₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: Join Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 1,830,172 members, 3,623,313 topics. Date: Wednesday, 28 June 2017 at 02:50 PM

PastorAIO's Posts

Nairaland Forum / PastorAIO's Profile / PastorAIO's Posts

(0) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (of 234 pages)

Religion / Re: Pantheism by PastorAIO: 1:15pm
Deicide:

So the thing we call Time doesnt exist?


It exists as a way of structuring our experiences, however we conjure it up ourselves and we can also continue to Experience without it.
Religion / Re: Pantheism by PastorAIO: 1:12pm
AnonyNymous:

Very very interesting. You imply that time doesn't exist. That is, time stands still. Memories of past actions are not real.

But in our 'now' we are capable of creating thoughts/images of probable future actions based on 'now'. And, our consciousness can see those images before they actually become reality, before they become 'now'. What then, is our consciousness seeing?

Based on your philosophy, it can't really be the future because for it to be so, time must exist and at one point it will become they present (and the present will become the past). What is it, then?

Time doesn't stand still. By it's definition Time is the background against which change/movement occurs.

I'm saying that Time could be invented in our minds. In which case the sense of events passing is also an illusion.

Seeing into the future would also be a part of the illusion. Things coming to pass would be a part of the illusion. Things seeming to have passed are also a part of the illusion. There is no past present or future outside of the mind.

So what are we studying? Illusion? Well, why not? This illusion called existence can be observed to follow certain patterns. So it is not just an haphazard arbitrary illusion. there is a structure to it. That structure can still be studied so we come to a better understanding of this illusion we live in.
Religion / Re: Pantheism by PastorAIO: 11:06am
AnonyNymous:
@ PastorAIO your contributions based on the OP would be appreciated

What if there is no big bang origin etc whatever?

What if all that is real is Now?!!

What if all are memories and all our history is an invention created Now?

From Now we create an illusion of a history that seems to be moving, growing more and more, giving the illusion of moving in time. But there is no temporeality. Only an Eternal Moment.

1 Like 1 Share

Religion / Re: A Simple Rebuttal To One Very Common Argument Made By Atheists . by PastorAIO: 7:00pm On Jun 25
But objective morals do not exist!

KingEbukasBlog:


God prohibits murder not killing .

There are many things that can lead to murdering someone - jealousy, hatred etc . The act of murdering someone is an act of wickedness and the aforementioned evil can be the cause of murder . And since God is the epitome of moral goodness, God is good meanwhile evil is the departure from good. These moral laws are in accordance to God's nature .

And our understanding of evil and good helped us construct the moral argument for God's existence.

1. if God does not exist , objective morals , values and duties do not exist

2. objective moral values and duties exist

3. Therefore , God exists.

As an atheist , morality is subjective to you ; why do you then condemn people who commit genocide and murder ? I mean if morality is down to just societal laws and personal perspective, then people who commit genocide, murder , oppress and torture people are doing good since its a norm in their society and it's a good thing from their perspective.

Honestly , there are no wise atheists; any atheist who discusses morality or condemns someone is just shooting himself on the foot . Because there is no reason at all to condemn someone else since you claim morality is subjective . You just making a fool of yourself whenever that happens,
Religion / Re: A Simple Rebuttal To One Very Common Argument Made By Atheists . by PastorAIO: 5:01am On Jun 21
KingEbukasBlog:


Not at all sir . Someone can be wrong about someone else's personality , it does not mean that they are referring to a different person. There is a creator of the universe of the universe undoubtedly , someone can be right or wrong about Its attributes . That's the way it is .


Have you heard of egregores?

I believe they exist and I believe that is what you are dealing with when you see christians gathered. Their Yahweh is just a big Egregore. Allah is another Egregore. etc etc

1 Like

Religion / Re: A Simple Rebuttal To One Very Common Argument Made By Atheists . by PastorAIO: 6:11pm On Jun 20
KingEbukasBlog:

shocked . Catholics are referring to a different God , Presbyterians are worshiping a different God and Born Agains are worshiping a different God . You claim all of them are imaginary or man made conceptions , this is an opinion and you too must be referring to a different God ?

Possibly.
Religion / Re: A Simple Rebuttal To One Very Common Argument Made By Atheists . by PastorAIO: 6:09pm On Jun 20
KingEbukasBlog:


Historically speaking too , Christianity , Islam and Judaism are worshiping the same God
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abrahamic_religions

The Gods of these religions are not historical personalities.

