received and perceived in these places.
I know that with my own person experience, I have had more non-black men approach me showing interest than black men. I am dark skinned, with dreads and keep my self presentable and in good shape. I am very social and am ready to talk to anyone and everyone. Yet, I have been told more than once that women who wear natural hair, or can leave the house without make up are 'too home-grown'. Yeah, unimpressive - especially from the mouth of black men.
In my travels, I have noticed that many of the white men in North American who date black women, seem to be paired with darker ones. Even Robert DeNiro was quoted stating how he loves black women and his past love interests have been dark-skinned (according to photos). During the college years, between my friends and I, I was always the one would attract white men. Not by my preference, it just seemed to happen that way.
I often wonder, even if black women develop enough consciousness to see through the BS and recognize their individual and natural beauty - would it end up being defeated by black mens preferences for the 'not-to-dark', 'not-to-home-grown looking', Europeanized black women they see on BET or other media sources?
|
|
|
|
|
|
LAHLAXZA (m)
|
I'm curious, Lahlaxza - why do you state that "africans, had no other option than to look to europeans for "administration and direction, ", I don't know, despite their influence, didn't we at least try to hold onto our values? your statement scares me - it implies that africans were weak and "had no choice" when it came to accepting europeans' values of beauty, etc. or worse, conceding to their "administration and direction" implies that we couldn't even govern ourselves, do you really believe africans "had no other options"? i think we did, but unfortunately we chose the easier way out - the path of least resistance. and rather than assert our own values of beauty, we conceded to their will,
Nia - I once had a friend like you - every time she saw a dark-skinned person she would comment, "there goes a crispy critter for you!". I confronted her - especially since her husband was very dark. I was like - "how can you ridicule dark-skinned people, when the man whose children you love puts a coal-black d, k in you practically every night?!!! maybe i'm naive, but i don't get the contradiction.
I tend to disagree with you because europeans did great job of supressing the ideals of the resident culture where ever they went to colonize.Ideologically we were converted to religions i.e christianity by pointing out "ills" in our own traditional religion e.g why do you throw identical twins down wells?,why do you bow to inanimate objects? etc.Technologically they were light years ahead of us with guns and cannons while we ran around with spears, bows and arrows,they also had their hands on medical technology that helped cure diseases like malaria etc. The Europeans also did a great job of painting the picture that Europe was this big bad ass place that had a never ending supply of men and it would take only a matter of time to conquer any country they want(Keep in mind "africans" had not travelled that far to know that was not true then) .The three above mentioned tactics helped create a divide and conquer situation among "africans"."Africans" who were not so brave before started questioning local religious acts and started converting to the colonial religion. They did not know what to do at war since they had no idea how to acquire or deal with an enemy that had guns and cannons.The ones that felt brave to go to war with the europeans were totally destroyed with little or no effect on the europeans, which made the ability of the european militarily larger than life to "africans", discouraging anyone who planned a war.On the issue of governing, africans did a good job of that before "they came" but "they" did not acknowledge it and actually started using african kings,chiefs and queens to rule us according to their own wish(indirect rule) it was only a matter of time before the masses realized they were being ruled by foreign powers. Africans had to look up to the european administration for direction because it was an european system that was inplace to replace thiers and they had no idea how to implement it alone.As far as "Africans" taking the easy way out, i could not disagree more, it was just a complicated case of if you can't beat them you join them.Africans could not concieve beating Europeans so they joined them.If you realise that colonization was an attack on the mindstate of the colony then you can understand why the replacement mindstate will be that of the conquering colonial master.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Levi6y (m)
|
I would like to add my two cents. To truly understand the Black race with have to go back to the time before the world was even created, but I will not say much I just wish to summarize what I know and be able to get any type of feed back. First in this day and time we can no longer look at the color of the person skin to truly identify them as being black we must look at their soul and spirit to determine that. Since the black D.N.A has mixed so much with other nations a piece of our soul and our spirit has been imbued with in them. We have to understand that we was the chosen people of the Almighty GOD.
And at the time we dominated and rule the entire earth. By the Almighty's will, he gave us dominion over everything of this earth. As we were in the Garden of Eden there were other nations on this physical earth. And once we sinned then we were banished to dwell with mankind on this physical earth. So we have to realize throughout history everytime we disobeyed our LORD CREATOR, that we were put into the hands of whom we trusted. Everytime we did things of the left side (which I will only name one ) namely have sexually intercourse with that, that was not of our kind then we fell into darkness. And by falling into that darkness we loose everything that belongs to us.
There is so much more to explain, but I just want to put a little bit out there. So everytime we lost a war, everytime we were put into slavery was not because we were weak it was because we did not have the protection of our Creator because we sinned against him and wanted to do things our way. And that is was we are governed by other nations. We lost our spiritual and fundamental education thats why they have all the technology because we gave it up. But if we can unite again and learn our true history and serve our Creator then we can finally go back home.
