ClintonNzedimma:

Just his personal hype.
Imagine somebody saying only Messi and Ronaldo are above Hazard, ave forgotten who made that comment.
Some pundits even say Neymar is comparable to Cr7 on international level.
Even Mikel Obi has more International Accolades/achievements than Hazard.

Bro u are wrong, team wins trophy not individual, you should compare individual award not team award/trophy.

hensben:
Bro u are wrong, team won trophy not individual, you should compare individual award not team award/trophy.

abegeee, fellaini is better than hazard when playing for belgium.

ClintonNzedimma:

check 2013 super cup final of barca and atletico madrid.
Neymar won the trophy for barca, leave that matter for matthias.

Neymar won it as how, that he was the only person on pitch that day or what, don't tell me he scored because it was somebody that assisted the goal..team win trophy not single player barca>>>>>atletico Madrid before and after Neymar arrival...barca can defeat atletico with or without Neymar but barca will struggle without messi. So u see.

ClintonNzedimma:

abegeee, fellaini is better than hazard when playing for belgium.

Baseless comment.

hensben:
Neymar won it as how, that he was the only person on pitch that day or what, don't tell me he scored because it was somebody that assisted the goal..team win trophy not single player barca>>>>>atletico Madrid before and after Neymar arrival...barca can defeat atletico with or without Neymar.

u know wat?.
Lets forget, it all boils down to the fact that Neymar is better tha Hazard.

hensben:
Baseless comment.

go nd make ur research, the world cup stats will tell, please compare the work rate

ClintonNzedimma:

u know wat?.
Lets forget, it all boils down to the fact that Neymar is better tha Hazard.

Still I disagree with you.

ClintonNzedimma:

go nd make ur research, the world cup stats will tell, please compare the work rate

You brought it up, you should make the research ok

hensben:
Still I disagree with you.

okay..time will tell

hensben:
You brought it up, you should make the research ok

i want u to see it for urself.

ClintonNzedimma:

okay..time will tell

Exactly

hensben:
Epl is a physical league for people like Neymar who always goes to the ground at any slight contact and u know epl ref hardly award free kick.....read the op analysis between the two very well, he said everything you need to know.

Lmaoooooooooooo!
Is there any popular club in the world more physical than Athletico Madrid? But Neymar has scored more goals against them than any other club!
Hazard is the most fouled player in epl, just like how Neymar is the most fouled in la liga! Does this not mean that they are always fouled due to their style of play?

Neymar shiits on Hazard in everything! !
they play the same wing, they both dribble, and Neymar scores lot of goals!
So why shouldn't I pick Neymar over hazard?

homesteady:


Lmaoooooooooooo!
Is there any popular club in the world more physical than Athletico Madrid? But Neymar has scored more goals against them than any other club!
Hazard is the most fouled player in epl, just like how Neymar is the most fouled in la liga! Does this not mean that they are always fouled due to their style of play?

if hazard play against atletico madrid ehn?, he will break into pieces...no wonder they conceded 4 goals from them last season and hazard was no where to be found.
Even on a Bad day, Neymar haunts Atletico Madrid like a ghost, his first goal than won barca the super cup 2 seasons ago came at the Vicente Calderon.

ClintonNzedimma:

Watch Neymar, your testimony will change too.
I remember you telling me that Hazard is more creative than Messi some time ago.
It was funny sha, only Neymar and James Rodriguez can lace Messi's boot.
Hazard should come to EPL to meet technical defenders that will make him frustrated.
Check barca's defence, they all have the physique of strikers yet they are one of the best defence in Europe and we are even complaining.
You want to say La Liga is very ease?
I will say GEJ till Chelsea beat Atletico Madrid, even Villareal's current form will kill Chelsea.
Lets face it comparing an overrated player to a Selecao captain is disrespect.