Jesus was an historical personality.

From this historical guy many theologies have been developed and they are all very different from each other.
Religion / Re: A Simple Rebuttal To One Very Common Argument Made By Atheists . by PastorAIO: 6:03pm On Jun 20
KingEbukasBlog:


So you mean Jesus Christ in Islam is different from Jesus Christ in Christianity and the Jesus Christ in Judaism simply because there are differences in the accounts ? You actually saying that Judaism , Islam and Christianity are talking of three different Jesus Christs ? Haba now


Even the Catholics, from the Presbyterians, to the Burn Agains are all referring to a different entity.
Religion / Re: A Simple Rebuttal To One Very Common Argument Made By Atheists . by PastorAIO: 6:02pm On Jun 20
KingEbukasBlog:


So you mean Jesus Christ in Islam is different from Jesus Christ in Christianity and the Jesus Christ in Judaism simply because there are differences in the accounts ? You actually saying that Judaism , Islam and Christianity are talking of three different Jesus Christs ? Haba now


Historically speaking the fellow being referred to is the same. Theologically, Christologically, Mythologically, and any other ology beyond the historical facts, The various cults are referring to a different entity.
Religion / Re: A Simple Rebuttal To One Very Common Argument Made By Atheists . by PastorAIO: 5:26pm On Jun 20
TheNazarene:


Yes, those are my points but clearly you don't understand them




Rubbish? But aren't those points clearly lettered words posted by you?

Therefore? Repented? Committed? You understand these words don't you?


Lol!! grin grin grin grin grin grin

Okay, what do I have to do or say to show you that I understand what you've spouted? Is it possible for someone to understand you and yet disagree with you? Or is it only those that sycophantically agree with you that understand you?

Just because I rephrase, parse, and lay out your rubbish points doesn't mean that they are not rubbish. You seem to think that I cannot call something rubbish just because they are 'clearly lettered words posted by me'. Your argument is rubbish if you cannot handle that then I'm sorry but I can't help you.


Is there any basis that she didn't worship other gods? She had a problem and you think that all she thought was to get to Israel to get healed without trying 'other sources of power'?


I have no idea. Even the woman who had a flow of blood tried other things first. But for me to start speculating baselessly would be daft. I don't do that. I'd rather leave such to you.



25And there was a woman who had had a discharge of blood for twelve years, 26and who had suffered much under many physicians, and had spent all that she had, and was no better but rather grew worse. 27She had heard the reports about Jesus and came up behind him in the crowd and touched his garment. 28For she said, “If I touch even his garments, I will be made well.”
- Mark 5

Trying other things first therefore has no bearing on whether Jesus will heal you or not. So my answer to your question is that I don't know, and it would be pointless to speculate, and furthermore it doesn't matter.


Who are the God fearers you are referring to? Or is it a name you coined to suit your deception?

God-fearers is a term that anybody who has studied the NT in any depth will be familiar with.

A God-fearer or Godfearer was a member of a class of non-Jewish (gentile) sympathizers to Second Temple Judaism mentioned in the Christian New Testament and other contemporary sources such as synagogue inscriptions in diaspora Hellenistic Judaism. The concept has precedents in the proselytes of the Hebrew Bible

In the Hebrew Bible, there is some recognition of non-Jewish monotheistic worship as being directed toward the same God. This forms the category of yirei Hashem ("יראי השם" meaning "Fearers of the Name", "the Name" being a Jewish euphemism for the Tetragrammaton
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God-fearer

You obviously don't even have that level of biblical knowledge.

What you do not understand is that every gentile(Namaan, Zarephath woman, the centurion servant, etc) that got healed had to have total faith only in the God of Israel and none in whatever they served before, thereby acknowledging Him as the only true God before they got their desires.

So who told you that the Canaanite woman didn't have faith in God. Even Jesus said she had faith and praised her for it.


15:28 Then Jesus answered and said unto her, O woman, great is thy faith:

Look! More italics!!! Today is a real bonanza day for you and your italics.

Are you not adding figments of your imagination to the passage by saying the woman was called a dog because neither did Jesus say you are a dog nor did she agree she was a dog?

Nope.

15:25 Then came she and worshipped him, saying, Lord, help me.

15:26 But he answered and said, It is not meet to take the children's bread, and to cast it to dogs.