So this light and dark skinned thing should be put to rest between those who have a problem with it because it is a matter of preference. Because what matters the most is the soul of that person.
Thank you for reading
|
|
|
|
|
|
Linda M. (f)
|
Nia - I am so sorry - my English was off that night - I didn't mean to imply you - I meant that I had such a friend as you had. Again I am sorry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Linda M. (f)
|
Hi Dakmanzero - sorry for the delay in response. I've just gone back to school (Bachelor's: Graphic Design), after a 23-year hiatus! So I've been unusually busy. I guess I think your explanation is a bit too simplistic - it reminds me of the child's game "Battleship". I got guns, you die, I think the conquering of African nations and thus their adopting European values rests on a much subtler level. I liken slavery to cancer - cancer invades COMPROMISED CELLS, not necessarily healthy ones. Thus the cancer of slavery, and subsequently the adoption of European values, was facilitated by an already weakened system rooted in African tribal systems, which was not on a par with the industrial revolution. Your answer alluded to violence being the catalyst for change, but I think it relates more to progress=money=power, and desire,
lm
|
|
|
|
|
|
dakmanzero (m)
|
That seems to make sense when you it and think about it, without considering the facts.
Whatever the events that preceded it, the scramble for Africa was the single event in history that sealed our fate. And it was entirely due to superior force of arms.
Consider that around that same time, Japan opened itself to foreign influence, and adopted their ways and customs wholesale after 200+ years of seclusion. They however did NOT become a colony simply because they never allowed themselves to be invaded, and indeed there was little incentive to.
We are the losers today because we got our arses handed to us. It really is that simple.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nia
|
Nia - I am so sorry - my English was off that night - I didn't mean to imply you - I meant that I had such a friend as you had. Again I am sorry.
Linda, no worries. I half suspected that that was what you meant, but I wasn't sure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oracle (m)
|
 Isn't she beautiful? she's definitely not white
|
|
|
|
|
|
Linda M. (f)
|
Dakman!!!! GROAN, Africa and guns existed LONG before the subjugation of Africans! So the possibility, or more so, the CONDITIONS for invasion existed EONS before it actually happened. Force of arms probably had less to do with Africa's demise than its internal and self-supported breakdown. As for Japan - its physical makeup made colonization an absolute impossibility. 80% of this island nation consists of rugged, uninhabitable mountains. It wasn't through an act of will that they were not colonized, but rather by the physical and emotional limitations of men who attempted to colonize them. (path of least resistance),
keep writing - I love what you have to say and this discourse is challenging. Take care, lm
|
|
|
|
|
|
kellorah (f)
|
skin colour? depends on the person's face
|
|
|
|
|
|
dakmanzero (m)
|
true, guns existed before the scramble.
but remember, the scramble was a scramble.
kind of like what happens when a bunch of chickens are loitering around a source of free food, assuming it is limitless, then suddenly going crazy and grabbing what they can when they realise it will soon finish (scrambling)
they could have dealt with us loooooooong ago, but industrialisation and the wars it precipitated cause them to suddenly wake up and go, HEY! if THEY get more of AFrica than us, they will be more powerful!
they were actually competing with each other, ot us, when scrambling for africa. We were just minor annoyances, hardly considered human.
It all came down to who could kick the most ASS
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHRISTEL (f)
|
hello there  It's rather absued that people could be jedged by d color of their skin rather than judge them 4 who they are (as a person). it just does'nt make any sence, i personally think it's out of ignorant n low or no self esteem to those who act that way. it's a pitty, what else can i say.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cleofel (f)
|
I AM NOT VERY DARK BUT I LOVE DARK SKIN. I don't EVEN KNOW WHY SOME PEOPLE BLEACH BLACK IS REALLY BEAUTIFUL N I THINK U SHOULD ALL LOVE IT.
|
|
|
|
|
|
shango (m)
|
Eureopean Imperialism was not restricted to just sub saharan Africa, All of North Africa, most of the middle east, as well as sections of Indo-China felt it as well as all of the Americas as we know it today. Over half the world was colonized by Europeans, predominantly British, and the most important strategy next to superior weaponary was institutionalized racism, and it has pervaded and will continue to pervade as long as the world is Eurocentric (which means Western not European).