i have and do watch neymar nd knw his qualities, it is no matter of sentiments. He is cool in front of goal, no doubt. I wl say it again, hazard is more creative than messi, neymar, james, bale, cr7 etc. I have already explained that to you, wat it means. Hazard is already in epl. Technical defenders wl b the easiest for hazard to get past. The last time chelsea met barca, they crashed out of d ucl. And i quote the commentator that day "they have chain barcelona here in their own magnificient stadium". The problem i have wt ppl i make dis argument wt is that they compare wt out objectivity. They just use sentiments, u dnt argue like a football fan. If dis same hazard is to b in d club u support nw, u wl start calling hm d best. I am a chelsea fan, chelsea once wanted to buy neymar, i would hv bn hapi if they had succeeded, cus i knw his quality. That he went to anoda club does make me to undermine his quality.

Debroslink:


So community shield is now a major trophy? The "great" man utd side that couldn't even win the UEFA super cup is not fit to lace the current Madrid side.

That awkward moment you realise that Felliani plays better than Hazard for Belgium, yet una dey compare am with Neymar... The golden boy of Brazil?

What an insult!

oga, u just dy rant. Hw cn madrid win four trophies in a season without winning d league. Madrid won four trophies last year nt last season.

Debroslink:


And I have stated clearly to you with examples how average LA liga players come to EPL to become mega stars. Players not as good as Neymar, yet u say Neymar won't cope in EPL.

I'm sure if Zidane and R9 were still playing football, you guys will say same thing as you are saying of Neymar. Same has been said to even Messi.

EPL is overrated jare.

i hv one question for you, iniesta and lampard, who is a beta player, and which would u choose over d other if u are a coach.

ClintonNzedimma:

Messi sacrificing his goal instincts for Neymar?
You must be high on fanta.
Messi is the second highest goal scorer in europe, and is less than 2 hattricks behind cr7, get my english 'less than 2 hattricks'...am insinuating that its chicken change for messi while Neymar currently stands at 3rd or 4th.
Messi is indescribable.
He scores more goals than Diego Costa and provides assist like Fabregas.
Concerning Neymar, he was 7th position in the ballon d'or list while your hazard was 21st.
Where was hazard at the world cup sef, i was busy yabbing Mikel Obi, even Musa played better than Hazard at the Mundial.
Hazard is overrated.

musa also played beta dn ronaldo. Does it make hm beta dan ronaldo? I would like to c the ballon d'or full ranking of 2015. I want to see those above hazard nd neymar.

Greatihex:
i have and do watch neymar nd knw his qualities, it is no matter of sentiments. He is cool in front of goal, no doubt. I wl say it again, hazard is more creative than messi, neymar, james, bale, cr7 etc. I have already explained that to you, wat it means. Hazard is already in epl. Technical defenders wl b the easiest for hazard to get past. The last time chelsea met barca, they crashed out of d ucl. And i quote the commentator that day "they have chain barcelona here in their own magnificient stadium". The problem i have wt ppl i make dis argument wt is that they compare wt out objectivity. They just use sentiments, u dnt argue like a football fan. If dis same hazard is to b in d club u support nw, u wl start calling hm d best. I am a chelsea fan, chelsea once wanted to buy neymar, i would hv bn hapi if they had succeeded, cus i knw his quality. That he went to anoda club does make me to undermine his quality.

Ur argument is baseless bro. U said Chelsea defeated Barca. Was Hazard in Chelsea then? Hazard's style of play suite Barca. If Chelsea wanna beat Barca, bench Hazard and put Mikel, Ramires and Matic in midfield, and park d bus as usual.

BTW where was Hazard when Chelsea faced Atletico twice? He was missing. Even when Barca couldn't beat Atletico last season, Neymar was scoring freely both home and away.

Against physical teams like Atletico, Villareal, Sevilla, and even Real Madrid, Neymar scored @ ease.

I still ask this question to Chelsea fans... What has Hazard won singlehandedly for Chelsea?

Greatihex:
i hv one question for you, iniesta and lampard, who is a beta player, and which would u choose over d other if u are a coach.

Iniesta of course. He played well for club and country unlike Lampard who sucks in his country's colours. Neymar is a big time player for club and country... Better than Hazard who is not as good as Feliani in the national team.