Unless she was not the dog in question here, maybe she approached Jesus because she thought jesus was a vet and her dog needed healing.

The muslim's quote...like it is from the kuran? grin

I see you don't still get my message of why you singled out that verse, you are just posting italics all over the place.

you are trying to capitalize on a Greengrocers apostrophe like you are just plain daft or something. By God's grace you are not actually that stupid.

Read it without the apostrophe and please bring it up in your next post if you still don't get it.

I singled out the verse because I was making a point that different people have different perspectives on the syncretization of deities. Someone said Jesus was for everybody and I demonstrated that Muslim s argue otherwise and refer to that verse in their arguments. It's actually quite simple, even 10 year olds should be able to understand it.

1 Like

Religion / Re: A Simple Rebuttal To One Very Common Argument Made By Atheists . by PastorAIO: 3:34pm On Jun 20
Would you extend your pattern of reasoning and say that the Jupiter and Odin are the same as Yahweh?

What about Sango?

This is called Syncretism.

it is my position, since as you have claimed: God is inscrutable, that any theological conception of God is just as false as any other theological conception.

I do believe that the conceptions vary from one another and so are different 'entities'.

That does nothing to change or affect God. If anything, all these conceptions are just obstacles to achieving a true acquaintance with 'God'.


These conceptions, all of them, are man made. They are as varied as man's imagination is varied.

KingEbukasBlog:


Oh , now I understand your perspective of the argument . I understand your analogies too . However , I think you took the wrong perspective sir. I suggest you see it is way and tell me what you think :

1. El and Yahweh

When the Levites came from Egypt to Canaan , the early Israelites who dwelt in Canaan worshiped the God El while the Levites worshiped the God Yahweh . They could have worshiped both and formed mythologies about the origin or worship and possibly of creation and even give them roles and confer them with new titles but this was not so . They could have decided to worship only El or only Yahweh. Instead, the tribes decided that El and Yahweh were one, in essence saying, “the same God by a different name.”

Exodus 6:2–3
I revealed myself to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob as Ēl Shaddāi, but was not known to them by my name, Yahweh.

We can see that the Abrahamic religions worship the God who revealed Himself to Abraham . But in the case of Allah of the Arabians , it is the same Yahweh but some people have decided to form different teachings even to the point of defamation for whatsoever purposes and that's why it appears that they are different . Remember , the Israelites in Canaan and the Levites could have worshiped them as different Gods . And what if they did? Does it now mean that Yahweh and El are different or would you see it as a misunderstanding ?

2. Theology

Theology studies the nature of the divine . The Divine is enigmatic , the Divine is a mystery , the Divine is inscrutable and that is why man has conceptions of It . Augustine of Hippo who saw the creation story in the bible as metaphorical describes theology as the "reasoning or discussion concerning the Deity" . Now we know that humans reason differently , we arrive at different conclusions concerning a particular issue because of how different our understanding and experiences are .

Deism is a theological position concerning the divine . The deists think that it is illogical that God would be powerful enough to create man and wouldn't bother to stop all evil that man does . Why would a God intervene in some and not in the other ? What if the perception of him intervening is false ? Therefore , it is logical that God does not intervene in the affairs of man . It does not owe man Its help , has bestowed man with reason and has provided everything sine qua non for the survival of man and the continuation of life . They rejected religion , they rejected revelations . They used natural theology since they believe that man ought to use his God's given ability to reason to understand the nature of God .

Islamic theology thought differently . It sees God as a singular all-powerful and all-knowing creator, sustainer, ordainer and judge of everything in existence. In Christian theology , God's divine Nature became united with the human nature in the person of Jesus Christ through Incarnation. God is also seen as having a triune Nature . Jewish theology rejects this belief insisting that God cannot incarnate as man.

If you listen to Christian , Jewish , and Islamic theologians discuss , you'd see that they have disagreements about the nature of God and that is what theology studies . Theology admits that the divine is enigmatic and we should have reasons to why we believe that nature of the divine is this or that . The differences do not imply they are different eternal beings and we are looking for a true God . No . It seeks to find the most accurate representation or portrayal of the Nature of the divine .