This topic is irrelevant on so many levels. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Each person likes what he likes, there is no versus. The problem comes in when a heirarchy of what human being is better based solely on skin color an phenotypical traits and that problem is perpetuated and exarcebated by a plutocracy that has world domination and is the standard by which everything is judged by.
|
|
|
|
|
|
elmero
|
Y'all africans are crazy, damn crazy
|
|
|
|
|
|
Efani (m)
|
is that a racist comment? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cleofel (f)
|
yeah,is that some kind of insult or wot?
|
|
|
|
|
|
nilla (f)
|
@ topic I don't have a problem with dark skinned or light skinned. I think all skin tones are uniquely beautiful. I do use the term if I am trying to describe someone. Those that bleach want to be lighter skinned because they think its finer (thats their right to, if they want to). But then if s/o is trying to describe that person well, (we know the description  )
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
twinkey
|
Dark woman do get the last in of the stick. I was dark until i started my skin treatments. For those who is dark now and want to change I can tell you my secret. Sense I've been doing my treatments i get a better response oppose to what i use to get when i was darker. I read a article on this topic. Most employers won't hire you in their company because you are dark. You have some self hating black folks out here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
wasty (f)
|
dark skin of course
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Teezy (f)
|
both buh my papi is light skinned  And Maazi what are you exactly? Please tell me promptly so I can insult your ancestors.  German is it?  roflmao
|
|
|
|
|
|
Neicee
|
hi 
|
|
|
|
|
|
WesleyanA (f)
|
Most employers won't hire you in their company because you are dark. You have some self hating black folks out here.
So if your dark skinned why don't you apply with a white employer, if most of the black employers are self hating? a lot of whites don't really care if your darker skinned or lighter skinned black/white. it's us blacks that have the problem.I don't know why some of us hate our race so much.
|
|
|
|
|
|
prncss (f)
|
Some people prefer to be light skinned because it makes them seem more like the caucasian and hispanic races but to me there is no such thing as race it is just something man uses to distinguish themselvelves from others sometimes they think they are superior to you and that you aint never going to b somebody jus because u r black. In the old times all they had was tribes they was no mention of white black or brown.u were either a philistine a jewand other tribes like that
|
|
|
|
|
|
twinkledew (f)
|
i never knew this was actually happening. good to read everyone's opinion.
By Charisse Jones Glamour Magazine October, 1995 p. 127
I'll never forget the day I was supposed to meet him. We had only spoken on the phone. But we got along so well, we couldn't wait to meet face-to-face. I took the bus from my high school to his for our blind date. While I nervously waited for him outside the school, one of his buddies came along, looked me over and remarked that I was going to he a problem, because his friend didn't like dating anybody darker than himself.
When my mystery man--who was not especially good-looking-- finally saw me, he took one look, uttered a hurried hello, then disappeared with his smirking friends. I had apparently been pronounced ugly on arrival and dismissed.
That happened nearly 15 years ago. I'm 30 now, and the hurt and humiliation have long since faded. But the memory still lingers, reinforced in later years by other situations in which my skin color was judged by other African Americans--for example, at a cocktail party or a nightclub where light-skinned black women got all the attention.
A racist encounter hurts badly. But it does not equal the pain of "colorism" -- being rejected by your own people because your skin is colored cocoa and not cream, ebony and not olive. On our scale of beauty, it is often the high yellows--in the lexicon of black America; those with light skin whose looks reap the most attention. Traditionally, if someone was described that way, there was no need to say that person was good-looking. It was a given that light was lovely. It was those of us with plain brown eyes and darker skin hues who had to prove ourselves.
I was 12, and in my first year of junior high school in San Francisco, when I discovered dark brown was not supposed to be beautiful. At that age, boys suddenly became important, and so did your looks. But by that time--the late 1970s--black kids no longer believed in that sixties mantra, "Black is beautiful." Light skin, green eyes and long, wavy hair were once again synonymous with beauty.
Colorism--and its subtext of self hatred--began during slavery on plantations where white masters often favored the lighter-skinned blacks, many of whom were their own children. But though it began with whites, black people have kept colorism alive. In the past, many black sororities, fraternities and other social organizations have been notorious for accepting only light-skinned members. Yes, some blacks have criticized their lighter-skinned peers. But most often in our history, a light complexion has been a passport to special treatment by both whites and blacks.
The use of bleaching creams to lighten complexions seems to have reached epidemic proportions in Mali, despite widespread education campaigns.
Women who refuse to bleach often find themselves regarded as second class citizens.
A woman who did not bleach her skin said she is often not offered a chair at baptisms, and is asked to make herself scarce when group photographs are taken at marriages.
A quick survey shows there are more than 100 bleaching products available on the market in the capital, Bamako.
Sold under brand names such as Marie-Claire or Diana, the products come from Morocco, Nigeria, the United States or Saudi Arabia.
Pain
Dermatologists estimate that more than half the women in Mali are now using these creams to lighten their skin. These products are costly and often cause pain and blemishes.