Greatihex:
i have and do watch neymar nd knw his qualities, it is no matter of sentiments. He is cool in front of goal, no doubt. I wl say it again, hazard is more creative than messi, neymar, james, bale, cr7 etc. I have already explained that to you, wat it means. Hazard is already in epl. Technical defenders wl b the easiest for hazard to get past. The last time chelsea met barca, they crashed out of d ucl. And i quote the commentator that day "they have chain barcelona here in their own magnificient stadium". The problem i have wt ppl i make dis argument wt is that they compare wt out objectivity. They just use sentiments, u dnt argue like a football fan. If dis same hazard is to b in d club u support nw, u wl start calling hm d best. I am a chelsea fan, chelsea once wanted to buy neymar, i would hv bn hapi if they had succeeded, cus i knw his quality. That he went to anoda club does make me to undermine his quality.

am not sentimental in my opinion, i know quality when i see one.
Krasid is a madrid fan and a known barca hater but he will tell you that Neymar is better than Hazard.

Debroslink:


Ur argument is baseless bro. U said Chelsea defeated Barca. Was Hazard in Chelsea then? Hazard's style of play suite Barca. If Chelsea wanna beat Barca, bench Hazard and put Mikel, Ramires and Matic in midfield, and park d bus as usual.

BTW where was Hazard when Chelsea faced Atletico twice? He was missing. Even when Barca couldn't beat Atletico last season, Neymar was scoring freely both home and away.

Against physical teams like Atletico, Villareal, Sevilla, and even Real Madrid, Neymar scored @ ease.

I still ask this question to Chelsea fans... What has Hazard won singlehandedly for Chelsea?

my guy, i nor understand this EPL fans oh.

Debroslink:


Iniesta of course. He played well for club and country unlike Lampard who sucks in his country's colours. Neymar is a big time player for club and country... Better than Hazard who is not as good as Feliani in the national team.

u c ur life. I just used this question to knw hw sentimental u are. Ofcourse i wl choose iniesta, i cn say 1 is beta, but It is nt abt dia contribution in country nd club. Mind u, lampard is a great player in his national team. Iniesta did nt win d world cup nd euro for spain, the team did. It is abt dia all round play wich wl make me pick iniesta. If i may ask again. why did u nt put dia goal statistics into consideration?

Debroslink:


Ur argument is baseless bro. U said Chelsea defeated Barca. Was Hazard in Chelsea then? Hazard's style of play suite Barca. If Chelsea wanna beat Barca, bench Hazard and put Mikel, Ramires and Matic in midfield, and park d bus as usual.

BTW where was Hazard when Chelsea faced Atletico twice? He was missing. Even when Barca couldn't beat Atletico last season, Neymar was scoring freely both home and away.

Against physical teams like Atletico, Villareal, Sevilla, and even Real Madrid, Neymar scored @ ease.

I still ask this question to Chelsea fans... What has Hazard won singlehandedly for Chelsea?

i was referring to the argument of spanish teams beating epl teams in d barca case. U see, bcus u dnt watch football, u dnt knw dat hazard was absent in d first leg against atletico due to injury and was just returning from injury in d second leg. U re sounding funny wt dis ur "singlehandedly" issue. There is ntin like single-handedly in football. Nobody wins anytin for his team singlehandedly. If i could recall vividly, neymar's goal in the first leg against atletico was a header, i wonder hw he would score a header without a cross from someone. Even d players themselve gv d credit to dia teammates.

ClintonNzedimma:

am not sentimental in my opinion, i know quality when i see one.
Krasid is a madrid fan and a known barca hater but he will tell you that Neymar is better than Hazard.

u knw quality wen u see it right? State the qualities of hazard and neymar, and tel us what qualities neymar hv over hazard?