Most Theologians are philosophers and in philosophy , everyone should have logical reasons why they have beliefs . Islamic , Christian , Jewish theology have reasons why they believe the nature of the divine is a certain way . Generally , theologians are agnostic about God's attributes : The nature of his knowledge , sovereignty , and even relationship with humans . In deism , some deists believe that God can have personal or a transpersonal relationship with man but it does not mean God intervenes ; some deists reject this belief . The agnosticism , the beliefs , the contradictions do not mean different Gods are being described .

3 Likes 1 Share

Religion / Re: A Simple Rebuttal To One Very Common Argument Made By Atheists . by PastorAIO: 3:27pm On Jun 20
TheNazarene:



Am I talking to you? Is that a question?
Alright, no, I am 'replying' you. grin

Let me give you the benefit of doubt that you read my post without having understanding, alright?
Could you please read again, slowly and again and again till you have understanding?

And by the way, Pastor, you need to go back to your first love.

I don't need to read your post more than once. I totally get the gist of what you are saying.

This is what you are saying:

1) Jesus didn't answer the woman because she followed other Gods.

2) She repented from following other Gods and committed to Yahweh solely.

3) Therefore Jesus healed her.

These are your points, abi? Or are they not.


And what I'm telling you is very simple. Your points are rubbish.

First, there is no basis in the text for you to say that she worshipped other Gods just because she was Canaanite. It is a known fact that there were many gentiles called God-fearers who were drawn to judaism. Why could she not have been a God-fearer? What about the Roman centurion's servant? He was a roman, does that mean he was a worshipper of roman gods along with helping Jews?

Second, there is no basis for your claim that she subsequently repented from the many gods to worship yahweh. No where in the text will you find that a conversion took place.

My point is that you are adding (as many of you do) figments of your own imagination to the passage.

The woman was called a dog, not to be treated as one of the children.
The woman agreed that she was a dog and accepted whatever she could get as a dog.

The passage that moslem's quote still stands:

24He answered, “I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.”

please note the bold Italics.

2 Likes

Religion / Re: A Simple Rebuttal To One Very Common Argument Made By Atheists . by PastorAIO: 1:50pm On Jun 20
Are you talking to me?

Please you need to read what I wrote and respond to it properly, or just leave it alone.

And please, stop smoking drugs.

Where did you see Italics and what has italics got to do with anything I said?

The moslems say that Jesus attested to the fact that he only came for the lost children of israel. You write and write and write all because of a short line and you can't make even one decent point.

The passage says nothing about the woman having numerous canaanite gods. That is your own addition.

The passage says nothing about quitting her canaanite gods, that is just more of your imagination.

She didn't ask to be a child of Israel, she said that even as a dog sebi the dogs can still eat the crumbs that the children spill. So she never converted from being a 'dog'. (look! an italicized word grin )

What Gods she had or didn't have no bearing on the simple statement that Jesus made.




TheNazarene:



Why do you guys like to quote things out of context?

Even while back in school, when you are asked for the meaning of an italicized word, they tell you not to give the off the bat meaning but you are asked to go back to the passage to read before and after the italicized word to get the right answer to the question.

Now, don't you think we should read some verses before and after the one you singled out?

Matthew 15:22 And, behold, a woman of Canaan came out of the same coasts, and cried unto him, saying, Have mercy on me, O Lord, thou son of David; my daughter is grievously vexed with a devil.

15:23 But he answered her not a word. And his disciples came and besought him, saying, Send her away; for she crieth after us.

15:24 But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.

15:25 Then came she and worshipped him, saying, Lord, help me.

15:26 But he answered and said, It is not meet to take the children's bread, and to cast it to dogs.


When you read it like this you see that when she sought help from Jesus, there was no reply, why? She was a canaanite, who came to Israel to give Jesus a try meaning she still was a staunch follower of the canaanite gods and came to add the God of Israel to her array of the gods she already worships, if her daughter gets healed.
And we all know that the God of Israel is a jealous God, therefore it was either she decided to remain a canaanite or become an Israelite by making the God of Israel her one and only God, otherwise Jesus wasn't going to give her the benefits or privileges of worshipping only the God of Israel.


Matthew 15:27 And she said, Truth, Lord: yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their masters' table.

15:28 Then Jesus answered and said unto her, O woman, great is thy faith: be it unto thee even as thou wilt. And her daughter was made whole from that very hour.