So why are so many women in Mali using them? The answer is simple, according to one Malian woman singer: The creams make her white, and impart a certain charm.
But Malian physician Dr Ali Gindo finds bleached skin anything but charming.
"They are just burning themselves," he says. "It's painful and it's awful."
Dr Gindo says bleaching can cause skin cancer and the poorest people are the most at risk, because the cheaper the product, the more dangerous it is.
But he says it is not just poor women are bleaching their skin.
Role models
"We have also people who are well educated like lawyers, writers or professors, or people on the TV - and this is a real problem because if people who are leaders of opinion bleach themselves, you can imagine how deep the problem is."
Many of the women who use these products told me they do so because Malian men prefer women with bleached skin.
But male musician Al Hassan Soumali disagrees.
"I don't think Malian men like bleached women," he says. "It's better for Malian women to change their minds."
|
|
|
|
|
|
yankidelta
|
well I am so dark in complexion and sincerely more attracted to light-skinned people of the opposite sex but having said that I believe it's my personal opinion.But if u really look at it i'll tell u black is beautiful because it hides beauty so anytime u c a black fine person abeg make una thumbs-up 4 am whether na male or female, light or dark,the choice is urs which to like!
|
|
|
|
|
|
PTBNaija (f)
|
I am of average skin complection, but I have to say that dark skin is beautiful. I was at this grocery store, and I was getting my groceries checked out by this one woman with dark skin, and she was gorgeous. Like I'm serious, supermodel gorgeous, and I love her skin color. I wish maybe I had such lovely skin, but I mean, I have what I have. And the fact that I am not light-skinned, hasn't stopped me from being approached by several guys, especially within in the last couple months. But I think any skin color is gorgeous, my sister is light-skinned, and there were times that I wished that maybe I was lighter. I know when we went to Nigeria, one of my cousins would always make it a point at how light my sister was and how that made he beautiful, and that if you were to just look at her feet, people would think she was a white person (or onyibo?). And that did hurt to hear that she was "prettier" than me because of her skin tone, but I can tell you that I got more male attention than her. But to be quite frank, it isn't one's skin color that makes on beautiful, it's a lot more than that. And people need to understand that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
lookather (f)
|
Wellz for starterz I'm a brownskin young woman, and i have all types of friends with different types of flavors men and women. What makes a person that looks good or not, is based upon their personality, or the way they carry themselves. Well i believe that as well, but i perfer men that looks good, i have my own options, likes and dislikes of men, it doesn't matter the skin color, but as long as he looks damn good. Thats just me! Like Jamie Foxx said "because i know what i want, and i know what i like". Now as you see in the up comming videos, you see the color BROWN, it dodoesn'tatter if your, African- American, Latinos, Indian, Asian, Iran people, but i;'ve seen a Mexicann @ Wal-Mart thats darker than me. To get tot he point, just because your dark skin, doesn't mean your just only a black person, or even white people conciders themselves as a bronze color, Brownskin is in, it represents color, sexiness, and confidence. Don't get me wrong, yellowbones, redbones, snow bunnies, lightskin, people are beautiful, but brownskin, tan skin, dark skin, caramel, is sexy. And you guys all know Sex is in, and you don't have to look at in a perv/negative way, sexiness is a part of someone, its just the confidence within your self. and i think i look very appealing to the eyes of all types of men and women, for the color that i am today. Hate it or love it! -winkz-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rhodalyn (f)
|
Wow!! for U Very first post, i would Say that was loadz!! PHeW! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
enugu (f)
|
Just dropping in and thot to add my two kobo's worth Posted by: twinkledew Posted on: August 27, 2006, 10:57 PM[table]The use of bleaching creams to lighten complexions seems to have reached epidemic proportions in Mali, despite widespread education campaigns. [/table] @twinkledew, It's not just Mali, Nigeria as well. Even Asians, they refer to it as skin whitening (sounds scary) Among some Indians, Pakistanis and Bengalis, dark-skinned women are least likely to find a marriage match. To support your article, in the next decade, if care is not taken, we would be facing skin cancer as the next biggest disease facing women and even in some cases, men of African heritage. Having said that, in answering the topic, I would say that people who are blessed to have 'dark skin' are, well, blessed. Have you seen white people age? It's not a very pretty sight. Every thing shows compared to those of a darker skin hue. Or when you are subjected to blemishes of anykind on your skin and you are light-skinned, forget it! There's no hiding place  Everything shows!!! Sure, lighter skinned people appear and I repeat, appear more attractive but on closer inspection, if they are not good looking, THEY ARE NOT! Cikena! That is not to say that any one skin colour is better than the rest; it's just that the brainwashing of people of African heritage that lighter is better has led to the bleaching epidemic that has threatened to engulf our people especially the women.
|
|
|
|
|
|