Greatihex:
i have and do watch neymar nd knw his qualities, it is no matter of sentiments. He is cool in front of goal, no doubt. I wl say it again, hazard is more creative than messi, neymar, james, bale, cr7 etc. I have already explained that to you, wat it means. Hazard is already in epl. Technical defenders wl b the easiest for hazard to get past. The last time chelsea met barca, they crashed out of d ucl. And i quote the commentator that day "they have chain barcelona here in their own magnificient stadium". The problem i have wt ppl i make dis argument wt is that they compare wt out objectivity. They just use sentiments, u dnt argue like a football fan. If dis same hazard is to b in d club u support nw, u wl start calling hm d best. I am a chelsea fan, chelsea once wanted to buy neymar, i would hv bn hapi if they had succeeded, cus i knw his quality. That he went to anoda club does make me to undermine his quality.

Like seriously? How dare you say such nonsense?
Hazard more creative than Messi? Guy you drink chelsea ogogoro? When did this nonsense start?
Do you know what creative means? You did not even compare him to fabregas, you are calling Messi! A natural - pure La masia breed!
bros sorry oh, but your football knowledge is limited!

Greatihex:
u knw quality wen u see it right? State the qualities of hazard and neymar, and tel us what qualities neymar hv over hazard?

Neymar can score, hazard can't!
do you even know that Neymar style of play suits chelsea more than Hazard?

Greatihex:
i was referring to the argument of spanish teams beating epl teams in d barca case. U see, bcus u dnt watch football, u dnt knw dat hazard was absent in d first leg against atletico due to injury and was just returning from injury in d second leg. U re sounding funny wt dis ur "singlehandedly" issue. There is ntin like single-handedly in football. Nobody wins anytin for his team singlehandedly. If i could recall vividly, neymar's goal in the first leg against atletico was a header, i wonder hw he would score a header without a cross from someone. Even d players themselve gv d credit to dia teammates.

My guy, certain players win trophies for their teams singlehandedly. Majority of big teams have their talisman. Ronaldo and Messi are the talismans of their respective teams. Neymar is d current talisman for Brazil and future star player for Barcelona after Messi is gone.

Is Hazard the star player of Chelsea? I doubt it. Is he the star player of Belgium? Feliani is ahead of him in Belgium.

So please, stop insulting Neymar. He is head and shoulder above Hazard.

Greatihex:
u c ur life. I just used this question to knw hw sentimental u are. Ofcourse i wl choose iniesta, i cn say 1 is beta, but It is nt abt dia contribution in country nd club. Mind u, lampard is a great player in his national team. Iniesta did nt win d world cup nd euro for spain, the team did. It is abt dia all round play wich wl make me pick iniesta. If i may ask again. why did u nt put dia goal statistics into consideration?

And how is Lampard a great player for his country? He's a flop for England. Not even a semifinal appearance for his country. KANU and Mikel shits on Lampard.

He may have more goals and assists than Iniesta, but Iniesta is a big match player and better than Lampard.

There are certain goals a player scores that takes him to legendary status. No matter the number of goals Lampard scores, they can NEVER eclipse 2010 world cup final match goal and 2009 Chelsea vs Barca @ Stamford Bridge.

Those are big games Iniesta won singlehandedly.

Greatihex:
u knw quality wen u see it right? State the qualities of hazard and neymar, and tel us what qualities neymar hv over hazard?

At club level it is
speed, goal scoring, fast and quick dribbles, finishing, versatility.
International Level it is
speed, goal scoring, fast and quick dribbles, playmaking, finishing, versatlity infact he has a higher work rate

Greatihex:
i was referring to the argument of spanish teams beating epl teams in d barca case. U see, bcus u dnt watch football, u dnt knw dat hazard was absent in d first leg against atletico due to injury and was just returning from injury in d second leg. U re sounding funny wt dis ur "singlehandedly" issue. There is ntin like single-handedly in football. Nobody wins anytin for his team singlehandedly. If i could recall vividly, neymar's goal in the first leg against atletico was a header, i wonder hw he would score a header without a cross from someone. Even d players themselve gv d credit to dia teammates.

more sperm to your epon

Homesteady, Debroslink, I dey hail ooooo. Dragging issues with chelsea fan? Una well done oooo