When we read further down we see she decided to ditch all other gods, because for sure she must have sought help far and wide for the solution to her problem and gotten none, and therefore decided to put all her trust, hope and to put all her faith in this God of Israel and she wasn't put to shame. JESUS HEALED HER DAUGHTER OF HER INFIRMITIES and the Bible says from that very hour her daughter was made whole! That means her daughter wasn't just healed but also every thing that signifies that she was formerly demon possessed was gone! Hallelujah!!!

So, my brother, Jesus can heal you or any muslim of any infirmity be it spiritual, physical or material all you need to do is to make Him your Lord and personal Saviour.

Hebrews 11:6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.

1 Like

Religion / Re: A Simple Rebuttal To One Very Common Argument Made By Atheists . by PastorAIO: 11:45am On Jun 20
KingEbukasBlog:


Do you agree that Yahweh and Allah are the same beings? Reasons for your answer too .

From what I can tell of your argument you seem to be saying that they are the same being because they are both the creator of the universe.


When you consider that some people say that The Big Bang is the creator of the universe, would you accept that Yahweh and allah are the big bang?

Or to put it another way. We all know that we have fathers, right? I know I have a father. If someone tells me that my fathers name is Thomas Nwagbodo and he comes from Anambra, while another person tells me that my father's name is Jeremy Williams and he is in fact an englishman, then would you say that Thomas and Jeremy are the same person simply because they are both said to be my father?

The creator is a Role, a function, or perhaps we should call it An Office.

Like in a company you have the office of the CEO aka Oga patapata. Now this CEO can be Chief Olurin from 2010 to 2013, and then after that the office can be taken by a Chief Azikwe from 2013 to 2017. These are two different people even though they have both played the same role within the corporate structure.

Similarly, the Ultimate Cause of the universe is a Role that can possibly be taken by any number of beings.

The issue becomes even more complicated when we allow for the fact that some of the beings that can be called God may be totally imaginary beings, or if not totally imaginary then based on part imagination part fact.

I would therefore agree that on some level Yahweh and Allah are the same, but on many other levels they are totally different. Not just Yahweh and Allah. It could argued that the Yahweh of Abraham is a different being from the Yahweh of Moses. And they are both a different being from the Yahweh of Jesus.
In fact this is not a new view. Marcion in the first century went as far as claiming that the Yahweh of the OT is in fact an evil demiurge and Jesus came to free us from his clutches.

3 Likes 2 Shares

Religion / Re: A Simple Rebuttal To One Very Common Argument Made By Atheists . by PastorAIO: 6:10pm On Jun 19
TheNazarene:


Matthew 13:57 And they were offended in him. But Jesus said unto them, A prophet is not without honour, save in his own country, and in his own house.

Jesus Christ foresaw the future cool Don't get cocky

And by the way, Jesus didn't come for the Israelites alone, He came for mankind.

muslims disagree with this. They say Jesus was only for the Jews and it is Mohammed that was sent for all mankind.

To prove it they quote Matthew 15:24

24He answered, “I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.”

3 Likes 1 Share

Religion / Re: The Falsehoods Of Paul by PastorAIO: 8:44am On Jun 16
Sarassin:


I would go with with the account of Paul to the Galatians. I think we can assume that Luke who wrote 40 or so years after Paul's letter to the Galatians simply "embellished" his story.

you mean like, Luke tried to legitimise the Paul movement by connecting it with the christians in Jerusalem but in actually fact Paul was just doing his own thing.
Religion / Re: The Falsehoods Of Paul by PastorAIO: 7:36pm On Jun 15
Sarassin:


"I did not confer with any human being nor did I go up to Jerusalem to those who were apostles before me but I went away off to Arabia, and afterwards I returned to Damascus. Then after three years I went up to Jerusalem to visit Cephas and I stayed with him fifteen days: but I did not see any of the other apostles except James the Lord's brother in what I am writing to You before God, I am not lying." (Galatians 1:16-20).

On all counts Acts seems to be at odds with Paul. Did he spend time with the other apostles immediately (Acts) or not (Paul)?

Further more in the same chapter of Galatians Paul says the following:


22And I was still unknown in person to the churches of Judea that are in Christ. 23They only were hearing it said, “He who used to persecute us is now preaching the faith he once tried to destroy.” 24And they glorified God because of me.


Compared with Acts 8:
3But Saul was ravaging the church, and entering house after house,

And:

26And when he had come to Jerusalem, he attempted to join the disciples. And they were all afraid of him, for they did not believe that he was a disciple. 27But Barnabas took him and brought him to the apostles and declared to them how on the road he had seen the Lord, who spoke to him, and how at Damascus he had preached boldly in the name of Jesus. 28 So he went in and out among them at Jerusalem , preaching boldly in the name of the Lord.



Naturally the question on everybody's lips should be, 'Did the christians in Jerusalem know Paul by sight not not?'. He said they didn't but the writer of Acts said he was moving around in and out among them. Or were they blind? Holy God please don't let us suffer from this kind of blindness that you will not recognise what is presented right before your eyes.
Religion / Re: A Simple Rebuttal To One Very Common Argument Made By Atheists . by PastorAIO: 12:16pm On Jun 07
felixomor:


Are you still trying to imply that chronology doesnt matter in matters the Law?

Divine Law, we are told, is unchanging.

Matthew 5:17-19
Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.

1 Like

Religion / Re: A Simple Rebuttal To One Very Common Argument Made By Atheists . by PastorAIO: 12:11pm On Jun 07
felixomor:

And how is it different from what has happened here?
The Children of God Sinned and Moses Pleaded and they were forgiven.
Please how is it different.?


The difference is that Evil/Justice was already being meted out.

If ye will still abide in this land, then will I build you, and not pull you down, and I will plant you, and not pluck you up: For I repent of the evil that I have done unto you.
Jeremiah 42:10

1 Like

Religion / Re: A Simple Rebuttal To One Very Common Argument Made By Atheists . by PastorAIO: 12:05pm On Jun 07
felixomor:




Besides I am just ignoring the part of earlier Mosaic laws that specifies the punishment on children and forthcoming generations.

Let us even Ignore the fact that you are trying to say that Chronology doesnt matter here?

legally speaking, the laws that applied to Nigeria before almagamation, are they the same Nigerian laws today?
Do u know what an amendment is?

What! Are you suggesting that different part of the Law contradict themselves?

Okay. And so you are resolving the contradictions by saying the later part of the law supercedes the earlier part. Or is it the earlier part that supercedes the later part.

1 Like

Religion / Re: A Simple Rebuttal To One Very Common Argument Made By Atheists . by PastorAIO: 11:26am On Jun 07
felixomor:


Ezekiel, Abraham and Moses, who came first?
In Chronological order.
Please tell us.

I don't see what this has to do with anything. I asked a simple question because you claimed that in the era of the Laws children must pay for their parents sin like they are property. You have directly and blatantly contradicted the prophet Ezekiel. Ezekiel is considered part of the law. So I asked you a rhetorical question. Is Ezekiel not part of the law?

If Ezekiel is part of the law then you told a plain faced lie on the head of your God.

Chronology has nothing to do with this point.

3 Likes

Religion / Re: A Simple Rebuttal To One Very Common Argument Made By Atheists . by PastorAIO: 11:22am On Jun 07
felixomor:

Mercy is what then?

Mercy is to forgive transgressions.


You clearly ignored where I wrote "God is a judge"
And then twisted the sentence to "God repented from Justice".....
Yeah right.

You said God is a judge, so what? The bible has God saying he repented from evil. You called the evil he did justice. Is the evil God did justice or not? If it is then God repented from justice. If it isn't then you have a case.



Its the work of a judge to repay evil with evil.
Even if we choose to follow it literally, it applies.
Really? shocked I thought Justice was to set things to right. To make things right. My mother used to tell me that 2 wrongs don't make a right. It seems to me that you God has human limitations if the only way he can bring about justice is to use Evil.



quote author=PastorAIO post=57276830]

You said the evil he did was justice.
I said the evil with which he used to repay another evil was justice.
But u chose to twist it.
Or u think I wont notice?


Okay, so God repented from the 'Evil that he used to repay another evil'. God repented from Justice.



Another fallacy.
Repenting from Justice, can be independent of the past.
Can you give us an example of this?


Repent
Please read this and comment:

There are two words for repentance in the Old Testament Hebrew. One word is “nacham” which means “to be sorry” or “to regret” but the overwhelming majority of the time it is used (391 times) it means “turn” or “return” (“shuwb”).
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/christiancrier/2014/05/29/what-is-repentance-bible-definition-of-repent-and-repentance/

3 Likes

Religion / Re: A Simple Rebuttal To One Very Common Argument Made By Atheists . by PastorAIO: 10:58am On Jun 07
felixomor:

Well the agreement then was that their children belonged to them.
Read the Laws.
Children are regarded as inheritance during the era of the law.

So your questions clearly arise from ignorance of other parts of the law.

Was Ezekiel part of the law?


20"The person who sins will die. The son will not bear the punishment for the father's iniquity, nor will the father bear the punishment for the son's iniquity; the righteousness of the righteous will be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked will be upon himself.

Ezekiel Chapter 18

1 Like

Religion / Re: A Simple Rebuttal To One Very Common Argument Made By Atheists . by PastorAIO: 10:52am On Jun 07
felixomor:


If u choose to twist it to that, well yes.
Its calle Mercy.

Just like a judge can pardon,
God pardoned them.
He repented from the payment of their evil.
You can twist it to any new sentence u like.

Mercy is NOT repentance from Justice.

Yahweh repented of the evil he did.

You said the evil he did was justice.

Therefore Yahweh repented of Justice.


Now to repent means to turn back. That means that Justice/evil had already been meted out. So where is the mercy when the evil/justice had already been done.

1 Like

Religion / Re: A Simple Rebuttal To One Very Common Argument Made By Atheists . by PastorAIO: 10:49am On Jun 07
felixomor:

The bible.

Next. undecided

Could you please show me where you read that in the bible?
Religion / Re: A Simple Rebuttal To One Very Common Argument Made By Atheists . by PastorAIO: 10:49am On Jun 07
felixomor:


Are u trying to play emotional games after an agreement .
If i seize your house and company after u refused to pay an agreement loan, is it ok?

Answer that question, u will get the answer to ur question.

My house and my property belong to me, they are inanimate possessions, they do not have souls. They are not autonomous entities. two human being however are 2 different autonomous entities. One person should not pay for the crimes of another. I think this is simple, but perhaps not to you.

3 Likes

Religion / Re: How Should Philosophy Impact The Study Of Theology? by PastorAIO: 9:50am On Jun 07
Tellemall:


Philosophy cannot be defined.

Based on etymology it should be all about the love of wisdom. But then philosophy has made people do unspeakable things, share thoughts that should not be imposed on others, etc. It has not been about enquiring minds.

It should not even exist.




So according to you the OP is dead on arrival.

"How should the undefinable Impact the study of Theology"?
Religion / Re: How Should Philosophy Impact The Study Of Theology? by PastorAIO: 9:06am On Jun 07
Tellemall:


"An enquiring mind" substituting the word "philosophy" is not satisfactory.

Why is that? What do you understand by the word philosophy?
Religion / Re: A Simple Rebuttal To One Very Common Argument Made By Atheists . by PastorAIO: 9:05am On Jun 07
felixomor:


That was the agreement they made with God.
It was simply terms and conditions.
Or you dont know what "terms and conditions" mean?

Go read it.

The babies were killed because of the agreement between who and God? Did the babies have agreement with God? Or their parents?

So if I make an agreement with Johnny and use your head for collateral that would be okay abi? If I tell Johnny, 'It's okay I will pay you tomorrow, if I don't you can hold Felixomor and send him to prison.' Does that make sense?

Is that fair to you if Johnny comes to grip your neck tomorrow because I didn't pay him?

2 Likes

Religion / Re: A Simple Rebuttal To One Very Common Argument Made By Atheists . by PastorAIO: 9:00am On Jun 07
felixomor:

Their death was done to wipe out the names of their parents who chose to disobey God.
They were warned before hand.

Besides, Babies dont have souls that are eternally liable.
So when they die they go back to their maker.

ooo, I love it when I run into another bit of made up doctrines. Please, what is the basis of this claim?

3 Likes

Religion / Re: A Simple Rebuttal To One Very Common Argument Made By Atheists . by PastorAIO: 8:58am On Jun 07
felixomor:

God is a Judge.
It is the work of a judge to repay evil with evil.
Its called justice.
The evil you highlighted there comes after people commited evil and abominations they were commanded not to.

But unfortunately, you wont read those verses before it.
Why?, because you simply read the bible because of argument.

So God repented from justice.

4 Likes

Religion / Re: How Should Philosophy Impact The Study Of Theology? by PastorAIO: 8:51am On Jun 07
I can help you rephrase your OP.


How should having an inquiring mind impact the study of Theology?

(0) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (of 234 pages)

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (0) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2017 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 276
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.